Skip to main content
Log in

Redefining the role of antiarrhythmic drugs in the management of ventricular arrhythmias

  • Clinical Trials Review
  • Published:
Current Cardiology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Singh BN: Acute management of ventricular arrhythmias: role of antiarrhythmic agents. Pharmacotherapy 1977, 2(Pt 2):56S-64S.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Desai AD, Chun S, Sung RJ: The role of intravenous amiodarone in the management of cardiac arrhythmias. Ann Intern Med 1997, 127:294–303.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Echt DS, Liebson PR, Mitchell LB, et al., and the CAST investigators: Mortality and Morbidity in patients receiving encainide, flecainide or placebo. The Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial. N Engl J Med 1991, 324:781–788.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Waldo AL, Camm AJ, deRuyter H, et al., for the SWORD investigators: Effect of d-sotalol on mortality in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after recent and remote myocardial infarction. The SWORD investigators. Survival with oral d-sotalol. Lancet 1996, 348:7–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Friedman PL, Stevenson WG: Proarrhythmia. Am J Cardiol 1998, 82:50N-58N.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. The AVID investigators: A comparison of antiarrhythmic drug therapy with implantable defibrillators in patients resuscitated from near fatal ventricular arrhythmias. N Engl J Med 1997, 337:1576–1583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cappato R: Secondary prevention of sudden death: the Dutch Study, the Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillator Trial, the Cardiac Arrest Study Hamburg, and the Canadian Implantable Defibrillator Study. Am J Cardiol 1999, 83(5B):68D-73D.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cardiac Arrest in Seattle: Conventional Versus Amiodarone Drug Evaluation (the CASCADE study). Am J Cardiol 1991, 67:578–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. The ESVEM Investigators: Determinants of predicted efficacy of antiarrhythmic drugs in the electrophysiologic study versus electrocardiographic monitoring trial. Circulation 1993, 87:323–329.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Haverkamp W, Martinez-Rubio A, Hief C, et al.: Efficacy and safety of dl-sotalol in patients with ventricular tachycardia and in survivors of cardiac arrest. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997, 30:487–495.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Pacifico A, Hohnloser SH, Williams JH, et al.: Prevention of Implantable-Defibrillator shocks by treatment with sotalol. N Engl J Med 1999, 340:1855–1862.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Seidl K, Hauer B, Schwick NG, et al.: Comparison of metoprolol and sotalol in preventing ventricular tachyarrhythmias after the implantation of a cardioverter/defibrillator. Am J Cardiol 1998, 82:744–748.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Klein LS, Shih HT, Hackett FK, et al.: Radiofrequency catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia in patients without structural heart disease. Circulation 1992, 85:1666–1674.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Stevenson WG, Khan H, Sager P, et al.: Identification of reentry circuit sites during catheter mapping and radiofrequency ablation of ventricular tachycardia late after myocardial infarction. Circulation 1993, 88:1647–1670.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mehta, D. Redefining the role of antiarrhythmic drugs in the management of ventricular arrhythmias. Curr Cardiol Rep 1, 265–267 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-999-0048-2

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-999-0048-2

Keywords

Navigation