Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Prevention, detection, and management of infected necrosis in severe acute pancreatitis

  • Published:
Current Gastroenterology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The management of infected peripancreatic or pancreatic necrosis in patients with severe pancreatitis has changed considerably in recent years. This review discusses the recent literature on prevention, detection, and management of infected necrosis. Though antibiotics, probiotics, and enteral nutrition have been tried to prevent infected necrosis, only enteral nutrition has consistently proven to be effective. Antibiotics and probiotics have not shown a consistent beneficial effect on outcome. Enteral nutrition reduced infectious complications and mortality in severe pancreatitis, compared with parenteral nutrition. The detection of infection of pancreatic necrosis is important for clinical decision making. Fine-needle aspiration may be used to confirm suspected infection, but if its results will not change clinical decisions, it should be omitted, as it may even introduce infection. Minimally invasive surgical, radiologic, or endoscopic intervention is increasingly being applied. In the absence of level 1 evidence, local expertise dictates which type of intervention is applied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

  1. Buchler MW, Gloor B, Muller CA, et al.: Acute necrotizing pancreatitis: treatment strategy according to the status of infection. Ann Surg 2000, 232:619–626.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Banks PA, Freeman ML: Practice guidelines in acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 2006, 101:2379–2400.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Besselink MG, de Bruijn MT, Rutten JP, et al.: Surgical intervention in patients with necrotizing pancreatitis. Br J Surg 2006, 93:593–599.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bradley EL 3rd: A clinically based classification system for acute pancreatitis. Summary of the International Symposium on Acute Pancreatitis, Atlanta, GA, September 11 through 13, 1992. Arch Surg 1993, 128:586–590.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rau BM, Bothe A, Kron M, et al.: Role of early multisystem organ failure as major risk factor for pancreatic infections and death in severe acute pancreatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006, 4:1053–1061.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Werner J, Feuerbach S, Uhl W, Buchler MW: Management of acute pancreatitis: from surgery to interventional intensive care. Gut 2005, 54:426–436.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Johnson CD, bu-Hilal M: Persistent organ failure during the first week as a marker of fatal outcome in acute pancreatitis. Gut 2004, 53:1340–1344.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Isenmann R, Runzi M, Kron M, et al.: Prophylactic antibiotic treatment in patients with predicted severe acute pancreatitis: a placebo-controlled, double-blind trial. Gastroenterology 2004, 126:997–1004.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Rau B, Pralle U, Mayer JM, et al.: Role of ultrasonographically guided fine-needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of infected pancreatic necrosis. Br J Surg 1998, 85:179–184.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Beger HG, Rau B, Mayer J, et al.: Natural course of acute pancreatitis. World J Surg 1997, 21:130–135.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rahman SH, Ammori BJ, Holmfield J, et al.: Intestinal hypoperfusion contributes to gut barrier failure in severe acute pancreatitis. J Gastrointest Surg 2003, 7:26–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Inoue K, Hirota M, Kimura Y, et al.: Further evidence for endothelin as an important mediator of pancreatic and intestinal ischemia in severe acute pancreatitis. Pancreas 2003, 26:218–223.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Van Felius L, Akkermans LM, Bosscha K, et al.: Interdigestive small bowel motility and duodenal bacterial overgrowth in experimental acute pancreatitis. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2003, 15:267–276.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Makhija R, Kingsnorth AN: Cytokine storm in acute pancreatitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2002, 9:401–410.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Alverdy JC, Laughlin RS, Wu L: Influence of the critically ill state on host-pathogen interactions within the intestine: gut-derived sepsis redefined. Crit Care Med 2003, 31:598–607.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bourgaux JF, Defez C, Muller L, et al.: Infectious complications, prognostic factors and assessment of anti-infectious management of 212 consecutive patients with acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 2007, 31:431–435.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Raymond DP, Pelletier SJ, Crabtree TD, et al.: Impact of bloodstream infection on outcomes among infected surgical inpatients. Ann Surg 2001, 233:549–555.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Besselink MG, van Santvoort HC, Boermeester MA, et al.: Timing and impact of infections in acute pancreatitis. Br J Surg 2009 Jan 5 (Epub ahead of print).

  19. Finch WT, Sawyers JL, Schenker S: A prospective study to determine the efficacy of antibiotics in acute pancreatitis. Ann Surg 1976, 183:667–671.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Working Party of the British Society of Gastroenterology; Association of Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland; Pancreatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland; Association of Upper GI Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland: UK guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis. Gut 2005, 54(Suppl 3):iii1–iii9.

  21. de Vries AC, Besselink MG, Buskens E, et al.: Randomized controlled trials of antibiotic prophylaxis in severe acute pancreatitis: relationship between methodological quality and outcome. Pancreatology 2007, 7:531–538.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Dellinger EP, Tellado JM, Soto NE, et al.: Early antibiotic treatment for severe acute necrotizing pancreatitis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Ann Surg 2007, 245:674–683.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Joint FAO/ WHO Working Group: Report on Drafting Guidelines for the Evaluation of Probiotics in Food. Report on meeting at London, Ontario, Canada; 30 April–1 May, 2002. Available at ftp://ftp.fao.org/es/esn/food/wgreport2.pdf. Accessed December 23, 2008.

  24. Bengmark S: Ecological control of the gastrointestinal tract. The role of probiotic flora. Gut 1998, 42:2–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Olah A, Belagyi T, Issekutz A, et al.: Randomized clinical trial of specific lactobacillus and fibre supplement to early enteral nutrition in patients with acute pancreatitis. Br J Surg 2002, 89:1103–1107.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Rayes N, Seehofer D, Theruvath T, et al.: Effect of enteral nutrition and synbiotics on bacterial infection rates after pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy: a randomized, double-blind trial. Ann Surg 2007, 246:36–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Besselink MG, van Santvoort HC, Buskens E, et al.: Probiotic prophylaxis in predicted severe acute pancreatitis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2008, 371:651–659.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Petrov MS, van Santvoort HC, Besselink MG, et al.: Enteral nutrition reduced the risk of mortality and infectious complications in patients with severe acute pancreatitis. A meta-analysis of randomized trials. Arch Surg 2008, 143:1111–1117.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Dahly EM, Gillingham MB, Guo Z, et al.: Role of luminal nutrients and endogenous GLP-2 in intestinal adaptation to mid-small bowel resection. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2003, 284:G670–G682.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Marik PE, Zaloga GP: Early enteral nutrition in acutely ill patients: a systematic review. Crit Care Med 2001, 29:2264–2270.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Pancreatitis, very early compared with selective delayed start of enteral feeding (PYTHON) trial. Available at http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN18170985. Accessed December 24, 2008.

  32. Banks PA, Gerzof SG, Langevin RE, et al.: CT-guided aspiration of suspected pancreatic infection: bacteriology and clinical outcome. Int J Pancreatol 1995, 18:265–270.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Rodriguez JR, Razo AO, Targarona J, et al.: Debridement and closed packing for sterile or infected necrotizing pancreatitis: insights into indications and outcomes in 167 patients. Ann Surg 2008, 247:294–299.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Besselink MG, Verwer TJ, Schoenmaeckers EJ, et al.: Timing of surgical intervention in necrotizing pancreatitis. Arch Surg 2007, 142:1194–1201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Rau BM, Kemppainen EA, Gumbs AA, et al.: Early assessment of pancreatic infections and overall prognosis in severe acute pancreatitis by procalcitonin (PCT): a prospective international multicenter study. Ann Surg 2007, 245:745–754.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. van Santvoort HC, Bollen TL, Besselink MG, et al.: Describing peripancreatic collections in severe acute pancreatitis using morphologic terms: an international interobserver agreement study. Pancreatology 2008, 8:593–599.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Besselink MG, van Santvoort HC, Bollen TL, et al.: Describing computed tomography findings in acute necrotizing pancreatitis with the Atlanta classification: an interobserver agreement study. Pancreas 2006, 33:331–335.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Bradley EL 3rd: Confusion in the imaging ranks: time for a change? Pancreas 2006, 33:321–322.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kivilaakso E, Fräki O, Nikki P, et al.: Resection of the pancreas for acute fulminant pancreatitis. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1981, 152:493–498.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Adler DG, Chari ST, Dahl TJ, et al.: Conservative management of infected necrosis complicating severe acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 2003, 98:98–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Baril NB, Ralls PW, Wren SM, et al.: Does an infected peripancreatic fluid collection or abscess mandate operation? Ann Surg 2000, 231:361–367.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Takahashi N, Papachristou GI, Schmit GD, et al.: CT findings of walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WOPN): differentiation from pseudocyst and prediction of outcome after endoscopic therapy. Eur Radiol 2008, 18:2522–2529.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Bradley EL 3rd: A fifteen year experience with open drainage for infected pancreatic necrosis. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1993, 177:215–222.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Carter CR, McKay CJ, Imrie CW: Percutaneous necrosectomy and sinus tract endoscopy in the management of infected pancreatic necrosis: an initial experience. Ann Surg 2000, 232:175–180.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Connor S, Ghaneh P, Raraty M, et al.: Minimally invasive retroperitoneal pancreatic necrosectomy. Dig Surg 2003, 20:270–277.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. van Santvoort HC, Besselink MG, Horvath KD, et al.: Videoscopic assisted retroperitoneal debridement in infected necrotizing pancreatitis. HPB (Oxford) 2007, 9:156–159.

    Google Scholar 

  47. French JJ, Lochan R, Al-Mukhtar A, et al.: Open surgery should no longer be considered as primary treatment for infected pancreatic necrosis [abstract]. Pancreas 2008, 37:470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. van Santvoort HC, Besselink MG, Bollen TL, et al.: Casematched comparison of the retroperitoneal approach with laparotomy for necrotizing pancreatitis. World J Surg 2007, 31:1635–1642.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Besselink MG, van Santvoort HC, Nieuwenhuijs VB, et al.: Minimally invasive ’step-up approach’ versus maximal necrosectomy in patients with acute necrotising pancreatitis (PANTER trial): design and rationale of a randomised controlled multicenter trial [ISRCTN13975868]. BMC Surg 2006, 6:6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Freeny PC, Hauptmann E, Althaus SJ, et al.: Percutaneous CT-guided catheter drainage of infected acute necrotizing pancreatitis: techniques and results. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998, 170:969–975.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Walser EM, Nealon WH, Marroquin S, et al.: Sterile fluid collections in acute pancreatitis: catheter drainage versus simple aspiration. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2006, 29:102–107.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Voermans RP, Bruno MJ, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Fockens P: Review article: Translumenal endoscopic debridement of organized pancreatic necrosis—the first step towards natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2007, 26(Suppl 2):233–239.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Schrover IM, Weusten BL, Besselink MG, et al.: EUSguided endoscopic transgastric necrosectomy in patients with infected necrosis in acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology 2008, 8:271–276.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Baron TH, Harewood GC, Morgan DE, Yates MR: Outcome differences after endoscopic drainage of pancreatic necrosis, acute pancreatic pseudocysts, and chronic pancreatic pseudocysts. Gastrointest Endosc 2002, 56:7–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, HP G04.228, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands

    Hein G. Gooszen

Authors
  1. Olaf J. Bakker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hjalmar C. van Santvoort
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Marc G. H. Besselink
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Erwin van der Harst
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. H. Sijbrand Hofker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Hein G. Gooszen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Consortia

the Dutch Pancreatitis Study Group

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hein G. Gooszen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bakker, O.J., van Santvoort, H.C., Besselink, M.G.H. et al. Prevention, detection, and management of infected necrosis in severe acute pancreatitis. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 11, 104–110 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-009-0017-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-009-0017-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation