Skip to main content
Log in

Tricuspid Regurgitation Following Implantation of a Pacemaker/Cardioverter-Defibrillator

  • Echocardiography (RM Lang, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Cardiology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Tricuspid regurgitation due to permanent pacemaker/defibrillator lead implantation (LITR) has been described more than 3 decades ago, but has come into attention recently due to the dramatic increase in the use of these devices. This entity has not been well defined and its impact on the patient and the health care system is largely unknown. This complication can have important implications. First, the presence and severity of tricuspid regurgitation in general is associated with reduced patient survival, and in the severe cases may require corrective surgery. Second, with the increasing age of the population and the expanding indications of these devices, one expects to encounter many more cases of LITR in the future. Third, this is an iatrogenic complication and therefore potentially preventable. This review discusses the prevalence, mechanisms, and risk factors of LITR as well as the management and potential strategies to prevent its occurrence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Rogers JH, Bolling SF. The tricuspid valve: current perspective and evolving management of tricuspid regurgitation. Circulation. 2009;119:2718–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. •• Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Chatterjee K, et al. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. 2008 focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to revise the 1998 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease) Endorsed by the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:e1–142. These are the latest guidelines on the management of patients with valvular heart disease.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. • Al-Mohaissen MA, Chan KL. Prevalence and mechanism of tricuspid regurgitation following implantation of endocardial leads for pacemaker or cardioverter-defibrillator. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2012;25:245–52. This paper reviewed all the pertinent publications on lead induced tricuspid regurgitation.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nachnani GH, Gooch AS, Hsu I. Systolic murmurs induced by pacemaker catheters. Arch Intern Med. 1969;124:202–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gibson TC, Davidson RC, DeSilvey DL. Presumptive tricuspid valve malfunction induced by a pacemaker lead: a case report and review of the literature. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1980;3:88–95.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fishenfeld J, Lamy Y. Laceration of the tricuspid valve by a pacemaker wire. Chest. 1972;61:697–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. • Kim JB, Spevack DM, Tunick PA, et al. The effect of transvenous pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator lead placement on tricuspid valve function: an observational study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2008;21:284–7. This study contained the largest patient size and showed a high incidence of tricuspid regurgitation following implantation of an endocardial lead, but this was a retrospective study.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Paniagua D, Aldrich HR, Lieberman EH, et al. Increased prevalence of significant tricuspid regurgitation in patients with transvenous pacemakers leads. Am J Cardiol. 1998;82:1130–2. A9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sakai M, Ohkawa S, Ueda K, et al. Tricuspid regurgitation induced by transvenous right ventricular pacing: echocardiographic and pathological observations. J Cardiol. 1987;17:311–20.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Leibowitz DW, Rosenheck S, Pollak A, et al. Transvenous pacemaker leads do not worsen tricuspid regurgitation: a prospective echocardiographic study. Cardiology. 2000;93:74–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lin G, Nishimura RA, Connolly HM, et al. Severe symptomatic tricuspid valve regurgitation due to permanent pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45:1672–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kucukarslan N, Kirilmaz A, Ulusoy E, et al. Tricuspid insufficiency does not increase early after permanent implantation of pacemaker leads. J Card Surg. 2006;21:391–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. • Seo Y, Ishizu T, Nakajima H, et al. Clinical utility of 3-dimensional echocardiography in the evaluation of tricuspid regurgitation caused by pacemaker leads. Circ J. 2008;72:1465–70. This study suggested a potential role of 3-dimensional echocardiography in the evaluation of lead induced tricuspid regurgitation.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Klutstein M, Balkin J, Butnaru A, et al. Tricuspid incompetence following permanent pacemaker implantation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2009;32:S135–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Vaturi M, Kusniec J, Shapira Y, et al. Right ventricular pacing increases tricuspid regurgitation grade regardless of the mechanical interference to the valve by the electrode. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2010;11:550–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Alizadeh A, Sanati HR, Haji-Karimi M, Yazdi AH, Rad MA, Haghjoo M, et al. Induction and aggravation of atrioventricular valve regurgitation in the course of chronic right ventricular apical pacing. Europace. 2011;13:1587–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Okura H, Takada Y, Yamabe A, et al. Prevalence and correlates of physiological valvular regurgitation in healthy subjects. Circ J. 2011;75:2699–704.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Eleid MF, Blauwet LA, Cha YM, et al. Bioprosthetic tricuspid valve regurgitation associated with pacemaker or defibrillator lead implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59:813–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Postaci N, Ekşi K, Bayata S, et al. Effect of the number of ventricular leads on right ventricular hemodynamics in patients with permanent pacemaker. Angiology. 1995;46:421–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Robboy SJ, Harthorne JW, Leinbach RC, et al. Autopsy findings with permanent pervenous pacemakers. Circulation. 1969;39:495–501.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen TE, Wang CC, Chern MS, et al. Entrapment of permanent pacemaker lead as the cause of tricuspid regurgitation. Circ J. 2007;71:1169–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Morgan DE, Norman R, West RO, et al. Echocardiographic assessment of tricuspid regurgitation during ventricular demand pacing. Am J Cardiol. 1986;58:1025–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Becker AE, Becker MJ, Claudon DG, et al. Surface thrombosis and fibrous encapsulation of intravenous pacemaker catheter electrode. Circulation. 1972;46:409–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Huang TY, Baba N. Cardiac pathology of transvenous pacemakers. Am Heart J. 1972;83:469–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Pothineni KR, Duncan K, Yelamanchili P, et al. Live/real time 3-dimensional transthoracic echocardiographic assessment of tricuspid valve pathology: incremental value over the 2-dimensional technique. Echocardiography. 2007;24:541–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Badano LP, Agricola E, Perez de Isla L, et al. Evaluation of the tricuspid valve morphology and function by transthoracic real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2009;10:477–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bhave NM, Ward RP. Echocardiographic assessment and clinical management of tricuspid regurgitation. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2011;13:258–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Nucifora G, Badano LP, Allocca G, et al. Severe tricuspid regurgitation due to entrapment of the anterior leaflet of the valve by a permanent pacemaker lead: role of real time 3-dimensional echocardiography. Echocardiography. 2007;24:649–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Nath J, Foster E, Heidenreich PA. Impact of tricuspid regurgitation on long-term survival. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43:405–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. McCarthy PM, Bhudia SK, Rajeswaran J, et al. Tricuspid valve repair: durability and risk factors for failure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004;127:674–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Navia JL, Nowicki ER, Blackstone EH, et al. Surgical management of secondary tricuspid valve regurgitation: annulus, commissure, or leaflet procedure? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;139:1473–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest

Maha A. Al-Mohaissen declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Kwan Leung Chan declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kwan Leung Chan.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Echocardiography

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Al-Mohaissen, M.A., Chan, K.L. Tricuspid Regurgitation Following Implantation of a Pacemaker/Cardioverter-Defibrillator. Curr Cardiol Rep 15, 357 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-013-0357-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-013-0357-3

Keywords

Navigation