Skip to main content
Log in

Left Ventricular Assist Devices and Other Devices for End-Stage Heart Failure: Utility of Echocardiography

  • Published:
Current Cardiology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The burgeoning ranks of patients with heart failure, the limited number of organs available for heart transplant, and technological improvements have made ventricular assist devices (VADs) important therapeutic options for patients with acute and chronic cardiac decompensation. The increased use of VADs is paralleled by an increased use of transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography to 1) assist in the selection of patients for VAD therapy and VADs to meet patient needs; 2) identify important anatomic considerations prior to implant; 3) guide placement of VADs; 4) diagnose the etiology of VAD dysfunction; and 5) guide the weaning from VAD support and the optimization of VAD device settings. This review discusses types of VADs and the uses of echocardiography in the care of VAD patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance, •• Of major importance

  1. Lloyd-Jones D, Adams R, Carnethon M, et al.: Heart disease and stroke statistics-2009 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation 2009, 119:480–486.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Boehmer JP, Popjes E: Cardiac failure: mechanical support strategies. Crit Care Med 2006, 34(Suppl):S268–S277.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Farrar DJ, Hill JD: Recovery of major organ function in patients awaiting heart transplantation with Thoratec ventricular assist devices. Thoratec Ventricular Assist Device Principal Investigators. J Heart Lung Transplant 1994, 13:1125–1132.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Friedel N, Viazis P, Schiessler A, et al.: Recovery of end-organ failure during mechanical circulatory support. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1992, 6:519–522.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Taylor DO, Edwards LB, Boucek MM, et al.: Registry of the international society for heart and lung transplantation: twenty-fourth official adult heart transplant report-2007. J Heart Lung Transplant 2007, 26:769–781.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. •• Patlolla V, Patten RD, DeNofrio D, et al.: The effect of ventricular assist devices on post-transplant mortality: an analysis of the United Network for Organ Sharing Thoracic Registry J Am Coll Cardiol 2009, 53:264–271. This important study describes the most recent findings concerning the use of VADs pretransplant and suggests that VAD use may not improve post-transplant mortality, as previously thought.

  7. Rose EA, Gelijns AC, Moskowitz AJ, et al.: Randomized Evaluation of Mechanical Assistance for the Treatment of Congestive Heart Failure (REMATCH) Study Group. Long-term mechanical left ventricular assistance for end-stage heart failure. N Engl J Med 2001, 345:1435–1443.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lietz K, Long JW, Kfoury AG, et al.: Outcomes of left ventricular assist device implantation as destination therapy in the post-REMATCH era: implications for patient selection. Circulation 2007, 116:497–505.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Heart Failure Society of America: Executive summary: HFSA 2006 Comprehensive Heart Failure Practice Guideline. J Card Fail 2006, 12:10–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jessup M, Abraham WT, Casey DE, et al.: 2009 focused update: ACCF/AHA Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Heart Failure in Adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines: developed in collaboration with the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009, 53:1343–1382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Song X, Throckmorton AL, Untaroiu A, et al.: Axial flow blood pumps. ASAIO J 2003, 49:355–364.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Farrar DJ, Bourque K, Dague CP, et al.: Design features, developmental status, and experimental results with the Heartmate III centrifugal left ventricular assist system with a magnetically levitated rotor. ASAIO J 2007, 53:310–315.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. •• Cheng JM, den Uil CA, Hoeks SE, et al.: Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices vs. intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation for treatment of cardiogenic shock: a meta-analysis of controlled trials. Eur Heart J 2009, 30:2102–2108. This study provides a summary of the currently available clinical trial data comparing percutaneous VADs and intra-aortic balloon pumps.

  14. Konstam MA, Czerska B, Bohm M, et al.: Continuous aortic flow augmentation: a pilot study of hemodynamic and renal responses to a novel percutaneous intervention in decompensated heart failure. Circulation 2005, 112:3107–3114.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hunt SA, Abraham WT, Chin MH, et al.: ACC/AHA 2005 guideline update for the diagnosis and management of chronic heart failure in the adult: summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Update the 2001 Guidelines for the Evaluation and Management of Heart Failure). J Am Coll Cardiol 2005, 46:e1–e82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Catena E, Milazzo F: Echocardiography and cardiac assist devices. Minerva Cardioangiol 2005, 55:247–265.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ochiai Y, McCarthy PM, Smedira NG, et al.: Predictors of severe right ventricular failure after implantable left ventricular assist device insertion: analysis of 245 patients. Circulation 2002, 24:198–202.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Miller LW: Patient selection for the use of ventricular assist device as a bridge to transplantation. Ann Thorac Surg 2003, 75:66–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Matthews JC, Koelling TM, Pagani FD, Aaronson KD: The right ventricular failure risk score a pre-operative tool for assessing the risk of right ventricular failure in left ventricular assist device candidates. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008, 51:2163–2172.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Shapiro GC, Leibowitz DW, Oz MC, et al.: Diagnosis of patent foramen ovale with transesophageal echocardiography in a patient supported with a left ventricular assist device. J Heart Lung Transplant 1995, 14:594–597.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rao V, Slater JP, Edwards NM, et al.: Surgical management of valvular disease in patients requiring left ventricular assist device support. Ann Thorac Surg 2001, 71:1448–1453.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Catena E, Milazzo F, Pittella G, et al.: Echocardiographic approach in a new left ventricular assist device: Impella Recover 100. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2004, 17:470–473.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pretorius M, Hughes AK, Stahlman MB, et al.: Placement of the TandemHeart percutaneous left ventricular assist device. Anesth Analg 2006, 103:1412–1413.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Tingleff J, Joyce FS, Pettersson G: Intraoperative echocardiographic study of air embolism during cardiac operations. Ann Thorac Surg 1995, 60:673–677.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Scalia GM, McCarthy PM, Savage RM, et al.: Clinical utility of echocardiography in the management of implantable ventricular assist device. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2000, 13:754–763.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Catena E, Milazzo F, Montorsi E, et al.: Left ventricular support by axial flow pump: the echocardiographic approach to device malfunction. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2005, 18:1422.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Horton SC, Khodaverdian R, Chatelain P, et al.: Left ventricular assist device malfunction: an approach to diagnosis by echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005, 45:1435–1440.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Baddour LM, Bettmann MA, Bolger AF, et al.: Nonvalvular cardiovascular device-related infections. Circulation 2003, 108:2015–2031.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Samuels LE, Thomas MP, Holmes EC, et al.: Insufficiency of the native aortic valve and left ventricular assist system inflow valve after support with an implantable left ventricular assist system: signs, symptoms, and concerns. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001, 122:380–381.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lacroix V, d’Udekem Y, Jacquet L, Noirhomme P: Resection of the ascending aorta and aortic valve patch closure for type A aortic dissection after Novacor LVAD insertion. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2003, 24:309–311.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rose AG, Connelly JH, Park SJ, et al.: Total left ventricular outflow tract obstruction due to left ventricular assist device-induced sub-aortic thrombosis in 2 patients with aortic valve bioprosthesis. J Heart Lung Transplant 2003, 22:594–599.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Connelly JH, Abrams J, Klima T, et al.: Acquired commissural fusion of aortic valves in patients with left ventricular assist devices. J Heart Lung Transplant 2003, 22:1291–1295.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Dowling RD, Park SJ, Pagani FD, et al.: HeartMate VE LVAS design enhancements and its impact on device reliability. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2004, 25:958–963.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Poirier VL: Inflow valve incompetence. J Congestive Heart Fail Circ Support 2001, 2:23–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Hetzer R, Muller JH, Weng Y, et al.: Bridging-to-recovery. Ann Thorac Surg 2001, 71:S109–S113.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Dandel M, Weng Y, Siniawski H, et al.: prediction of cardiac stability after weaning from left ventricular assist devices in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Circulation 2008, 118(Suppl 1):S94–S105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Khan T, Delgado RM, Radovancevic B, et al.: Dobutamine stress echocardiography predicts myocardial improvement in patients supported by left ventricular assist devices (LVADs): hemodynamic and histologic evidence of improvement before LVAD explantation. J Heart Lung Transplant 2003, 22:137–146.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Chen JM, Levin HR, Rose EA, et al.: Experience with right ventricular assist devices for perioperative right-sided circulatory failure. Ann Thorac Surg 1996, 61:305–310.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Abbas AE, Fortuin FD, Schiller NB, et al.: A simple method for noninvasive estimation of pulmonary vascular resistance. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003, 41:1021–1027.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Lam KM, Ennis S, O’Driscoll G, et al.: Observations from non invasive measures of right heart hemodynamics in left ventricular assist device patients. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2009, 22:1055–1062.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Sugeng L, Mor-Avi V, Weinert L, et al.: Quantitative assessment of left ventricular size and function: side-by-side comparison of real-time three-dimensional echocardiography and computed tomography with magnetic resonance reference. Circulation 2006, 114:654–661.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosure

No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James N. Kirkpatrick.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kirkpatrick, J.N., Wiegers, S.E. & Lang, R.M. Left Ventricular Assist Devices and Other Devices for End-Stage Heart Failure: Utility of Echocardiography. Curr Cardiol Rep 12, 257–264 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-010-0102-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-010-0102-0

Keywords

Navigation