The Evolving Role of the Cardiologist in the Management of Type 2 Diabetes

Abstract

Purpose of Review

To evaluate the treatment of type 2 diabetes from a cardiologist’s view.

Recent Findings

A new era in the treatment of type 2 diabetes began for the cardiologist in 2015 with the publication of the EMPA-REG outcome trial finding a significant reduction in CV death with empagliflozin (oral sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 [SGLT2] inhibitor) in patients with type 2 diabetes at increased cardiovascular risk. Shortly thereafter, the injectable glucagon-like peptide agonists (GLP-1) liraglutide and semaglutide found a significant reduction in composite major cardiovascular events (CV death, non-fatal MI, or stroke). Both classes have demonstrated significant renal protection when added to usual care. Moreover, there may be some exciting new benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors for patients with heart failure. These research studies are underway.

Summary

These two new classes of cardiovascular drugs for type 2 diabetes usher in a new era for the cardiologist who sees greater than 50% of patients with diabetes. The off-target effect of these agents is different as with all new cardiovascular compounds. While safety profiles in these populations are consistent with the known effects of these classes, new off-target effects have been seen with some agents in this class. Ongoing collaboration between cardiologists and other care providers remains important in the implementation of the evidence and care of patients with type 2 diabetes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. 1.

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. New CDC report: more than 100 million Americans have diabetes or prediabetes. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2017/p0718-diabetes-report.html. Accessed 18 July.

  2. 2.

    National Diabetes Statistic Report, 2017. Estimates of diabetes and its burden in the United States. Available from https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pdfs/data/statistics/national-diabetes-statistics-report.pdf. Accessed 30 August.

  3. 3.

    Savage PD, Banzer JA, Balady GJ, Ades PA. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome in cardiac rehabilitation/secondary preventions programs. Am Heart J. 2005;149:627–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2004.07.037.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Gyberg V, De Bacquer D, De Backer G, Jennings C, Kotseva K, Mellbin L, et al. Patients with coronary artery disease and diabetes need improved management: a report from the EUROASPIRE IV survey: a registry from the EuroObservational Research Programme of the European Society of Cardiology. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2015;14:133. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-015-0296-y.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Yusuf S, Hawken S, Ounpuu S, Dans T, Avezum A, Lanas F, et al. Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case-control study. Lancet. 2004;364:937–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17018-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    • Oellgaard J, Gaede P, Rossing P, Rorth R, Kober L, Parving HH, et al. Reduced risk of heart failure with intensified multifactorial intervention in individuals with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria: 21 years of follow-up in the randomised Steno-2 study. Diabetologia. 2018;61:1724–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-018-4642-y. This study is important because it continues to find significant benefits in global risk reduction.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Gaede P, Oellgaard J, Carstensen B, Rossing P, Lund-Anderson H, Parving HH, et al. Years of life gained by multifactorial intervention in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and microalbuminuria: 21 years follow-up on the Steno-2 randomised trial. Diabetologia. 2016;59:2298–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-016-4065-6.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Farkouh ME, Domanski M, Sleeper LA, Siami FS, Dangas G, Mack M, et al. Strategies for multivessel revascularization in patients with diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2012;357:2375–84. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1211585.

  9. 9.

    Dangas GD, Farkouh ME, Sleeper LA, Yang M, Schoos MM, Macaya C, et al. Long-term outcome of PCI versus CABG in insulin and non-insulin-treated diabetic patients: results from the FREEDOM trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64:1189–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.06.1182.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Lancet. 1998;12:837–53.

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    ADVANCE Collaborative Group, Patel A, MacMahon S, Chalmers J, Neal B, Billot L, et al. Intensive blood glucose control and vascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:2560–72. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0802987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Ismail-Beigi F, Craven T, Banerji MA, Basile J, Calles J, Cohen RM, et al. Effect of intensive treatment of hyperglycaemia on microvascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes: an analysis of the ACCORD randomised trial. Lancet. 2010;376:419–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60576-4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Duckworth W, Abraira C, Moritz T, Red D, Emanuele N, Reaven PD, et al. Glucose control and vascular complications in veterans with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:129–39. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0808431.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    • Zoungas S, Arima H, Gerstein HC, Holman RR, Woodward M, Reaven P, et al. Effects of intensive glucose control on microvascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of individual participant data from randomised controlled trials. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;5:431–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30104-3. This study addresses the importance of glucose control for microvascular events.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    ADVANCE Collaborative Group, Patel A, MacMahon S, Chalmers J, Neal B, et al. Intensive blood glucose control and vascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J. 2008;358:2560–72. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0802987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    • Conceicao J, Dores J, Araujo F, Laires PA, Carr RD, Brodovicz K, et al. Severe hypoglycaemia among patients with type 2 diabetes requiring emergency hospital admission: the Hypoglycaemia In Portugal Observational Study-Emergency Room (HIPOS-ER). Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018;20:50–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.13030. This study shows that hypoglycemia is one of the most important side effects in diabetes treatment with significant morbidity and mortality.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    • Zinman B, Wanner C, Lachin JM, Fitchett D, Bluhmki E, Hantel S, et al. Empagliflozin, cardiovascular outcomes, and mortality in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:2117–28. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1504720. This trial changed the treatment of type 2 diabetes, placing it alongside other cardiovascular agents.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    FDA briefing document: Endocrine and Metabolic Drug Advisory Committee Meeting. June 28, 2016. https://www.fda.gov/downloads/AdvisoryCommittees/UCM508422.pdf. Accessed September 10, 2018.

  19. 19.

    Dormandy JA, Charbonnel B, Eckland DJ, Erdmann E, Massi-Benedetti M, Moules IK, et al. Secondary prevention of macrovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes in the PROactive Study (PROspective pioglitAzone Clinical Trial In macroVascular Events): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;366:1279–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67528-9.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Neal B, Perkovic V, Mahaffey KW, de Zeeuw D, Fulcher G, Erondu N, et al. Canagliflozin and cardiovascular and renal events in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:644–57. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1611925.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Inzucchi SE, Iliev H, Pfarr E, Zinman B. Empagliflozin and assessment of lower-limb amputations in the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial. Diabetes Care. 2018;41:e4–5. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc17-1551.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Drucker DJ, Nauck MA. The incretin system: glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors in type 2 diabetes. Lancet. 2006;368:1696–705. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69705-5.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Marso SP, Hardy E, Han J, Wang H, Chilton RJ. Changes in heart rate associated with exenatide once weekly: pooled analysis of clinical data in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Ther. 2018;9:551–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13300-018-0370-z.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Scirica BM, Braunwald E, Raz I, Cavender MA, Morrow DA, Jarolim P, et al. Heart failure, saxagliptin, and diabetes mellitus: observations from the SAVOR-TIMI 53 randomized trial. Circulation. 2014;130:1579–88. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.010389.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Pfeffer MA, Claggett B, Diaz R, Dickstein K, Gerstein HC, Kober LV, et al. Lixisenatide in patients with type 2 diabetes and acute coronary syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:2247–57. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1509225.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Holman RR, Bethel MA, Mentz RJ, Thompson VP, Lokhnygina Y, Buse JB, et al. Effects of once-weekly exenatide on cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:1228–39. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1612917.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Marso SP, Daniels GH, Brown-Frandsen K, Kristensen P, Mann JF, Nauck MA, et al. Liraglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:311–22. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1603827.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Marso SP, Bain SC, Consoli A, Eliaschewitz FG, Jodar E, Leiter LA, et al. Semaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:1834–44. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1607141.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Bethel MA, Patel RA, Merrill P, Lokhnygina Y, Buse JB, Mentz RJ, et al. Cardiovascular outcomes with glucagon-like peptine-1 receptor agonists in patients with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018;6:105–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30412-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert J. Chilton.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Macrovascular Complications in Diabetes

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chilton, R.J., Gallegos, K.M., Silva-Cardoso, J. et al. The Evolving Role of the Cardiologist in the Management of Type 2 Diabetes. Curr Diab Rep 18, 144 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-018-1114-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • SGLT 2 inhibitors
  • GLP-1 agonist
  • Retinopathy
  • Amputations
  • Kidney protection
  • Heart failure