Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Endoscopy in the management of choledocholithiasis

  • Published:
Current Gastroenterology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Choledocholithiasis (bile duct stones) occurs in 10% to 15% of patients with cholelithiasis. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and biliary sphincterotomy, combined with the use of a variety of available accessories (eg, mechanical lithotriptors), are highly effective in managing most common bile duct stones. The combination of biliary sphincterotomy and papillary balloon dilation allows removal of many stones without the need for mechanical lithotripsy. Large stones may require additional expertise and the use of cholangioscopy with intraductal lithotripsy. Some patients, especially those with intrahepatic stones, require the help of an interventional radiologist or a biliary surgeon. The availability of endoscopists, radiologists, and surgeons interested in and experienced with biliary diseases will allow successful and safe therapy to be tailored to the individual patient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

  1. Kawai K, Akasaka Y, Murakami K, et al.: Endoscopic sphincterotomy of the ampulla of Vater. Gastrointest Endosc 1974, 20:148–151.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lim JH: Oriental cholangiohepatitis; pathologic, clinical and radiologic features. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1991, 157:1–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lygidakis NJ: Incidence of bile infection in patients with choledocholithiasis. Am J Gastroenterol 1982, 77:12–17.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Taylor TV, Armstrong CP: Migration of gallstones. Br Med J 1987, 294:1320–1322.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ayub K, Imada R, Slavin J: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in gallstone-associated acute pancreatitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004, (4):CD003630.

  6. Venneman NG, Buskens E, Besselink MG, et al.: Small gallstones are associated with increased risk of acute pancreatitis: potential benefits of prophylactic cholecystectomy? Am J Gastroenterol 2005, 100:2540–2550.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Toh SK, Phillips S, Johnson CD: A prospective audit against national standards of the presentation and management of acute pancreatitis in the South of England. Gut 2000, 46:239–243.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Peng WK, Sheikh Z, Paterson-Brown S, Nixon SJ: Role of liver function tests in predicting common bile duct stones in acute calculous cholecystitis. Br J Surg 2005, 92:1241–1247.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Shea JA, Berlin JA, Escarce JJ, et al.: Revised estimates of diagnostic test sensitivity and specificity in suspected biliary tract disease. Arch Intern Med 1994, 154:2573–2581.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Amouyal P, Amouyal G, Levy P, et al.: Diagnosis of choledocholithiasis by endoscopic ultrasonography. Gastroenterology 1994, 106:1062–1067.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Jeffrey RB, Federle MP, Laing FC, et al.: Computed tomography of choledocholithiasis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1983, 140:1179–1183.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Laokpessi A, Bouillet P, Sautereau D, et al.: Value of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the preoperative diagnosis of common bile duct stones. Am J Gastroenterol 2001, 96:2354–2359.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cohen S, Bacon BR, Berlin JA, et al.: NIH state-of-the-science statement on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for diagnosis and therapy. NIH Consens State Sci Statements 2002, 19:1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Abboud PA, Malet PF, Berlin JA, et al.: Predictors of common bile duct stones prior to cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 1996, 44:450–455.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cohen ME, Slezak L, Wells CK, et al.: Prediction of bile duct stones and complications in gallstone pancreatitis using early laboratory trends. Am J Gastroenterol 2001, 96:3305–3311.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rewbridge AG: The disappearance of gallstone shadows following the prolonged administration of bile salts. Surgery 1937, 1:395–400.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kaffes AJ, Parupudi V, Sriram J, et al.: Early institution of pre-cutting for difficult biliary cannulation: a prospective study comparing conventional vs. a modified technique. Gastrointest Endosc 2005, 62:669–674.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Freeman ML, Nelson DB, Sherman S, et al.: Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med 1996, 335:909–918.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Freeman ML: Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. A review. Endoscopy 1997, 29:288–297.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Moreira VF, Arribas R, Sanroman AL, et al.: Choledocholithiasis in cirrhotic patients: is endoscopic sphincterotomy the safest choice? Am J Gastroenterol 1991, 86:1006–1009.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Freeman ML: Pancreatic stents for prevention of post endoscopic retrograde cholangiography pancreatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007, 5:1354–1365.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Nelson DB, Freeman ML: Major hemorrhage from endoscopic sphincterotomy: risk factor analysis. J Clin Gastroenterol 1994, 19:283–287.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Pereira-Lima JC, Jakobs R, Winter UH, et al.: Long-term results (7 to 10 years) of endoscopic papillotomy for choledocholithiasis. Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors for the recurrence of biliary symptoms. Gastrointest Endosc 1998, 48:457–464.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Costamagna G, Tringali A, Shah KH, et al.: Long-term follow-up of patients after endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis, and risk factors for recurrence. Endoscopy 2002, 34:273–279.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Lau JY, Leow CK, Fung T, et al.: Cholecystectomy or gallbladder in situ after endoscopic sphincterotomy and bile duct stone removal in Chinese patients. Gastroenterology 2006, 130:96–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Boerma D, Rauws EA, Keulemans YC, et al.: Wait-and-see policy or laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile-duct stones: a randomised trial. Lancet 2002, 360:761–765.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. McAlister VC, Davenport E, Renouf E: Cholecystectomy deferral in patients with endoscopic sphincterotomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007, (4):CD006233.

  28. Archibald JD, Love JR, McAlister VC: The role of prophylactic cholecystectomy versus deferral in the care of patients after endoscopic sphincterotomy. Can J Surg 2007, 50:19–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Cappell MS: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with endoscopic sphincterotomy for symptomatic choledocholithiasis after recent myocardial infarction. Am J Gastroenterol 1996, 91:1827–1831.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Prat F, Tennenbaum R, Ponsot P, et al.: Endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with liver cirrhosis. Gastrointest Endosc 1996, 43:127–131.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Park DH, Kim MH, Lee SK, et al.: Endoscopic sphincterotomy vs. endoscopic papillary balloon dilation for choledocholithiasis in patients with liver cirrhosis and coagulopathy. Gastrointest Endosc 2004, 60:180–185.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Bergman JJ, Rauws EA, Fockens P, et al.: Randomised trial of endoscopic balloon dilatation versus endoscopic sphincterotomy for removal of bile duct stones. Lancet 1997, 349:1124–1129.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Disario JA, Freeman ML, Bjorkman DJ, et al.: Endoscopic balloon dilation compared with sphincterotomy for extraction of bile duct stones. Gastroenterology 2004, 127:1291–1299.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Weinberg BM, Shindy W, Lo S: Endoscopic balloon sphincter dilation (sphincteroplasty) versus sphincterotomy for common bile duct stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006, (4):CD004890.

  35. Baron TH, Harewood GC: Endoscopic balloon dilation of the biliary sphincter compared to endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy for removal of common bile duct stones during ERCP: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. Am J Gastroenterol 2004, 99:1455–1460.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Ersoz G, Tekesin O, Ozutemiz AO, et al.: Biliary sphincterotomy plus dilation with a large balloon for bile duct stones that are difficult to extract. Gastrointest Endosc 2003, 57:156–159.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Maydeo A, Bandari S: Balloon sphincteroplasty for removing difficult bile duct stones. Endoscopy 2007, 39:958–961.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Heo JH, Kang DH, Jung HJ, et al.: Endoscopic sphincterotomy plus large-balloon dilation versus endoscopic sphincterotomy for removal of bile-duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc 2007, 66:720–726.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Minami A, Hirose S, Nomoto T, Hayakawa S: Small sphincterotomy combined with papillary dilation with large balloon permits retrieval of large stones without mechanical lithotripsy. World J Gastroenterol 2007, 13:2179–2182.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Attasaryanya S, Sherman S: Balloon dilation of the papilla after sphincterotomy: rescue therapy for difficult bile duct stones. Endoscopy 2007, 39:1023–1025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Uchida N, Ezaki T, Hirabayashi S, et al.: Endoscopic lithotomy of common bile duct stones with sublingual nitroglycerin and guidewire. Am J Gastroenterol 1997, 92:1440–1443.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Ibuki Y, Kudo M, Todo A: Endoscopic retrograde extraction of common bile duct stones with drip infusion of isosorbide dinitrate. Gastrointest Endosc 1992, 38:178–180.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Cipolletta L, Costamagna G, Bianco MA, et al.: Endoscopic mechanical lithotripsy of difficult common bile duct stones. Br J Surg 1997, 84:1407–1409.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Garg PK, Tandon RK, Ahuja V, et al.: Predictors of unsuccessful mechanical lithotripsy and endoscopic clearance of large bile duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc 2004, 59:601–605.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Chang WH, Chu CH, Wang TE, et al.: Outcome of simple use of mechanical lithotripsy of difficult common bile duct stones. World J Gastroenterol 2005, 11:593–596.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Binmoeller KF, Bruckner M, Thonke F, et al.: Treatment of difficult bile duct stones using mechanical, electrohydraulic and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Endoscopy 1993, 25:201–206.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Adamek HE, Maier M, Jakobs R, et al.: Management of retained bile duct stones: a prospective open trial comparing extracorporeal and intracorporeal lithotripsy. Gastrointest Endosc 1996, 44:40–47.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Hochberger J, Tex S, Miass J, et al.: Management of difficult common bile duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2003, 13:623–634.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Neuhaus H, Zillinger C, Born P, et al.: Randomized study of intracorporeal laser lithotripsy versus extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy for difficult bile duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc 1998, 47:327–334.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Sackman M, Holl J, Sauter GH, et al.: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for clearance of bile duct stones resistant to endoscopic extraction. Gastrointest Endosc 2001, 53:27–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Ellis RD, Jenkins AP, Thompson RP, et al.: Clearance of refractory bile duct stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for clearance of refractory bile duct stones. Gut 2000, 47:728–731.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Jain SK, Stein R, Bhuva M, et al.: Pig tail stents. An alternative in the treatment of difficult bile duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc 2000, 52:490–493.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. McHenry L, Lehman GA: Difficult bile duct stones. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol 2006, 9:123–132.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Chan AC, Ng EK, Chung SC, et al.: Common bile duct stones become smaller after endoscopic biliary stenting. Endoscopy 1998, 30:356–359.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Maxton DG, Tweedle DE, Martin DF: Retained common bile duct stones after endoscopic sphincterotomy: temporary and long term treatment with biliary stenting. Gut 1995, 36:446–449.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Anselmi M, Acuña JC, Del Valle A, Gemmato AM: Endoscopic biliary stents for the temporary management of choledocholithiasis [in Spanish]. Rev Med Chil 2006, 134:721–725.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Emmett DS, Mallat DB: Double-balloon ERCP in patients who have undergone Roux-en-Y surgery: a case series. Gastrointest Endosc 2007, 66:1038–1041.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Lee SK, Seo DW, Myung SJ, et al.: Percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopic treatment for hepatolithiasis: an evaluation of long-term results and risk factors for recurrence. Gastrointest Endosc 2001, 53:318–323.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Dickey W: Parallel cannulation technique et ERCP rendezvous. Gastrointest Endosc 2006, 63:686–687.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Georgetown University Hospital, 3800 Reservoir Road Northwest, Washington, DC, 20007, USA

    Firas Al-Kawas

Authors
  1. Naveen Gupta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Vijay Poreddy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Firas Al-Kawas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Firas Al-Kawas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gupta, N., Poreddy, V. & Al-Kawas, F. Endoscopy in the management of choledocholithiasis. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 10, 169–176 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-008-0039-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-008-0039-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation