Advertisement

Current Bladder Dysfunction Reports

, Volume 7, Issue 4, pp 268–274 | Cite as

Evaluation and Management of Urinary Retention and Voiding Dysfunction After Sling Surgery for Female Stress Urinary Incontinence

  • Christopher S. ElliottEmail author
  • Craig V. Comiter
Acquired Voiding Dysfunction (CV Comiter, Section Editor)

Abstract

Female urethral sling surgery is the most common procedure performed to treat stress urinary incontinence with cure rates in excess of 85 %. In a small minority of patients however, postoperative voiding dysfunction develops, in the form of: urinary retention; high post-void residual; poor urinary flow; urinary frequency; urinary urgency; urinary urge incontinence; or pelvic pain. This article reviews the occurrence of voiding dysfunction after sling surgery and outlines the current evaluation and management of patients with these complaints.

Keywords

Urinary stress incontinence Urethral sling Voiding dysfunction Female 

Notes

Disclosure

No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    Markland AD, Richter HE, Fwu CW, et al. Prevalence and trends of urinary incontinence in adults in the United States, 2001 to 2008. J Urol. 2011;186:589.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    •• Wu JM, Kawasaki A, Hundley AF, et al. Predicting the number of women who will undergo incontinence and prolapse surgery, 2010 to 2050. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205:230 e1. Excellent epidemiologic study of surgery for SUI.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jonsson Funk M, Levin PJ, Wu JM. Trends in the surgical management of stress urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;119:845.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carr LK, Webster GD. Voiding dysfunction following incontinence surgery: diagnosis and treatment with retropubic or vaginal urethrolysis. J Urol. 1997;157:821.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Deng DY, Rutman M, Raz S, et al. Presentation and management of major complications of midurethral slings: are complications under-reported? Neurourol Urodyn. 2007;26:46.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Albo ME, Richter HE, Brubaker L, et al. Burch colposuspension versus fascial sling to reduce urinary stress incontinence. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:2143.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kenton K, Richter H, Litman H, et al. Risk factors associated with urge incontinence after continence surgery. J Urol. 2009;182:2805.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    •• Kraus SR, Lemack GE, Richter HE, et al. Changes in urodynamic measures two years after Burch colposuspension or autologous sling surgery. Urology. 2001;78:1263. Urodynamic followup of autologous bladder neck slings which shows that successful surgery is associated with an increase in urethral resistance.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    •• Richter HE, Albo ME, Zyczynski HM, et al. Retropubic versus transobturator midurethral slings for stress incontinence. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:2066. Randomized control trial of retropubic versus transobturator midurethral slings which highlights increased postoperative voiding dysfunction in the retropubic as compared to the transobturator group.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Barber MD, Kleeman S, Karram MM, et al. Transobturator tape compared with tension-free vaginal tape for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111:611.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Barry C, Lim YN, Muller R, et al. A multi-centre, randomised clinical control trial comparing the retropubic (RP) approach versus the transobturator approach (TO) for tension-free, suburethral sling treatment of urodynamic stress incontinence: the TORP study. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008;19:171.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schierlitz L, Dwyer PL, Rosamilia A, et al. Effectiveness of tension-free vaginal tape compared with transobturator tape in women with stress urinary incontinence and intrinsic sphincter deficiency: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;112:1253.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Laurikainen E, Valpas A, Kivela A, et al. Retropubic compared with transobturator tape placement in treatment of urinary incontinence: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109:4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ross S, Robert M, Swaby C, et al. Transobturator tape compared with tension-free vaginal tape for stress incontinence: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114:1287.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sander P, Moller LM, Rudnicki PM, et al. Does the tension-free vaginal tape procedure affect the voiding phase? Pressure-flow studies before and 1 year after surgery. BJU Int. 2002;89:694.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Moran PA, Ward KL, Johnson D, et al. Tension-free vaginal tape for primary genuine stress incontinence: a two-centre follow-up study. BJU Int. 2000;86:39.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Alperin M, Abrahams-Gessel S, Wakamatsu MM. Development of de novo urge incontinence in women post sling: the role of preoperative urodynamics in assessing the risk. Neurourol Urodyn. 2008;27:407.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Campbell E, Thoma S, Frilot II C, et al. Does trocar puncture of the bladder during midurethral sling impact postoperative urinary storage and voiding symptoms? - Abstract from Society for Urodynamics and Female Urology, 2012 Winter Meeting, February 28–March 3, 2012, The Roosevelt Hotel, New Orleans. Louisiana Neurourol Urodyn. 2012;31:212.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gamble TL, Botros SM, Beaumont JL, et al. Predictors of persistent detrusor overactivity after transvaginal sling procedures. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199:696 e1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Deval B, Jeffry L, Al Najjar F, et al. Determinants of patient dissatisfaction after a tension-free vaginal tape procedure for urinary incontinence. J Urol. 2002;167:2093.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Barber MD, Gustilo-Ashby AM, Chen CC, et al. Perioperative complications and adverse events of the MONARC transobturator tape, compared with the tension-free vaginal tape. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195:1820.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Weinberger MW, Ostergard DR. Postoperative catheterization, urinary retention, and permanent voiding dysfunction after polytetrafluroethylene suburethral sling placement. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;87:50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Iglesia CB, Shott S, Fenner DE, et al. Effect of preoperative voiding mechanism on success rate of autologous rectus fascia suburethral sling procedure. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;91:577.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mutone N, Brizendine E, Hale D. Factors that influence voiding function after the tension-free vaginal tape procedure for stress urinary incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188:1477.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cho ST, Song HC, Song HJ, et al. Predictors of postoperative voiding dysfunction following transobsturator sling procedures in patients with stress urinary incontinence. Int Neurourol J. 2010;14:26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    •• Nager CW, Brubaker L, Litman HJ, et al. A randomized trial of urodynamic testing before stress-incontinence surgery. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1987. Data from a large randomized controlled trial showing that preoperative urodynamics do not predict postoperative voiding dysfunction and are not necessary in the routine patient.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Foster Sr RT, Borawski KM, South MM, et al. A randomized, controlled trial evaluating 2 techniques of postoperative bladder testing after transvaginal surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197:627 e1.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    •• Ingber MS, Vasavada SP, Moore CK, et al. Force of stream after sling therapy: safety and efficacy of rapid discharge care pathway based on subjective patient report. J Urol. 2011;185:993. Description for an effective postoperative voiding trial in the recovery room that minimizes the need for postoperative urethral catheterization.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kobak WH, Walters MD, Piedmonte MR. Determinants of voiding after three types of incontinence surgery: a multivariable analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;97:86.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Vasavada SP, Rackley RR, Goldman H, et al. Vaginal Sling Surgery for Stress Urinary Incontinence. In: Novick AC, Jones JS, Gill IS, et al., editors. Operative urology at the Cleveland Clinic. Totowa: Humana; 2006. p. 273–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Goldman HB. Simple sling incision for the treatment of iatrogenic urethral obstruction. Urology. 2003;62:714.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Frenkl TL, Rackley RR, Vasavada SP, et al. Management of iatrogenic foreign bodies of the bladder and urethra following pelvic floor surgery. Neurourol Urodyn. 2008;27:491.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Chassagne S, Bernier PA, Haab F, et al. Proposed cutoff values to define bladder outlet obstruction in women. Urology. 1998;51:408.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Nitti VW, Tu LM, Gitlin J. Diagnosing bladder outlet obstruction in women. J Urol. 1999;161:1535.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Blaivas JG, Groutz A. Bladder outlet obstruction nomogram for women with lower urinary tract symptomatology. Neurourol Urodyn. 2000;19:553.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Nitti VW, Carlson KV, Blaivas JG, et al. Early results of pubovaginal sling lysis by midline sling incision. Urology. 2002;59:47.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Molden S, Bracken J, Nguyen A, et al. A retrospective multicenter study on outcomes after midurethral polypropylene sling revision for voiding dysfunction. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2010;16:340.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Klutke C, Siegel S, Carlin B, et al. Urinary retention after tension-free vaginal tape procedure: incidence and treatment. Urology. 2001;58:697.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Nguyen JN. Tape mobilization for urinary retention after tension-free vaginal tape procedures. Urology. 2005;66:523.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Boulanger L, Boukerrou M, Lambaudie E, et al. Tissue integration and tolerance to meshes used in gynecologic surgery: an experimental study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006;125:103.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ghoniem GM, Elgamasy AN. Simplified surgical approach to bladder outlet obstruction following pubovaginal sling. J Urol. 1995;154:181.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    South MM, Wu JM, Webster GD, et al. Early vs late midline sling lysis results in greater improvement in lower urinary tract symptoms. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200:564 e1.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Thiel DD, Pettit PD, McClellan WT, et al. Long-term urinary continence rates after simple sling incision for relief of urinary retention following fascia lata pubovaginal slings. J Urol. 2005;174:1878.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Yoost T, Rames R, Lebed B, et al. Predicting for postoperative incontinence following sling incision. Int Urogynecol J. 2001;22:665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Rardin CR, Rosenblatt PL, Kohli N, et al. Release of tension-free vaginal tape for the treatment of refractory postoperative voiding dysfunction. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;100:898.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Mishra VC, Mishra N, Karim OM, et al. Voiding dysfunction after tension-free vaginal tape: a conservative approach is often successful. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2005;16:210.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Karram MM, Segal JL, Vassallo BJ, et al. Complications and untoward effects of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;101:929.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Gomelsky A, Nitti VW, Dmochowski RR. Management of obstructive voiding dysfunction after incontinence surgery: lessons learned. Urology. 2003;62:391.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Metcalfe PD, Wang J, Jiao H, et al. Bladder outlet obstruction: progression from inflammation to fibrosis. BJU Int. 2010;106:1686.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Leng WW, Davies BJ, Tarin T, et al. Delayed treatment of bladder outlet obstruction after sling surgery: association with irreversible bladder dysfunction. J Urol. 2004;172:1379.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Scarpero HM, Dmochowski RR, Nitti VW. Repeat urethrolysis after failed urethrolysis for iatrogenic obstruction. J Urol. 2003;169:1013.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of UrologyStanford Medical SchoolStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations