Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

General anesthetic allergy testing

  • Published:
Current Allergy and Asthma Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Anaphylaxis in the setting of general anesthesia is a rare but potentially lethal event. The investigation of severe reactions is important for confirming the clinical diagnosis and identifying likely causative agents and safe agents that may be used in the future. Many comprehensive reports have described the testing protocol of individual specialized units, whereas there has been no standardization of testing techniques or formal assessment of these tests’ diagnostic accuracy. We review the literature with reference to the recently published standards for reporting of diagnostic accuracy (STARD) and make recommendations for future studies of diagnostic accuracy in the field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

  1. Ebo DG, Fisher MM, Hagendorens MM, et al.: Anaphylaxis during anaesthesia: diagnostic approach. Allergy 2007, 62:471–487.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fisher M: Intradermal testing after anaphylactoid reaction to anaesthetic drugs: practical aspects of performance and interpretation. Anaesth Intensive Care 1984, 12:115–120.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Thong BY, Yeow-Chan: Anaphylaxis during surgical and interventional procedures. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2004, 92:619–628.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al.: The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration. Clin Chem 2003, 49:7–18.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Murat I: Anaphylactic reactions during paediatric anaesthesia; results of the survey of the French Society of Paediatric Anaesthetists (ADARPEF). Paediatr Anaesth 1993, 3:339–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fisher MM, Baldo BA: The incidence and clinical features of anaphylactic reactions during anesthesia in Australia. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 1993, 12:97–104.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Laxenaire MC, Mertes PM: Anaphylaxis during anaesthesia. Results of a two-year survey in France. Br J Anaesth 2001, 87:549–558.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Karila C, Brunet-Langot D, Labbez F, et al.: Anaphylaxis during anesthesia: results of a 12-year survey at a French pediatric center. Allergy 2005, 60:828–834.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Levy JH, Gottge M, Szlam F, et al.: Weal and flare responses to intradermal rocuronium and cisatracurium in humans. Br J Anaesth 2000, 85:844–849.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fisher M, Baldo BA: Anaphylaxis during anaesthesia: current aspects of diagnosis and prevention. Eur J Anaesthesiol 1994, 11:263–284.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Chacko T, Ledford D: Peri-anesthetic anaphylaxis. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am 2007, 27:213–230.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Laxenaire MC, Mouton DC, Moneret-Vautrin DA, et al.: Drugs and another agents involved in anaphylactic shock during anesthesia: a French multicenter epidemiological inquiry. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 1993, 12:91–96.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Simon MR: Anaphylaxis associated with relative bradycardia. Ann Allergy 1989, 62:495–497.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Currie M, Kerridge RK, Bacon AK, Williamson JA: Crisis management during anaesthesia: anaphylaxis and allergy. Qual Saf Health Care 2005, 14:e19.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Fisher MM, Bowey CJ: Intradermal compared with prick testing in the diagnosis of anaesthetic allergy. Br J Anaesth 1997, 79:59–63.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Garvey LH, Roed-Petersen J, Menné T, Husum B.: Danish Anaesthesia Allergy Centre—preliminary results. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2001, 45:1204–1209.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Thacker MA, Davis FM: Subsequent general anaesthesia in patients with a history of previous anaphylactoid/anaphylactic reaction to muscle relaxant. Anaesth Intensive Care 1999, 27:190–193.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Pepys J, Pepys EO, Baldo BA, Whitwam JG: Anaphylactic/anaphylactoid reactions to anaesthetic and associated agents. Skin prick tests in aetiological diagnosis. Anaesthesia 1994, 49:470–475.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Rose M, Fisher M: Rocuronium: high risk for anaphylaxis? Br J Anaesth 2001, 86:678–682.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Harboe T, Guttormsen AB, Irgens A, et al.: Anaphylaxis during anesthesia in Norway: a 6-year single-center follow-up study. Anesthesiology 2005, 102:897–903.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Deville WL, Bezemer PD, Bouter LM: Publications on diagnostic test evaluation in family medicine journals: an optimal search strategy. J Clin Epidemiol 2000, 53:65–69.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Moscicki RA, Sockin SM, Corsello BF, et al.: Anaphylaxis during induction of general anesthesia: subsequent evaluation and management. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1990, 86:325–332.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Fisher MM, Baldo BA: Mast cell tryptase in anaesthetic anaphylactoid reactions. Br J Anaesth 1998, 80:26–29.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Brown SG, Blackman KE, Heddle RJ: Can serum mast cell tryptase help diagnose anaphylaxis? Emerg Med 2004, 16:120–124.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tamayo E, Perez M, Gomez JI, Alvarez FJ: Allergy of anaesthetizing agents in Spain. Br J Anaesth 1999, 83:336–337.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Mertes PM, Laxenair MC, Lienhart A, et al.: Reducing the risk of anaphylaxis during anaesthesia: guidelines for clinical practice. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 2005, 15:91–101.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Edwards R, Aronson JK: Adverse drug reactions: definitions, diagnosis, and management. Lancet 2000, 356:1255–1259.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kroigaard M, Garvey LH, Gillberg L, et al.: Scandinavian Clinical Practice Guidelines on the diagnosis, management and follow-up of anaphylaxis during anaesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2007, 51:655–670.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Aberer W, Bircher A, Romano A, et al.: Drug provocation testing in the diagnosis of drug hypersensitivity reactions: general considerations. Allergy 2003, 58:854–863.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Messaad D, Sahla H, Benahmed S, et al.: Drug provocation testing in patients with a history suggesting an immediate drug hypersensitivity reaction. Ann Intern Med 2004, 140:1001–1007.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Macy E, Mangat R, Burchette RJ: Penicillin skin testing in advance of need: multiyear follow-up in 568 test result-negative subjects exposed to oral penicillins. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2003, 111:1111–1115.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Torres MJ, Mayorga C, Leyva L, et al.: Controlled administration of penicillin to patients with a positive history but negative skin and specific serum IgE tests. Clin Exp Allergy 2002, 32:270–276.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Brockow K, Romano A, Blanca M, et al.: General considerations for skin test procedures in the diagnosis of drug hypersensitivity. Allergy 2002, 57:45–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Wöhrl S, Vigl K, Stingl G: Patients with drug reactions—is it worth testing? Allergy 2006, 61:928–934.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Schatz M: Skin testing and incremental challenge in the evaluation of adverse reactions to local anesthetics. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1984, 74:606–616.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Wasserfallen JB, Frei PC: Long-term evaluation of usefulness of skin and incremental challenge tests in patients with history of adverse reaction to local anesthetics. Allergy 1995, 50:162–165.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Nelson H: Variables in allergy skin testing. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am 2001, 21:281–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Vervloet D, Nizankowska E, Araud A, et al.: Adverse reactions to suxamethonium and other muscle relaxants under general anesthesia. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1983, 71:552–559.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Van der Schouw YT, Verbeek AL, Ruijs JH: ROC curves for the initial assessment of new diagnostic tests. Fam Pract 1992, 9:506–511.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. McCann WA, Ownby DR: The reproducibility of the allergy skin test scoring and interpretation by board-certified/board-eligible allergists. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2002, 89:368–371.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Turkeltaub P: Performance standards for allergen skin testing: an approach to proficiency testing. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am 2001, 21:321–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Mailing HJ: Methods of skin testing. Allergy 1993, 48:s14.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Laroche D, Malzac L, Nicaise-Roland P, et al.: Assessment of a new commercial IgE test for diagnosing allergy to neuromuscular blocking agents [abstract]. Anesthesiology 2008, 109:A1143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Mertes PM, Laxenaire M, Alla F: Anaphylactic and anaphylactoid reactions occurring during anesthesia in France in 1999–2000. Anesthesiology 2003, 99:521–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Bernstein D, Wanner M, Borish L, Liss G: Twelve-year survey of fatal reactions to allergen injections and skin testing: 1990–2001 J Allergy Clin Immunol 2004, 113:1129–1136.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Assem E: Anaphylactic anaesthetic reactions. The value of paper radioallergosorbent tests for IgE antibodies to muscle relaxants and thiopentone. Anaesthesia 1990, 45:1032–1038.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Hamilton R, Rossil CE, Yeang HY, et al.: Latex specific IgE assay sensitivity enhanced using Hev b5 enriched latex allergosorbent. Available at http://deptmed. med.som.jhmi.edu/research/2003/Abstracts/hamilton.html. Accessed July 8, 2008.

  48. Brown RH, Schauble JA, Hamilton RG: Prevalence of latex allergy in occupationally exposed healthcare workers: identification of sensitized but non-symptomatic latex allergic anesthesiologists. Anesthesiology 1998, 89:292–299.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Fisher MM, Baldo BA: Immunoassays in the diagnosis of anaphylaxis to neuromuscular blocking drugs: the value of morphine for the detection of IgE antibodies in allergic subjects. Anaesth Intensive Care 2000, 28:167–170.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Fisher MM, Merefield D, Baldo B: Failure to prevent an anaphylactic reaction to a second neuromuscular blocking drug during anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 1999, 82:770–773.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Grattan Street, Parkville, 3050, Victoria, Australia

    Karl E. Bleasel

Authors
  1. Karl E. Bleasel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Garry Donnan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gary A. Unglik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karl E. Bleasel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bleasel, K.E., Donnan, G. & Unglik, G.A. General anesthetic allergy testing. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 9, 50–56 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11882-009-0008-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11882-009-0008-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation