Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Approach to Perioperative Anaphylaxis in 2020: Updates in Diagnosis and Management

  • Anaphylaxis and Drug Allergy (BT Kelly and M Castells, Section Editors)
  • Published:
Current Allergy and Asthma Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

The goal of the paper is to review the epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and manifestations of perioperative anaphylaxis (POA). We seek to review the most common culprits of POA and different diagnostic modalities for evaluation.

Recent Findings

Specific IgE testing has a limited role in POA evaluation due to lack of widespread availability and low sensitivity. Basophil activation testing is complementary to skin tests and can assist NMBA sensitivity diagnosis in complex cases. In the past years, there has been an exponential increase in suspected teicoplanin allergic reactions in the European Union. Chlorhexidine is also being increasingly implicated as a culprit in POA.

Summary

Multiple classes of perioperative medications cause POA. Diagnostic modalities available include skin testing with nonirritating concentrations, basophil activation tests, specific IgE, and drug provocation testing. An accurate record and critical analysis of perioperative events is more important than isolated test results. Future studies evaluating the pathophysiology of these reactions and other therapeutic strategies, such as targeting the MRGPRX2 receptor, are needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

POA:

Perioperative anaphylaxis

NMBAs:

Neuromuscular blocking agents

NAP6:

National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anesthetists

MRGPRX2:

Mas-related G protein–coupled receptor X2

BAT:

Basophil activation testing

DPT:

Drug provocation testing

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Harper NJN, Cook TM, Garcez T, et al. Anaesthesia, surgery, and life-threatening allergic reactions: epidemiology and clinical features of perioperative anaphylaxis in the 6th National Audit Project (NAP6). Br J Anaesth. 2018;121(1):159–71. COMMENT: Results from the most recent National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anesthetists describing current epidemiologic trends in perioperative anaphylaxis.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kemp HI, Cook TM, Thomas M, Harper NJN. UK anaesthetists’ perspectives and experiences of severe perioperative anaphylaxis: NAP6 baseline survey. Br J Anaesth. 2017;119(1):132–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Savic LC, Kaura V, Yusaf M, Hammond-Jones AM, Jackson R, Howell S, et al. Incidence of suspected perioperative anaphylaxis: a multicenter snapshot study. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2015;3(3):454–5 e451.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mertes PM, Volcheck GW, Garvey LH, Takazawa T, Platt PR, Guttormsen AB, et al. Epidemiology of perioperative anaphylaxis. Presse Med. 2016;45(9):758–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hsu Blatman KS, Hepner DL. Current knowledge and Management of Hypersensitivity to perioperative drugs and Radiocontrast media. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017;5(3):587–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Turner PJ, Gowland MH, Sharma V, Ierodiakonou D, Harper N, Garcez T, et al. Increase in anaphylaxis-related hospitalizations but no increase in fatalities: an analysis of United Kingdom national anaphylaxis data, 1992-2012. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015;135(4):956–63 e951.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Volcheck GW, Hepner DL. Identification and Management of Perioperative Anaphylaxis. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019;7(7):2134–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Harper NJ, Dixon T, Dugue P, et al. Suspected anaphylactic reactions associated with anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 2009;64(2):199–211.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Mertes PM, Alla F, Trechot P, Auroy Y, Jougla E. Groupe d'Etudes des reactions Anaphylactoides P. anaphylaxis during anesthesia in France: an 8-year national survey. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011;128(2):366–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rose MA, Green SL, Crilly HM, Kolawole H. Perioperative anaphylaxis grading system: 'making the grade'. Br J Anaesth. 2016;117(5):551–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Garvey LH, Belhage B, Kroigaard M, Husum B, Malling HJ, Mosbech H. Treatment with epinephrine (adrenaline) in suspected anaphylaxis during anesthesia in Denmark. Anesthesiology. 2011;115(1):111–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Francuzik W, Dolle-Bierke S, Knop M, et al. Refractory anaphylaxis: data from the European anaphylaxis registry. Front Immunol. 2019;10:2482.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Vitte J, Amadei L, Gouitaa M, et al. Paired acute-baseline serum tryptase levels in perioperative anaphylaxis: an observational study. Allergy. 2019;74(6):1157–65. COMMENT: Highlights the importance of paired tryptase levels in the diagnosis of perioperative anaphylaxis.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Brown JC, Simons E, Rudders SA. Epinephrine in the Management of Anaphylaxis. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020;8(4):1186–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ebo DG, Van Gasse AL, Decuyper II, et al. Acute management, diagnosis, and follow-up of suspected perioperative hypersensitivity reactions in Flanders 2001-2018. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019;7(7):2194–204 e2197.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Guyer AC, Saff RR, Conroy M, Blumenthal KG, Camargo CA Jr, Long AA, et al. Comprehensive allergy evaluation is useful in the subsequent care of patients with drug hypersensitivity reactions during anesthesia. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2015;3(1):94–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lafuente A, Javaloyes G, Berroa F, Goikoetxea MJ, Moncada R, Núñez-Córdoba JM, et al. Early skin testing is effective for diagnosis of hypersensitivity reactions occurring during anesthesia. Allergy. 2013;68(6):820–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Brockow K, Garvey LH, Aberer W, Atanaskovic-Markovic M, Barbaud A, Bilo MB, et al. Skin test concentrations for systemically administered drugs -- an ENDA/EAACI drug allergy interest group position paper. Allergy. 2013;68(6):702–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kim YY, Kim IT, Shin SI, Yim SM. Intradermal skin tests for rocuronium and cisatracurium in patients with a history of allergy: a retrospective study. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2018;71(4):296–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Suzuki M, Kawase H, Ogita A, Bito H. Skin testing to identify safe drugs for patients with Rocuronium-induced anaphylaxis. Case Rep Anesthesiol. 2020;2020:8163620.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Moneret-Vautrin DA, Kanny G. Anaphylaxis to muscle relaxants: rational for skin tests. Allerg Immunol (Paris). 2002;34(7):233–40.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sadleir PH, Russell T, Clarke RC, Maycock E, Platt PR. Intraoperative anaphylaxis to sugammadex and a protocol for intradermal skin testing. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2014;42(1):93–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mullins RJ, James H, Platts-Mills TA, Commins S. Relationship between red meat allergy and sensitization to gelatin and galactose-alpha-1,3-galactose. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012;129(5):1334–42 e1331.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Shiratori T, Sato A, Fukuzawa M, Kondo N, Tanno S. Severe dextran-induced anaphylactic shock during induction of hypertension-hypervolemia-Hemodilution therapy following subarachnoid hemorrhage. Case Rep Crit Care. 2015;2015:967560.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Reddy JI, Cooke PJ, van Schalkwyk JM, Hannam JA, Fitzharris P, Mitchell SJ. Anaphylaxis is more common with rocuronium and succinylcholine than with atracurium. Anesthesiology. 2015;122(1):39–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Dong S, Acouetey DS, Gueant-Rodriguez RM, et al. Prevalence of IgE against neuromuscular blocking agents in hairdressers and bakers. Clin Exp Allergy. 2013;43(11):1256–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Florvaag E, Johansson SG. The pholcodine story. Immunol Allergy Clin N Am. 2009;29(3):419–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Che D, Wang J, Ding Y, Liu R, Cao J, Zhang Y, et al. Mivacurium induce mast cell activation and pseudo-allergic reactions via MAS-related G protein coupled receptor-X2. Cell Immunol. 2018;332:121–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Navines-Ferrer A, Serrano-Candelas E, Lafuente A, Munoz-Cano R, Martin M, Gastaminza G. MRGPRX2-mediated mast cell response to drugs used in perioperative procedures and anaesthesia. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):11628.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. McNeil BD, Pundir P, Meeker S, et al. Identification of a mast-cell-specific receptor crucial for pseudo-allergic drug reactions. Nature. 2015;519(7542):237–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Suzuki Y, Liu S, Ogasawara T, Sawasaki T, Takasaki Y, Yorozuya T, et al. A novel MRGPRX2-targeting antagonistic DNA aptamer inhibits histamine release and prevents mast cell-mediated anaphylaxis. Eur J Pharmacol. 2020;878:173104.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Garvey LH, Dewachter P, Hepner DL, et al. Management of suspected immediate perioperative allergic reactions: an international overview and consensus recommendations. Br J Anaesth. 2019;123(1):e50–64. COMMENT: Comprehensive review on updated management of perioperative anaphylaxis.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Dewachter P, Chollet-Martin S, Mouton-Faivre C, de Chaisemartin L, Nicaise-Roland P. Comparison of basophil activation test and skin testing performances in NMBA allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018;6(5):1681–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Tacquard C, Collange O, Gomis P, Malinovsky JM, Petitpain N, Demoly P, et al. Anaesthetic hypersensitivity reactions in France between 2011 and 2012: the 10th GERAP epidemiologic survey. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2017;61(3):290–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Sadleir PH, Clarke RC, Bunning DL, Platt PR. Anaphylaxis to neuromuscular blocking drugs: incidence and cross-reactivity in Western Australia from 2002 to 2011. Br J Anaesth. 2013;110(6):981–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Miller J, Clough SB, Pollard RC, Misbah SA. Outcome of repeat anaesthesia after investigation for perioperative anaphylaxis. Br J Anaesth. 2018;120(6):1195–201.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Chiriac AM, Tacquard C, Fadhel NB, Pellerin C, Malinovsky JM, Mertes PM, et al. Safety of subsequent general anaesthesia in patients allergic to neuromuscular blocking agents: value of allergy skin testing. Br J Anaesth. 2018;120(6):1437–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Gouel-Cheron A, Neukirch C, Chollet-Martin S, Longrois D, Nicaise-Roland P, de Chaisemartin L. Grade IV perioperative anaphylaxis to atracurium despite a previous negative skin test. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020;8:2445–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Rose MA, Anderson J, Green SL, Yun J, Fernando SL. Morphine and pholcodine-specific IgE have limited utility in the diagnosis of anaphylaxis to benzylisoquinolines. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2018;62(5):628–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Dona I, Barrionuevo E, Blanca-Lopez N, et al. Trends in hypersensitivity drug reactions: more drugs, more response patterns, more heterogeneity. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2014;24(3):143–53 quiz 141 p following 153.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Ebo DG, Faber M, Elst J, et al. In vitro diagnosis of immediate drug hypersensitivity during anesthesia: a review of the literature. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018;6(4):1176–84. COMMENT: Comprehensive review of in vitro diagnostic techniques in perioperative anaphylaxis.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Uyttebroek AP, Sabato V, Leysen J, Bridts CH, De Clerck LS, Ebo DG. Flowcytometric diagnosis of atracurium-induced anaphylaxis. Allergy. 2014;69(10):1324–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Ebo DG, Bridts CH, Hagendorens MM, Mertens CH, De Clerck LS, Stevens WJ. Flow-assisted diagnostic management of anaphylaxis from rocuronium bromide. Allergy. 2006;61(8):935–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Uyttebroek AP, Sabato V, Bridts CH, De Clerck LS, Ebo DG. Immunoglobulin E antibodies to atracurium: a new diagnostic tool? Clin Exp Allergy. 2015;45(2):485–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Garvey LH, Ebo DG, Kroigaard M, et al. The use of drug provocation testing in the investigation of suspected immediate perioperative allergic reactions: current status. Br J Anaesth. 2019;123(1):e126–34. COMMENT: Introduces the potential role of drug provocation challenges in the evaluation of perioperative anaphylaxis.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Jabaley CS, Wolf FA, Lynde GC, O'Reilly-Shah VN. Crowdsourcing sugammadex adverse event rates using an in-app survey: feasibility assessment from an observational study. Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2018;9(7):331–42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Baldo BA, McDonnell NJ, Pham NH. The cyclodextrin sugammadex and anaphylaxis to rocuronium: is rocuronium still potentially allergenic in the inclusion complex form? Mini Rev Med Chem. 2012;12(8):701–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Ebo DG, Baldo BA, Van Gasse AL, et al. Anaphylaxis to sugammadex-rocuronium inclusion complex: an IgE-mediated reaction due to allergenic changes at the sugammadex primary rim. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020;8(4):1410–5 e1413.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Hashimoto M, Sato Boku A, Tachi N, et al. Two cases of Rocuronium-induced anaphylaxis/anaphylactic shock successfully treated with Sugammadex. Anesth Prog. 2019;66(3):151–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Platt PR, Clarke RC, Johnson GH, Sadleir PH. Efficacy of sugammadex in rocuronium-induced or antibiotic-induced anaphylaxis. A case-control study. Anaesthesia. 2015;70(11):1264–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Ebo DG, Clarke RC, Mertes PM, Platt PR, Sabato V, Sadleir PHM. Molecular mechanisms and pathophysiology of perioperative hypersensitivity and anaphylaxis: a narrative review. Br J Anaesth. 2019;123(1):e38–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Kuhlen JL Jr, Camargo CA Jr, Balekian DS, Blumenthal KG, Guyer A, Morris T, et al. Antibiotics are the Most commonly identified cause of perioperative hypersensitivity reactions. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2016;4(4):697–704.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Marinho S. Perioperative anaphylaxis - Time for a NAP... 6! Clin Exp Allergy. 2018;48(10):1252–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Uyttebroek AP, Decuyper II, Bridts CH, Romano A, Hagendorens MM, Ebo DG, et al. Cefazolin hypersensitivity: toward optimized diagnosis. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2016;4(6):1232–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Kayode OS, Rutkowski K, Haque R, Till SJ, Siew LQC. Teicoplanin hypersensitivity in perioperative anaphylaxis. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020;8(6):2110–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Marinho S, Kemp H, Cook TM, Farmer L, Farooque S, Lucas DN, et al. Cross-sectional study of perioperative drug and allergen exposure in UK practice in 2016: the 6th National Audit Project (NAP6) allergen survey. Br J Anaesth. 2018;121(1):146–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Rutkowski K, Wagner A. Chlorhexidine: a new latex? Eur Urol. 2015;68(3):345–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Opstrup MS, Garvey LH. Intraoperative anaphylaxis: remember the hidden allergens. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018;6(6):2175–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Opstrup MS, Jemec GBE, Garvey LH. Chlorhexidine allergy: on the rise and often overlooked. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2019;19(5):23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Calogiuri G, Garvey LH, DiLeo E, Nettis E, Vacca A, Foti C. Injured skin as risk factor for chlorhexidine anaphylaxis. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018;6(6):2177.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Garvey LH, Hunter JM. Changing culprits in perioperative anaphylaxis. Br J Anaesth. 2018;121(1):114–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Haque RA, Wagner A, Whisken JA, Nasser SM, Ewan PW. Anaphylaxis to patent blue V: a case series and proposed diagnostic protocol. Allergy. 2010;65(3):396–400.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Kalangara J, Potru S, Kuruvilla M. Clinical manifestations and diagnostic evaluation of opioid allergy labels - a review. J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2019;33(3–4):131–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Dewachter P, Kopac P, Laguna JJ, Mertes PM, Sabato V, Volcheck GW, et al. Anaesthetic management of patients with pre-existing allergic conditions: a narrative review. Br J Anaesth. 2019;123(1):e65–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Laguna JJ, Archilla J, Dona I, et al. Practical guidelines for perioperative hypersensitivity reactions. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2018;28(4):216–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Charlesworth M, Shelton CL. Should intravenous gelatins have a role in contemporary peri-operative and critical care? Anaesthesia. 2020;75(2):266–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Levy JH, Bartz RR. Protamine, is something fishy about it? The spectre of anaphylaxis continues. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2019;33(2):487–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Freundlich RE, Duggal NM, Housey M, Tremper TT, Engoren MC, Kheterpal S. Intraoperative medications associated with hemodynamically significant anaphylaxis. J Clin Anesth. 2016;35:415–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Merin Kuruvilla.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Dr. Lynde reports personal fees from Merck Pharmacuticals. The other authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Anaphylaxis and Drug Allergy

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kalangara, J., Vanijcharoenkarn, K., Lynde, G.C. et al. Approach to Perioperative Anaphylaxis in 2020: Updates in Diagnosis and Management. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 21, 4 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11882-020-00980-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11882-020-00980-y

Keywords

Navigation