Abstract
In the era of aggressive control of cardiovascular risk factors such as hypertension, the mantra of “lower is better” has taken a strong foothold. Although there is clear epidemiologic evidence that lower blood pressure improves specific organ-related outcomes, this rule does not apply to all patients and definitely not all target organs. The concept of J-curve or adverse outcomes at lower blood pressure has been proposed for more than three decades but has recently come under increasing scrutiny. Specifically, a relationship between adverse cardiovascular outcomes and low diastolic blood pressure has been observed in multiple clinical trials. In this article we review the advances in understanding of the J-curve phenomenon and include a discussion on specific populations that might be at higher risk due to the J-curve relationship.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
Frank E. Deutsches Archiv Fur Klin. Vol 103; 1911.
Turnbull F. Effects of different blood-pressure-lowering regimens on major cardiovascular events: results of prospectively-designed overviews of randomised trials. Lancet. 2003;362(9395):1527–35.
Collins R, Peto R, MacMahon S, et al. Blood pressure, stroke, and coronary heart disease: part 2, short-term reductions in blood pressure: overview of randomised drug trials in their epidemiological context. Lancet. 1990;335(8693):827–38.
Lewington S. Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies. Lancet. 2002;360(9349):1903–13.
Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, et al. The seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. 2003;289(19):2560–71.
Stewart IMG. Relation of reduction in pressure to first myocardial infarction in patients receiving treatment for severe hypertension. The Lancet. 1979;313(8121):861–5.
Cruickshank J, Thorp J, Zacharias FJ. Benefits and potential harm of lowering high blood pressure. Lancet. 1987;329(8533):581–4.
Waller PC, Isles C, Lever AF, Murray GD, McInnes GT. Does therapeutic reduction of diastolic blood pressure cause death from coronary heart disease? J Hum Hypertens. 1988;2(1):7–10.
Farnett L, Mulrow CD, Linn WD, Lucey CR, Tuley MR. The J-Curve phenomenon and the treatment of hypertension. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. 1991;265(4):489–95.
Chrysant S. Current status of aggressive blood pressure control. World Journal of Cardiology. 2011;3(3):65–71.
•• Messerli FH, Panjrath GS. The J-Curve between blood pressure and coronary artery disease or essential hypertension: exactly how essential? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54(20):1827–34. This article is a comprehensive review of literature supporting the J-curve relationship and DBP over the past decade and discussion on the underlying pathophysiology.
Williams B, Lacy PS, Thom SM, Cruickshank K, Stanton A, Collier D, Hughes AD, Thurston H, O'Rourke M, CAFE Investigators, Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial Investigators, CAFE Steering Committee and Writing Committee. Differential impact of blood pressure-lowering drugs on central aortic pressure and clinical outcomes: principal results of the Conduit Artery Function Evaluation (CAFE) study. Circulation. 2006;113(9):1213–25.
Group JS. Principal results of the Japanese Trial to Assess Optimal Systolic Blood Pressure in Elderly Hypertensive Patients (JATOS). Hypertens Res. 2008;31(12):2115–27.
Ogihara T, Saruta T, Rakugi H, et al. Target blood pressure for treatment of isolated systolic hypertension in the elderly. Hypertension. August 1, 2010 2010;56(2):196–202.
Oates DJ, Berlowitz DR, Glickman ME, Silliman RA, Borzecki AM. Blood pressure and survival in the oldest old. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007;55(3):383–8.
Denardo SJ, Gong Y, Nichols WW, et al. Blood pressure and outcomes in very old hypertensive coronary artery disease patients: an INVEST Substudy. Am J Med. 2010;123(8):719–26.
Beckett NS, Peters R, Fletcher AE, et al. Treatment of hypertension in patients 80 years of age or older. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(18):1887–98.
de Craen AJM, Gussekloo J, Teng YKO, Macfarlane PW, Westendorp RGJ. Prevalence of five common clinical abnormalities in very elderly people: population based cross sectional study. BMJ. 2003;327(7407):131–2.
Hall W. Representation of blacks, women, and the very elderly (aged = 80) in 28 major randomized clinical trials. Ethn Dis. 1999;9:333–339.
Denardo SJ, Messerli FH, Gaxiola E, et al. Coronary revascularization strategy and outcomes according to blood pressure (from the International Verapamil SR-Trandolapril Study [INVEST]). Am J Cardiol. 2010;106(4):498–503.
Messerli FH, Bangalore S, Htyte N, Ather S. Authors' Reply. Am J Cardiol. 2009;107(3):491–2.
• Bangalore S, Qin J, Sloan S, Murphy SA, Cannon CP, for the PITTTI. What is the optimal blood pressure in patients after acute coronary syndromes? Circulation 2010;122(21):2142–2151. In this trial of patients with recent acute coronary syndrome, DBP was found to be a predictor of poor prognosis. The J-curve relationship was observed with both SBP and DBP.
Fagard RH, Staessen JA, Thijs L, et al. On-treatment diastolic blood pressure and prognosis in systolic hypertension. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(17):1884–91.
Sleight P, Redon J, Verdecchia P, et al. Prognostic value of blood pressure in patients with high vascular risk in the Ongoing Telmisartan Alone and in combination with Ramipril Global Endpoint Trial study. J Hypertens. 2009;27(7):1360–9.
•• Bangalore S, Messerli FH, Wun C-C, et al. J-curve revisited: an analysis of blood pressure and cardiovascular events in the Treating to New Targets (TNT) trial. European Heart Journal, 2010. This is a recent study on patients in whom the traditional cardiovascular risk factors were well controlled and demonstrated a J-curve relationship with DBP.
•• Group AS. Long-term effects of intensive glucose lowering on cardiovascular outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(9):818–828. This is the first large, randomized controlled trial in diabetic patients showing no additional benefit from aggressive blood pressure lowering.
•• Cooper-DeHoff RM, Gong Y, Handberg EM, et al. Tight blood pressure control and cardiovascular outcomes among hypertensive patients with diabetes and coronary artery disease. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association 2010;304(1):61–68. This is a substudy of INVEST showing no additional benefit of tight control of SBP in patients with diabetes and/or CAD.
Schrier RW, Estacio RO, Esler A, Mehler P. Effects of aggressive blood pressure control in normotensive type 2 diabetic patients on albuminuria, retinopathy and strokes. Kidney Int. 2002;61(3):1086–97.
Appel LJ, Wright JT, Greene T, et al. Intensive blood-pressure control in hypertensive chronic kidney disease. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(10):918–29.
• Agarwal R. Blood pressure components and the risk for end-stage renal disease and death in chronic kidney disease. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 2009;4(4):830–837. This trial showed a J-curve relationship between DBP and adverse outcomes in participants with CKD.
Mandell BF. Hypertension: do not worry about the "J curve” treat the patient. Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine. 2011;78(2):74–4.
Bryan W. Hypertension and the "J-Curve". J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54(20):1835–6.
Disclosure
No conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Panjrath, G.S., Chaudhari, S. & Messerli, F.H. The J-Point Phenomenon in Aggressive Therapy of Hypertension: New Insights. Curr Atheroscler Rep 14, 124–129 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11883-012-0233-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11883-012-0233-4