Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Computed Tomography Imaging of Aortic Dissections with Endovascular Treatment Considerations

  • Cardiac PET, CT, and MRI (P Cremer, Section Editors)
  • Published:
Current Cardiology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

In the present review, we discuss the role of CT imaging in the management of aortic dissection, with a particular emphasis on endovascular treatment considerations.

Recent Findings

Computed tomography imaging is a fundamental tool in the diagnosis and management of acute and chronic aortic dissection. Its diagnostic accuracy and high resolution contribute to and guide operative strategy.

Summary

Persistent high mortality for patients who develop aortic dissections suggests a need for innovative diagnostic and treatment strategies. In the recent era, considerable advances have been made in computed tomography (CT) image acquisition, processing, and analysis as well as endovascular technologies with expanded roles in the treatment of aortic diseases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. DeMartino RR, Sen I, Huang Y, Bower TC, Oderich GS, Pochettino A, et al. Population-based assessment of the incidence of aortic dissection, intramural hematoma, and penetrating ulcer, and its associated mortality from 1995 to 2015. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018;11(8):e004689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Evangelista A, Isselbacher EM, Bossone E, Gleason TG, Eusanio MD, Sechtem U, et al. Eagle KA; IRAD Investigators. Insights from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection: a 20-year experience of Collaborative Clinical Research. Circulation. 2018;137(17):1846–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Andersen ND, Benrashid E, Ross AK, Pickett LC, Smith PK, Daneshmand MA, et al. The utility of the aortic dissection team: outcomes and insights after a decade of experience. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 May;5(3):194–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mariscalco G, Maselli D, Zanobini M, Ahmed A, Bruno VD, Benedetto U, et al. Aortic centres should represent the standard of care for acute aortic syndrome. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2018;25(1_suppl):3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Carroll BJ, Schermerhorn ML, Manning WJ. Imaging for acute aortic syndromes. Heart. 2020;106(3):182–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Schoenhagen P, Roselli EE, Harris CM, Eagleton M, Menon V. Online network of subspecialty aortic disease experts: Impact of “cloud” technology on management of acute aortic emergencies. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;152(1):39–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bhave NM, Nienaber CA, Clough RE, Eagle KA. Multimodality imaging of thoracic aortic diseases in adults. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;11(6):902–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. • Lombardi JV, Hughes GC, Appoo JJ, Bavaria JE, Beck AW, Cambria RP, et al. Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) and Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) reporting standards for type B aortic dissections. Ann Thorac Surg. 2020;109(3):959–81 This society statement document discusses important classification and nomenclature for type B dissections. These reporting standards will facilitate more granular analyses that may shape how to manage different variants of type B aortic pathology.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kreibich M, Siepe M, Beyersdorf F. Aortic dissection reconsidered: type, entry site, malperfusion classification adding clarity and enabling outcome prediction. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2020;30(3):451–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Moon MC, Greenberg RK, Morales JP, Martin Z, Lu Q, Dowdall JF, et al. Computed tomography-based anatomic characterization of proximal aortic dissection with consideration for endovascular candidacy. J Vasc Surg. 2011;53(4):942–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sobocinski J, O'Brien N, Maurel B, Bartoli M, Goueffic Y, Sassard T, et al. Endovascular approaches to acute aortic type A dissection: a CT-based feasibility study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011;42(4):442–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Roselli EE, Hasan SM, Idrees JJ, Aftab M, Eagleton MJ, Menon V, et al. Inoperable patients with acute type A dissection: are they candidates for endovascular repair? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2017;25(4):582–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. • Roselli EE, Idrees JJ, Johnston DR, Eagleton MJ, Desai MY, Svensson LG. Zone zero thoracic endovascular aortic repair: a proposed modification to the classification of landing zones. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018;155(4):1381–9 Findings from this study discuss the complex anatomical considerations of the ascending aorta and endovascular repair of this zone.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Vallabhajosyula P, Szeto WY, Pulsipher A, Desai N, Menon R, Moeller P, et al. Antegrade thoracic stent grafting during repair of acute DeBakey type I dissection promotes distal aortic remodeling and reduces late open distal reoperation rate. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;147(3):942–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Roselli EE, Idrees JJ, Bakaeen FG, Tong MZ, Soltesz EG, Mick S, et al. Evolution of simplified frozen elephant trunk repair for acute DeBakey type I dissection: midterm outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg. 2018;105(3):749–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Leshnower BG, Keeling WB, Duwayri YM, Jordan WD Jr, Chen EP. The “thoracic endovascular aortic repair-first” strategy for acute type A dissection with mesenteric malperfusion: initial results compared with conventional algorithms. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019;158(6):1516–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yang B, Norton EL, Rosati CM, Wu X, Kim KM, Khaja MS, et al. Managing patients with acute type A aortic dissection and mesenteric malperfusion syndrome: a 20-year experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019;158(3):675–687.e4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lombardi JV, Gleason TG, Panneton JM, Starnes BW, Dake MD, Haulon S, et al. STABLE II clinical trial on endovascular treatment of acute, complicated type B aortic dissection with a composite device design. J Vasc Surg. 2020;71(4):1077–1087.e2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Woo EY, Carpenter JP, Jackson BM, Pochettino A, Bavaria JE, Szeto WY, et al. Left subclavian artery coverage during thoracic endovascular aortic repair: a single-center experience. J Vasc Surg. 2008;48(3):555–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Canaud L, Ozdemir BA, Patterson BO, Holt PJE, Loftus IM, Thompson MM. Retrograde aortic dissection after thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Ann Surg. 2014;260(2):389–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pantaleo A, Jafrancesco G, Buia F, Leone A, Lovato L, Russo V, et al. Distal stent graft-induced new entry: an emerging complication of endovascular treatment in aortic dissection. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;102:527–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Nienaber CA, Kische S, Rousseau H, Eggebrecht H, Rehders TC, Kundt G, et al. Ince H; INSTEAD-XL trial. Endovascular repair of type B aortic dissection: long-term results of the randomized investigation of stent grafts in aortic dissection trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6(4):407–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ryoi O, Lin CH, Chen JM, Hsieh YK, Wang SS, Wu IH. Endovascular repair for retrograde type A intramural haematoma with intimal tear in the descending thoracic aorta. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020;60(3):386–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Levack MM, Kindzelski BA, Miletic KG, Vargo PR, Bakaeen FG, Johnston DR, et al. Adjunctive endovascular balloon fracture fenestration for chronic aortic dissection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020;7:S0022-5223(20)32711–2.

  25. Miletic KG, Kindzelski BA, Hodges KE, Beach J, Tong MZ, Bakaeen F, et al. Impact of endovascular false lumen embolization on thoracic aortic remodeling in chronic dissection. Ann Thorac Surg. 2021;111(2):495–501.

  26. Upchurch GR Jr, Escobar GA, Azizzadeh A, Beck AW, Conrad MF, Matsumura JS, et al. Society for Vascular Surgery clinical practice guidelines of thoracic endovascular aortic repair for descending thoracic aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2021;73(1S):55S–83S.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Aortic Center, Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA

    Patrick R. Vargo & Eric E. Roselli

  2. Central California Heart and Lung Surgery, Clovis, CA, USA

    Heidi Reich

Authors
  1. Patrick R. Vargo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Heidi Reich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Eric E. Roselli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick R. Vargo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Dr. Patrick reports personal fees from Edwards Lifesciences. Dr. Reich has nothing to disclose. Dr. Roselli reports personal fees from Cryolife, Terumo Aortic, Medtronic, and Cook Medical.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Cardiac PET, CT, and MRI

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vargo, P.R., Reich, H. & Roselli, E.E. Computed Tomography Imaging of Aortic Dissections with Endovascular Treatment Considerations. Curr Cardiol Rep 23, 113 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-021-01541-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-021-01541-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation