Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Systematic Review of Telestroke for Post-Stroke Care and Rehabilitation

  • Cardiovascular Disease and Stroke (D Leifer and JE Safdieh, Section Editors)
  • Published:
Current Atherosclerosis Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Telemedicine for acute stroke care is supported by a literature base. It remains unclear whether or not the use of telemedicine for other phases of stroke care is beneficial. The authors conducted a systematic review of the published literature on telemedicine for the purposes of providing post-stroke care. Studies were included if the title or abstract expressed use of two-way audio/video communication for post-stroke care. From an initial yield of 1,405 potentially eligible hits, two reviewers ultimately identified 24 unique manuscripts to undergo functionality, application, technology, and evaluative (F.A.T.E.) scoring. Each article was classified using a scoring rubric to assess the functionality, application, technology, and evaluative stage. It was found that most post-stroke telemedicine studies evaluated rehabilitation of adults. All primary data manuscripts were small and preliminary in scope and evaluative phase, and median F.A.T.E. score for primary data was 2. The use of telemedicine for post-stroke care is nascent and is primarily focused on post-stroke rehabilitation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Roger VL, Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM, Benjamin EJ, Berry JD, Borden WB, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2012 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2012;125(1):e2–220.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Brundtland GH. From the World Health Organization. Reducing risks to health, promoting healthy life. JAMA. 2002;288(16):1974.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lichtman JH, Allen NB, Wang Y, Watanabe E, Jones SB, Goldstein LB. Stroke patient outcomes in US hospitals before the start of the Joint Commission Primary Stroke Center certification program. Stroke. 2009;40(11):3574–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Donnan GA, Davis SM. Neurologist, internist, or strokologist? Stroke. 2003;34(11):2765.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Goldstein LB, Matchar DB, Hoff-Lindquist J, Samsa GP, Horner RD. VA Stroke Study: neurologist care is associated with increased testing but improved outcomes. Neurology. 2003;61(6):792–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Smith MA, Liou JI, Frytak JR, Finch MD. 30-day survival and rehospitalization for stroke patients according to physician specialty. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2006;22(1):21–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Levine SR, Gorman M. “Telestroke”: the application of telemedicine for stroke. Stroke. 1999;30(2):464–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang S, Lee SB, Pardue C, Ramsingh D, Waller J, Gross H, et al. Remote evaluation of acute ischemic stroke: reliability of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale via telestroke. Stroke. 2003;34(10):e188–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Demaerschalk BM, Bobrow BJ, Raman R, Kiernan TE, Aguilar MI, Ingall TJ, et al. Stroke team remote evaluation using a digital observation camera in Arizona: the initial mayo clinic experience trial. Stroke. 2010;41(6):1251–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Demaerschalk BM, Raman R, Ernstrom K, Meyer BC. Efficacy of telemedicine for stroke: pooled analysis of the Stroke Team Remote Evaluation Using a Digital Observation Camera (STRokE DOC) and STRokE DOC Arizona telestroke trials. Telemed J E Health. 2012;18(3):230–7. This manuscript represents a pooled analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing telephone versus videoconference telestroke.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Meyer BC, Raman R, Hemmen T, Obler R, Zivin JA, Rao R, et al. Efficacy of site-independent telemedicine in the STRokE DOC trial: a randomised, blinded, prospective study. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7(9):787–95.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. •• Nelson RE, Saltzman GM, Skalabrin EJ, Demaerschalk BM, Majersik JJ. The cost-effectiveness of telestroke in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Neurology. 2011;77(17):1590–8. This study represents the first United States health economic analysis for telestroke.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. • Switzer JA, Demaerschalk BM, Xie J, Fan L, Villa KF, Wu EQ. Cost-effectiveness of hub-and-spoke telestroke networks for the management of acute ischemic stroke from the hospitals’ perspectives. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcome. 2013;6((1):18–26. This study is the first telestroke health economic analysis conducted from the perspective of the hub and spoke network of participating hospitals.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Silva GS, Farrell S, Shandra E, Viswanathan A, Schwamm LH. The status of telestroke in the United States: a survey of currently active stroke telemedicine programs. Stroke. 2012;43(8):2078–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Demaerschalk BM, Miley ML, Kiernan TE, Bobrow BJ, Corday DA, Wellik KE, et al. Stroke telemedicine. Mayo Clin Proc. 2009;84(1):53–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Stewart SF, Switzer JA. Perspectives on telemedicine to improve stroke treatment. Drugs Today (Barc). 2011;47(2):157–67.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Switzer JA, Levine SR, Hess DC. Telestroke 10 years later–‘telestroke 2.0’. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2009;28(4):323–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Demaerschalk BM. Telestrokologists: treating stroke patients here, there, and everywhere with telemedicine. Semin Neurol. 2010;30(5):477–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Johansson T, Wild C. Telemedicine in acute stroke management: systematic review. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2010;26(2):149–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rubin MN, Wellik KE, Channer DD, Demaerschalk BM. A systematic review of telestroke. Postgrad Med. 2013;125(1):45–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rubin MN, Wellik KE, Channer DD, Demaerschalk BM. Systematic review of teleneurology: methodology. Front Neurol. 2012;3:156.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(4):264–9. W64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Fanale CV, Demaerschalk BM. Telestroke network business model strategies. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2012. doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2012.06.013.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Switzer JA, Demaerschalk BM. Overcoming challenges to sustain a telestroke network. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2012. doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2012.06.014.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gregory P, Alexander J, Satinsky J. Clinical telerehabilitation: applications for physiatrists. Pm R. 2011;3(7):647–56. quiz 56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Mikulik R, Alexandrov AV, Ribo M, Garami Z, Porche NA, Fulep E, et al. Telemedicine-guided carotid and transcranial ultrasound: a pilot feasibility study. Stroke. 2006;37(1):229–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Perry JC, Ruiz-Ruano JA, Keller T. Telerehabilitation: toward a cost-efficient platform for post-stroke neurorehabilitation. IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot. 2011;2011:5975413.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Schweickert PA, Rutledge CM, Cattell-Gordon DC, Solenski NJ, Jensen ME, Branson S, et al. Telehealth stroke education for rural elderly Virginians. Telemed J E Health. 2011;17(10):784–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Waters B. Home care and telestroke. Caring. 2009;28(8):60–1.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Piron L, Turolla A, Tonin P, Piccione F, Lain L, Dam M. Satisfaction with care in post-stroke patients undergoing a telerehabilitation programme at home. J Telemed Telecare. 2008;14(5):257–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Maeno R, Fujita C, Iwatsuki H. A pilot study of physiotherapy education using videoconferencing. J Telemed Telecare. 2004;10 Suppl 1:74–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Huijgen BC, Vollenbroek-Hutten MM, Zampolini M, Opisso E, Bernabeu M, Van Nieuwenhoven J, et al. Feasibility of a home-based telerehabilitation system compared to usual care: arm/hand function in patients with stroke, traumatic brain injury and multiple sclerosis. J Telemed Telecare. 2008;14(5):249–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lai JC, Woo J, Hui E, Chan WM. Telerehabilitation - a new model for community-based stroke rehabilitation. J Telemed Telecare. 2004;10(4):199–205.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Tran BQ, Buckley KM, Prandoni CM. Selection & use of telehealth technology in support of homebound caregivers of stroke patients. Caring. 2002;21(3):16–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Carter L, Rukholm E, Kelloway L. Stroke education for nurses through a technology-enabled program. J Neurosci Nurs. 2009;41(6):336–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Durfee W, Carey J, Nuckley D, Deng J. Design and implementation of a home stroke telerehabilitation system. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2009;2009:2422–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Brennan DM, Lum PS, Uswatte G, Taub E, Gilmore BM, Barman J. A telerehabilitation platform for home-based automated therapy of arm function. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2011;2011:1819–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Joubert J, Joubert LB, de Bustos EM, Ware D, Jackson D, Harrison T, et al. Telestroke in stroke survivors. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2009;27 Suppl 4:28–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Johansson T, Mutzenbach SJ, Ladurner G. Telemedicine in acute stroke care: the TESSA model. J Telemed Telecare. 2011;17(5):268–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Durfee WKWS, Bhatt E, Nagpal A, Carey JR. Design and usability of a home telerehabilitation system to train hand recovery following stroke. J Med Dev. 2009;3:0410031–8.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Broeren J, Dixon M, Sunnerhagen KS, Rydmark M. Rehabilitation after stroke using virtual reality, haptics (force feedback) and telemedicine. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2006;124:51–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Yu T. Telemedicine and the older person. CME Geriatri Med. 2010;12(3):123–7.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Marziali EDP, Crossin G. Caring for others: internet health care support intervention for family caregivers of persons with Alzheimer's, stroke, or Parkinson's disease. Fam Soc J Contemp Soc Serv. 2005;86(3):375–83.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Palsbo SE, Dawson SJ, Savard L, Goldstein M, Heuser A. Televideo assessment using Functional Reach Test and European Stroke Scale. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2007;44(5):659–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Buckley KM, Tran BQ, Prandoni CM. Receptiveness, use and acceptance of telehealth by caregivers of stroke patients in the home. Online J Issues Nurs. 2004;9(3):9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Stein JHR, Fasoli S, Krebs HI, Hogan N. Clinical applications of robots in rehabilitation. Crit Rev Phys Rehabil Med. 2005;17(3):217–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Taylor DM, Cameron JI, Walsh L, McEwen S, Kagan A, Streiner DL, et al. Exploring the feasibility of videoconference delivery of a self-management program to rural participants with stroke. Telemed J E Health. 2009;15(7):646–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Brennan DM, Georgeadis AC, Baron CR, Barker LM. The effect of videoconference-based telerehabilitation on story retelling performance by brain-injured subjects and its implications for remote speech-language therapy. Telemed J E Health. 2004;10(2):147–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest

Mark N Rubin declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Kay E Wellik declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Dwight D Channer declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Bart M. Demaerschalk discloses having served as a consultant to Cell Trust and REACH.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA

    Mark N. Rubin

  2. Department of Library Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA

    Kay E. Wellik

  3. Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, 5777 East Mayo Clinic Blvd., Phoenix, AZ, 85254, USA

    Dwight D. Channer & Bart M. Demaerschalk

Authors
  1. Mark N. Rubin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kay E. Wellik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dwight D. Channer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Bart M. Demaerschalk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bart M. Demaerschalk.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Cardiovascular Disease and Stroke

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rubin, M.N., Wellik, K.E., Channer, D.D. et al. Systematic Review of Telestroke for Post-Stroke Care and Rehabilitation. Curr Atheroscler Rep 15, 343 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11883-013-0343-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11883-013-0343-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation