The Contemporary Role of Stents and Angioplasty for the Treatment of Infrapopliteal Disease in Critical Limb Ischemia
- 179 Downloads
Purpose of Review
Critical limb ischemia (CLI) is associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and increased health care expenses. Revascularization has a central role in the treatment of CLI. Following publication of BASIL (bypass versus angioplasty in severe ischemia of the leg) trial a decade ago, an “endovascular first” approach had gained momentum and the technologies available for endovascular therapy have exponentially increased. Both the development of technology and technique, highlighted in this review, have allowed operators to treat complex infrapopliteal lesions which are central to CLI pathology.
The role of atherectomy remains controversial but for calcified lesions it has become an accepted adjunctive tool for plaque modification. The place of drug delivery technologies requires further trials. The use of a drug-coated balloon (DCB) makes intuitive sense; however, choice of excipient, lower limit of vessel size, and impact on remodeling and thrombosis remain uncertain.
The optimal treatment of infrapopliteal disease remains an area of active investigation. The endpoints in CLI trials continue to be challenging and calibration of patency in relation to wound healing remains a moving target. In addition, unaccounted variables continue to confound interpretation of CLI trials—including quality and nature of wound care, status of pedal-plantar loop patency, and management of underlying diabetes and other comorbidities. In summary, these challenges will also need to be addressed as the CLI field continues to mature in the twenty-first century.
KeywordsPeripheral artery disease Claudication Critical limb ischemia Infrapopliteal Endovascular Balloon Stent Atherectomy
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
Tarek A. Hammad and Anand Prasad declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: •Of importance •• Of major importance
- 1.Hirsch AT, Haskal ZJ, Hertzer NR, et al. ACC/AHA 2005 guidelines for the management of patients with peripheral arterial disease (lower extremity, renal, mesenteric, and abdominal aortic): executive summary a collaborative report from the American Association for Vascular Surgery/Society for Vascular Surgery, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, Society of Interventional Radiology, and the ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease) endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Society for Vascular Nursing; TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus; and Vascular Disease Foundation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47(6):1239–312.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 4.• Agarwal S, Sud K, Shishehbor MH. Nationwide trends of hospital admission and outcomes among critical limb ischemia patients: from 2003–2011. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67(16):1901–13. A contemporary and huge (over 642,000 patients) analysis which reveals outcomes of surgical and endovascular procedures in CLI. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 6.•• Menard MT, Farber A, Assmann SF, et al. Design and rationale of the best endovascular versus best surgical therapy for patients with critical limb ischemia (BEST-CLI) trial. J Am Heart Assoc 2016;5(7). This trial will hopefully address the most important question: “What is the best treatment for CLI?.” Google Scholar
- 9.Siablis D, Kraniotis P, Karnabatidis D, Kagadis GC, Katsanos K, Tsolakis J. Sirolimus-eluting versus bare stents for bailout after suboptimal infrapopliteal angioplasty for critical limb ischemia: 6-month angiographic results from a nonrandomized prospective single-center study. J Endovasc Ther. 2005;12(6):685–95.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 11.Schulte KL, Pilger E, Schellong S, et al. Primary self-EXPANDing nitinol stenting vs balloon angioplasty with optional bailout stenting for the treatment of infrapopliteal artery disease in patients with severe Intermittent claudication or critical limb ischemia (EXPAND study). J Endovasc Ther. 2015;22(5):690–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.Scheinert D, Katsanos K, Zeller T, et al. A prospective randomized multicenter comparison of balloon angioplasty and infrapopliteal stenting with the sirolimus-eluting stent in patients with ischemic peripheral arterial disease: 1-year results from the ACHILLES trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60(22):2290–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 21.• Katsanos K, Kitrou P, Spiliopoulos S, Diamantopoulos A, Karnabatidis D. Comparative effectiveness of plain balloon angioplasty, bare metal stents, drug-coated balloons, and drug-eluting stents for the treatment of infrapopliteal artery disease: systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Endovasc Ther 2016. This is a contemporary analysis of 16 randomized clinical trials of endovascular therapy of infrapopliteal PAD. Google Scholar
- 23.Siablis D, Kitrou PM, Spiliopoulos S, Katsanos K, Karnabatidis D. Paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty versus drug-eluting stenting for the treatment of infrapopliteal long-segment arterial occlusive disease: the IDEAS randomized controlled trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;7(9):1048–56.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 27.• Sarode K, Spelber DA, Bhatt DL, et al. Drug delivering technology for endovascular management of infrainguinal peripheral artery disease. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;7(8):827–39. This is a great review article highlighting and examining the technological aspects, challenges, and safety concerns of current endovascular treatment for PAD. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar