Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Pregnancy After Lower Urinary Tract Reconstruction: Considerations for Prenatal Management and Delivery

  • Published:
Current Bladder Dysfunction Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of review

The goal of this work is to review the existing evidence base regarding the prenatal and delivery care for pregnant patients with a history of lower urinary tract reconstruction (LUTR). The primary audience of this work is both urologists and obstetricians who will be involved in the management of patients with LUTR.

Recent findings

The literature surrounding this topic is limited due to the small patient population. However, given significant advancements in care for patients with spinal dysraphism and complex urogenital anatomy these patients are living longer and are having richer social lives with relationships and childrearing. A systematic review published in 2020 found that vaginal delivery is possible for this patient population, with the exception of bladder exstrophy due to the risk of severe prolapse. Cesarean section in this population is associated with high complication rates and should be approached by a multidisciplinary team that includes a urologist who specializes in complex reconstructions. Increased surveillance for urinary tract infection/asymptomatic bacteriuria and upper tract deterioration should be performed.

Summary

Female patients with prior LUTR can safely become pregnant and carry to term. However, these patients represent a high-risk pregnancy group and require individualized multidisciplinary care to optimize their prenatal and delivery care. The choice of delivery modality should ultimately depend on anatomic and obstetric considerations, with a heavy emphasis on shared decision-making with the patient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: •• Of major importance

  1. Bricker EM. Substitution for the urinary bladder by the use of isolated ileal segments. Surg Clin N Am. 1956;36(4):1117–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lapides J, Diokno AC, Silber SJ, Lowe BS. Clean, intermittent self-catheterization in the treatment of urinary tract disease. J Urol. 1972;107(3):458–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Greenberg RE, Vaughan ED Jr, Pitts WR Jr. Normal pregnancy and delivery after ileal conduit urinary diversion. J Urol. 1981;125(2):172–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jeyabalan A, Lain KY. Anatomic and functional changes of the upper urinary tract during pregnancy. Urol Clin North Am. 2007;34(1):1–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kauffman M. Campbell-Walsh-Wein Urology 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  6. FitzGerald MP, Graziano S. Anatomic and functional changes of the lower urinary tract during pregnancy. Urol Clin North Am. 2007;34(1):7–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Obstetric management of patients with spinal cord injuries. ACOG committee opinion summary, number 808. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;135(5):1247–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. USPSTF. Screening for asymptomatic bacteriuria in adults: US preventive services task force recommendation statement. JAMA. 2019;322(12):1188–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Szucs K, O'Neil KM, Faden H. Urinary findings in asymptomatic subjects with spina bifida treated with intermittent catheterization. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2001;20(6):638–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Greenwell TJ, Venn SN, Creighton S, Leaver RB, Woodhouse CR. Pregnancy after lower urinary tract reconstruction for congenital abnormalities. BJU Int. 2003;92(7):773–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. •• Roth JD, Casey JT, Whittam BM, Szymanski KM, Kaefer M, Rink RC, et al. Complications and outcomes of pregnancy and cesarean delivery in women with neuropathic bladder and lower urinary tract reconstruction. Urology. 2018;114:236–43. A retrospective case series of pregnant patients with history of LUTR.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. •• Bey E, Manach Q, Peyronnet B, Even A, Chartier Kastler E, Walder R, et al. Pregnancy and delivery in women with lower urinary tract reconstruction: a national multicenter retrospective study from the French-Speaking Neuro-Urology Study Group (GENULF) and the Neuro-Urology Committee of the French Association of Urology. J Urol. 2020;204(6):1263–9. A national multicenter retrospective study with more than 20 years of data capturing the experience of pregnant women with LUTR.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Michau A, Dinh A, Denys P, Levy J, Chartier-Kastler E, Bernard L, et al. Control cross-sectional study evaluating an antibiotic prevention strategy in 30 pregnancies under clean intermittent self-catheterization and review of literature. Urology. 2016;91:58–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Salomon J, Schnitzler A, Ville Y, Laffont I, Perronne C, Denys P, et al. Prevention of urinary tract infection in six spinal cord-injured pregnant women who gave birth to seven children under a weekly oral cyclic antibiotic program. Int J Infect Dis. 2009;13(3):399–402.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hou S. Pregnancy in women with chronic renal disease. N Engl J Med. 1985;312(13):836–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ross JPJ, Keays M, Neville C, Leonard M, Guerra L. Pediatric bladder augmentation - Panacea or Pandora’s box? Can Urol Assoc J. 2020;14(6):E251–e6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. •• Bey E, Perrouin-Verbe B, Reiss B, Lefort M, Le Normand L, Perrouin-Verbe MA. Outcomes of pregnancy and delivery in women with continent lower urinary tract reconstruction: systematic review of the literature. Int Urogynecol J. 2021;32(7):1707–17. Updated systematic review outlining outcomes of pregnancy and delivery in women with continent LUTR.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Misseri R, Roth JD. Author reply. Urology. 2018;114:243.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hautmann RE, Volkmer BG. Pregnancy and urinary diversion. Urol Clin North Am. 2007;34(1):71–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Colby P. Souders.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kennedy, L.N., Freedman, A.L. & Souders, C.P. Pregnancy After Lower Urinary Tract Reconstruction: Considerations for Prenatal Management and Delivery. Curr Bladder Dysfunct Rep 18, 310–317 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11884-023-00724-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11884-023-00724-4

Keywords

Navigation