Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Surgical Treatment of Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation: Valve Repair Versus Replacement

  • Ischemic Heart Disease (D Mukherjee, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Cardiology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Ischemic mitral regurgitation (MR), which occurs in about 20–30% patients with a prior myocardial infarction, is associated with worsening heart failure and an increase in cardiovascular mortality. It should be treated surgically if certain hemodynamic severity criteria are met and in patients who continue to experience symptoms of heart failure despite optimal medical therapy. However, current guidelines do not suggest which of the available approaches to mitral valve surgery-mitral valve (MV) repair or replacement (MVR) is superior for this indication. While MV repair is reported to confer improved survival, MVR may provide higher rates of freedom from recurrent MR. This article attempts to provide the reader with a comprehensive review and comparison of current techniques of mitral valve surgery in patients with severe ischemic MR.

Recent Findings

The first randomized trial to compare MV repair versus MVR in patients with severe ischemic MR, the Cardiothoracic Surgical Trials Network (CTSN) trial, was recently concluded and reported no significant difference in the primary outcome of left ventricular end systolic volume index between the two approaches at either 1- or 2-year follow-ups.

Summary

Data comparing approaches of MV repair and MVR for ischemic MR is largely limited to small, non-randomized retrospective trials. The only randomized trial data to examine this issue suggested no difference in mortality with either MVR or MV repair; however, MVR was shown to be consistently associated with higher rates of MR recurrence. Certain echocardiographic features have been reported to predict poor outcomes with MVR and may help refine the selection of the surgical approach in the individual patient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CSTN:

Cardiothoracic Surgical Trials Network

LV:

Left ventricle

LVESVI:

Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume Index

MR:

Mitral regurgitation

MV:

Mitral valve

MVR:

Mitral valve replacement

References

Papers of Particular Interest, Published Recently, Have Been Highlighted as: • Of Importance, •• Of Major Importance

  1. 2016 Heart and stroke statistical update. available at: www.americanheart.org (accessed August 28, 2)

  2. Levine RA, Schwammenthal E. Ischemic mitral regurgitation on the threshold of a solution: from paradoxes to unifying concepts. Circulation. 2005;112:745–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Velazquez EJ, Lee KL. Deja MA, et al. Coronary-artery bypass surgery in patients with left ventricular dysfunction N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1607–16.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Castleberry AW, Williams JB, Daneshmand MA, et al. Surgical revascularization is associated with maximal survival in patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation: a 20-year experience. Circulation. 2014;129:2547–56.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Campwala SZ, Bansal RC, Wang N, et al. Mitral regurgitation progression following isolated coronary artery bypass surgery: frequency, risk factors, and potential prevention strategies. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006;29:348–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, et al. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(22):2438–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. The Joint Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version 2012). Eur Heart J. 2012;33:2451–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Santana O, Lamelas J. Surgical options of ischemic mitral regurgitation. Cardiol Rev. 2010;18:163–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Madesis A, Tsakiridis K, Zarogoulidis P, et al. Review of mitral valve insufficiency: repair or replacement. J Thorac Dis. 2014;6(Suppl 1):S39–51.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Grossi EA, Goldberg JD, LaPietra A, et al. Ischemic mitral valve reconstruction and replacement: comparison of long-term survival and complications. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;122(6):1107–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gillinov AM, Wierup PN, Blackstone EH, et al. Is repair preferable to replacement for ischemic mitral regurgitation? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;122(6):1125–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Di Salvo TG, Acker MA, Dec GW, et al. Mitral valve surgery in advanced heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:271–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. MacHaalany J, Sénéchal M, O’Connor K, et al. Early and late mortality after repair or replacement in mitral valve prolapse and functional ischemic mitral regurgitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Int J Cardiol. 2014;173:499–505.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Magne J, Sénéchal M, Dumesnil JG, et al. Ischemic mitral regurgitation: a complex multifaceted disease. Cardiology. 2009;112:244–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Acker MA, Parides MK, Perrault LP, et al. Mitral-valve repair versus replacement for severe ischemic mitral regurgitation. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:23–32. This was the first randomized trial to compare outcomes of mitral valve repair versus replacement in a cohort of severe ischemic mitral regurgitation patients conducted by the cardiothoracic surgical trials network (CSTN). Results of 1-year follow-up were reported with no difference in primary outcome of left ventricular end systolic index using either approach to mitral valve surgery.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Silbiger JJ. Mechanistic insights into ischemic mitral regurgitation: echocardiographic and surgical implications. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2011;24:707–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tibayan FA, Rodriguez F, Langer F, et al. Annular or subvalvular approach to chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;129:1266–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Carpentier A. Cardiac valve surgery—the ‘French correction’. J Thoracic Cardiovasc Surg. 1983;86:323–37.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Nicholas HT. Mitral insufficiency: treatment by polar cross-fusion of the mitral annulus fibrosus. J Thorac Surg. 1957;33(1):102–22.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Merendino KA, Thomas GI, Jesseph JE, et al. The open correction of rheumatic mitral regurgitation and/or stenosis; with special reference to regurgitation treated by posteromedial annuloplasty utilizing a pump-oxygenator. Ann Surg. 1959;150(1):5–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Kay EB, Mendelsohn D, Zimmerman HA. Evaluation of the surgical correction of mitral regurgitation. Circulation. 1961;23:813–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kwon MH, Lee LS, Cevasco M, et al. Recurrence of mitral regurgitation after partial versus complete mitral valve ring annuloplasty for functional mitral regurgitation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;146(3):616–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Spoor MT, Geltz A, Bolling SF. Flexible versus nonflexible mitral valve rings for congestive heart failure: differential durability of repair. Circulation. 2006;114(1 Suppl):I67–71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bolling SF, Pagani FD, Deeb GM, Bach DS. Intermediate-term outcome of mitral reconstruction in cardiomyopathy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998;115(2):381–6. discussion 387-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kuwahara E, Otsuji Y, Iguro Y, et al. Mechanism of recurrent/persistent ischemic/functional mitral regurgitation in the chronic phase after surgical annuloplasty: importance of augmented posterior leaflet tethering. Circulation. 2006;114(1 Suppl):I529–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Tahta SA, Oury JH, Maxwell JM, et al. Outcome after mitral valve repair for functional ischemic mitral regurgitation. J Heart Valve Dis. 2002;11(1):11–8. discussion 18-9

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. McGee EC, Gillinov AM, Blackstone EH, et al. Recurrent mitral regurgitation after annuloplasty for functional ischemic mitral regurgitation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004;128(6):916–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Calafiore AM, Refaie R, Iacò AL, et al. Chordal cutting in ischemic mitral regurgitation: a propensity-matched study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;148(1):41–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Messas E, Guerrero JL, Handschumacher MD, et al. Chordal cutting: a new therapeutic approach for ischemic mitral regurgitation. Circulation. 2001;104(16):1958–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Murashita T, Okada Y, Kanemitsu H, et al. Midterm outcomes of chordal cutting in combination with downsized ring annuloplasty for ischemic mitral regurgitation. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;20(6):1008–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Borger MA, Murphy PM, Alam A, et al. Initial results of the chordal-cutting operation for ischemic mitral regurgitation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;133(6):1483–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kron IL, Green GR, Cope JT. Surgical relocation of the posterior papillary muscle in chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;74(2):600–1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Fattouch K, Lancellotti P, Castrovinci S, et al. Papillary muscle relocation in conjunction with valve annuloplasty improve repair results in severe ischemic mitral regurgitation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;143(6):1352–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Watanabe T, Arai H, Nagaoka E, et al. Influence of procedural differences on mitral valve configuration after surgical repair for functional mitral regurgitation: in which direction should the papillary muscle be relocated? J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014;9:185.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Langer F, Kunihara T, Hell K, et al. RING+STRING: successful repair technique for ischemic mitral regurgitation with severe leaflet tethering. Circulation. 2009;120(11 Suppl):S85–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Nappi F, Lusini M, Spadaccio C, et al. Papillary muscle approximation versus restrictive annuloplasty alone for severe ischemic mitral regurgitation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67(20):2334–46. This study randomized patients with severe ischemic MR to either undersizing restrictive mitral annuloplasty or papillary muscle approximation with undersizing restrictive mitral annuloplasty in addition to complete surgical myocardial revascularization. At 5-year follow-up compared with annuloplasty only, papillary muscle approximation resulted in a beneficial effect on left ventricular remodeling (assessed by left ventricular end diastolic volume) without a significant difference in mortality or quality of life.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Mick SL, Keshavamurthy S, Gillinov AM. Mitral valve repair versus replacement. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2015;4(3):230–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. David TE, Armstrong S, Sun Z. Left ventricular function after mitral valve surgery. J Heart Valve Dis. 1995;4(Suppl 2):S175–80.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Mirabel M, Iung B, Baron G, et al. What are the characteristics of patients with severe, symptomatic, mitral regurgitation who are denied surgery? Eur Heart J. 2007;28(11):1358–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Goel SS, Bajaj N, Aggarwal B, et al. Prevalence and outcomes of unoperated patients with severe symptomatic mitral regurgitation and heart failure: comprehensive analysis to determine the potential role of MitraClip for this unmet need. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(2):185–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Whitlow PL, Feldman T, Pedersen WR, EVEREST II Investigators. Acute and 12-month results with catheter-based mitral valve leaflet repair: the EVEREST II (Endovascular Valve Edge-to-Edge Repair) High Risk Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59(2):130–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Silberman S, Oren A, Klutstein MW, et al. Does mitral valve intervention have an impact on late survival in ischemic cardiomyopathy? Isr Med Assoc J. 2006;8:17–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Bonacchi M, Prifti E, Maiani M, et al. Mitral valve surgery simultaneous to coronary revascularization in patients with end-stage ischemic cardiomyopathy. Heart Vessel. 2006;21:20–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Calafiore AM, Di Mauro M, Gallina S, et al. Mitral valve surgery for chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;77:1989–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. De Bonis M, Ferrara D, Taramasso M, et al. Mitral replacement or repair for functional mitral regurgitation in dilated and ischemic cardiomyopathy: is it really the same? Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;94:44–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Milano CA, Daneshmand MA, Rankin JS, et al. Survival prognosis and surgical management of ischemic mitral regurgitation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;86:735–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Tavakoli R, Weber A, Brunner-La Rocca H, et al. Results of surgery for irreversible moderate to severe mitral valve regurgitation secondary to myocardial infarction. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2002;21:818–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Hausmann H, Siniawski H, Hetzer R. Mitral valve reconstruction and replacement for ischemic mitral insufficiency: seven years’ follow up. J Heart Valve Dis. 1999;8:536–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Cohn LH, Rizzo RJ, Adams DH, et al. The effect of pathophysiology on the surgical treatment of ischemic mitral regurgitation: operative and late risks of repair versus replacement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1995;9:568–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Mantovani V, Mariscalco G, Leva C, et al. Long-term results of the surgical treatment of chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation: comparison of repair and prosthetic replacement. J Heart Valve Dis. 2004;13:421–8. discussion 428–429

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Vassileva CM, Boley T, Markwell S, Hazelrigg S. Meta-analysis of short-term and long-term survival following repair versus replacement for ischemic mitral regurgitation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011;39:295–303.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Rao C, Murphy MO, Saso S, et al. Mitral valve repair or replacement for ischaemic mitral regurgitation: a systematic review. Heart Lung Circ. 2011;20:555–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Goldstein D, Moskowitz AJ, Gelijns AC, et al. Two-year outcomes of surgical treatment of severe ischemic mitral regurgitation. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(4):344–53. This manuscript reports 2-year follow up results of the randomized CSTN trial which had previously randomized patients with severe ischemic MR to mitral valve repair or replacement. Mitral valve repair was associated with a significantly higher incidence of moderate or more severe recurrent MR and heart failure, with no difference in indices of left ventricular reverse remodeling compared with valve replacement

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Lio A, Miceli A, Varone E, et al. Mitral valve repair versus replacement in patients with ischaemic mitral regurgitation and depressed ejection fraction: risk factors for early and mid-term mortality. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014;19(1):64–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Hung J, Papakostas L, Tahta SA, et al. Mechanism of recurrent ischemic mitral regurgitation after annuloplasty: continued LV remodeling as a moving target. Circulation. 2004;110:II85–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Kron IL, Hung J, Overbey JR, et al. Predicting recurrent mitral regurgitation after mitral valve repair for severe ischemic mitral regurgitation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;149:752–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Timek TA, Lai DT, Tibayan F, et al. Septal-lateral annular cinching abolishes acute ischemic mitral regurgitation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002;123(5):881–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Dayan V, Soca G, Cura L, Mestres CA. Similar survival after mitral valve replacement or repair for ischemic mitral regurgitation: a meta-analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;97(3):758–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Chan V, Ruel M, Mesana TG. Mitral valve replacement is a viable alternative to mitral valve repair for ischemic mitral regurgitation: a case-matched study. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;92(4):1358–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Lorusso R, Gelsomino S, Vizzardi E, et al. Mitral valve repair or replacement for ischemic mitral regurgitation? The Italian Study on the Treatment of Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation (ISTIMIR). J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;145(1):128–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Stevenson LW, Bellil D, Grover-McKay M, et al. Effects of afterload reduction (diuretics and vasodilators) on left ventricular volume and mitral regurgitation in severe congestive heart failure secondary to ischemic or idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol. 1987;60:654–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Magne J, Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG, Sénéchal M. Continued global left ventricular remodeling is not the sole mechanism responsible for the late recurrence of ischemic mitral regurgitation after restrictive annuloplasty. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2009;22:1256–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Gelsomino S, Lorusso R, Capecchi I, et al. Left ventricular reverse remodeling after undersized mitral ring annuloplasty in patients with ischemic regurgitation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;85:1319–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Shiota M, Gillinov AM, Takasaki K, et al. Recurrent mitral regurgitation late after annuloplasty for ischemic mitral regurgitation. Echocardiography. 2011;28:161–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Crabtree TD, Bailey MS, Moon MR, et al. Recurrent mitral regurgitation and risk factors for early and late mortality after mitral valve repair for functional ischemic mitral regurgitation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;85:1537–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Gelsomino S, Lorusso R, De Cicco G, et al. Five-year echocardiographic results of combined undersized mitral ring annuloplasty and coronary artery bypass grafting for chronic ischaemic mitral regurgitation. Eur Heart J. 2008;29:231–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Haan CK, Cabral CI, Conetta DA, et al. Selecting patients with mitral regurgitation and left ventricular dysfunction for isolated mitral valve surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;78:820–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Lee AP, Acker M, Kubo SH, et al. Mechanisms of recurrent functional mitral regurgitation after mitral valve repair in nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy: importance of distal anterior leaflet tethering. Circulation. 2009;119:2606–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Onorati F, Rubino AS, Marturano D, et al. Midterm clinical and echocardiographic results and predictors of mitral regurgitation recurrence following restrictive annuloplasty for ischemic cardiomyopathy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;138:654–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Miller DC. Ischemic mitral regurgitation redux—to repair or to replace? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;122:1059–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Mihos CG, Santana O. Mitral valve repair for ischemic mitral regurgitation: lessons from the Cardiothoracic Surgical Trials Network randomized study. J Thorac Dis. 2016;8(1):E94–9. This paper reviews results of the randomized CSTN trial of mitral valve repair versus replacement for severe ischemic MR and discusses evidence supporting a pathophysiologic-guided repair strategy incorporating combined annuloplasty and subvalvular repair techniques in order to optimize outcomes of repair surgery.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Roshanali F, Vedadian A, Shoar S, et al. When to repair ischemic mitral valve regurgitation? An algorithmic approach. Eur Surg. 2013;2(45):98–105. This paper provides a useful algorithm to help select the best approach to surgical revascularization and choice of mitral valve surgery in patients suffering from surgical coronary artery disease and ischemic MR.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Kron IL, Acker MA, Adams DH, et al. The American Association for Thoracic Surgery consensus guidelines: ischemic mitral valve regurgitation. American Association for Thoracic Surgery Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation Consensus Guidelines Writing Committee. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;151(4):940–56. This is the guideline paper of the American Association of Thoracic Surgery and provides consensus recommendations on the strategy of mitral valve surgery, repair versus replacement on the basis of certain pathologic characteristics such as regurgitation jet complexity, leaflet tethering, and/ or basal dyskinesis.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Yoshida K, Okada K, Miyahara S, et al. Mitral valve replacement versus annuloplasty for treating severe functional mitral regurgitation. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;62(1):38–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Chan V, Ruel M, Mesana TG. Mitral valve replacement is a viable alternative to mitral valve repair for ischemic mitral regurgitation: a case-matched study. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;92:1358–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Maltais S, Schaff HV, Daly RC, et al. Mitral regurgitation surgery in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and ischemic mitral regurgitation: factors that influence survival. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;142(5):995–1001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Ljubacev A, Medved I, Ostrik M, et al. Mitral regurgitation and coronary artery bypass surgery: comparison of mitral valve repair and replacement. Acta Chir Belg. 2013;113(3):187–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abhishek Sharma.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Abhishek Sharma, Sahil Agrawal, Sunny Goel, and Jeffrey S. Borer declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Ischemic Heart Disease

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sharma, A., Agrawal, S., Goel, S. et al. Surgical Treatment of Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation: Valve Repair Versus Replacement. Curr Cardiol Rep 19, 3 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-017-0813-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-017-0813-6

Keywords

Navigation