Skip to main content
Log in

Solid state biliary manometry catheter: Impact on diagnosis and post-study pancreatitis

  • Published:
Current Gastroenterology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Perfusion manometry of the sphincter of Oddi has been the standard for the investigation of patients with presumed sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD). Micro-transducer manometry (MTM) of the sphincter of Oddi represents an alternative to perfusion manometry. The technical success and reproducibility of MTM are as good as for perfusion manometry. Current data suggest that the upper limit for normal of basal sphincter of Oddi pressures measured with MTM lies at approximately 35 mm Hg. Pancreatitis risk after MTM in patients with SOD compares favorably with that after perfusion manometry. Low cost and ease of handling make MTM of the sphincter of Oddi an attractive alternative.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

  1. Behar J, Corazziari E, Guelrud M. et al.: Functional Gall-bladder and sphincter of Oddi disorders. Gastroenterology 2006, 130:1498–1509.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cohen S, Bacon BR, Berlin JA, et al.: NIH State of the Sciences Conference on ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 2002, 56:803–809.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Albert MB, Steinber WM, Irani SK: Severe acute pancreatitis complicating sphincter of Oddi manometry. Gastrointest Endosc 1988, 34:342–345.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. King CE, Kalvaria I, Suinsky CA: Pancreatitis due to endoscopic biliary manometry: proceed with caution. Gastroenterology 1988, 94:227.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rolny P, Anderberg B, Ihse I, et al.: Pancreatitis after sphincter of Oddi manometry. Gut 1990, 31:821–824.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wehrmann T, Wendler OG, Jung M, Caspary WF: Risk factors of endoscopic manometry in patients with suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 1997, 122:808–814.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Maldonado ME, Brady PG, Mamel JJ, Robinson B: Incidence of pancreatitis in patients undergoing sphincter of Oddi manometry. Am J Gastroenterol 1999, 94:387–390.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Freeman M, Nelson DB, Sherman S, et al.: Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med 1996, 35:908–918.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sherman S, Hawes RH, Troiano FP, Lehman GA: Pancreatitis following bile duct sphincter of Oddi manometry: utility of the aspirating catheter. Gastrointest Endosc 1992, 38:347–350.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sherman S, Troiano FP, Hawes RH, et al.: Sphincter of Oddi manometry: decreased risk of clinical pancreatitis with use of a modified aspiration catheter. Gastrointest Endosc 1990, 36:462–466.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Alfa MJ, Ilnyckyj A, MacFarlane N, et al.: Microbial overgrowth in water perfusion equipment for esophageal/rectal motility. Gastrointest Endosc 2002, 55:209–213.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tanaka M, Ikeda S: Sphincter of Oddi manometry: comparison of microtransducer and perfusion methods. Endoscopy 1988, 20(Suppl 1):184–188.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tanaka M, Ikeda S, Nakayama F: Nonoperative measurement of pancreatic and common bile duct pressures with a microtransducer catheter and effects of duodenoscopic sphincterotomy. Dig Dis Sci 1981, 26:545–552.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wehrmann T, Schmitt T, Schonfeld A, et al.: Endoscopic sphincter of Oddi manometry with a portable electronic microtransducer system: comparison with the perfusion manometry method and routine clinical application. Endoscopy 2000, 32:444–451.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Patel R, Freeman JE, Hawes RH, et al.: Catheters of sphincter of Oddi manometry: size may be important [abstract]. Gastrointest Endosc 1999, 49:80.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wehrmann T, Stergiou N, Schmitt T. et al.: Reduced risk for pancreatitis after endoscopic microtransducer manometry of the sphincter of Oddi: a randomized comparison with the perfusion manometry technique. Endoscopy 2003, 35:472–477.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Freeman M, DiSario JA, Nelson DB, et al.: Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective, multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2001, 54:425–434.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cotton PB: ERCP is most dangerous for people who need it least [editorial]. Gastrointest Endosc 2001, 54:425–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rashdan A, Fogel EL, McHenry L Jr, et al.: Improved stent characteristics for prophylaxis of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004, 2:322–329.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Baillie J: Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction: overdue for an overhaul. Am J Gastroenterol 2005, 100:1217–1220.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Till Wehrmann MD, PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Frenz, M.B., Wehrmann, T. Solid state biliary manometry catheter: Impact on diagnosis and post-study pancreatitis. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 9, 171–174 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-007-0013-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-007-0013-4

Keywords

Navigation