Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Esophageal impedance recording: Clinical utility and limitations

  • Published:
Current Gastroenterology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Multichannel intraluminal impedance (MII) is a new technique available for the evaluation of esophageal bolus transit and reflux similar to barium swallow, but without the hazards of radiation exposure. Combined MII and pH monitoring (MII-pH) allows evaluation of the nature and pH of the refluxate and the proximal extent of a reflux event. Thus, MII-pH is useful in evaluation of nonacid reflux in patients with persistent typical or atypical symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease that are refractory to acid suppression therapy. Additionally, combined MII and esophageal manometry (MII-EM) affords concurrent assessment of esophageal function (bolus transit) and motility. Therefore, it provides a more complete esophageal function test than esophageal manometry alone. The few limitations of impedance monitoring include the complexity of interpreting the tracings and the lack of data in the diseased population. However, continued improvements in the software and increasing studies in different patient populations will aid in overcoming these limitations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

  1. Vaezi MF, Shay SS: New techniques in measuring nonacidic esophageal reflux. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001, 13:255–264.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sifrim D, Holloway R, Silny J, et al.: Acid, nonacid, and gas reflux in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease during ambulatory 24-hour pH-impedance recordings. Gastroenterology 2001, 120:1588–1598.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sifrim D, Silny J, Holloway RH, et al.: Patterns of gas and liquid reflux during transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxation: a study using intraluminal electrical impedance. Gut 1999, 44:47–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Silny J: Intraluminal multiple electric impedance procedure for measurement of gastrointestinal motility. J Gastrointest Motil 1991, 3:151–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Blom D, Mason RJ, Balaji NS, et al.: Esophageal bolus transport identified by simultaneous multichannel intraluminal impedance and manofluoroscopy. Gastroenterology 2001, 120:P103.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tutuian R, Vela MF, Shay SS, et al.: Multichannel intraluminal impedance in esophageal function testing and gastroesophageal reflux monitoring. J Clin Gastroenterol 2003, 37:206–215. This article provides a comprehensive review on MII-pH and MII-EM testing methods and clinical utility.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Silny J, Knigge KP, Fass J, et al.: Verification of the intraluminal multiple electrical impedance measurement for recording of gastrointestinal motility. J Gastrointest Motil 1993, 5:107–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Simren M, Silny J, Holloway R, et al.: Relevance of ineffective oesophageal motility during oesophageal acid clearance. Gut 2003, 52:784–790.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Shay SS, Sifrim D, Tutuian R, et al.: Multichannel intraluminal impedance (MII) in the evaluation of patients with persistent GERD symptoms despite proton pump inhibitors (PPI): a multicenter study. Gastroenterology 2003, 124(Suppl 1):A537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. DeVault KR, Castell DO: Updated guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. The Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology. Am J Gastroenterol 2005, 100:190–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Shay SS, Eggli D, Johnson LF: Simultaneous esophageal pH monitoring and scintigraphy during the postprandial period in patients with severe reflux esophagitis. Dig Dis Sci 1991, 36:558–564.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sifrim D, Holloway R, Silny J, et al.: Composition of the postprandial refluxate in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2001, 96:647–655.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sifrim D, Castell D, Dent J, et al.: Gastro-oesophageal reflux monitoring: review and consensus report on detection and definitions of acid, non-acid, and gas reflux. Gut 2004, 53:1024–1031. This is an international consensus report on various diagnostic tools available for evaluation of acid and nonacid reflux including impedance monitoring. It provides evidence-based analysis of different techniques and recommendations on their clinical use.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Shay S, Tutuian R, Sifrim D, et al.: Twenty-four hour ambulatory simultaneous impedance and pH monitoring: a multicenter report of normal values from 60 healthy volunteers. Am J Gastroenterol 2004, 99:1037–1043. This multicenter trial established the normative data for MII-pH on healthy volunteers not on acid-suppressive therapy. The proposed normal values for MII-pH are shown in Table 1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Vela MF, Camacho-Lobato L, Srinivasan R, et al.: Simultaneous intraesophageal impedance and pH measurement of acid and nonacid gastroesophageal reflux: effect of omeprazole. Gastroenterology 2001, 120:1599–1606.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Skopnik H, Silny J, Heiber O, et al.: Gastroesophageal reflux in infants: evaluation of a new intraluminal impedance technique. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1996, 23:591–598.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Wenzl TG, Schenke S, Peschgens T, et al.: Association of apnea and nonacid gastroesophageal reflux in infants: Investigations with the intraluminal impedance technique. Pediatr Pulmonol 2001, 31:144–149.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Peter CS, Sprodowski N, Bohnhorst B, et al.: Gastroesophageal reflux and apnea of prematurity: no temporal relationship. Pediatrics 2002, 109:8–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rosen R, Nurko S: The importance of multichannel intraluminal impedance in the evaluation of children with persistent respiratory symptoms. Am J Gastroenterol 2004, 99(12):2452–2458.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lazenby JP, Harding SM: Chronic cough, asthma, and gastroesophageal reflux. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2000, 2:217–223.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Tack J, Koek G, Demedts I, et al.: Gastroesophageal reflux disease poorly responsive to single-dose proton pump inhibitors in patients without Barrett’s esophagus: acid reflux, bile reflux, or both? Am J Gastroenterol 2004, 99:981–988.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Vaezi MF: ’Refractory GERD’: acid, nonacid, or not GERD? Am J Gastroenterol 2004, 99:989–990.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. xRichter JE: Ear, nose and throat and respiratory manifestations of gastro-esophageal reflux disease: an increasing conundrum. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004, 16:837–845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Shay SS, Bomeli S, Richter J: Multichannel intraluminal impedance accurately detects fasting, recumbent reflux events and their clearing. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2002, 283:G376-G383.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Tamhankar AP, Peters JH, Portale G, et al.: Omeprazole does not reduce gastroesophageal reflux: new insights using multichannel intraluminal impedance technology. J Gastrointest Surg 2004, 8:888–896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Vaezi MF, Hicks DM, Abelson TI, et al.: Laryngeal signs and symptoms and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD): a critical assessment of cause and effect association. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2003, 1:333–344.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kawamura O, Aslam M, Rittmann T, et al.: Physical and pH properties of gastroesophagopharyngeal refluxate: a 24-hour simultaneous ambulatory impedance and pH monitoring study. Am J Gastroenterol 2004, 99:1000–1010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Park W, Vaezi MF: Is reflux laryngitis refractory to high dose PPI therapy caused by persistent acid or non-acid reflux? Gastroenterology 2005, in press.

  29. Shay S: Esophageal impedance monitoring: the ups and downs of a new test. Am J Gastroenterol 2004, 99:1020–1022. This article provides a good summary of clinical use and limitations of MII-pH and MII-EM.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Tutuian R, Vela MF, Balaji NS, et al.: Esophageal function testing with combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and manometry: multicenter study in healthy volunteers. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2003, 1:174–182. This study of MII-EM established normative data on healthy volunteers. The proposed normal values for MII-EM are shown in Table 2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Tutuian R, Castell DO: Combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and manometry clarifies esophageal function abnormalities: study in 350 patients. Am J Gastroenterol 2004, 99:1011–1019. This is the first study to evaluate MII-EM on symptomatic patients referred for esophageal function testing. This study shows clinical usefulness of MII for evaluating functional esophageal abnormalities associated with abnormal manometry. In this study, bolus transit abnormalities were primarily associated with esophageal body pressure defects more than isolated LES abnormalities.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Tutuian R, Castell DO: Clarification of the esophageal function defect in patients with manometric ineffective esophageal motility: studies using combined impedance-manometry. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004, 2:230–236.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Richter JE, Wu WC, Johns DN, et al.: Esophageal manometry in 95 healthy adult volunteers: variability of pressures with age and frequency of ’abnormal’ contractions. Dig Dis Sci 1987, 32:583–592.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Kahrilas PJ, Dodds WJ, Hogan WJ: Effect of peristaltic dysfunction on esophageal volume clearance. Gastroenterology 1988, 94:73–80.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Zentilin P, Dulbecco P, Savarino E, et al.: Combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH-metry: a novel technique to improve detection of gastro-oesophageal reflux literature review. Dig Liver Dis 2004, 36:565–569. This review article addresses MII-pH clinical use and limitations.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Sifrim D, Holloway RH, Tack J, et al.: Impedance patterns at the gastroesophageal junction and distal esophagus in patients with Barrett’s esophagus [abstract]. Gastroenterology 2000, 118:A488.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, A30, Center for Swallowing and Esophageal Disorders, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, 44195, Cleveland, OH, USA

    Woosuk Park MD & Michael F. Vaezi MD, PhD

Authors
  1. Woosuk Park MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael F. Vaezi MD, PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Park, W., Vaezi, M.F. Esophageal impedance recording: Clinical utility and limitations. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 7, 182–189 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-005-0032-y

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-005-0032-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation