Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Quality of Diabetes Care in the USA

  • Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease (D Bruemmer, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Cardiology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the current quality of diabetes care in the USA, discuss barriers to guideline-recommended treatment adherence, and outline strategies for the improvement in care.

Recent Findings

Current treatment guidelines highlight the importance of glycemic control, use of novel medications with proven cardiovascular efficacy, and multifactorial cardiovascular risk factor intervention for the treatment of diabetes and associated complications. Albeit proven evidence for these guidelines, the vast majority of patients with diabetes remain insufficiently treated. Interventions to improve outcomes require focus on care delivery systems, physician behavior, and patient-centered approaches. De-fragmenting care systems to form collaborative, multi-specialty teams, use of standardized and comprehensive treatment algorithms, development of quality assessment tools, avoiding physician therapeutic inertia, and addressing patient barriers, including lack of perceived benefit, insufficient diabetes education and access to care, and medication costs, represent key objectives to improve diabetes care and outcomes.

Summary

Clinical research in standardized trials has proven the feasibility to reduce morbidity and mortality associated with diabetes. Implementing models of care to disseminate these encouraging research findings to the wider population and to overcome barriers to achieving guideline-recommended treatment goals should be the objective to improve our current quality of diabetes care in the USA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ACE:

Angiotensin-converting enzyme

ASCVD:

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease

CVD:

Cardiovascular disease

DSMES :

Diabetes self-management education and support strategies

GLP1-RA :

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist

HbA1c:

Hemoglobin A1c

LDL:

Low-density lipoprotein

SGLT2:

Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2

T2DM :

Type 2 diabetes

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Lin J, Thompson TJ, Cheng YJ, Zhuo X, Zhang P, Gregg E, et al. Projection of the future diabetes burden in the United States through 2060. Popul Health Metrics. 2018;16(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12963-018-0166-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Diabetes Statistics Report. 2020. Available at https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pdfs/data/statistics/national-diabetes-statistics-report.pdf.

  3. Menke A, Casagrande S, Geiss L, Cowie CC. Prevalence of and trends in diabetes among adults in the United States, 1988-2012. JAMA. 2015;314(10):1021–9. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.10029.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/National Center for Health Statistics/Division of Analysis and Epidemiology. Health, United States, 2018 - Data Finder, Table 021. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hus/2018/021.pdf.

  5. Cockrell Skinner A, Ravanbakht SN, Skelton JA, Perrin EM, Armstrong SC, Skinner C. Prevalence of obesity and severe obesity in US children. Pediatrics. 1999;141(3):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2017-4078.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Andes LJ, Cheng YJ, Rolka DB, Gregg EW, Imperatore G. Prevalence of prediabetes among adolescents and young adults in the United States, 2005-2016. JAMA Pediatr. 2020;174(2). https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.4498.

  7. Low Wang CC, Hess CN, Hiatt WR, Goldfine AB. Clinical update: cardiovascular disease in diabetes mellitus. Circulation. 2016;133(24):2459–502. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.022194.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration; Sarwar N, Gao P, Kondapally Seshasai SR, Gobin R, Kaptoge S, Di Angelantonio E, Ingelsson E, Lawlor DA, Selvin E, Stampfer M, Stehouwer CDA, Lewington S, Pennells L, Thompson A, Sattar N, White IR, Ray KK, Danesh J. Diabetes mellitus, fasting blood glucose concentration, and risk of vascular disease: a collaborative meta-analysis of 102 prospective studies. Lancet. 2010;375(9733):2215–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60484-9.

  9. Rawshani A, Rawshani A, Franzén S, Eliasson B, Svensson AM, Miftaraj M, et al. Mortality and cardiovascular disease in type 1 and type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(15):1407–18. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1608664.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Donahoe SM, Stewart GC, McCabe CH, Mohanavelu S, Murphy SA, Cannon CP, Antman EM. Diabetes and mortality following acute coronary syndromes. JAMA. 2007;298(7):765–75. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.298.7.765.

  11. Baena-Díez JM, Peñafiel J, Subirana I, Ramos R, Elosua R, Marín-Ibañez A, et al. Risk of cause-specific death in individuals with diabetes: a competing risks analysis. Diabetes Care. 2016;39(11):1987–95. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc16-0614.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Benjamin EJ, Muntner P, Alonso A, Bittencourt MS, Callaway CW, Carson AP, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2019 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2019;139(10):e56–e528. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000659.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gregg EW, Hora I, Benoit SR. Resurgence in diabetes-related complications. JAMA. 2019;321(19):1867–8. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.3471.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 9. Pharmacologic approaches to glycemic treatment: standards of medical care in diabetes—2020. Diabetes Care. 2020;43:S98–S110. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc20-S009.

  15. Klein R, Klein BEK, Moss SE, Davis MD, Demets DL. Glycosylated hemoglobin predicts the incidence and progression of diabetic retinopathy. JAMA. 1988;260(19):2864–71. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1988.03410190112033.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Selvin E, Marinopoulos S, Berkenblit G, Rami T, Brancati FL, Powe NR, Golden SH. Meta-analysis: glycosylated hemoglobin and cardiovascular disease in diabetes mellitus. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141(6):421–31. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-141-6-200409210-00007

  17. Raghavan S, et al. Diabetes mellitus–related all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in a national cohort of adults. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8(4). https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.011295.

  18. Brown A, Reynolds LR, Bruemmer D. Intensive glycemic control and cardiovascular disease: an update. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2010;7(7):369–75. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrcardio.2010.35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Garber AJ, Abrahamson MJ, Barzilay JI, Blonde L, Bloomgarden ZT, Bush MA, et al. Consensus statement by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American College of Endocrinology on the comprehensive type 2 diabetes management algorithm - 2017 executive summary. Endocr Pract. 2017;23(2):207–38. https://doi.org/10.4158/EP161682.CS.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. National Committee for Quality Assurance/ HEDIS Measures and Technical Resources. Comprehensive diabetes care. Available at https://www.ncqa.org/hedis/measures/comprehensive-diabetes-care/. Accessed 2020.

  21. Stolker JM, Sun D, Conaway DG, Jones PG, Masoudi FA, Peterson PN, et al. Importance of measuring glycosylated hemoglobin in patients with myocardial infarction and known diabetes mellitus. Am J Cardiol. 2010;105(8):1090–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.12.010.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Stolker JM, Spertus JA, McGuire DK, Lind M, Tang F, Jones PG, et al. Relationship between glycosylated hemoglobin assessment and glucose therapy intensification in patients with diabetes hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction. Diabetes Care. 2012;35(5):991–3. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc11-1839.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Brunzell JD, Davidson M, Furberg CD, Goldberg RB, Howard BV, Stein JH, et al. Lipoprotein management in patients with cardiometabolic risk. Consensus Conference Report From the American Diabetes Association and the American College of Cardiology Foundation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51(15):1512–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2008.02.034.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gaede P, Vedel P, Larsen N, Jensen GV, Parving HH, Pedersen O. Multifactorial intervention and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(5):383–93. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa021778. The Steno-2 trial revealed that intensive, multifactorial intervention in patients with type 2 diabetes reduces the risk of death from cardiovascular causes and of cardiovascular events.

  25. Rawshani A, Rawshani A, Franzén S, Sattar N, Eliasson B, Svensson AM, Zetheliu B, Miftaraj M, McGuire DK, Rosengren A, Gudbjörnsdottir S. Risk factors, mortality, and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(7):633–44. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1800256. This registry data revealed that in patients with type 2 diabetes who have five risk factors (elevated glycated hemoglobin level, elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level, albuminuria, smoking, and elevated blood pressure) controlled to target levels, there is little or no excess risk for death, myocardial infarction, or stroke compared to the general population.

  26. Lingvay I, Leiter LA. Use of GLP-1 Ras in cardiovascular disease prevention: a practical guide. Circulation. 2018;137(21):2200–2. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.032759.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lopaschuk GD, Verma S. Mechanisms of cardiovascular benefits of sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors: a state-of-the-art review. JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2020;5(6):632–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacbts.2020.02.004.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Marx N, Grant PJ, Cosentino F. Compelling evidence for SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists as first-line therapy in patients with diabetes at very high/high cardiovascular risk. Eur Heart J. 2020;41(2):329–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz853.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang X, Gregg EW, Williamson DF, Barker LE, Thomas W, Bullard KM, et al. A1C level and future risk of diabetes: a systematic review. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(7):1665–73. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc09-1939.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Vistisen D, Witte DR, Brunner EJ, Kivimäki M, Tabák A, Jørgensen ME, et al. Risk of cardiovascular disease and death in individuals with prediabetes defined by different criteria: the whitehall II study. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(4):899–906. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc17-2530.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Comprehensive medical evaluation and assessment of comorbidities: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2020. Diabetes Care. 2020;43:S37–47. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc20-S004.

  32. Kiefer MM, Silverman JB, Young BA, Nelson KM. National patterns in diabetes screening: data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2005–2012. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30(5):612–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-014-3147-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Arnold SV, Lipska KJ, Li Y, McGuire DK, Goyal A, Spertus JA, Kosiborod M. Prevalence of glucose abnormalities among patients presenting with an acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J. 2014;168(4):466–470.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2014.06.023.

  34. Arnold SV, Stolker JM, Lipska KJ, Jones PG, Spertus JA, McGuire DK, et al. Recognition of incident diabetes mellitus during an acute myocardial infarction. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2015;8(3):260–7. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.114.001452.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Suskin N, McKelvie RS, Burns RJ, Latini R, Pericak D, Probstfield J, Rouleau JL, Sigouin S, Solymoss C B, Tsuyuki R, White M, Yusuf S. Glucose and insulin abnormalities relate to functional capacity in patients with congestive heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2000;21(16):1368–75. https://doi.org/10.1053/euhj.1999.2043.

  36. Bartnik M, Rydén L, Ferrari R, Malmberg K, Pyörälä K, Simoons M, Standl E, Soler-Soler J, Ohrvik J; Euro Heart Survey Investigators. The prevalence of abnormal glucose regulation in patients with coronary artery disease across Europe: the Euro Heart Survey on diabetes and the heart. Eur Heart J. 2004;25(21):1880–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ehj.2004.07.027.

  37. Herman WH, Hoerger TJ, Brandle M, Hicks K, Sorensen S, Zhang P, et al. The cost-effectiveness of lifestyle modification or metformin in preventing type 2 diabetes in adults with impaired glucose tolerance. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142(5):323–32. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-142-5-200503010-00007.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Newman JD, Berger JS, Ladapo JA. Underuse of medications and lifestyle counseling to prevent cardiovascular disease in patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2019;42(5):E75–6. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc18-1554.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Dai M, Peabody MR, Peterson LE, Mainous AG. Adherence to clinical guidelines for monitoring diabetes in primary care settings. Fam Med Community Health. 2018;6(4):161–7. https://doi.org/10.15212/FMCH.2018.0121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kirkman MS, Williams SR, Caffrey HH, Marrero DG. Impact of a program to improve adherence to diabetes guidelines by primary care physicians. Diabetes Care. 2002;25(11):1946–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Chen Y, Sloan FA , Yashkin AP. Adherence to diabetes guidelines for screening, physical activity and medication and onset of complications and death. J Diabetes Complicat. 2015;29(8):1228–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2015.07.005.Adherence.

  42. 1. Improving care and promoting health in populations: standards of medical care in diabetes-2020. Diabetes Care. 2020;43:S7–S13. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc20-S001.

  43. 10. Cardiovascular disease and risk management: standards of medical care in diabetes-2019. Diabetes Care. 2019;42:S103–23. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc19S010.

  44. Garber AJ, Handelsman Y, Grunberger G, Einhorn D, Abrahamson MJ, Barzilay JI, et al. Consensus statement by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American College of Endocrinology on the comprehensive type 2 diabetes management algorithm - 2020 executive summary. Endocr Pract. 2020;26(1):107–39. https://doi.org/10.4158/CS-2019-0472.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Casagrande SS, Fradkin JE, Saydah SH, Rust KF, Cowie CC. The prevalence of meeting A1C, blood pressure, and LDL goals among people with diabetes, 1988-2010. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(8):2271–9. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc12-2258.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Nally LM, Sherr JL, Van Name MA, Patel AD, Tamborlane WV. Pharmacologic treatment options for type 1 diabetes: what’s new? Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2019;12(5):471–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512433.2019.1597705.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Arnold SV, de Lemos JA, Rosenson RS, Ballantyne CM, Liu Y, Mues KE, Alam S, Elliott-Davey M, Bhatt DL, Cannon CP, Kosiborod M; GOULD Investigators. Use of guideline-recommended risk redduction strategies among patients with diabetes and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Circulation. 2019;140(7):618–20. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.041730This registry data revealed that only 6.9% of patients with diabetes and ASCVD received optimal medical management according to current guidelines for secondary prevention of ASCVD.

  48. Arnold SV, Echouffo-Tcheugui JB, Lam CSP, Inzucchi SE, Tang F, McGuire DK, et al. Patterns of glucose-lowering medication use in patients with type 2 diabetes and heart failure. Insights from the Diabetes Collaborative Registry (DCR). Am Heart J. 2018;203:25–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2018.05.016.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Effect of intensive blood-glucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34). Lancet. 1998;352(9131):854–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(98)07037-8.

