Skip to main content
Log in

Guidance of Transcatheter Mitral and Tricuspid Valve Repair by Echocardiography

  • Echocardiography (JM Gardin and AH Waller, Section Editors)
  • Published:
Current Cardiology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Transcatheter valve therapies for mitral and tricuspid regurgitation are alternative methods to more invasive surgical treatment in candidates with high or prohibitive surgical risk. Echocardiography is the primary imaging modality for patient selection, pre-procedural planning, intra-procedural guidance, and post-procedural follow-up.

Recent Findings

This article outlines the applications of transcatheter valve repair therapy for mitral and tricuspid regurgitation based on the current cardiovascular guidelines and a growing body of evidence.

Summary

In this review, we provide a stepwise approach echocardiography in the guidance of the MitraClip device as currently the only FDA-approved transcatheter edge-to-edge repair device.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Gertz ZM, Raina A, Mountantonakis SE, et al. The impact of mitral regurgitation on patients undergoing catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. EP Europace. 2011;13:1127–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Oikawa M, Yoshihisa A, Sato Y, et al. Prognostic impact of moderate mitral regurgitation on hospitalized heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction: a report from the JASPER registry. Heart Vessels. 2020;35:1087–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gillinov AM, Mihaljevic T, Blackstone EH, et al. Should patients with severe degenerative mitral regurgitation delay surgery until symptoms develop? Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;90:481–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hahn RT, Asch F, Weissman NJ, et al. Impact of tricuspid regurgitation on clinical outcomes: the COAPT trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76:1305–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Nath J, Foster E, Heidenreich PA. Impact of tricuspid regurgitation on long-term survival. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43:405–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. •• Feldman T, Kar S, Elmariah S, et al. Randomized comparison of percutaneous repair and surgery for mitral regurgitation: 5-year results of EVEREST II. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66:2844–54. Findings from this study suggest that patients with primary mitral regurgitation treated with percutaneous repair had comparably low rates of re-do surgery for mitral valve dysfunction with either percutaneous or surgical therapy during follow up beyond the first year after treatment suggesting durability of both therapies.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. •• Stone GW, Lindenfeld J, Abraham WT, et al. Transcatheter mitral-valve repair in patients with heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:2307–18. Findings of this study suggest that in patients with heart failure and moderate-to-severe or severe secondary mitral regurgitation who remained symptomatic despite the use of maximal doses of guideline-directed medical therapy, transcatheter mitral-valve repair resulted in a lower rates of hospitalization for heart failure and all-cause mortality within two years of follow-up than medical therapy alone.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. van Rosendael PJ, Kamperidis V, Kong WK, et al. Computed tomography for planning transcatheter tricuspid valve therapy. Eur Heart J. 2017;38:665–74.

    Google Scholar 

  9. • Thériault-Lauzier P, Mylotte D, Dorfmeister M, et al. Quantitative multi-slice computed tomography assessment of the mitral valvular complex for transcatheter mitral valve interventions part 1: systematic measurement methodology and inter-observer variability. EuroIntervention. 2016;12:e1011–20. This article describes the proper use of multi-slice computed tomography for assestment of mitral valvular complex for transcatheter mitral valve repair.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. • Zoghbi WA, Adams D, Bonow RO, et al. Recommendations for noninvasive evaluation of native valvular regurgitation: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography developed in collaboration with the society for cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2017;30:303–71. Concensus document on nonivasive evaluation of native valvular regurgitiaton accompanied by a number of tutorials and illustrative case studies on evaluation of valvular regurgitation posted on the following website (https://www.asecho.org/vrcases.html).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. • Enriquez A, Saenz LC, Rosso R, et al. Use of Intracardiac Echocardiography in interventional cardiology: working with the anatomy rather than fighting it. Circulation. 2018;137:2278–94. This article provides a guidance on how to conduct a comprehensive ICE survey and summarizes the main applications of ICE in a variety of structural procedures.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. •• Otto CM, Nishimura RA, Bonow RO, et al. 2020 ACC/AHA guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2021;143:e35–71. 2020 CC/AHA guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease including current recommendations on percutaneous and surgical therapies of valvular heart disease.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mauri L, Foster E, Glower DD, et al. 4-year results of a randomized controlled trial of percutaneous repair versus surgery for mitral regurgitation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62:317–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sorajja P, Vemulapalli S, Feldman T, et al. Outcomes with transcatheter mitral valve repair in the United States: an STS/ACC TVT registry report. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70:2315–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. • Obadia JF, Messika-Zeitoun D, Leurent G, et al. Percutaneous repair or medical treatment for secondary mitral regurgitation. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:2297–306. Findings of this study suggest no benefits of percutaneous mitral valve repair in addition to receiving medical therapy in patients with severe secondary mitral regurgitation based on the rates of composite outcome of death or unplanned hospitalization for heart failure at 1 year of follow-up. These findings should be critically appraised together with the results of COAPT trial (study under reference 7.).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pibarot P, Delgado V, Bax JJ. MITRA-FR vs. COAPT: lessons from two trials with diametrically opposed results. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2019;20:620–624.

