Skip to main content

Faecal Occult Blood Testing for Colorectal Cancer Screening: the Past or the Future

Current Gastroenterology Reports volume 17, Article number: 7 (2015) Cite this article

Abstract

Screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) reduces CRC mortality; many countries have implemented population-based CRC screening programmes and many more are poised to do so. Whilst several different CRC screening modalities are available, choice will be influenced by cost, available resources (e.g. high-quality colonoscopy) and acceptability of the test by the invited population. For CRC screening, no screening test has so far surpassed the practicality, affordability and effectiveness of tests for the presence of blood in faeces (faecal occult blood tests, FOBt). The results of several large FOBt-based randomised controlled trials provide the best clinical evidence to support their use in population-based CRC screening. This review considers the current options for CRC screening and the future for FOBt.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Ervi M, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 11 [Internet]. GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.0 Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2013. Available from: http://globocan.iarc.fr.

  2. Brenner H, Hoffmeister M, Stegmaier C, Brenner G, Altenhofen L, Haug U. Risk of progression of advanced adenomas to colorectal cancer by age and sex: estimates based on 840 149 screening colonoscopies. Gut. 2007;56(11):1585–9.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Winawer SJ, Fletcher RH, Miller L, Godlee F, Stolar MH, Mulrow CD, et al. Colorectal cancer screening: clinical guidelines and rationale. Gastroenterology. 1997;112(2):594–642.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gupta S, Sussman DA, Doubeni CA, Anderson DS, Day L, Deshpande AR, et al. Challenges and possible solutions to colorectal cancer screening for the underserved. JNCI 2014;106(4):dju032.

  5. Pox CP, Altenhofen L, Brenner H, Theilmeier A, Von Stillfried D, Schmiegel W. Efficacy of a nationwide screening colonoscopy program for colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology. 2012;142(7):1460–7. e2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. First edition ed. Segnan N, Patnick J, von Karsa L, editors. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2010.

  7. Panteris V, Haringsma J, Kuipers EJ. Colonoscopy perforation rate, mechanisms and outcome: from diagnostic to therapeutic colonoscopy. Endoscopy. 2009;41(11):941–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kaminski MF, Bretthauer M, Zauber AG, Kuipers EJ, Adami HO, van Ballegooijen M, et al. The NordICC Study: rationale and design of a randomized trial on colonoscopy screening for colorectal cancer. Endoscopy. 2012;44(7):695–702.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Elmunzer BJ, Hayward RA, Schoenfeld PS, Saini SD, Deshpande A, Waljee AK. Effect of flexible sigmoidoscopy-based screening on incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS Med. 2012;9(12):e1001352.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Schoen RE, Pinsky PF, Weissfeld JL, Yokochi LA, Church T, Laiyemo AO, et al. Colorectal-cancer incidence and mortality with screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. NEJM. 2012;366(25):2345–57.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Segnan N, Armaroli P, Bonelli L, Risio M, Sciallero S, Zappa M, et al. Once-only sigmoidoscopy in colorectal cancer screening: follow-up findings of the Italian Randomized Controlled Trial–SCORE. JNCI. 2011;103(17):1310–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Atkin WS, Edwards R, Kralj-Hans I, Wooldrage K, Hart AR, Northover JM, et al. Once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in prevention of colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;375(9726):1624–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Holme Ø, Løberg M, Kalager M, et al. Effect of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2014;312(6):606–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cappell MS. The pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and diagnosis of colon cancer and adenomatous polyps. Med Clin North Am. 2005;89(1):1–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. National Cancer Institute. Protocol for the National Cancer Institute Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial. Version 13. March 2006. Available from: http://www.nejm.org/doi/suppl/10.1056/NEJMoa1114635/suppl_file/nejmoa1114635_protocol.pdf. Accessed: 18-11-2014.

