Primary Prevention of Food Allergy
- 715 Downloads
Food allergy is estimated to affect approximately 8% of children in the USA. This is a disease without any known treatment or cure and, for some, a disease that can be quite severe, even life-threatening. While recent advances in potential treatment have made remarkable strides, with two food-targeted immunotherapy products now in phase III trials, perhaps the biggest gains in the field have come in the advent of potential preventative strategies to avoid the development of food allergy in high-risk individuals. There have been multiple, randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) performed in the past 5 years that have demonstrated significant risk reduction from early allergen introduction. These include two trials for early peanut introduction and five trials for early egg introduction in the first year of life. The results indicate that primary prevention of food allergy through early allergen introduction may represent a strategy that could potentially avert tens of thousands of children from becoming food allergic. In support of the data for peanut, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases recently sponsored an addendum to the 2010 food allergy guidelines, specifically recommending peanut be introduced in both high- and standard-risk infants to reduce the risk of developing peanut allergy. To date, no formal recommendations have been made for egg, however. This review will focus on the latest evidence supporting early introduction as a strategy to prevent food allergy, as well as on practical aspects for its successful implementation.
KeywordsFood allergy Peanut allergy Allergy treatment Immunotherapy Food allergy guidelines
Randomized controlled trials
Randomized, placebo-controlled trial
Influences of Lifestyle-Related Factors on the Immune System and the Development of Allergies in Childhood
Oral food challenge
Learning Early About Peanut Study
Relative risk reduction
Absolute risk reduction
Number needed to treat
Enquiring About Tolerance
Solids Timing for Allergy Reduction
Starting Time for Egg Protection
Beating Egg Allergy Study
Hen’s Egg Allergy Prevention
Prevention of Egg Allergy with Tiny Amount Intake
American Academy of Pediatrics
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology
Skin prick test
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
Matthew Greenhawt is supported by grant 1K08HS024599-01 from the Agency for Healthcare Quality and Research; was an Expert Panel member of the NIAID-sponsored Guidelines for Peanut Allergy Prevention; represented the American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology in the formation of the Consensus Communication on Early Peanut Introduction and the Prevention of Peanut Allergy in High-Risk Infants; has served as a consultant for the Canadian Transportation Agency and Aimmune Therapeutics; is a member of physician/medical advisory boards for Aimmune, Nutricia, Kaleo Pharmaceutical, Nestle, and Monsanto; is a member of the scientific advisory boards for the National Peanut Board; has received honorarium for lectures from Thermo Fisher, ReachMD, and the Kentucky/Pennsylvania/Aspen/New York allergy societies, the ACAAI, the EAACI, and UCLA/Harbor Medical Center; and is a member of the Joint Taskforce on Allergy Practice Parameters.
David Fleischer is a member of the scientific advisory council for the National Peanut Board, represented the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology in the formation of the Consensus Communication on Early Peanut Introduction and the Prevention of Peanut Allergy in High-Risk Infants; was a Coordinating Committee and Expert Panel member of the NIAID-sponsored Guidelines for Peanut Allergy Prevention; is a member of physician/medical advisory boards for Aimmune, Kaleo Pharmaceutical, Nestle, and Monsanto; and received grant support from Nestle, Monsanto, DBV Technologies, and Aimmune Therapeutics.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Sources of Support
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
- 4.• Venter C, Maslin K, Patil V, Kurukulaaratchy R, Grundy J, Glasbey G, et al. The prevalence, natural history and time trends of peanut allergy over the first 10 years of life in two cohorts born in the same geographical location 12 years apart. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2016;27:804–11. This recent update to the Isle of Wight cohort questions if the prevalence of peanut allergy has really increased.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 5.•• Ierodiakonou D, Garcia-Larsen V, Logan A, Groome A, Cunha S, Chivinge J, et al. Timing of allergenic food introduction to the infant diet and risk of allergic or autoimmune disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2016;316:1181–92. A cutting edge meta-analysis of food allergy prevention trials showing sginficant risk reduction is associated with both early egg and early peanut introduction.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 18.•• Perkin MR, Logan K, Tseng A, Raji B, Ayis S, Peacock J, et al. Randomized trial of introduction of allergenic foods in breast-fed infants. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:1733–43. An innovtive study showing small risk reduction in the development of peanut and egg allergy in standard risk breast fed infants introduced peanut and egg at 3 months vs. 6 months of life, but in the per protocol analysis only.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 21.•• Bellach J, Schwarz V, Ahrens B, Trendelenburg V, Aksunger O, Kalb B, et al. Randomized placebo-controlled trial of hen’s egg consumption for primary prevention in infants. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016; doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.06.045. An early egg introduction study suggesting possible increased risk of allergy and the potential that egg-senstized individuals are at risk of severe reaction upon early egg introduction.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 22.•• Natsume O, Kabashima S, Nakazato J, Yamamoto-Hanada K, Narita M, Kondo M, et al. Two-step egg introduction for prevention of egg allergy in high-risk infants with eczema (PETIT): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2017;389:276–86. A highly successful trial of early cooked egg introduction in eczematous children where their eczema was conrolled before introduction. The trial was halted early as it showed clear benefit.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 25.Greer FR, Sicherer SH, Burks AW. Effects of early nutritional interventions on the development of atopic disease in infants and children: the role of maternal dietary restriction, breastfeeding, timing of introduction of complementary foods, and hydrolyzed formulas. Pediatrics. 2008;121:183–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 27.•• Togias A, Cooper SF, Acebal ML, Assa’ad A, Baker Jr JR, Beck LA, et al. Addendum guidelines for the prevention of peanut allergy in the United States: report of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases—sponsored expert panel. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017;139:29–44. The most up-to-date US infant feeding policy, recmmending early peanut introduction.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 33.O'Connor C, Kelleher M, Horrihane J. Calculating the effect of population-level implementation of the Learning Early About Peanut Allergy (LEAP) protocol to prevent peanut allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016;137:1263–4 e1-2.Google Scholar
- 34.Greenhawt M, Fleischer D, Chan ES, Venter C, Stukus D, Gupta R, et al. LEAPing through the looking glass: secondary analysis of the effect of skin test size and age of introduction on peanut tolerance after early peanut introduction. Allergy 2016.Google Scholar
- 35.Australioasian Society of Clinical Immunology and Allergy infant feeding guidelines. At https://www.allergy.org.au/images/pcc/ASCIA_Guidelines_infant_feeding_and_allergy_prevention.pdf. Accessed December 4, 2016.