Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Pancreatoscopy: Present and future role

  • Published:
Current Gastroenterology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Current imaging modalities do not allow for direct access to the pancreatic duct. Because of this limitation, diagnosis and assessment of pancreatic diseases require radiographic imaging and cytologic analysis. Although many of these techniques have excellent specificity for the detection of pancreatic cancer, they offer no therapeutic capabilities and are relatively poor in early detection of cancer and in differentiating chronic pancreatitis from malignancy, particularly when the conditions coexist. Currently available cholangioscopes are too large to access the pancreatic duct without sphincterotomy or balloon dilation, increasing the risk of instrumentation trauma to the pancreas. Novel, dedicated pancreatoscopes have recently been developed and are under investigation in clinical trials. Preliminary evidence suggests that these new technologies allow for direct visualization of the pancreatic ducts, with the potential for forceps biopsy in suspected malignancy and endotherapy for pancreatic calculi. Future and ongoing clinical trials will better define the utility and roles of these new endoscopy tools.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

  1. Jemal A, Tiwari RC, Murray T, et al.: Cancer statistics, 2004. CA Cancer J Clin 2004, 54:8–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Freelove R, Walling AD: Pancreatic cancer: diagnosis and management. Am Fam Physician 2006, 73:485–492.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sohn TA, Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, et al.: Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas: an increasingly recognized clinicopathologic entity. Ann Surg 2001, 234:313–321.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Eloubeidi MA, Hawes RH: Mucinous tumors of the exocrine pancreas. Cancer Control 2000, 7:445–451.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mukai H, Yasuda K, Nakajima M: Differential diagnosis of mucin-producing tumors of the pancreas by intraductal ultrasonography and peroral pancreatoscopy. Endoscopy 1998, 30(Suppl 1):A99–A102.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yamao K, Nakamura T, Suzuki T, et al.: Endoscopic diagnosis and staging of mucinous cystic neoplasms and intraductal papillary-mucinous tumors. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2003, 10:142–146.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Yamaguchi T, Hara T, Tsuyuguchi T, et al.: Peroral pancreatoscopy in the diagnosis of mucin-producing tumors of the pancreas. Gastrointest Endosc 2000, 52:67–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Li D, Xie K, Wolff R, Abbruzzese JL: Pancreatic cancer. Lancet 2004, 363:1049–1057.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lim JE, Chien MW, Earle CC: Prognostic factors following curative resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a population-based, linked database analysis of 396 patients. Ann Surg 2003, 237:74–85.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Klinkenbijl JH, Jeekel J, Sahmoud T, et al.: Adjuvant radiotherapy and 5-fluorouracil after curative resection of cancer of the pancreas and periampullary region: phase III trial of the EORTC gastrointestinal tract cancer cooperative group. Ann Surg 1999, 230:776–782.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Goh BK, Tan YM, Chung YF: Utility of fusion CT-PET in the diagnosis of small pancreatic carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2005, 11:3800–3802.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kwon RS, Scheiman JM: New advances in pancreatic imaging. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2006, 22:512–519.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kinney TP, Lai R, Freeman ML: Endoscopic approach to acute pancreatitis. Rev Gastroenterol Disord 2006, 6:119–135.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Adler DG, Lichtenstein D, Baron TH, et al.: The role of endoscopy in patients with chronic pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc 2006, 63:933–937.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kodama T, Tatsumi Y, Kozarek RA, Riemann JF: Direct pancreatoscopy. Endoscopy 2002, 34:653–660.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ramsay D, Marshall M, Song S, et al.: Identification and staging of pancreatic tumours using computed tomography, endoscopic ultrasound and mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Australas Radiol 2004, 48:154–161.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Maguchi H: The roles of endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis of pancreatic tumors. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2004, 11:1–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Borbath I, Van Beers BE, Lonneux M, et al.: Preoperative assessment of pancreatic tumors using magnetic resonance imaging, endoscopic ultrasonography, positron emission tomography and laparoscopy. Pancreatology 2005, 5:553–561.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dewitt J, Devereaux BM, Lehman GA, et al.: Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound and computed tomography for the preoperative evaluation of pancreatic cancer: a systematic review. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006, 4:717–725.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hocke M, Schulze E, Gottschalk P, et al.: Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound in discrimination between focal pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2006, 12:246–250.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Afify AM, al-Khafaji BM, Kim B, Scheiman JM: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of the pancreas. Diagnostic utility and accuracy. Acta Cytol 2003, 47:341–348.