Developmental dyslexia: Related to specific or general deficits?

Abstract

The present study was designed to examine the question of whether developmental dyslexia in 12-year-old students at the beginning of secondary education in the Netherlands is confined to problems in the domain of reading and spelling or also is related to difficulties in other areas. In particular, hypotheses derived from theories on phonological processing, rapid automatized naming, working memory, and automatization of skills were tested. To overcome the definition and selection problems of many previous studies, we included in our study all students in the first year of secondary special education in a Dutch school district. Participants were classified as either dyslexic, garden-variety, or hyperlexic poor readers, according to the degree of discrepancy between their word recognition and listening comprehension scores. In addition, groups of normal readers were formed, matching the poor readers in either reading age or chronological age. A large test battery was administered to each student, including phonological, naming, working memory, speed of processing, and motor tests. The findings indicate that dyslexia is associated with deficits in (1) phonological recoding, word recognition (both in their native Dutch and in English as a second language), and spelling skills; and (2) naming speed for letters and digits. Dyslexia was not associated with deficits in other areas. The results suggest that developmental dyslexia, at the age of 12, might be (or might have become) a difficulty rather isolated from deficiencies in other cognitive and motor skills.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Aaron, P. G. 1991. Can reading disabilities be diagnosed without using intelligence tests? Journal of Learning Disabilities 24:178–86.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baddeley, A. D. 1986. Working Memory. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bowers, P. G., and Wolf, M. 1993. Theoretical links between naming speed, precise timing mechanisms and orthographic skill in dyslexia. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 5:69–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brus, B. Th., and Voeten, M. J. M. 1973. Eén-Minuut-Test [One-Minute TestOO123]. Nijmegen (Netherlands): Berkhout.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Caron, C., and Rutter, M. 1991. Comorbidity in child psychopathology: Concepts, issues and research strategies. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 32:1063–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. De Jong, P. F. 1998. Working memory deficits of reading disabled children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 70:75–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. De Jong, P. F., and Das-Smaal, E. A. 1995. Attention and intelligence: The validity of the Star Counting Test. Journal of Educational Psychology 87:80–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. De Jong, P. F., and Van der Leij, A. 1999. Phonological abilities and reading acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology 91:450–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. De Vos, T. 1992. Tempo Test Rekenen [Speeded Arithmetic Test00123]. Nijmegen (Netherlands): Berkhout.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Denckla, M., and Rudel, R. 1976. Rapid automatized naming (R.A.N.): Dyslexia differentiated from other disabilities. Neuropsychologia 14:471–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Elbro, C. 1996. Early linguistic abilities and reading development: A review and a hypothesis. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 8:1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ellis, N. 1981. Visual and name coding in dyslexic children. Psychological Research 43:201–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ellis, N., and Large, B. 1987. The development of reading: As you seek so shall you find. British Journal of Psychology 78:1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ellis, N., and Large, B. 1988. The early stages of reading: A longitudinal study. Applied Cognitive Psychology 2:47–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fawcett, A. J., and Nicolson, R. I. 1994. Speed of processing, motor skill, automaticity and dyslexia. In Dyslexia in Children. Multidisciplinary Perspectives. A. J. Fawcett and R. I. Nicolson, eds. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fawcett, A. J., Nicolson, R. I., and Dean, P. 1996. Impaired performance of children with dyslexia on a range of cerebellar tasks. Annals of Dyslexia 46:259–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Henderson, S. E., and Sugden, D. A. 1992. Movement Assessment Battery for Children. Kent, England: The Psychological Corporation Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lyon, G. R. 1995. Toward a definition of dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia 45:3–27.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Maussen, L. H. M. 1971. OTIS Test. Nijmegen (Netherlands): Berkhout.

    Google Scholar 

  20. McNicol, D. 1972. A Primer of Signal Detection Theory. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Miles, T. R. 1982. The Bangor Dyslexia Test. Wisbech, England: Learning Development Aids.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Miles, T. R. 1983. Dyslexia: The Pattern of Difficulties. St Albans, England: Granada Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Miles, T. R. 1994. A proposed taxonomy and some consequences. In Dyslexia in Children. Multidisciplinary Perspectives. A. J. Fawcett and R. I. Nicolson, eds. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Miles, T. R., Haslum, M. N., and Wheeler, T. J. 1998. Gender ratio in dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia 48:27–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Miles, T. R., and Haslum, M. N. 1986. Dyslexia: Anomaly or normal variation? Annals of Dyslexia 36:103–17.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Nicolson, R. I., and Fawcett, A. J. 1990. Automaticity: A new framework for dyslexia research? Cognition 30:1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Nicolson, R. I., and Fawcett, A. J. 1994. Comparison of deficit severity across skills: Towards a taxonomy for dyslexia. In Dyslexia in Children. Multidisciplinary Perspectives. A. J. Fawcett and R. I. Nicolson, eds. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Rack, J. P., Snowling, M. J., and Olson, R. K. 1992. The nonword reading deficit in developmental dyslexia: A review. Reading Research Quarterly 27:28–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Raven, J. C., Court, J. H., and Raven, J. 1979. Manual for Raven’s Progressive Matrices and Vocabulary Scales. Section I General Overview. London: H.K. Lewis & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Siegel, L. S. 1988. Evidence that IQ scores are irrelevant to the definition and analysis of reading disability. Canadian Journal of Psychology 42:202–15.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Siegel, L. S. 1989. I.Q. is irrelevant to the definition of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities 22:469–78.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Siegel, L. S. 1992. Dyslexics vs. poor readers: Is there a difference? Journal of Learning Disabilities 25:618–29.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Smart, D., Sanson, A., and Prior, M. 1996. Connections between reading disability and behavior problems: Testing temporal and causal hypotheses. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 24:363–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Snowling, M. J. Dyslexia: A Cognitive Developmental Perspective. Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell Ltd.

  35. Spring, C., and Capps, C. 1974. Encoding speed, rehearsal, and probed recall of dyslexic boys. Journal of Educational Psychology 66:780–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Stanovich, K. E. 1988. Explaining the differences between the dyslexic and the garden-variety poor reader: The phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Learning Disabilities 21:590–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Stanovich, K. E. 1991. Discrepancy definitions of reading disability: Has intelligence lead us astray? Reading Research Quarterly 26:7–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Stanovich, K. E., and Siegel, L. S. 1994. Phenotypic performance profile of children with reading disabilities: A regression-based test of the phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Educational Psychology 56:24–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Stringer, R., and Stanovich, K. E. 1998. On the possibility of cerebellar involvement in reading disability. Paper read at the 4th conference of the SSSR, April 1998, San Diego.

  40. Tønnessen, F. E. 1997. How can we best define ‘dyslexia’? Dyslexia 3:78–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Van Daal, V. H. P. In preparation. Learning to read in a foreign language.

  42. Van Daal, V. H. P., and Van der Leij, A. In preparation. Large-scale screening and diagnosis of dyslexia in secondary education.

  43. Van den Bos, K. P. 1996. BELL96. Groningen University (Netherlands): Department of Special Education.

  44. Van den Bos, K. P., Lutje Spelberg, H. C., Scheepstra, A. J. M., and De Vries, J. 1994. De Klepel. Vorm A en B. Een test voor de leesvaardigheid van pseudowoorden. Verantwoording, handleiding, diagnostiek en behandeling [The Klepel. Form A and B. A test of reading pseudowords]. Nijmegen (Netherlands): Berkhout.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Van der Leij, A. 1987. Special education in the Netherlands. In Encyclopedia of Special Education, Vol. 2. C. R. Reynolds and L. Mann, eds. New York: Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Van der Leij, A., and Van Daal, V. H. P. 1999. Automaticity, automatization and dyslexia. In Dyslexia: Advances in Theory and Practice. I. Austad, I. Lundberg, and F. E. Tønnessen, eds. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Van der Leij, A., and Van Daal, V. H. P. In press. Automatization aspects of dyslexia: Speed limitation in word identification, sensitivity to increasing task demands, and orthographic compensation. Journal of Learning Disabilities.

  48. Wimmer, H., Mayringer, H., and Landerl, K. 1998. Poor reading: A deficit in skill automatization or a phonological deficit? Scientific Studies of Reading 2:321–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Wimmer, H., Mayringer, H., and Raberger, Th. 1999. Reading and dual-task balancing: Evidence against the automatization deficit explanation of developmental dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities 32:473–78.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Wolf, M., Bowers, P. G., and Biddle, K. in press. Naming-speed process, timing, and reading: A conceptual review. Journal of Learning Disabilities.

  51. Yap, R. L., and Van der Leij, A. 1993. Word processing in dyslexics: An automatic decoding deficit? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 5:261–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Yap, R. L., and Van der Leij, A. 1994. Word processing in dyslexics: An automatic decoding deficit? In Dyslexia in Children. Multidisciplinary Perspectives. A. J. Fawcett and R. I. Nicolson, eds. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Victor van Daal or Aryan van der Leij.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Daal, V., van der Leij, A. Developmental dyslexia: Related to specific or general deficits?. Ann. of Dyslexia 49, 71–104 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-999-0020-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Reading Comprehension
  • Dyslexia
  • Developmental Dyslexia
  • Rapid Automatize Naming
  • Rapid Naming