Traditional tools and scoring systems for nutritional assessment have focused solely on parameters of poor nutritional status in the past, in an effort to define the elusive concept of malnutrition. Such tools fail to account for the contribution of disease severity to overall nutritional risk. High nutritional risk, caused by either deterioration of nutritional status or greater disease severity (or a combination of both factors), puts the patient in a metabolic stress state characterized by adverse outcome and increased complications. Newer scoring systems for determining nutritional risk, such as the Nutric Score and the Nutritional Risk Score-2002 have created a paradigm shift connecting assessment and treatment with quality outcome measures of success. Clinicians now have the opportunity to identify high risk patients through their initial assessment, provide adequate or sufficient nutrition therapy, and expect improved patient outcomes as a result. These concepts are supported by observational and prospective interventional trials. Greater clinical experience and refinement in these scoring systems are needed in the future to optimize patient response to nutrition therapy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
Sheean PM, Peterson SJ, Chen Y, Liu D, Lateef O, Braunschweig CA. Utilizing multiple methods to classify malnutrition among elderly patients admitted to the medical and surgical intensive care units (ICU). Clin Nutr. 2013;32(5):752–7.
Kondrup J. Nutritional-risk scoring systems in the intensive care unit. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2014;17(2):177–82. This is a recent review by Kondrup of the principles behind the NRS-2002 scoring system, emphazing the evolution of the concept of nutritional risk.
Heyland, et al. Identifying critically ill patients who benefit the most from nutrition therapy: the development and initial validation of a novel risk assessment tool. Crit Care. 2011;15(6):R268. This is the original paper by Heyland delineating the NUTRIC Score system.
Coltman A, Peterson S, Roehl K, Roosevelt H, Sowa D. Use of 3 tools to assess nutrition risk in the intensive care unit. JPEN J Parent Enteral Nutr. 2015;39(1):28–33.
Omidvari AH, Vali Y, Murray SM, Wonderling D, Rashidian A. Nutritional screening for improving professional practice for patient outcomes in hospital and primary care settings. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;6:CD005539.
Minne L, Abu-Hanna A, de Jonge E. Evaluation of SOFA-based models for predicting mortality in the ICU: a systematic review. Crit Care. 2008;12(6):R161.
Kondrup J, Rasmussen HH, Hamberg O, Stanga Z. Nutritional risk screening (NRS 2002): a new method based on an analysis of controlled clinical trials. Clin Nutr. 2003;22(3):321–36. This is the original paper which describes how the NRS-2002 scoring system was derived.
Rahman A, Hasan RM, Agarwala R, Martin C, Day AG, Heyland DK. Identifying critically-ill patients who will benefit most from nutritional therapy: further validation of the “modified NUTRIC” nutritional risk assessment tool. Clin Nutr. 2015. This is an updated re-validated version of the NUTRIC score.
Jie B, Jiang ZM, Nolan MT, Zhu SN, Yu K, Kondrup J. Impact of preoperative nutritional support on clinical outcome in abdominal surgical patients at nutritional risk. Nutrition. 2012;28(10):1022–7. This observational trial shows how high risk patients derive outcome benefits from sufficient nutritional therapy, while low risk patients do not.
Starke J, Schneider H, Alteheld B, Stehle P, Meier R. Short-term individual nutritional care as part of routine clinical setting improves outcome and quality of life in malnourished medical patients. Clin Nutr. 2011;30(2):194–201.
Raslan M, Gonzalez MC, Torrinhas RS, Ravacci GR, Pereira JC, Waitzberg DL. Complementarity of Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) and Nutritional Risk Screening 2002. (NRS 2002) for predicting poor clinical outcomes in hospitalized patients. Clin Nutr. 2011;30(1):49–53.
Badia-Tahull MB, Cobo-Sacristán S, Leiva-Badosa E, Miquel-Zurita ME, Méndez-Cabalerio N, Jódar-Masanés R, et al. Use of subjective global assessment, patient-generated subjective global assessment and nutritional risk screening 2002 to evaluate the nutritional status of non-critically ill patients on parenteral nutrition. Nutr Hosp. 2014;29(2):411–9.
Benoit M, Grass F, Demartines N, Coti-Bertrand P, Schäfer M, Hübner M. Use of the nutritional risk score by surgeons and nutritionists. Clin Nutr. 2016;35(1):230–3.
Moretti D, Bagilet DH, Buncuga M, Settecase CJ, Quaglino MB, Quintana R. Study of two variants of nutritional risk score “NUTRIC” in ventilated critical patients. Nutr Hosp. 2014;29(1):166–72.
Moisey LL, Mourtzakis M, Cotton BA, Premji T, Heyland DK, Wade CE, et al. Skeletal muscle predicts ventilator-free days, ICU-free days, and mortality in elderly ICU patients. Crit Care. 2013;17(5):R206.
Bozeman MC, Benns MV, McClave SA, Miller KR, Jones CM. When can nutritional therapy impact liver disease? Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2014;16(10):411.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Nutrition and Obesity
About this article
Cite this article
Patel, C., Omer, E., Diamond, S.J. et al. Can Nutritional Assessment Tools Predict Response to Nutritional Therapy?. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 18, 15 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-016-0488-y
- Nutritional assessment
- Nutritional risk