Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Familial Hypercholesterolaemia in the Era of Genetic Testing

  • Cardiovascular Genomics (TL Assimes, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Cardiology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is a relatively common autosomal dominant genetic condition leading to premature ischaemic vascular disease and mortality if left untreated. Currently, a universal consensus on the diagnostic criteria of FH does not exist but the diagnosis of FH largely relies on the evaluation of low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) levels, a careful documentation of family history, and the identification of clinical features. Diagnosis based purely on lipid levels remains common but there are several limitations to this method of diagnosis both practically and in the proportion of false-negatives and false-positives detected, resulting in substantial under-diagnosis of FH. In some countries, diagnostic algorithms are supplemented with genetic testing of the index case as well as genetic and lipid testing of relatives of the index case. Such "cascade" screening of families following identification of index cases appears to not only improve the rate of diagnosis but is also cost-effective. Currently, we observe a great variation in the excess mortality among patients with FH, which likely reflects a combination of additional genetic and environmental effects on risk overlaid on the risk associated with FH. Current accepted drug therapies for FH include statins and PSCK9 inhibitors. Further work is required to evaluate the cardiovascular disease risk in patients with genetically diagnosed FH and to determine whether a risk-based approach to the treatment of FH is appropriate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Nordestgaard BG, Chapman MJ, Humphries SE, et al. Familial hypercholesterolaemia is underdiagnosed and undertreated in the general population: guidance for clinicians to prevent coronary heart disease: consensus statement of the European Atherosclerosis Society. Eur Heart J. 2013;34:3478-90a.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Watts GF, Gidding S, Wierzbicki AS, et al. Integrated guidance on the care of familial hypercholesterolaemia from the international FH foundation. Int J Cardiol. 2014;171:309–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gidding SS, Ann Champagne M, de Ferranti SD, et al. The agenda for familial hypercholesterolemia: a scientific statement from the American heart association. Circulation. 2015;132:2167–92. Detailed statement regarding the current position in FH with agenda for care of the patient and for directions of new research including limitations of the current diagnostic criteria.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bell DA, Garton-Smith J, Vickery A, et al. Familial hypercholesterolaemia in primary care: knowledge and practices among general practitioners in Western Australia. Heart Lung Circ. 2014;23:309–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Foody JM. Familial hypercholesterolemia: an under-recognized but significant concern in cardiology practice. Clin Cardiol. 2014;37:119–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Goldstein JL, Schrott HG, Hazzard WR, et al. Hyperlipidemia in coronary heart disease. II. Genetic analysis of lipid levels in 176 families and delineation of a new inherited disorder, combined hyperlipidemia. J Clin Invest. 1973;52:1544–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Raal FJ, Santos RD. Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia: current perspectives on diagnosis and treatment. Atherosclerosis. 2012;223:262–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Versmissen J, Oosterveer DM, Yazdanpanah M, et al. Efficacy of statins in familial hypercholesterolaemia: a long term cohort study. BMJ. 2008;337:a2423.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Benn M, Watts GF, Tybjaerg-Hansen A, Nordestgaard BG. Familial hypercholesterolemia in the danish general population: prevalence, coronary artery disease, and cholesterol-lowering medication. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97:3956–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sjouke B, Kusters DM, Kindt I, et al. Homozygous autosomal dominant hypercholesterolaemia in the Netherlands: prevalence, genotype-phenotype relationship, and clinical outcome. Eur Heart J. 2015;36:560–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Brown MS, Goldstein JL. A receptor mediated pathway for cholesterol homeostasis. Science. 1986;232:34–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Innerarity TL, Mahley RW, Weisgraber KH, et al. Familial defective apoprotein B-100: a mutation that causes hypercholesterolemia. J Lipid Res. 1990;31:1337–49.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Abifadel M, Varret M, Rabès JP, et al. Mutations in PCSK9 cause autosomal dominant hypercholesterolemia. Nat Genet. 2003;34:154–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hovingh GK, Davidson MH, Kastelein JJ, O'Connor AM. Diagnosis and treatment of familial hypercholesterolaemia. Eur Heart J. 2013;34:962–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. van Aalst-Cohen ES, Jansen AC, Tanck MW, et al. Diagnosing familial hypercholesterolaemia: the relevance of genetic testing. Eur Heart J. 2006;27:2240–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Scientific Steering Committee on behalf of the Simon Broome Register Group. Risk of fatal coronary heart disease in familial hypercholesterolaemia. BMJ. 1991;303:893–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wierzbicki AS, Humphries SE, Minhas R. Familial hypercholesterolaemia: summary of NICE guidance. BMJ 2008.

  18. Rabar S, Harker M, O'Flynn N, et al. Lipid modification and cardiovascular risk assessment for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease: summary of updated NICE guidance. BMJ. 2014;349:g4356.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Williams RR, Hopkins PN, Stephenson S, et al. Primordial prevention of cardiovascular disease through applied genetics. Prev Med. 1999;29:S41–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wierzbicki AS, Graham CA, Young IS, Nicholls DP. Familial combined hyperlipidaemia: under - defined and under - diagnosed? Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2008;6:13–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Weng SF, Kai J, Andrew Neil H, et al. Improving identification of familial hypercholesterolaemia in primary care: derivation and validation of the familial hypercholesterolaemia case ascertainment tool (FAMCAT). Atherosclerosis. 2015;238:336–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Marks D, Wonderling D, Thorogood M, et al. Screening for hypercholesterolaemia versus case finding for familial hypercholesterolaemia: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis. Health Technol Assess. 2000;4:1–123.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Starr BJ, Hadfield G, Hutten BA, et al. Development of sensitive and specific age- and gender specific low-density lipoprotein cholesterol cutoffs for diagnosis of first-degree relatives with familial hypercholesterolaemia in cascade testing. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2008;46:791–803.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wonderling D, Umans-Eckenhausen MA, Marks D, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of the genetic screening program for familial hypercholesterolemia in The Netherlands. Semin Vasc Med. 2004;4:97–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wald DS, Bestwick JP, Wald NJ. Child-parent screening for familial hypercholesterolaemia: screening strategy based on a meta-analysis. BMJ. 2007;335:599.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Norsworthy PJ, Vandrovcova J, Thomas ER, et al. Targeted genetic testing for familial hypercholesterolaemia using next generation sequencing: a population-based study. BMC Med Genet. 2014;15:70.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Civeira F, Ros E, Jarauta E, et al. Comparison of genetic versus clinical diagnosis in familial hypercholesterolemia. Am J Cardiol. 2008;102:1187–93. 93 e1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Clarke RE, Padayachee ST, Preston R, et al. Effectiveness of alternative strategies to define index case phenotypes to aid genetic diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolaemia. Heart. 2013;99:175–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Huijgen R, Vissers MN, Kindt I, et al. Assessment of carotid atherosclerosis in normocholesterolemic individuals with proven mutations in the low-density lipoprotein receptor or apolipoprotein B genes. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2011;4:413–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Alves AC, Etxebarria A, Soutar AK, et al. Novel functional APOB mutations outside LDL-binding region causing familial hypercholesterolaemia. Hum Mol Genet. 2014;23:1817–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Talmud PJ, Shah S, Whittall R, et al. Use of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol gene score to distinguish patients with polygenic and monogenic familial hypercholesterolaemia: a case-control study. Lancet. 2013;381:1293–301.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Palacios L, Grandoso L, Cuevas N et al. Molecular characterization of familial hypercholesterolemia in Spain. Atherosclerosis 2011.

  33. Morris JK, Wald DS, Wald NJ. The evaluation of cascade testing for familial hypercholesterolemia. Am J Med Genet A. 2012;158A:78–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Sijbrands EJ, Westendorp RG, Defesche JC, et al. Mortality over two centuries in large pedigree with familial hypercholesterolaemia: family tree mortality study. BMJ. 2001;322:1019–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Christoffersen M, Frikke-Schmidt R, Schnohr P, et al. Xanthelasmata, arcus corneae, and ischaemic vascular disease and death in general population: prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2011;343:d5497.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Oosterveer DM, Versmissen J, Yazdanpanah M, et al. Differences in characteristics and risk of cardiovascular disease in familial hypercholesterolemia patients with and without tendon xanthomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Atherosclerosis. 2009;207:311–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Oosterveer DM, Versmissen J, Yazdanpanah M, et al. The risk of tendon xanthomas in familial hypercholesterolaemia is influenced by variation in genes of the reverse cholesterol transport pathway and the low-density lipoprotein oxidation pathway. Eur Heart J. 2010;31:1007–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Neefjes LA, Ten Kate GJ, Alexia R, et al. Accelerated subclinical coronary atherosclerosis in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia. Atherosclerosis. 2011;219:721–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Nherera L, Marks D, Minhas R, et al. Probabilistic cost-effectiveness analysis of cascade screening for familial hypercholesterolaemia using alternative diagnostic and identification strategies. Heart. 2011;97:1175–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Boren J, Ekstrom U, Agren B, et al. The molecular mechanism for the genetic disorder familial defective apolipoprotein B100. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:9214–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Lambert G, Sjouke B, Choque B, et al. The PCSK9 decade. J Lipid Res. 2012;53:2515–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Emberson JR, Whincup PH, Morris RW, et al. Re-assessing the contribution of serum total cholesterol, blood pressure and cigarette smoking to the aetiology of coronary heart disease: impact of regression dilution bias. Eur Heart J. 2003;24:1719–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Kathiresan S, Melander O, Anevski D. Polymorphisms associated with cholesterol and risk of cardiovascular events. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:1240–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Graham CA, McClean E, Ward AJ, et al. Mutation screening and genotype:phenotype correlation in familial hypercholesterolaemia. Atherosclerosis. 1999;147:309–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Humphries SE, Whittall RA, Hubbart CS, et al. Genetic causes of familial hypercholesterolaemia in patients in the UK: relation to plasma lipid levels and coronary heart disease risk. J Med Genet. 2006;43:943–949.44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. de Sauvage Nolting PR, Defesche JC, Buirma RJ, et al. Prevalence and significance of cardiovascular risk factors in a large cohort of patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia. J Intern Med. 2003;253:161–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Wierzbicki AS, Watts GF. The hinterland of familial hypercholesterolaemia: what do we not know? Curr Opin Lipidol. 2016;26:475–83. Explanation of the current gaps limitations in FH risk assessment and the areas requiring further research.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Marteau T, Senior V, Humphries SE, et al. Psychological impact of genetic testing for familial hypercholesterolemia within a previously aware population: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Med Genet A. 2004;128:285–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Viljoen A, Wierzbicki AS. Improving the odds: ezetimibe and cardiovascular disease. Int J Clin Pract. 2015;69:390–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Zhang XL, Zhu QQ, Zhu L, et al. Safety and efficacy of anti-PCSK9 antibodies: a meta-analysis of 25 randomised, controlled trials. BMC Med. 2015;13:123.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Robinson JG, Farnier M, Krempf M, et al. Efficacy and safety of alirocumab in reducing lipids and cardiovascular events. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1489–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Sabatine MS, Giugiano RP, Wiviott SD, et al. Efficacy and safety of evolocumab in reducing lipids and cardiovascular events. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1500–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Grygotis L. The cardiology advisor. FDA approves PCSK-9 inhibitors alirocumab and evolocumab based on LDL cholesterol reduction. Available at http://www.thecardiologyadvisor.com/hypertension/fda-approves-alirocumab-and-evolocumab/article/449479/ (Accessed 19 February 2016).

  54. Smilde TJ, van Wissen S, Wollersheim H, et al. Effect of aggressive versus conventional lipid lowering on atherosclerosis progression in familial hypercholesterolemia (ASAP): a prospective, randomised, double-blind trial. Lancet. 2001;357:577–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Raal FJ, Honarpour N, Blom DJ, et al. TESLA Investigators. Inhibition of PCSK9 with evolocumab in homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (TESLA Part B): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;385:341–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Raal FJ, Hovingh GK, Blom DJ et al. Long-term treatment with evolocumab in patients with Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolaemia (HoFH): interim results from the trial assessing long-term use of PCSK9 inhibition in subjects with genetic LDL disorders (TAUSSIG) study. Available at http://www.athero.org/isa2015/ClinicalBreak/Raal.pdf (Accessed 8 February 2016).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Viljoen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

A. Viljoen reports personal fees and other from AstraZeneca, personal fees and other from Merck Sharpe & Dohme, personal fees, non-financial support and other from Novo Nordisk, personal fees, non-financial support and other from Sanofi-Aventis, personal fees from Janssen, other from Amgen, and personal fees and other from Takeda.

A.S. Wierzbicki reports being a clinical trial investigator for Merck Sharp & Dohme, and for Amgen, and part of the clinical trial registry for Chiesi, D.P. Hughes declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Cardiovascular Genomics

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hughes, D.P., Viljoen, A. & Wierzbicki, A.S. Familial Hypercholesterolaemia in the Era of Genetic Testing. Curr Cardiol Rep 18, 42 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-016-0723-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-016-0723-z

Keywords

Navigation