Abstract
Between 1996 and 1998, several small international studies were conducted in which pathologists in group settings were asked to identify various cancers from previously prepared slides. It was hoped that these sessions would lead to international consensus with regard to terminology and help to explain the previously noted differences in diagnoses reported between Western and Japanese practitioners. This article reviews the findings of the various groups and their implications for practicing gastroenterologists.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References and Recommended Reading
Schlemper RJ, Itabashi M, Kato, et al.: Differences in diagnostic criteria for gastric carcinoma between Japanese and Western pathologists. Lancet 1997, 349:1725–1729. Original article reporting the results of the first meeting in Japan in 1996. It sparked the international debate and served as a model for most subsequent studies based on the circulation of slides and the comparison of diagnoses of Japanese and Western pathologists.
Rugge M, Cassaro M, Farinati F, et al.: Diagnosis of gastric carcinoma in Japan and western countries. Lancet 1997, 350:448.
Stolte M: Diagnosis of gastric carcinoma in Japan and western countries. Lancet 1997, 350:448.
Sakamoto J, Yasue M: Do Japanese statistics on gastric carcinoma need to be revised? Lancet 1997, 349:1711–1712.
Schlemper RJ, Itabashi M, Kato Y, et al.: Differences in the diagnostic criteria used by Japanese and Western pathologists to diagnose colorectal carcinoma. Cancer 1998, 82:60–69.
Schlemper RJ, Dawsey SM, Itabashi M, et al.: Differences in diagnostic criteria for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma between Japanese and Western pathologists. Cancer 2000, 88:996–1006.
Schlemper RJ, Borchard F, Dixon MF, et al.: International comparability of the pathological diagnosis for early cancer of the digestive tract: Munich meeting. J Gastroenterol 2000, 35 (suppl 12):102–110.
Rugge M, Correa P, Dixon MF, et al.: Gastric dysplasia: the Padova international classification. Am J Surg Pathol 2000, 24:167–176. An account of the background and methodology used to reach the Padova classification. Although the statistics are not as clearly detailed as they could be, the article presents a good overview of the process that led to and followed the Padova meeting. It also discusses why the authors perceive the need to reach an international agreement on this issue.
Schlemper RJ, Riddell RH, Kato Y and others: The Vienna classification of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia. Gut 2000, 47:251–255. Report on the Vienna workshop. For the modified, more clinically relevant classification developed at the workshop, consult Schlemper et al. [17].
Landis JR, Koch GG: An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers. Biometrics 1977, 33:363–374.
Lauwers GY, Shimizu M, Correa P, et al.: Evaluation of gastric biopsies for neoplasia: differences between Japanese and Western pathologists. Am J Surg Pathol 1999, 23:511–518.
Riddell RH, Iwafuchi M: Problems arising from eastern and western classification systems for gastrointestinal dysplasia and carcinoma: are they resolvable? Histopathology 1998, 33:197–202.
Lewin KJ: Nomenclature problems of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia. Am J Surg Pathol 1998, 22:1043–1047. A brief, well-written, and sensible article on a proposal by a seasoned pathologist for a uniform classification of epithelial dysplasia for the entire gastrointestinal tract.
Lewin KJ, Appelman HD: Tumors of the Esophagus and Stomach. Washington, DC: Armed Forces Institute of Pathology; 1996:1–468.
Riddell RH: East meets West: what is early cancer? Can J Gastroenterol 1999, 13:495–497.
Lauwers GY, Riddell RH: Gastric epithelial dysplasia. Gut 1999, 45:784–790.
Schlemper RJ, Kato Y, Stolte M: Diagnostic criteria for gastrointestinal carcinoma in Japan and Western countries: proposal for a new classification system of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2000, 15:C52-C60. Recapitulation of the Vienna workshop with the most recent proposal for a clinically relevant modified classification.
Bowers JZ: When the Twain Meet. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press; 1980.
Nardone G, Staibano S, Rocco A, et al.: Effect of Helicobacter pylori infection and its eradication on cell proliferation, DNA status, and oncogene expression in patients with chronic gastritis. Gut 1999, 44:789–799.
Wu TT, Watanabe T, Heitmiller R, et al.: Genetic alterations in Barrett esophagus and adenocarcinomas of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction region. Am J Pathol 1998, 153:287–294.
Jass JR, Iino H, Ruszkiewicz A, et al.: Neoplastic progression occurs through mutator pathways in hyperplasic polyposis of the colorectum. Gut 2000, 47:43–49.
Fogt F, Urbanski SJ, Sanders ME, et al.: Distinction between dysplasia-associated lesion or mass (DALM) and adenoma in patients with ulcerative colitis. Hum Pathol 2000, 31:288–291.
Schlemper RJ, Kato Y, Stolte M: Well-differentiated adenocarcinoma or dysplasia of the gastric epithelium: rationale for a new classification system. Verh Dtsch Ges Pathol 1999, 83:62–70.
Stolte M: Diagnosis of gastric carcinoma: Japanese fairy tales or Western deficiency? Virchows Arch 1999, 434:279–280. An insightful editorial that recounts the initial reactions to Schlemper's article and cautions against quick and easy judgments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Genta, R.M. Dysplasia east and west. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2, 465–470 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-000-0010-3
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-000-0010-3