  16. Stoop EM, de Haan MC, de Wijkerslooth TR, Bossuyt PM, van Ballegooijen M, Nio CY, et al. Participation and yield of colonoscopy versus non-cathartic CT colonography in population-based screening for colorectal cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13(1):55–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mandel JS, Bond JH, Church TR, Snover DC, Bradley GM, Schuman LM, et al. Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood. Minnesota Colon Cancer Control Study. NEJM. 1993;328(19):1365–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kewenter J, Brevinge H, Engaras B, Haglind E, Ahren C. Results of screening, rescreening, and follow-up in a prospective randomized study for detection of colorectal cancer by fecal occult blood testing. Results for 68,308 subjects. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1994;29(5):468–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hardcastle JD, Chamberlain JO, Robinson MH, Moss SM, Amar SS, Balfour TW, et al. Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer. Lancet. 1996;348(9040):1472–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kronborg O, Fenger C, Olsen J, Jorgensen OD, Sondergaard O. Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood test. Lancet. 1996;348(9040):1467–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hewitson P, Glasziou P, Watson E, Towler B, Irwig L. Cochrane systematic review of colorectal cancer screening using the fecal occult blood test (hemoccult): an update. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103(6):1541–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Greegor DH. Occult blood testing for detection of asymptomatic colon cancer. Cancer. 1971;28(1):131–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Greegor DH. Diagnosis of large-bowel cancer in the asymptomatic patient. JAMA. 1967;201:943–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. van Rossum LG, van Rijn AF, Laheij RJ, van Oijen MG, Fockens P, van Krieken HH, et al. Random comparison of guaiac and immunochemical fecal occult blood tests for colorectal cancer in a screening population. Gastroenterology. 2008;135(1):82–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kuipers EJ, Rosch T, Bretthauer M. Colorectal cancer screening—optimizing current strategies and new directions. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2013;10(3):130–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Duffy MJ, Lamerz R, Haglund C, Nicolini A, Kalousová M, Holubec L, et al. Tumor markers in colorectal cancer, gastric cancer and gastrointestinal stromal cancers: European group on tumor markers 2014 guidelines update. Int J Cancer. 2014;134(11):2513–22. This paper provides a recommendation from an international expert panel that an immunochemical-based faecal occult blood test be used for screening asymptomatic subjects for colorectal cancer.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Young GP, Fraser CG, Halloran SP, Cole S. Guaiac based faecal occult blood testing for colorectal cancer screening: an obsolete strategy? Gut. 2012;61(7):959–60.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Allison JE, Fraser CG, Halloran SP, Young GP. Population screening for colorectal cancer means getting FIT. The past, present, and future of colorectal cancer screening using FIT. Gut and Liver. 2014;8:117–30.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Rabeneck L, Rumble RB, Thompson F, Mills M, Oleschuk C, Whibley A, et al. Fecal immunochemical tests compared with guaiac fecal occult blood tests for population-based colorectal cancer screening. Can J Gastroenterol. 2012;26(3):131–47. The Cancer Care Ontario’s Fecal Immunochemical Tests (FIT) Guidelines Expert Panel reviewed the evidence for FIT and concluded that FIT performance is superior to guaiac-based faecal occult blood tests in terms of uptake of screening and the detection of colorectal cancer and advanced adenoma.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Songster CL, Barrows GH, Jarrett DD. Immunochemical detection of fecal occult blood–the fecal smear punch-disc test: a new non-invasive screening test for colorectal cancer. Cancer. 1980;45(5 Suppl):1099–102.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hol L, Wilschut JA, van Ballegooijen M, van Vuuren AJ, van der Valk H, Reijerink JC, et al. Screening for colorectal cancer: random comparison of guaiac and immunochemical faecal occult blood testing at different cut-off levels. Br J Cancer. 2009;100(7):1103–10.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. von Karsa L, Patnick J, Segnan N, Atkin W, Halloran S, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, et al. European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis: overview and introduction to the full supplement publication. Endoscopy. 2013;45(1):51–9.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Halloran SP, Launoy G, Zappa M. European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. First Edition Faecal occult blood testing. Endoscopy. 2012;44(S 03):SE65–87. A special edition of Endoscopy includes guidelines on faecal occult blood testing for colorectal cancer from the European Colorectal Cancer Screening Guidelines Working Group. The detailed description of guaiac-based tests and faecal immunochemical tests (FIT), and a review of the evidence for DNA and other related markers, highlights the superiority of quantitative FIT in terms of uptake, laboratory processes and disease detection and the opportunities FIT afford to adjust cut-offs for positivity to manage local colonoscopy resource.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Steele RJC, McDonald PJ, Digby J, Brownlee LA, Strachan JA, Libby G, et al. Clinical outcomes using a faecal immunochemical test for haemoglobin as a first-line test in a national programme constrained by colonoscopy capacity. U Eur Gastroenterol J. 2013;1(3):198–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. van Roon AHC, Goede SL, van Ballegooijen M, van Vuuren AJ, Looman CWN, Biermann K, et al. Random comparison of repeated faecal immunochemical testing at different intervals for population-based colorectal cancer screening. Gut. 2013;62(3):409–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Zorzi M, Fedato C, Grazzini G, Sassoli de’ Bianchi P, Naldoni C, Pendenza M, et al. Screening for colorectal cancer in Italy, 2010 survey. Epidemiol Prev. 2012;36(6 Suppl 1):55–77. Lo screening colorettale in Italia, survey 2010.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Zorzi M, Fedeli U, Schievano E, Bovo E, Guzzinati S, Baracco S, et al. Impact on colorectal cancer mortality of screening programmes based on the faecal immunochemical test. Gut 2014. Epub 2014/09/01. This recent paper reports a significant reduction in CRC mortality in FIT-based screening programmes in Italy.

  38. van Roon AH, Wilschut JA, Hol L, van Ballegooijen M, Reijerink JC, t Mannetje H, et al. Diagnostic yield improves with collection of 2 samples in fecal immunochemical test screening without affecting attendance. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;9(4):333–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Oort FA, van Turenhout ST, Coupe VM, van der Hulst RW, Wesdorp EI, Terhaar sive Droste JS, et al. Double sampling of a faecal immunochemical test is not superior to single sampling for detection of colorectal neoplasia: a colonoscopy controlled prospective cohort study. BMC Cancer. 2011;11:434.

  40. Young GP, Sinatra MA, St John DJ. Influence of delay in stool sampling on fecal occult blood test sensitivity. Clin Chem. 1996;42(7):1107–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Faure H, Exbrayat C, Winckel P, Bolla M. Moisture content of hemoccult slides influences test sensitivity. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003;15(10):1111–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Hunter JP, Saratzis A, Froggatt P, Harmston C. Effect of season and ambient temperature on outcome of guaiac-based faecal occult blood tests performed for colorectal cancer screening. Colorectal Dis. 2012;14(9):1084–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Seaman HE, Butler P, Snowball JM, Halloran SP. PWE-020: do seasonal trends in positivity exist with the guaiac-based faecal occult blood test? Gut. 2013;62 Suppl 1:A137–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Grazzini G, Ventura L, Zappa M, Ciatto S, Confortini M, Rapi S, et al. Influence of seasonal variations in ambient temperatures on performance of immunochemical faecal occult blood test for colorectal cancer screening: observational study from the Florence district. Gut. 2010;59(11):1511–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Guittet L, Guillaume E, Levillain R, Beley P, Tichet J, Lantieri O, et al. Analytical comparison of three quantitative immunochemical fecal occult blood tests for colorectal cancer screening. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011;20(7):1492–501.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. van Roon AHC, Hol L, van Vuuren AJ, Francke J, Ouwendijk M, Heijens A, et al. Are fecal immunochemical test characteristics influenced by sample return time? A population-based colorectal cancer screening trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107(1):99–107.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Chausserie S, Levillain R, Puvinel J, Ferrand O, Ruiz A, Raginel T, et al. Seasonal variations do not affect the superiority of fecal immunochemical tests over guaiac tests for colorectal cancer screening. Int J Cancer 2014.

  48. Steele RJC, McClements P, Watling C, Libby G, Weller D, Brewster DH, et al. Interval cancers in a FOBT-based colorectal cancer population screening programme: implications for stage, gender and tumour site. Gut. 2012;61(4):576–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Zorzi M, Fedato C, Grazzini G, Stocco FC, Banovich F, Bortoli A, et al. High sensitivity of five colorectal screening programmes with faecal immunochemical test in the Veneto Region. Italy Gut. 2011;60(7):944–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Sadik R, Abrahamsson H, Stotzer PO. Gender differences in gut transit shown with a newly developed radiological procedure. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2003;38(1):36–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Digby J, Fraser CG, Carey FA, McDonald PJ, Strachan JA, Diament RH, et al. Faecal haemoglobin concentration is related to severity of colorectal neoplasia. J Clin Pathol. 2013;66(5):415–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Stegeman I, de Wijkerslooth TR, Stoop EM, van Leerdam ME, Dekker E, van Ballegooijen M, et al. Combining risk factors with faecal immunochemical test outcome for selecting CRC screenees for colonoscopy. Gut. 2014;63(3):466–71. This Dutch group developed a risk prediction model for use in CRC screening, incorporating the FIT result with other known risk factors for CRC and demonstrated that combining risk stratification with the FIT result increased the accuracy of FIT screening.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Moran A, Radley S, Neoptolemos J, Jones AF, Asquith P. Detection of colorectal cancer by faecal α1-Antitrypsin. Ann Clin Biochem. 1993;30(1):28–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Nakayama T, Yasuoka H, Kishino T, Ohguchi H, Takada M. ELISA for occult faecal albumin. Lancet. 1987;329(8546):1368–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Miyoshi H, Ohshiba S, Asada S, Hirata I, Uchida K. Immunological determination of fecal hemoglobin and transferrin levels: a comparison with other fecal occult blood tests. Am J Gastroenterol. 1992;87(1):67–73.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Dubrow R, Kim CS, Eldred AK. Fecal lysozyme: an unreliable marker for colorectal cancer. Am J Gastroenterol. 1992;87(5):617–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Tonus C, Sellinger M, Koss K, Neupert G. Faecal pyruvate kinase isoenzyme type M2 for colorectal cancer screening: a meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18(30):4004–11.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Imperiale TF, Ransohoff DF, Itzkowitz SH, Turnbull BA, Ross ME. Fecal DNA versus fecal occult blood for colorectal-cancer screening in an average-risk population. NEJM. 2004;351(26):2704–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Ahlquist DA, Sargent DJ, Loprinzi CL, Levin TR, Rex DK, Ahnen DJ, et al. Stool DNA and occult blood testing for screen detection of colorectal neoplasia. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149(7):441. –50, W81.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Imperiale TF, Ransohoff DF, Itzkowitz SH, Levin TR, Lavin P, Lidgard GP, et al. Multitarget stool DNA testing for colorectal-cancer screening. NEJM. 2014;370:1287–97. Imperiale et al. compared the performance of a multi-target stool DNA test plus FIT with FIT alone for the detection of CRC and adenomas in average-risk subjects. The multi-target test demonstrated superior sensitivity but was less specific than FIT alone; the practicalities and expense of the multi-target stool test currently preclude consideration for use in routine population-based CRC screening programmes.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Senore C, Segnan N. Multitarget stool DNA testing for colorectal-cancer screening. NEJM. 2014;371(2):185–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. The Wall Street Journal. FDA approves DNA test for colon cancer. Dow Jones & Company; 2014; Available from: http://online.wsj.com/articles/fda-approves-dna-test-for-colon-cancer-1407798806. Accessed: 2014-09-19.

  63. Toyooka S, Toyooka KO, Harada K, Miyajima K, Makarla P, Sathyanarayana UG, et al. Aberrant methylation of the CDH13 (H-cadherin) promoter region in colorectal cancers and adenomas. Cancer Res. 2002;62(12):3382–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Toyota M, Shen L, Ohe-Toyota M, Hamilton SR, Sinicrope FA, Issa JP. Aberrant methylation of the cyclooxygenase 2 CpG island in colorectal tumors. Cancer Res. 2000;60(15):4044–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Ebert MP, Mooney SH, Tonnes-Priddy L, Lograsso J, Hoffmann J, Chen J, et al. Hypermethylation of the TPEF/HPP1 gene in primary and metastatic colorectal cancers. Neoplasia (New York, NY). 2005;7(8):771–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Lofton-Day C, Model F, Devos T, Tetzner R, Distler J, Schuster M, et al. DNA methylation biomarkers for blood-based colorectal cancer screening. Clin Chem. 2008;54(2):414–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. de Vos T, Tetzner R, Model F, Weiss G, Schuster M, Distler J, et al. Circulating methylated SEPT9 DNA in plasma is a biomarker for colorectal cancer. Clin Chem. 2009;55(7):1337–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Church TR, Wandell M, Lofton-Day C, Mongin SJ, Burger M, Payne SR, et al. Prospective evaluation of methylated SEPT9 in plasma for detection of asymptomatic colorectal cancer. Gut. 2014;63(2):317–25.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Steele RJC, Kostourou I, McClements P, Watling C, Libby G, Weller D, et al. Effect of gender, age and deprivation on key performance indicators in a FOBT-based colorectal screening programme. J Med Screen. 2010;17(2):68–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Moss SM, Campbell C, Melia J, Coleman D, Smith S, Parker R, et al. Performance measures in three rounds of the English bowel cancer screening pilot. Gut. 2012;61(1):101–7.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. von Wagner C, Baio G, Raine R, Snowball J, Morris S, Atkin W, et al. Inequalities in participation in an organized national colorectal cancer screening programme: results from the first 2.6 million invitations in England. Int J Epidemiol. 2011;40(3):712–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Quintero E, Castells A, Bujanda L, Cubiella J, Salas D, Lanas Á, et al. Colonoscopy versus fecal immunochemical testing in colorectal-cancer screening. NEJM. 2012;366(8):697–706.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Hol L, van Leerdam ME, van Ballegooijen M, van Vuuren AJ, van Dekken H, Reijerink JC, et al. Screening for colorectal cancer: randomised trial comparing guaiac-based and immunochemical faecal occult blood testing and flexible sigmoidoscopy. Gut. 2010;59(1):62–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Federici A, Giorgi Rossi P, Borgia P, Bartolozzi F, Farchi S, Gausticchi G. The immunochemical faecal occult blood test leads to higher compliance than the guaiac for colorectal cancer screening programmes: a cluster randomized controlled trial. J Med Screen. 2005;12(2):83–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Hoffman RM, Steel S, Yee EF, Massie L, Schrader RM, Murata GH. Colorectal cancer screening adherence is higher with fecal immunochemical tests than guaiac-based fecal occult blood tests: a randomized, controlled trial. Prev Med. 2010;50(5–6):297–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Vart G, Banzi R, Minozzi S. Comparing participation rates between immunochemical and guaiac faecal occult blood tests: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prev Med. 2012;55(2):87–92. This systematic review of the published literature comparing participation in colorectal cancer screening programmes using a FIT with programmes using a guaiac-based faecal occult blood test reported significantly higher participation with FIT.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Senore C, Ederle A, Benazzato L, Arrigoni A, Silvani M, Fantin A, et al. Offering people a choice for colorectal cancer screening. Gut. 2013;62(5):735–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Whyte S, Chilcott J, Halloran S. Re-appraisal of the options for colorectal cancer screening in England. Colorectal Dis 2012.

Download references

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

Conflict of Interest

Sally C Benton, Helen E Seaman, and Stephen P Halloran declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Southern Programme Hub, 20 Priestley Road, Surrey Research Park, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7YS, UK

    Sally C. Benton, Helen E. Seaman & Stephen P. Halloran

  2. University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, UK

    Sally C. Benton & Stephen P. Halloran

Authors
  1. Sally C. Benton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Helen E. Seaman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Stephen P. Halloran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sally C. Benton.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on GI Oncology

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Benton, S.C., Seaman, H.E. & Halloran, S.P. Faecal Occult Blood Testing for Colorectal Cancer Screening: the Past or the Future. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 17, 7 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-015-0428-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-015-0428-2

Keywords

  • Colorectal cancer
  • Faecal immunochemical test
  • Faecal occult blood test
  • Guaiac
  • Population-based screening
  • Screening