  17. Ruf TF, Hahn RT, Kreidel F et al. Short-term clinical outcomes of transcatheter tricuspid valve repair with the third-generation MitraClip XTR system. JACC: Cardiovasc Interv 2021;14:1231–1240.

  18. Nickenig G, Kowalski M, Hausleiter J, et al. Transcatheter treatment of severe tricuspid regurgitation with the edge-to-edge MitraClip technique. Circulation. 2017;135:1802–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Nickenig G, Weber M, Lurz P, et al. Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair for reduction of tricuspid regurgitation: 6-month outcomes of the TRILUMINATE single-arm study. Lancet. 2019;394:2002–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lurz P, Stephan von Bardeleben R, Weber M et al. Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair for treatment of tricuspid regurgitation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2021;77:229–239.

  21. Feldman T, Foster E, Glower DD, Kar S, Rinaldi MJ, Fail PS, Smalling RW, Siegel R, Rose GA, Engeron E, Loghin C, Trento A, Skipper ER, Fudge T, Letsou GV, Massaro JM, Mauri L. Percutaneous repair or surgery for mitral regurgitation. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1395–406.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hahn RT, Zamorano JL. The need for a new tricuspid regurgitation grading scheme. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;18:1342–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. • Hahn RT. State-of-the-art review of echocardiographic imaging in the evaluation and treatment of functional tricuspid regurgitation. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2016;9. This article provides a guidance on how to use transesophageal echocardiography for evaluation of tricuspid valve morphology and function, and discuss imaging requirements for transcatheter treatment of functional tricuspid regurgitation.

  24. Sherif MA, Paranskaya L, Yuecel S, Kische S, Thiele O, D’Ancona G, Neuhausen-Abramkina A, Ortak J, Ince H, Öner A. MitraClip step by step; how to simplify the procedure. Neth Heart J. 2017;25:125–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Cockburn J, Fragkou P, Hildick-Smith D. Development of mitral stenosis after single MitraClip insertion for severe mitral regurgitation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;83:297–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tamburino C, Ussia GP, Maisano F, et al. Percutaneous mitral valve repair with the MitraClip system: acute results from a real world setting. Eur Heart J. 2010;31:1382–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Zoghbi WA, Asch FM, Bruce C, et al. Guidelines for the evaluation of valvular regurgitation after percutaneous valve repair or replacement: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Japanese Society of Echocardiography, and Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2019;32:431–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abhishek Sharma.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of Topical Collection on Echocardiography

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (MP4 8679 KB) Video 1. Intracardiac echocardiography (left side) and transesophageal echocardiography (right side) intrans-gastric short axis view showing a positioning of device arms grasping oftricuspid valve.

Supplementary file2 (MP4 4255 KB) Video 2. Post-procedural transesophageal echocardiography evaluation ofresidual mitral regurgitation (right side) and tricuspid regurgitation (leftside) after successful deployment of the device.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brankovic, M., Sharma, A. Guidance of Transcatheter Mitral and Tricuspid Valve Repair by Echocardiography. Curr Cardiol Rep 24, 1901–1906 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-022-01808-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-022-01808-z

Keywords

Navigation