Current Bladder Dysfunction Reports

, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp 13–17 | Cite as

Clinical Application of Ultrasound in Male Voiding Dysfunction

Post-Prostatectomy and Acquired Voiding Dysfunction (V Tse, Section Editor)
  • 20 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Post-Prostatectomy and Acquired Voiding Dysfunction

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Ultrasound is the most widely used imaging modality in the assessment of male voiding dysfunction. The lower urinary tract can be in imaged by transabdominal, transrectal, and transperineal approaches.

Recent Findings

There is an emerging role of transperineal ultrasound in pelvic floor physiotherapy and also in the evaluation of male sling, especially in failed sling cases.

Summary

Common applications of ultrasound in lower urinary tract (LUT) dysfunction include measurement of post-void residual volume, prostate size, bladder wall thickness, and intravesical protrusion of the prostate (IPP). IPP measurement by transabdominal ultrasound of the bladder base is the most established non-invasive imaging parameter in the diagnosis of bladder outlet obstruction (BOO).

Keywords

Ultrasound Bladder outlet obstruction Incontinence Radical prostatectomy 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Dr. Chan, Jarvis, and Tse declare no conflicts of interests

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Supplementary material

ESM 1

Transabdominal ultrasound video of bladder and prostate (MP4 4891 kb).

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    Oelke M, Khullar V, Wijkstra H. Review on ultrasound measurement of bladder or detrusor wall thickness in women: techniques, diagnostic utility, and use in clinical trials. World J Urol. 2013;31(5):1093–104.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-013-1030-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Franco G, De Nunzio C, Leonardo C, Tubaro A, Ciccariello M, De Dominicis C, et al. Ultrasound assessment of intravesical prostatic protrusion and detrusor wall thickness—new standards for noninvasive bladder outlet obstruction diagnosis? J Urol. 2010;183(6):2270–4.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2010.02.019.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    •• Latthe P, Middleton L, Rachaneni S, McCooty S, Daniels J, Coomarasamy A, et al. Ultrasound bladder wall thickness and detrusor overactivity: a multicentre test accuracy study. BJOG. 2017;124(9):1422–29.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.14503. The utility of ultrasound bladder wall thickness measurement in voiding dysfunction has been controversial over the years. This multicentre study provides further evidence that BWT is not useful in the diagnosis of detrusor overactivity. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Aganovic D, Hasanbegovic M, Prcic A, Kulovac B, Hadziosmanovic O. Which is a better indicator of bladder outlet obstruction in patients with benign prostatic enlargement—intravesical protrusion of prostate or bladder wall thickness? Med Arch. 2012;66(5):324–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ahmed AF. Sonographic parameters predicting the outcome of patients with lower urinary tract symptoms/benign prostatic hyperplasia treated with alpha1-adrenoreceptor antagonist. Urology. 2016;88:143–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2015.11.017.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rademakers KL, van Koeveringe GA, Oelke M, Force Research Group M, Hannover. Ultrasound detrusor wall thickness measurement in combination with bladder capacity can safely detect detrusor underactivity in adult men. World J Urol. 2017;35(1):153–9.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-016-1902-7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tan YH, Foo KT. Intravesical prostatic protrusion predicts the outcome of a trial without catheter following acute urine retention. J Urol. 2003;170(6 Pt 1):2339–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    •• Kuo TL, Teo JS, Foo KT. The role of intravesical prostatic protrusion (IPP) in the evaluation and treatment of bladder outlet obstruction (BOO). Neurourol Urodyn. 2016;35(4):535–7. This is a review article by the group that pioneered IPP discussing the role of this easily performed ultrasound measurement in a variety of clinical settings in voiding dysfunction. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Matsukawa Y, Ishida S, Majima T, Funahashi Y, Sassa N, Kato M, et al. Intravesical prostatic protrusion can predict therapeutic response to silodosin in male patients with lower urinary tract symptoms. Int J Urol. 2017;24(6):454–9.  https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.13333.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kalkanli A, Tandogdu Z, Aydin M, Karaca AS, Hazar AI, Balci MB, et al. Intravesical prostatic protrusion: a potential marker of alpha-blocker treatment success in patients with benign prostatic enlargement. Urology. 2016;88:161–5.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2015.11.029.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bansal A, Arora A. Predictors of successful trial without catheter following acute urinary retention in benign prostatic enlargement: a single centre, multivariate analysis. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017;36(7):1757–62.  https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23194.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bang WJ, Kim HW, Lee JY, Lee DH, Hah YS, Lee HH, et al. Prostatic urethral angulation associated with urinary flow rate and urinary symptom scores in men with lower urinary tract symptoms. Urology. 2012;80(6):1333–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2012.08.058.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ko YH, Kim TH, Song PH, Kim BH, Kim BS, Kim KH, et al. Structural variations of the prostatic urethra within the prostate predict the severities of obstructive symptoms: a prospective multicenter observational study. Urology. 2017;104:160–5.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2017.03.014.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Stafford RE, Ashton-Miller JA, Constantinou CE, Hodges PW. Novel insight into the dynamics of male pelvic floor contractions through transperineal ultrasound imaging. J Urol. 2012;188(4):1224–30.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2012.06.028.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bryk DJ, Khurana K, Yamaguchi Y, Kozirovsky M, Telegrafi S, Zhao LC. Outpatient ultrasound urethrogram for assessment of anterior urethral stricture: early experience. Urology. 2016;93:203–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2016.03.016.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    •• Mungovan SF, Sandhu JS, Akin O, Smart NA, Graham PL, Patel MI. Preoperative membranous urethral length measurement and continence recovery following radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2017;71(3):368–78. This article reviews the relationship between membranous urethral length measured on MRI preoperatively with continence post radical prostatecctomy. This measurement can be obtained using ultrasound and may have potential in predicting continence recovery after prostatectomy. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Heesakkers J, Farag F, Bauer RM, Sandhu J, De Ridder D, Stenzl A. Pathophysiology and contributing factors in postprostatectomy incontinence: a review. Eur Urol. 2017;71(6):936–44.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2016.09.031.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chan L, Tse V. 1355 dynamic compression of the urethra—the role of ultrasound imaging in understanding how the male transobturator sling works. J Urol. 2012;187(4):e550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chan L, Tse V, Wang A. 1043 dynamic compression of the urethra—2D and 3D ultrasound imaging of the male transobturator sling with medium term follow-up. J Urol. 2013;189(4):e428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Brucker BM, Demirtas A, Fong E, Kelly C, Nitti VW. Artificial urinary sphincter revision: the role of ultrasound. Urology. 2013;82(6):1424–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2013.07.064.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sydney Medical SchoolUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Prince of Wales Clinical SchoolUniversity of New South WalesSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations