Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Endoscopic therapy for chronic pancreatitis: Technical success, clinical outcomes, and complications

  • Published:
Current Gastroenterology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Chronic pancreatitis (CP) can cause failure of both the exocrine and endocrine portions of the gland. Pain is the most recalcitrant clinical complaint in CP. Generally, conservative measures are first attempted to manage pain. These include cessation of alcohol use and smoking, enzyme replacement therapy, and finally, opioid analgesia. Endoscopy can be employed to treat the pain and complications due to CP. The results of the only two prospective randomized controlled trials suggest that surgery has a more durable effect than endoscopic therapy in controlling pain. Both trials suffer from severe limitations, however, and endoscopy remains the preferred approach for many patients because of its minimally invasive nature. Endoscopic ultrasound celiac plexus block has limited value in helping to control pain. More randomized trials are needed, along with further technologic innovation to improve the current treatment modalities. When considering interventional therapy for a patient with CP, a tailored and multidisciplinary therapeutic approach should be taken.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

  1. Witt H, Apte MV, Keim V, et al.: Chronic pancreatitis: challenges and advances in pathogenesis, genetics, diagnosis, and therapy. Gastroenterology 2007, 132:1557–1573.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Brown A, Hughes M, Tenner S, et al.: Does pancreatic enzyme supplementation reduce pain in patients with chronic pancreatitis: a meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 1997, 92:2032–2035.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Neuhaus H: Pancreatic stents in chronic pancreatitis: Do they function as a tube, a wick, or a placebo? Gastrointest Endosc 2006, 63:67–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cremer M, Deviere J, Delhaye M, et al.: Stenting in severe chronic pancreatitis: results of medium-term follow-up in seventy-six patients. Endoscopy 1991, 23:171–176.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Costamagna G, Bulajic M, Tringali A, et al.: Multiple stenting of refractory pancreatic duct strictures in severe chronic pancreatitis: long-term results. Endoscopy 2006, 38:254–259.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ikenberry SO, Sherman S, Hawes RH, et al.: The occlusion rate of pancreatic stents. Gastrointest Endosc 1994, 40:611–613.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Morgan DE, Smith JK, Hawkins K, et al.: Endoscopic stent therapy in advanced chronic pancreatitis: relationships between ductal changes, clinical response, and stent patency. Am J Gastroenterol 2003, 98:821–826.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Smits ME, Badiga SM, Rauws EA, et al.: Long-term results of pancreatic stents in chronic pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc 1995, 42:461–467.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Smith MT, Sherman S, Ikenberry SO, et al.: Alterations in pancreatic ductal morphology following polyethylene pancreatic stent therapy. Gastrointest Endosc 1996, 44:268–275.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kozarek RA: Pancreatic stents can induce ductal changes consistent with chronic pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc 1990, 36:93–95.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Brand B, Kahl M, Sidhu S, et al.: Prospective evaluation of morphology, function, and quality of life after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy and endoscopic treatment of chronic calcific pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 2000, 95:3428–3438.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sasahira N, Tada M, Isayama H, et al.: Outcomes after clearance of pancreatic stones with or without pancreatic stenting. J Gastroenterol 2007, 42:63–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dumonceau JM, Costamagna G, Tringali A, et al.: Treatment for painful calcified chronic pancreatitis: extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus endoscopic treatment: a randomised controlled trial. Gut 2007, 56:545–552.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sherman S, Lehman GA, Hawes RH, et al.: Pancreatic ductal stones: frequency of successful endoscopic removal and improvement in symptoms. Gastrointest Endosc 1991, 37:511–517.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Thomas M, Howell DA, Carr-Locke D, et al.: Mechanical lithotripsy of pancreatic and biliary stones: complications and available treatment options collected from expert centers. Am J Gastroenterol 2007, 102:1896–1902.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rösch T, Daniel S, Scholz M, et al.: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Research Group. Endoscopic treatment of chronic pancreatitis: a multicenter study of 1000 patients with long-term follow-up. Endoscopy 2002, 34:765–771.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Díte P, Ruzicka M, Zboril V, Novotny I: A prospective, randomized trial comparing endoscopic and surgical therapy for chronic pancreatitis. Endoscopy 2003, 35:553–558.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cahen DL, Gouma DJ, Nio Y, et al.: Endoscopic versus surgical drainage of the pancreatic duct in chronic pancreatitis. N Engl J Med 2007, 356:676–684.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Faigel DO, Veloso KM, Long WB, et al.: Endosonography-guided celiac plexus injection for abdominal pain due to chronic pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 1996, 91:1675.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Gress F, Schmitt C, Sherman S, et al.: A prospective randomized comparison of endoscopic ultrasound- and computed tomography-guided celiac plexus block for managing chronic pancreatitis pain. Am J Gastroenterol 1999, 94:900–905.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Gress F, Schmitt C, Sherman S, et al.: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided celiac plexus block for managing abdominal pain associated with chronic pancreatitis: a prospective single center experience. Am J Gastroenterol 2001, 96:409–416.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Gleeson FC, Levy MJ, Papachristou GI, et al.: Frequency of visualization of presumed celiac ganglia by endoscopic ultrasound. Endoscopy 2007, 39:620–624.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Levy MJ, Topazian MD, Wiersema MJ, et al.: Initial evaluation of the efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided direct ganglia neurolysis and block. Am J Gastroenterol 2008, 103:98–103.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Abdallah AA, Krige JE, Bornman PC: Biliary tract obstruction in chronic pancreatitis. HPB (Oxford) 2007, 9:421–428.