Body Disposal Patterns of Sexual Murderers: Implications for Offender Profiling



Offender profiling postulates that crime scene behavior should predict certain offender characteristics. The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between offender characteristics, situational factors, and body disposal patterns. Sequential logistic regression analysis on a sample of 85 sexual murderers shows that those who were in a relationship at the time of the crime and who present organized psychological characteristics are more likely to move the victim’s body after the homicide. However, when the victim is older and a conflict with the offender occurred prior to the crime, the body is more likely to be left at the crime scene. Implications for offender profiling are discussed in light of the results.


Body disposal Criminal investigation Offender profiling Sexual homicide 


  1. Alison LJ, Bennell C, Mokros A, Ormerod D (2002) The personality paradox in offender profiling: A theoretical review of the processes involved in deriving background characteristics from crime scene actions. Psychol. Public Policy Law 8:115–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. American Psychiatric Association (1994) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th edn. Author, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  3. Beauregard E, Proulx J (2002) Profiles in the offending process of nonserial sexual murderers. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol 46:386–399PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beauregard E, Lussier P, Proulx J (2005a) The role of sexual interests and situational factors on rapists’ modus operandi: implications for offender profiling. Legal Criminol Psychol 10:265–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beauregard E, Proulx J, Rossmo DK (2005b) Spatial patterns of sex offenders: theoretical, empirical, and practical issues. Aggress Violent Behav 10:579–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beauregard E, Lussier P, Proulx J (2007a) Criminal propensity and criminal opportunity: an investigation of crime scene behaviors of sexual aggressors of women. In: Kocsis RN (ed) Criminal profiling: international theory, research, and practice. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ, pp 89–113Google Scholar
  7. Beauregard E, Proulx J, Rossmo K, Leclerc B, Allaire J-F (2007b) Script analysis of the hunting process of serial sex offenders. Crim Justice Behav 34:1069–1084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beauregard E, Proulx J, St-Yves M (2007c) Angry or sadistic: two types of sexual murderers. In: Proulx J, Beauregard E, Cusson M, Nicole A (eds) Sexual murderers: a comparative analysis and new perspectives. Wiley, Chichester, UK, pp 123–141Google Scholar
  9. Beauregard E, Stone MR, Proulx J, Michaud P (2008) Sexual murderers of children: Developmental, precrime, crime, and postcrime factors. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol 52:253–269PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bennell C, Canter DV (2002) Linking commercial burglaries by modus operandi: tests using regression and ROC analysis. Sci Justice 42:153–164PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Canter DV (1994) Criminal shadows. Harper Collins, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. Canter DV, Alison LJ, Alison E, Wentink N (2004) The organized/disorganized typology of serial murder: myth or model? Psychol Public Policy Law 10:293–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cohen L, Felson M (1979) Social change and crime rate trends: a routine activity approach. Am Sociol Rev 44:588–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cook PE, Hinman DL (1999) Criminal profiling: science and art. J Contemp Crim Justice 15:230–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Davies A (1992) Rapists’ behaviour: a three aspect model as a basis for analysis and the identification of serial crime. Forensic Sci Int 55:173–194PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Douglas JE, Ressler RK, Burgess AW, Hartman CR (1986) Criminal profiling from crime scene analysis. Behav Sci Law 4:401–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Egger SA (1999) Psychological profiling: past, present, and future. J Contemp Crim Justice 15:242–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Felson M (2002) Crime in everyday life, 3rd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar
  19. Fox JA, Levin J (1994) Overkill: mass murder and serial killing exposed. Plenum Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Gerard F, Mormont C, Kocsis RN (2007) Offender profiles and crime scene patterns in Belgian sexual murderers. In: Kocsis RN (ed) Criminal profiling: international theory, research, and practice. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ, pp 27–47Google Scholar
  21. Godwin M (1998) Reliability, validity, and utility of extant serial murderer classifications. The Criminologist 22:194–210Google Scholar
  22. Godwin M, Canter DV (1997) Encounter and death: the spatial behavior of US serial killers. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategy and Management 20:24–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Goodwill AM, Alison LJ (2007) When is profiling possible? Offense planning and aggression as moderators in predicting offender age from victim age in stranger rape. Behav Sci Law 25:823–840PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Häkkänen H, Laajasalo T (2006) Homicide crime scene behaviors in a Finnish sample of mentally ill offenders. Homicide Stud 10:33–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Häkkänen H, Hurme K, Liukkonen M (2008) Distance patterns and disposal sites in Finnish wooded area homicides. Manuscript submitted for publicationGoogle Scholar
  26. Hanfland KA, Keppel RD, Weis JG (1997) Case management for missing children and homicide investigation. Attorney General of Washington, OlympiaGoogle Scholar
  27. Holmes RM, De Burger J (1988) Serial murder: studies in crime law and justice. Sage, Newbury Park, CAGoogle Scholar
  28. Holmes RM, Holmes ST (1998) Serial murder. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar
  29. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (2000) Applied logistic regression, 2nd edn. Wiley, Chichester, UKGoogle Scholar
  30. Keppel RD, Walter R (1999) Profiling killers: a revised classification model for understanding sexual murder. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol 43:417–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Knight RA, Warren JL, Reboussin R, Soley BJ (1998) Predicting rapist type from crime scene variables. Crim Justice Behav 25:30–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kocsis RN, Irwin HJ, Hayes AF (1998) Organised and disorganised criminal behavior syndromes in arsonists: a validation study of a psychological profiling concept. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law 5:117–131Google Scholar
  33. Kocsis RN, Cooksey RW, Irwin HJ (2002) Psychological profiling of sexual murders: an empirical model. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol 46:532–554PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kraemer G, Lord WD, Heilbrun K (2004) Comparing single and serial homicide offenses. Behav Sci Law 22:325–343PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lundrigan S, Canter DV (2001a) A multivariate analysis of serial murderers’ disposal site location choice. J Environ Psychol 21:423–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lundrigan S, Canter DV (2001b) Spatial patterns of serial murder: an analysis of disposal site location choice. Behav Sci Law 19:595–610PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mokros A, Alison LJ (2002) Is offender profiling possible? Testing the predicted homology of crime scene actions and background characteristics in a sample of rapists. Legal Criminol Psychol 7:25–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nethery K (2004) Non-familial abductions that end in homicide: An analysis of the distance patterns and disposal sites. Unpublished master’s thesis, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  39. Proulx J, St-Yves M, McKibben A (1994) CQSA: Computerised Questionnaire for Sexual Aggressors. Unpublished manuscriptGoogle Scholar
  40. Proulx J, Beauregard E, Cusson M, Nicole A (2007) Sexual murders: a comparative analysis and new perspectives. Wiley, Chichester, UKGoogle Scholar
  41. Ressler RK, Burgess AW, Douglas JE, Hartman CR, D’Agostino RB (1986) Sexual killers and their victims: identifying patterns through crime scene analysis. J Interpers Violence 1:288–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ressler RK, Burgess A, Douglas J (1988) Sexual homicide: patterns and motives. Lexington Books, Lexington, MAGoogle Scholar
  43. Rossmo DK (1997) Geographic profiling. In: Jackson JL, Bekerian DA (eds) Offender profiling: theory, research and practice. Wiley, Chichester, UK, pp 159–176Google Scholar
  44. Rossmo DK (2000) Geographic profiling. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FLGoogle Scholar
  45. Salfati CG (2000) The nature of expressiveness and instrumentality in homicide: implications for offender profiling. Homicide Stud 4:265–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Salfati CG (2003) Offender interaction with victims in homicide: a multidimensional analysis of frequencies in crime scene behaviors. J Interpers Violence 18:490–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Salfati CG, Bateman AL (2005) Serial homicide: an investigation of behavioural consistency. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling 2:121–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Salfati CG, Haratsis E (2001) Greek homicide. Homicide Stud 5:335–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Santtila P, Canter DV, Elfgren T, Häkkänen H (2001) The structure of crime-scene actions in Finnish homicides. Homicide Stud 5:363–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Santtila P, Runtti M, Mokros A (2004) Predicting presence of offender’s criminal record from antisocial lifestyle indicators of homicide victims. J Interpers Violence 19:541–557PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Snook B, Cullen RM, Mokros A, Harbort S (2005) Serial murderers’ spatial decisions: factors that influence crime location choice. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling 2:147–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Snook B, Eastwood J, Gendreau P, Goggin C, Cullen RM (2007) Taking stock of criminal profiling: a narrative review and meta-analysis. Crim Justice Behav 34:437–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Swets JA (1988) Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 240:1285–1293PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Taylor PJ, Bennell C, Snook B (2002, July). Problems of classification in investigative psychology. Paper presented at the conference of the International Federation of Classification Societies, Krakow, Poland.Google Scholar
  55. Turco RN (1990) Psychological profiling. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol 34:147–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wilson PR, Soothill K (1996) Psychological profiling: red, green or amber? Police Journal 1:12–20Google Scholar
  57. Wilson PR, Lincoln R, Kocsis RN (1997) Validity, utility and ethics in profiling for serial violent and sexual offenders. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law 4:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Woodworth M, Porter S (1999) Historical foundations and current applications of criminal profiling in violent crime investigations. Expert Evid 7:241–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of CriminologySimon Fraser UniversityBurnabyCanada

Personalised recommendations