Current Gastroenterology Reports

, Volume 1, Issue 5, pp 410–416 | Cite as

Intestinal permeability, leaky gut, and intestinal disorders

  • Daniel Hollander
Article

Abstract

A major task of the intestine is to form a defensive barrier to prevent absorption of damaging substances from the external environment. This protective function of the intestinal mucosa is called permeability. Clinicians can use inert, nonmetabolized sugars such as mannitol, rhamnose, or lactulose to measure the permeability barrier or the degree of leakiness of the intestinal mucosa. Ample evidence indicates that permeability is increased in most patients with Crohn’s disease and in 10% to 20% of their clinically healthy relatives. The abnormal leakiness of the mucosa in Crohn’s patients and their relatives can be greatly amplified by aspirin preadministration. Permeability measurements in Crohn’s patients reflect the activity, extent, and distribution of the disease and may allow us predict the likelihood of recurrence after surgery or medically induced remission. Permeability is also increased in celiac disease and by trauma, burns, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. The major determinant of the rate of intestinal permeability is the opening or closure of the tight junctions between enterocytes in the paracellular space. As we broaden our understanding of the mechanisms and agents that control the degree of leakiness of the tight junctions, we will be increasingly able to use permeability measurements to study the etiology and pathogenesis of various disorders and to design or monitor therapies for their management.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References and Recommended Reading

  1. 1.
    Bjarnason I, MacPherson A, Hollander D: Intestinal permeability: an overview. Gastroenterology 1995, 108:1566–1581. A very comprehensive review of the topic of permeability covering the period up to 1995. Includes an extensive bibliography and a good presentation of experimental and clinical information.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hollander D: Intestinal permeability in health and disease. In Inflammatory Bowel Disease, edn 5. Edited by Kirsenr JB and Hanauer S. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1999; in press. The most up-to-date review of the clinical issues and applications of intestinal permeability.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Madara JL, Pappenheimer JR: Structural basis for physiological regulation of paracellular pathways in intestinal epithelia. J Membrane Biol 1987, 100:149–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Menzies, I.S: Transmucosal passage of inert molecules in health and disease. In In Intestinal Absorption and Secretion, Falk symposium 36. Edited by Skadhauge E, Heintze K. Baltimore: University Park Press; 1983:527–543.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hollander D: The intestinal permeability barrier: a hypothesis as to its regulation and involvement in Crohn’s disease. Scand J Gastroenterol 1992, 27:721–726. This article details the experimental background supporting the hypothesis that clinical permeability measurements reflect the state of the paracellular tight junctions.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pearson ADJ, Eastham EJ, Laker MF, et al.: Intestinal permeability in children with Crohn’s disease and celiac disease. Br Med J 1982, 285:20–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ukabam SO, Clamp JR, Cooper BT: Abnormal small intestinal permeability to sugars in patients with Crohn’s disease of the terminal ileum and colon. Digestion 1983, 27:70–74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hollander D, Vadheim CM, Brettholz E, et al.: Increased intestinal permeability in Crohn’s patients and their relatives: an etiological factor. Ann Int Med 1986, 105:883–885. This is the seminal report demonstrating permeability abnormalities in clinically normal blood relatives of patients with Crohn’s disease.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Katz KD, Hollander D, Vadheim CM, et al.: Intestinal permeability in patients with Crohn’s disease and their healthy relatives. Gastroenterology 1989, 97:927–931.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    May GR, Sutherland LR, Meddings JB: Is small intestinal permeability really increased in relatives of patients with Crohn’s disease? Gastroenterology 1993, 104:1627–1632.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hollander D: Crohn’s disease: a permeability disorder of the tight-junction? Gut 1988, 29:621–1624.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hollander D: Permeability in Crohn’s disease: altered barrier functions in healthy relatives? Gastroenterology 1993; 104:1848–1851.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hollander D. The importance of intestinal permeability in the pathogenesis of Crohn’s disease. In Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Falk Symposium 72. Edited by Rachmilewitz D. London: Kluwer Academic; 1994:41–51.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pironi L, Miglioli M, Ruggeri E, et al.: Effect of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on intestinal permeability of first degree relatives of patients with Crohn’s disease [abstract]. Gastroenterology 1992, 102:A679.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hilsden RJ, Meddings JB, Sutherland LR: Intestinal permeability changes in response to acetylsalicylic acid in relatives of patients with Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology 1996, 110:1395–1403.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Peters M, Geypens B, Claus D, et al.: Clustering of increased small intestinal permeability in families with Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology 1997,113:802–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Söderholm JD, Olaison G, Lindberg E, et al.: Different intestinal permeability patterns in relatives and spouses of patients with Crohn’s disease: an inherited defect in mucosal defence? Gut 1999, 44:96–100. This recent paper demonstrates that aspirin preadministration can greatly clarify the genetic basis of permeability abnormalities in the relatives of patients with Crohn’s disease.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Anderson JM, Van Itallie CM: Tight junctions and molecular basis for regulation of paracellular permeability. Am J Physiol 1995, 269:467–475.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lee VHL, Yamamoto A, Kompella VB: Mucosal penetration enhancers for facilitation of peptide and protein drug absorption. Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst 1991, 8:91–192.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hochman J, Artursson P: Mechanisms of absorption enhancement and tight junction regulation. J Controlled Release 1994, 29:253–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fasano A, Baudry B, Pumplin DW, et al.: Vibrio cholerae produces a second enterotoxin, which affects intestinal tight junctions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1991, 88:5242–5246.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fasano A, Fiorentini C, Donelli G, et al.: Zonula Occludens Toxin modulates tight junctions through protein kinase C-dependent actin reorganization, in vitro. J Clin Invest 1995, 96:710–720.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fasano A, Uzzau S: Modulation of intestinal tight junctions by zonula occludens toxin permits enteral administration of insulin and other macromolecules in an animal model. J Clin Invest 1997, 99:158–164. An important demonstration of the therapeutic utility of manipulating the degree of permeability of the tight junctions.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sanderson IR, Boulton P. Menzies IS, Walker-Smith JA: Improvement of abnormal lactulose/rhamnose permeability in active Crohn’s disease of the small bowel by an elemental diet. Gut 1987, 28:1073–1076.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pironi L, Miglioli M, Ruggeri E, et al.: Relationship between intestinal permeability to 51Cr-EDTA and inflammatory activity in asymptomatic patients with Crohn’s disease. Dig Dis Sci 1990, 35:582–588.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Teahon K, Smethurst P, Pearson M, et al.: The effect of elemental diet on intestinal permeability and inflammation in Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology 1991, 101:84–89.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Akram S, Morani S, Ou CN, et al.: Assessment of intestinal permeability with a two-hour urine collection. Dig Dis Sci 1998, 43:1946–1950.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Cox MA, Lewis KO, Cooper BT: Measurement of small intestinal permeability markers, lactulose, and mannitol in serum: results in celiac disease. Dig Dis Sci 1999, 44:402–406.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wyatt J, Hubl W, Vogelsang H, Lochs H: Intestinal permeability predicts acute phases of Crohn’s disease [abstract]. Gastroenterology 1991, 100:A848.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Valpiani D, Ornigotti L, Ricca Rosellini S, et al.: Intestinal permeability: a non invasive method in predicting Crohn’s disease relapse [abstract]. Gastroenterology 1991, 100:A259.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wyatt J, Vogelsang H, Hubl W, et al.: Intestinal permeability and the prediction of relapse in Crohn’s disease. Lancet 1993, 341:1437–1439.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Nejdfors P, Wang Q, Ekelund M, et al.: Increased colonic permeability in patients with ulcerative colitis: an in vitro study. Scand J Gastroenterol 1998, 33:749–753.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Miki K, Moore DJ, Butler RN, et al.: The sugar permeability test reflects disease activity in children and adolescents with inflammatory bowel disease. J Pediatr 1998, 133:750–754.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Pironi L, Miglioli M, Ruggeri E, et al.: Intestinal permeability (IP) to 51Cr-EDTA and postoperative recurrence of Crohn’s disease (CD): a follow-up study [abstract]. Gastroenterology 1991, 100:A239.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Krugliak P, Hollander D, Schlaepfer CC, et al.: Mechanisms and sites of mannitol permeability of small and large intestine in the rat. Dig Dis Sci 1994, 39:796–801.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Blomquist L, Oman H, Henriksson K, et al.: Increased absorption of polysucrose, a marker of intestinal paracellular permeability in Crohn’s disease. Eur J of Gastroenterol Hepatol 1993, 5:913–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Knight I: The development and applications of sucralose, a new high-intensity sweetener. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 1994, 72:435–439.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Meddings JB, Sutherland LR, Byles NI, Wallace JL: Sucrose: a novel permeability marker for gastroduodenal disease. Gastroenterology 1993, 104:1619–1626.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Jenkins AP, Nukajam WS, Menzies IS, Creamer B: Simultaneous administration of lactulose and 51Cr-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid: a test to distinguish colonic from small-intestinal permeability change. Scand J Gastroenterol 1992, 27:769–773.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Bjarnason I, Peters TJ, Veall N: A persistent defect in intestinal permeability in celiac disease demonstrated by a [51Cr] labelled EDTA absorption test. Lancet 1983, 1(8336):1284–1285.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ukabam SO, Cooper BT: Small intestinal permeability to mannitol, lactulose, and polyethylene glycol 400 in celiac disease. Dig Dis Sci 1984, 29:809–816.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Hamilton I, Cobden I, Axon ATR: Intestinal permeability in celiac disease: the response to gluten withdrawal and single dose gluten challenge. Gut 1982, 23:202–210.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Vogelsang H, Wyatt J, Penner E, et al.: Screening for celiac disease in first-degree relatives of patients with celiac disease by lactulose/mannitol test. Am J Gasteronenterol 1995, 90:1838–1842.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Bjarnason I, Peters TJ: Intestinal permeability, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug enteropathy and inflammatory bowel disease: an overview. Gut 1989, 30:22–28.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Bjarnason I, Haylar J. MacPherson AJ, Russell AS: Side effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on the small and large intestine in humans. Gastroenterology 1993, 104:1832–1847.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Marcial MA, Carlson SL, Madara JL: Partitioning of paracellular conductance along the ileal and crypt-villus axis: a hypothesis based on structural analysis with detailed consideration of tight junction structure-function relationship. J Membr Biol 1984, 80:59–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Harris CE, Griffiths RD, Freestone N, et al.: Intestinal permeability in the critically ill. Intensive Care Med 1992, 18:38–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Roumen RM, van der Vliet JA, et al.: Intestinal permeability is increased after major vascular surgery. J Vasc Surg 1993, 17:734–737.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Deitz EA: Intestinal permeability is increased in burn patients shortly after injury. Surgery 1990, 102:411–412.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Current Science Inc 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel Hollander
    • 1
  1. 1.Harbor-UCLA Research and Education InstituteTorranceUSA

Personalised recommendations