  50. Douros A, Dell’Aniello S, Yu OHY, Filion KB, Azoulay L, Suissa S. Sulfonylureas as second line drugs in type 2 diabetes and the risk of cardiovascular and hypoglycaemic events: population based cohort study. BMJ. 2018;362. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k2693.

  51. Cook MN, Girman CJ, Stein PP, Alexander CM, Holman RR. Glycemic control continues to deteriorate after sulfonylureas are added to metformin among patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2005;28(5):995–1000. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.28.5.995.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Giustino G, Colantonio LD, Brown TM, Carson AP, Dai Y, Farkouh ME, et al. Titration to high-intensity statin therapy following acute myocardial infarction in patients with and without diabetes mellitus. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2018;32(5):453–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10557-018-6816-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. The TRIAD Study Group. Health systems, patients factors, and quality of care for diabetes: a synthesis of findings from the TRIAD study. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(4):940–7. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc09-1802.

  54. Tricco AC, Ivers NM, Grimshaw JM, Moher D, Turner L, Galipeau J, et al. Effectiveness of quality improvement strategies on the management of diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2012;379(9833):2252–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60480-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Papanicolas I, Woskie LR, Jha AK. Health care spending in the United States and other high-income countries. JAMA. 2018;319(10):1024–39. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.1150.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Dieleman JL, Baral R, Birger M, Bui AL, Bulchis A, Chapin A, et al. US spending on personal health care and public health, 1996-2013. JAMA. 2016;316(24):2627–46. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.16885.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Dieleman JL, Cao J, Chapin A, Chen C, Li Z, Liu A, et al. US health care spending by payer and health condition, 1996-2016. JAMA. 2020;323(9):863–84. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.0734.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. The American Diabetes Association. Economic costs of diabetes in the U.S. in 2017. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(5):917–28. https://doi.org/10.2337/dci18-0007.

  59. Enthoven AC. Integrated delivery systems: the cure for fragmentation. Am J Manag Care. 2009;15(10):S300–5.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Parchman ML, Zeber JE, Romero RR, Pugh JA. Risk of coronary artery disease in type 2 diabetes and the delivery of care consistent with the chronic care model in primary care settings: A STARNet study. Med Care. 2007;45(12):1129–34. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0b013e318148431e.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Wan EYF, Fung CSC, Jiao FF, Yu EYT, Chin WY, Fong DYT, et al. Five-year effectiveness of the multidisciplinary risk assessment and management programme-diabetes mellitus (RAMP-DM) on diabetes-related complications and health service usesd a population-based and propensity- matched cohort study. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(1):49–59. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc17-0426.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Zhou X, Siegel KR, Ng BP, Jawanda S, Proia KK, Zhang X, et al. Cost-effectiveness of diabetes prevention interventions targeting high-risk individuals and whole populations: a systematic review. Diabetes Care. 2020;43(7):1593–616. https://doi.org/10.2337/dci20-0018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Stroebel RJ, Scheitel SM, Fitz JS, Herman RA, Naessens JM, Scott CG, et al. A randomized trial of three diabetes registry implementation strategies in a community internal medicine practice. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2002;28(8):441–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1070-3241(02)28044-X.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Davidson JA. The increasing role of primary care physicians in caring for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Mayo Clin Proc. 2010;85(12 SUPPL):S3–4. https://doi.org/10.4065/mcp.2010.0466.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Young RA, Burge SK, Kumar KA, Wilson JM, Ortiz DF. A time-motion study of primary care physicians’ work in the electronic health record era. Fam Med. 2018;50(2):91–9. https://doi.org/10.22454/FamMed.2018.184803.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Beaser R, Okeke E, Neighbours J, Brown J, Ronk K, Wolyniec W. Coordinated primary and specialty care for type 2 diabetes mellitus, guidelines, and systems: an educational needs assessment. Endocr Pract. 2011;17(6):880–90. https://doi.org/10.4158/EP10398.OR.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Vigersky RA, Fish L, Hogan P, Stewart A, Kutler S, Ladenson PW, et al. The clinical endocrinology workforce: current status and future projections of supply and demand. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99(9):3112–21. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2014-2257.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Gunawan F, Nassif ME, Partridge C, Ahmad T, Kosiborod M, Inzucchi SE. Relative frequency of cardiology vs. endocrinology visits by type 2 diabetes patients with cardiovascular disease in the USA: implications for implementing evidence-based use of glucose-lowering medications. Cardiovasc Endocrinol Metab. 2020;9(2):56–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/XCE.0000000000000195.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Greenfield S, Rogers W, Mangotich M, Carney MF, Tarlov AR. Outcomes of patients with hypertension and non—insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus treated by different systems and specialties: results from the Medical Outcomes Study. JAMA. 1995;274(18):1436–44. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1995.03530180030026.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Arnold SV, Goyal A, Inzucchi SE, McGuire DK, Tang F, Mehta SN, et al. Quality of care of the initial patient cohort of the Diabetes Collaborative Registry. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6(8):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.005999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Elrashidi MY, Mohammed K, Bora PR, Haydour Q, Farah W, DeJesus R, et al. Co-located specialty care within primary care practice settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Healthcare. 2018;6(1):52–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hjdsi.2017.09.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Scanlon DP, Hollenbeak CS, Beich J, Dyer AM, Gabbay RA, Milstein A. Financial and clinical impact of team-based treatment for Medicaid enrollees with diabetes in a federally qualified health center. Diabetes Care. 2008;31(11):2160–5. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc08-0587.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. O’Reilly D, Hopkins R, Blackhouse G, Clarke P, Hux J, Tarride J-E, Dolovich L, Goeree R. Long-term cost-utility analysis of a multidisciplinary primary care diabetes management program in Ontario. Can J Diabetes. 2007;31(3):205–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1499-2671(07)13007-0.

  74. Koopman RJ, Kochendorfer KM, Moore JL, Mehr DR, Wakefield DS, Yadamsuren B, et al. A diabetes dashboard and physician efficiency and accuracy in accessing data needed for high-quality diabetes care. Ann Fam Med. 2011;9(5):398–405. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1286.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Khunti K, Gomes MB, Pocock S, Shestakova MV, Pintat S, Fenici P, et al. Therapeutic inertia in the treatment of hyperglycaemia in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018;20(2):427–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.13088.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Okemah J, Peng J, Quiñones M. Addressing clinical inertia in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a review. Adv Ther. 2018;35(11):1735–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-018-0819-5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. Phillips L S, Branch WT, Cook C B, Doyle JP, El-Kebbi IM, Gallina DL, Miller CD, Ziemer DC, Barnes CS. Clinical inertia. Ann Intern Med. 2001;135(6):825–34. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-137-6-200209170-00024.

  78. Karam SL, Dendy J, Polu S, Blonde L. Overview of therapeutic inertia in diabetes: prevalence, causes, and consequences. Diabetes Spectr. 2020;33(1):8–15. https://doi.org/10.2337/ds19-0029.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. Goodall G, Sarpong EM, Hayes C, Valentine WJ. The consequences of delaying insulin initiation in UK type 2 diabetes patients failing oral hyperglycaemic agents: a modelling study. BMC Endocr Disord. 2009;9:19. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6823-9-19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. Fu AZ, Sheehan JJ. Treatment intensification for patients with type 2 diabetes and poor glycaemic control. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2016;18(9):892–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.12683.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Folse HJ, Mukherjee J, Sheehan JJ, Ward AJ, Pelkey RL, Dinh TA, et al. Delays in treatment intensification with oral antidiabetic drugs and risk of microvascular and macrovascular events in patients with poor glycaemic control: an individual patient simulation study. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017;19(7):1006–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.12913.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Cosentino F, Grant PJ, Aboyans V, Bailey CJ, Ceriello A, Delgado V, et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases developed in collaboration with the EASD. Eur Heart J. 2020;41(2):255–323. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz486.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. McCoy RG, Dykhoff HJ, Sangaralingham L, Ross JS, Karaca-Mandic P, Montori VM, et al. Adoption of new glucose-lowering medications in the U.S. - the case of SGLT2 inhibitors: nationwide cohort study. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2019;21(12):702–12. https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2019.0213.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. Khunti K, Millar-Jones D. Clinical inertia to insulin initiation and intensification in the UK: A focused literature review. Prim Care Diabetes. 2017;11(1):3–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcd.2016.09.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Polonsky WH, Fisher L, Guzman S, Villa-Caballero L, Edelman SV. Psychological insulin resistance in patients with type 2 diabetes: The scope of the problem. Diabetes Care. 2005;28(10):2543–5. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.28.10.2543.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Peyrot M, Rubin RR, Lauritzen T, Skovlund SE, Snoek FJ, Matthews DR, et al. Resistance to insulin therapy among patients and providers: results of the cross-national Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes, and Needs (DAWN) study. Diabetes Care. 2005;28(11):2673–9. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.28.11.2673.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Zafar A, Stone MA, Davies MJ, Khunti K. Acknowledging and allocating responsibility for clinical inertia in the management of type 2 diabetes in primary care: a qualitative study. Diabet Med. 2015;32(3):407–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.12592.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Ziemer DC, Doyle JP, Barnes CS, Branch WT, Cook CB, el-Kebbi IM, et al. An intervention to overcome clinical inertia and improve diabetes mellitus control in a primary care setting: Improving Primary Care of African Americans with Diabetes (IPCAAD) 8. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(5):507–13. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.166.5.507.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Slater TA, Drozd M, Palin V, Bowles C, Waduud MA, Khatib R, et al. Prescribing diabetes medication for cardiovascular risk reduction in patients admitted with acute coronary syndromes: a survey of cardiologists’ attitudes and practice. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2020;6(3):194–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjcvp/pvz058.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. O’Keefe JH, Nassif ME, Magwire ML, O’Keefe EL, Lavie CJ. The elephant in the room: why cardiologists should stop ignoring type 2 diabetes. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2019;62(4):364–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcad.2019.08.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Funnel MM, Anderson RM. The problem with compliance in diabetes. JAMA. 2000;284(13):1709. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.284.13.1709-JMS1004-6-1

  92. Powers MA, Bardsley J, Cypress M, Duker P, Funnell MM, Hess Fischl A, Maryniuk MD, Siminerio L, Vivian E. Diabetes self-management education and support in type 2 diabetes: a joint position statement of the American Diabetes Association, the American Association of Diabetes Educators, and the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(7):1372–82. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc15-0730.

  93. 5. Facilitating behavior change and well-being to improve health outcomes: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2020. Diabetes Care. 2020;43:S48–65. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc20-S005.

  94. Li R, Shrestha SS, Lipman R, Burrows NR, Kolb LE, Rutledge S. Diabetes self-management education and training among privately insured persons with newly diagnosed diabetes — United States, 2011–2012. Centers Dis Control Prev Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2014;63(46).

  95. Heisler M, Vijan S, Anderson RM, Ubel PA, Bernstein SJ, Hofer TP. When do patients and their physicians agree on diabetes treatment goals and strategies, and what difference does it make? J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18(11):893–902. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.21132.x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  96. Davies M, Storms F, Shutler S, Bianchi-Biscay M, Gomis R; ATLANTUS Study Group. Improvement of glycemic control in subjects with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes: comparison of two treatment algorithms using insulin glargine. Diabetes Care. 2005;28(6):1282–8. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.28.6.1282.

  97. Anderson RJ, Freedland K, Clouse RE, Lustman PJ. The prevalence of comorbid depression. Diabetes Care. 2001;24(6):1069. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.24.6.1069

  98. Barnacle M, Strand MA, Werremeyer A, Maack B, Petry N. Depression Screening in Diabetes Care to Improve Outcomes: Are We Meeting the Challenge? Diabetes Educ. 2016 Oct;42(5):646–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145721716662917.

  99. Katon WJ, Lin EHB, von Korff M, Ciechanowski P, Ludman EJ, Young B, et al. Collaborative care for patients with depression and chronic illnesses. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(27):2611–20. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1003955.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  100. Chua KP, Lee JM, Conti RM. Out-of-pocket spending for insulin, diabetes-related supplies, and other health care services among privately insured US patients with type 1 diabetes. JAMA Intern Med. 2020;180(7):1012–4. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.28.6.1282.

  101. Fralick M, Kesselheim AS. The U.S. insulin crisis-rationing a lifesaving medication discovered in the 1920s. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(19):1793–5. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1909402.

  102. Luo J, Feldman R, Rothenberger SD, Hernandez I, Gellad WF. Coverage, formulary restrictions, and out-of-pocket costs for sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists in the Medicare Part D Program. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(10):e2020969. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.20969.

  103. Herkert D, Vijayakumar P, Luo J, Schwartz JI, Rabin TL, DeFilippo E, Lipska KJ. Cost-related insulin underuse among patients with diabetes. JAMA Intern Med. 2019;179:112–4. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.5008.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dennis Bruemmer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alencherry, B., Bruemmer, D. Quality of Diabetes Care in the USA. Curr Cardiol Rep 23, 73 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-021-01503-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-021-01503-5

Keywords

Navigation