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Barthet M, Bernard JP, Duval JL, et al.: Biliary stenting in benign biliary stenosis complicating chronic calcifying pancreatitis. Endoscopy 1994, 26:569–572.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Smits ME, Rauws EA, van Gulik TM, et al.: Long-term results of endoscopic stenting and surgical drainage for biliary stricture due to chronic pancreatitis. Br J Surg 1996, 83:764–768.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Cahen DL, van Berkel AM, Oskam D, et al.: Long-term results of endoscopic drainage of common bile duct strictures in chronic pancreatitis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005, 17:103–108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Vitale GC, Reed DN Jr, Nguyen CT, et al.: Endoscopic treatment of distal bile duct stricture from chronic pancreatitis. Surg Endosc 2000, 14:227–231.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Catalano MF, Linder JD, George S, et al.: Treatment of symptomatic distal common bile duct stenosis secondary to chronic pancreatitis: comparison of single vs. multiple simultaneous stents. Gastrointest Endosc 2004, 60:945–952.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Pozsár J, Sahin P, László F, et al.: Medium-term results of endoscopic treatment of common bile duct strictures in chronic calcifying pancreatitis with increasing numbers of stents. J Clin Gastroenterol 2004, 38:118–123.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kahl S, Zimmermann S, Genz I, et al.: Risk factors for failure of endoscopic stenting of biliary strictures in chronic pancreatitis: a prospective follow-up study. Am J Gastroenterol 2003, 98:2448–2453.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Cantu P, Hookey LC, Morales A, et al.: The treatment of patients with symptomatic common bile duct stenosis secondary to chronic pancreatitis using partially covered metal stents. Endoscopy 2005, 37:735–739.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kahaleh M, Behm B, Clarke BW, et al.: Temporary placement of covered self-expandable metal stents in benign biliary strictures: a new paradigm? (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2008, 67:446–454.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Baile J: Pancreatic pseudocysts (part II). Gastrointest Endosc 2004, 60:105–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Heider R, Meyer AA, Galanko JA, et al.: Percutaneous drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts is associated with a higher failure rate than surgical treatment in unselected patients. Ann Surg 1999, 229:781–787.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Parks RW, Tzovaras G, Diamond T, et al.: Management of pancreatic pseudocysts. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2000, 82:383–387.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Jacobson BC, Baron TH, Adler DG, et al.; American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: ASGE guideline: the role of endoscopy in the diagnosis and the management of cystic lesions and inflammatory fluid collections of the pancreas. Gastrointest Endosc 2005, 61:363–370.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Kahaleh M, Shami VM, Conaway MR, et al.: Endoscopic ultrasound drainage of pancreatic pseudocyst: a prospective comparison with conventional endoscopic drainage. Endoscopy 2006, 38:355–359.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Varadarajulu S, Christein JD, Tamhane A, et al.: Prospective randomized trial comparing EUS and EGD for transmural drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2008, 68:1102–1111.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Fockens P: EUS in drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts. Gastrointest Endosc 2002, 56(4 Suppl):S93–S97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Cahen D, Rauws E, Fockens P, et al.: Endoscopic drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts: long-term outcome and procedural factors associated with safe and successful treatment. Endoscopy 2005, 37:977–983.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Arvanitakis M, Delhaye M, Bali MA, et al.: Pancreatic-fluid collections: a randomized controlled trial regarding stent removal after endoscopic transmural drainage. Gastrointest Endosc 2007, 65:609–619.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Baron TH, Harewood GC, Morgan DE, et al.: Outcome differences after endoscopic drainage of pancreatic necrosis, acute pancreatic pseudocysts, and chronic pancreatic pseudocysts. Gastrointest Endosc 2002, 56:7–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Lawrence C, Howell DA, Stefan AM, et al.: Disconnected pancreatic tail syndrome: potential for endoscopic therapy and results of long-term follow-up. Gastrointest Endosc 2008, 67:673–679.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Brennan PM, Stefaniak T, Palmer KR, et al.: Endoscopic transpapillary stenting of pancreatic duct disruption. Dig Surg 2006, 23:250–254.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Telford JJ, Farrell JJ, Saltzman JR, et al.: Pancreatic stent placement for duct disruption. Gastrointest Endosc 2002, 56:18–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Varadarajulu S, Noone TC, Tutuian R, et al.: Predictors of outcome in pancreatic duct disruption managed by endoscopic transpapillary stent placement. Gastrointest Endosc 2005, 61:568–575.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Balakrishnan V, Chatni S, Radhakrishnan L, et al.: Groove pancreatitis: a case report and review of literature. JOP 2007, 8:592–597.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Shudo R, Obara T, Tanno S, et al.: Segmental groove pancreatitis accompanied by protein plugs in Santorini’s duct. J Gastroenterol 1998, 33:289–294.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Tan CH, Chow PK, Thng CH, et al.: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma that mimics groove pancreatitis: case report of a diagnostic dilemma. Dig Dis Sci 2006, 51:1294–1296.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Isayama H, Kawabe T, Komatsu Y, et al.: Successful treatment for groove pancreatitis by endoscopic drainage via the minor papilla. Gastrointest Endosc 2005, 61:175–178.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Florida, 1600 SW Archer Road, Room HD 611, Box 100214, Gainesville, FL, 32610-0214, USA

    Peter V. Draganov

Authors
  1. Lukasz M. Kowalczyk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Peter V. Draganov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter V. Draganov.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kowalczyk, L.M., Draganov, P.V. Endoscopic therapy for chronic pancreatitis: Technical success, clinical outcomes, and complications. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 11, 111–118 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-009-0018-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-009-0018-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation