Quality Criteria for a Good Screening Colonoscopy
Screening for bowel cancer has been shown to reduce mortality from colorectal cancer by up to 15%. Colonoscopy is the key investigation, not only for diagnosis but also for removal of precancerous polyps. Hence, the quality of screening colonoscopy is of paramount importance for a successful screening program. In this article, we discuss the criteria that serve as benchmarks for a good screening colonoscopy, taking into account procedural details, colonoscopist skills, and accreditation.
KeywordsColonoscopy Bowel cancer Screening Quality criteria
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as:• Of importance •• Of major importance
- 2.Hol L, Van Leerdam ME, Van Ballegooijen M, et al.: Screening for colorectal cancer; randomised trial comparing guaiac-based and immunochemical faecal occult blood testing and flexible sigmoidoscopy. Gut 2009 Aug 10 (Epub ahead of print).Google Scholar
- 3.Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, et al.: Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. CA Cancer J Clin 2008, 58:130–160.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.Joint Advisory Group on Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (JAG): Guidelines for the training, appraisal and assessment of trainees in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Available at http://www.thejag.org.uk/TrainingandAccreditation/tabid/67/Default.aspx. Accessed June 2009.
- 21.Saito Y, Fukuzawa M, Matsuda T, et al.: Clinical outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection of large colorectal tumors as determined by curative resection. Surg Endosc Jun 2009 (Epub ahead of print).Google Scholar
- 23.•• Simmons DT, Harewood GC, Baron TH, et al.: Impact of endoscopist withdrawal speed on polyp yield: implications for optimal colonoscopy withdrawal time. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2007, 24:965–971. This study, along with the older one by Barclay et al. , has been used as a benchmark in the assessment of the quality of withdrawal and correlation with mucosal visualization during colonoscopy.Google Scholar
- 25.NHS National Patient Safety Agency: Rapid response report NPSA/2009/RRR012: reducing risk of harm from oral bowel cleansing solutions. Available at http://www.nrls.npsa.nhs.uk/resources/?entryid45=59869. Accessed October 2009.
- 32.Brown SR, Baraza W, Hurlstone P: Chromoscopy versus conventional endoscopy for the detection of polyps in the colon and rectum. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007, CD006439.Google Scholar
- 37.Shaukat A, Oancea C, Bond JH, et al.: Variation in detection of adenomas and polyps by colonoscopy and change over time with a performance improvement program. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009 Aug 7 (Epub ahead of print).Google Scholar
- 46.Fu KI, Sano Y, Kato S, et al.: Chromoendoscopy using indigo carmine dye spraying with magnifying observation is the most reliable method for differential diagnosis between non-neoplastic and neoplastic colorectal lesions: a prospective study. Endoscopy 2004, 36:1089–1093.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 48.•• Swan MP, Bourke MJ, Alexander S, et al.: Large refractory colonic polyps: is it time to change our practice? A prospective study of the clinical and economic impact of a tertiary referral colonic mucosal resection and polypectomy service. Gastrointest Endosc 2009 Sep 11 (Epub ahead of print). This is an interesting study assessing the clinical and economic impact of advanced endoscopic therapy.Google Scholar