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Eloubeidi MA, Jhala D, Chhieng DC, et al.: Yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy in patients with suspected pancreatic carcinoma. Cancer 2003, 99:285–292.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Klapman JB, Chang KJ, Lee JG, Nguyen P: Negative predictive value of endoscopic ultrasound in a large series of patients with a clinical suspicion of pancreatic cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 2005, 100:2658–2661.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Qian X, Hecht JL: Pancreatic fine needle aspiration. A comparison of computed tomographic and endoscopic ultrasonographic guidance. Acta Cytol 2003, 47:723–726.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Volmar KE, Vollmer RT, Jowell PS, et al.: Pancreatic FNA in 1000 cases: a comparison of imaging modalities. Gastrointest Endosc 2005, 61:854–861.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sperti C, Pasquali C, Di Prima F, et al.: Percutaneous CT-guided fine needle aspiration cytology in the differential diagnosis of pancreatic lesions. Ital J Gastroenterol 1994, 26:126–131.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Horwhat JD, Paulson EK, McGrath K, et al.: A randomized comparison of EUS-guided FNA versus CT or US-guided FNA for the evaluation of pancreatic mass lesions. Gastrointest Endosc 2006, 63:966–975.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Farrell JJ: Diagnosing pancreatic malignancy in the setting of chronic pancreatitis: is there room for improvement? Gastrointest Endosc 2005, 62:737–741.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Varadarajulu S, Tamhane A, Eloubeidi MA: Yield of EUS-guided FNA of pancreatic masses in the presence or the absence of chronic pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc 2005, 62:728–736.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lai R, Stanley MW, Bardales R, et al.: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic duct aspiration: diagnostic yield and safety. Endoscopy 2002, 34:715–720.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Pugliese V, Pujic N, Saccomanno S, et al.: Pancreatic intraductal sampling during ERCP in patients with chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer: cytologic studies and k-ras-2 codon 12 molecular analysis in 47 cases. Gastrointest Endosc 2001, 54:595–599.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Van Laethem JL, Vertongen P, Deviere J, et al.: Detection of c-Ki-ras gene codon 12 mutations from pancreatic duct brushings in the diagnosis of pancreatic tumours. Gut 1995, 36:781–787.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Vandervoort J, Soetikno RM, Montes H, et al.: Accuracy and complication rate of brush cytology from bile duct versus pancreatic duct. Gastrointest Endosc 1999, 49:322–327.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Logrono R, Kurtycz DF, Molina CP, et al.: Analysis of false-negative diagnoses on endoscopic brush cytology of biliary and pancreatic duct strictures: the experience at 2 university hospitals. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2000, 124:387–392.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Macken E, Drijkoningen M, Van Aken E, Van Steenbergen W: Brush cytology of ductal strictures during ERCP. Acta Gastroenterol Belg 2000, 63:254–259.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Gress TM: Molecular diagnosis of pancreatobiliary malignancies in brush cytologies of biliary strictures. Gut 2004, 53:1727–1729.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. McGuire DE, Venu RP, Brown RD, et al.: Brush cytology for pancreatic carcinoma: an analysis of factors influencing results. Gastrointest Endosc 1996, 44:300–304.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. DeWitt J, McGreevy K, LeBlanc J, et al.: EUS-guided Trucut biopsy of suspected nonfocal chronic pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc 2005, 62:76–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Varadarajulu S, Fraig M, Schmulewitz N, et al.: Comparison of EUS-guided 19-gauge Trucut needle biopsy with EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration. Endoscopy 2004, 36:397–401.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Kubota Y, Takaoka M, Tani K, et al.: Endoscopic transpapillary biopsy for diagnosis of patients with pancreaticobiliary ductal strictures. Am J Gastroenterol 1993, 88:1700–1704.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Sugiyama M, Atomi Y, Wada N, et al.: Endoscopic transpapillary bile duct biopsy without sphincterotomy for diagnosing biliary strictures: a prospective comparative study with bile and brush cytology. Am J Gastroenterol 1996, 91:465–467.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Schoefl R, Haefner M, Wrba F, et al.: Forceps biopsy and brush cytology during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for the diagnosis of biliary stenoses. Scand J Gastroenterol 1997, 32:363–368.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Atia GN, Brown RD, Alrashid A, et al.: The role of pancreatoscopy in the preoperative evaluation of intraductal papillary mucinous tumor of the pancreas. J Clin Gastroenterol 2002, 35:175–179.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Yamaguchi T, Shirai Y, Ishihara T, et al.: Pancreatic juice cytology in the diagnosis of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas: significance of sampling by peroral pancreatoscopy. Cancer 2005, 104:2830–2836.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Hara T, Yamaguchi T, Ishihara T, et al.: Diagnosis and patient management of intraductal papillary-mucinous tumor of the pancreas by using peroral pancreatoscopy and intraductal ultrasonography. Gastroenterology 2002, 122:34–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Chaparala RP, Patel R, Guthrie JA, et al.: Solitary main pancreatic ductal calculus of possible biliary origin causing acute pancreatitis. JOP 2005, 6:445–448.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Sarles H, Bernard JP, Gullo L: Pathogenesis of chronic pancreatitis. Gut 1990, 31:629–632.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Guda NM, Partington S, Freeman ML: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the management of chronic calcific pancreatitis: a meta-analysis. JOP 2005, 6:6–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Dite P, Ruzicka M, Zboril V, Novotny I: A prospective, randomized trial comparing endoscopic and surgical therapy for chronic pancreatitis. Endoscopy 2003, 35:553–558.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Farrell JJ, Bounds BC, Al-Shalabi S, et al.: Single-operator duodenoscope-assisted cholangioscopy is an effective alternative in the management of choledocholithiasis not removed by conventional methods, including mechanical lithotripsy. Endoscopy 2005, 37:542–547.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Awadallah NS, Chen YK, Piraka C, et al.: Is there a role for cholangioscopy in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis? Am J Gastroenterol 2006, 101:284–291.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Piraka C, Awadallah NS, Chen YK, et al.: Cholangioscopy (CP) with electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL) in patients with difficult bile duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc 2005, 61:AB217.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Arya N, Nelles SE, Haber GB, Kim YI, Kortan PK: Electrohydraulic lithotripsy in 111 patients: a safe and effective therapy for difficult bile duct stones. Am J Gastroenterol 2004, 99:2330–2334.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Howell DA, Dy RM, Hanson BL, et al.: Endoscopic treatment of pancreatic duct stones using a 10F pancreatoscope and electrohydraulic lithotripsy. Gastrointest Endosc 1999, 50:829–833.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Lehman GA: Role of ERCP and other endoscopic modalities in chronic pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc 2002, 56:S237–S240.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Delhaye M, Arvanitakis M, Verset G, et al.: Long-term clinical outcome after endoscopic pancreatic ductal drain-age for patients with painful chronic pancreatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004, 2:1096–1106.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Shah RJ, Langer DA, Antillon MR, Chen YK: Pancreatoscopy with electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL): primary or adjunctive therapy for pancreatic stones? Gastrointest Endosc 2004, 59:AB204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Uehara H, Nakaizumi A, Tatsuta M, et al.: Diagnosis of carcinoma in situ of the pancreas by peroral pancreatoscopy and pancreatoscopic cytology. Cancer 1997, 79:454–461.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Kaneko T, Nakao A, Nomoto S, et al.: Intraoperative pancreatoscopy with the ultrathin pancreatoscope for mucin-producing tumors of the pancreas. Arch Surg 1998, 133:263–267.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Kodama T, Tatsumi Y, Sato H, et al.: Initial experience with a new peroral electronic pancreatoscope with an accessory channel. Gastrointest Endosc 2004, 59:895–900.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Kodama T, Sato H, Horii Y, et al.: Pancreatoscopy for the next generation: development of the peroral electronic pancreatoscope system. Gastrointest Endosc 1999, 49:366–371.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Kodama T, Koshitani T, Sato H, et al.: Electronic pancreatoscopy for the diagnosis of pancreatic diseases. Am J Gastroenterol 2002, 97:617–622.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Kodama T, Abe M, Sato H, et al.: A case of pseudotumorous pancreatitis that presented unique pancreatoscopic findings with the peroral electronic pancreatoscope. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2003, 18:108–111.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Chen YK: Preclinical characterization of the SpyGlass peroral cholangiopancreatoscopy system for direct access, visualization and biopsy. Gastrointest Endosc 2007, 65:303–311.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Chen YK, Pleskow DKL: Results from the first human use clinical series utilizing a new peroral cholangiopancreatoscopy system (Spyglass Direct Visualization System). Gastrointest Endosc 2006, 63:AB88.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Chen YK, Pleskow D: Six month results from a first human use series utilizing a new peroral cholangiopancreatoscopy system (SpyGlass Direct Visualization System). Gut 2006, 38(Suppl 2):A313.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Press Release. Olympus America, Inc. January 23, 2006. Available at http://www.olympusamerica.com/msg_section/msg_PressDetails.asp?pressNo=449. Accessed 1/4/07.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center Anschutz Centers for Advanced Medicine, MS F735, 1635 N. Ursula Street, Room OP6710, P.O. Box 6510, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA

    Yang K. Chen MD

Authors
  1. Yang K. Chen MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yang K. Chen MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, Y.K. Pancreatoscopy: Present and future role. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 9, 136–143 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-007-0008-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-007-0008-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation