Advertisement

Annals of Dyslexia

, 49:43 | Cite as

Persistent arithmetic, reading, or arithmetic and reading disability

  • Nathlie A. Badian
Part II Classification Issues Pertaining To Dyslexia And Other Learning Weaknesses

Abstract

The achievement of 1,075 school children was followed to the end of grade 7 or 8. Retrospective details of birth, medical history, and infant adaptive behavior, as well as current information about preschool behavior, were provided by parents before kindergarten entry when their children were ages four to five. At that time, each child was given language, preacademic, and visual-motor tests, and a short-form verbal IQ was obtained. For grades 1 to 8, a mean 6.9 percent qualified as low in arithmetic (including 3.9 percent low only in arithmetic) and 9 percent as low in reading (including 6 percent low only in reading). Groups of children with persistent disability in arithmetic only (2.3 percent), reading only (6.6 percent), and arithmetic plus reading (3.4 percent) were compared on all variables, and gender differences were examined. The specific arithmetic group was superior to the other two groups in preschool verbal IQ and language, and had suffered more birth problems and illness. As found by Rourke and his colleagues (e.g., Rourke and Finlayson 1978) for older children, boys with a specific arithmetic disability showed a preschool profile with high verbal scores and low nonverbal scores. Many gender differences were found for the total sample, but few for the learning disability subgroups.

Keywords

Reading Disability Learn Disability Dyslexia School Achievement Disability Group 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Alarcón, M., DeFries, J. C., Light, J. G., and Pennington, B. F. 1997. A twin study of mathematics disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities 30:617–23.Google Scholar
  2. Badian, N. A. 1983. Dyscalculia and nonverbal disorders of learning. In Progress in Learning Disabilities, vol. 5. H. R. Myklebust, ed. New York: Grune and Stratton.Google Scholar
  3. Badian, N. A. 1990. Background factors and preschool test scores as predictors of reading: A nine-year longitudinal study. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 2:307–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barakat, M. K. 1951. A factorial study of mathematical abilities. British Journal of Psychology, Statistical Section 4:137–56.Google Scholar
  5. Cone, T. E., Wilson, L. R., McDonald Bradley, C., and Reese, J. H. 1985. Characteristics of LD students in Iowa: An empirical investigation. Learning Disability Quarterly 8:211–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cox, T. 1987. Slow starters versus long term backward readers. British Journal of Educational Psychology 57:73–86.Google Scholar
  7. Davis, J. T., Parr, G., and Lan, W. 1997. Differences between learning disabled subtypes classified using the revised Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery. Journal of Learning Disabilities 30:346–52.Google Scholar
  8. Finucci, J. M., and Childs, B. 1981. Are there really more dyslexic boys than girls? In Sex Differences in Dyslexia. A. Ansara, N. Geschwind, A. Galaburda, M. Albert, and N. Gartrell, eds. Towson, MD: Orton Dyslexia Society.Google Scholar
  9. Gardner, E. F., Rudman, H. C., Karlsen, B., and Merwin, J. C. 1982. Stanford Achievement Test. New York: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  10. Ginsburg, H. P. 1997. Mathematics learning disabilities: A view from developmental psychology. Journal of Learning Disabilities 30:20–33.Google Scholar
  11. Jastak, J. F., and Jastak, S. R. 1965. Wide Range Achievement Test. Wilmington, DE: Guidance Associates of Delaware.Google Scholar
  12. Koppitz, E. M. 1968. Psychological Evaluation of Children’s Human Figure Drawings. New York: Grune and Stratton.Google Scholar
  13. Kosc, L. 1974. Developmental dyscalculia. Journal of Learning Disabilities 7: 164–77.Google Scholar
  14. Liberman, I. Y., and Shankweiler, D. 1985. Phonology and the problems of learning to read and write. Remedial and Special Education 6:8–17.Google Scholar
  15. Light, J. G., and DeFries, J. C. 1995. Comorbidity of reading and mathematics disabilities: Genetic and environmental etiologies. Journal of Learning Disabilities 28:96–106.Google Scholar
  16. McGee, R., Williams, S., and Silva, P. A. 1988. Slow starters and long-term backward readers: A replication and extension. British Journal of Educational Psychology 58:330–37.Google Scholar
  17. Olson, R., Wise, B., Conners, F., Rack, J., and Fulker, D. 1989. Specific deficits in component reading and language skills: Genetic and environmental influences. Journal of Learning Disabilities 22:339–48.Google Scholar
  18. Olson, R. K., Wise, B., Johnson, M. C., and Ring, J. 1997. The etiology and remediation of phonologically based word recognition and spelling disabilities: Are phonological deficits the “hole” story? In Foundations of Reading Acquisition and Dyslexia: Implications for Early Intervention, B. Blachman, ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  19. Paulos, J. A. 1988. Innumeracy: Mathematical Illiteracy and its Consequences. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
  20. Rivera, D. P. 1997. Mathematics education and students with learning disabilities: Introduction to the special series. Journal of Learning Disabilities 30:2–19, 68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rourke, B. P. 1993. Arithmetic disabilities, specific and otherwise: A neuropsychological perspective. Journal of Learning Disabilities 26:214–26.Google Scholar
  22. Rourke, B. P., and Conway, J. A. 1997. Disabilities of arithmetic and mathematical reasoning; Perspectives from neurology and neuropsychology. Journal of Learning Disabilities 30:34–36.Google Scholar
  23. Rourke, B. P., and Finlayson, M. A. J. 1978. Neuropsychological significance of variations in patterns of academic performance: Verbal and visual-spatial abilities. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 6:121–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rourke, B. P., and Strang, J. 1978. Neuropsychological significance of variations in patterns of academic performance: Motor, psychomotor, and tactile-perceptual abilities. Journal of Pediatric Psychology 3:62–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rutter, M. 1978. Prevalence and types of dyslexia. In Dyslexia: An Appraisal of Current Knowledge. A.L. Benton and D. Pearl, eds. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Sattler, J. M. 1974. Assessment of Children’s Intelligence. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.Google Scholar
  27. Shafrir, U., and Siegel, L. S. 1994. Subtypes of learning disabilities in adolescents and adults. Journal of Learning Disabilities 27:123–34.Google Scholar
  28. Share, D. L., Jorm, A. F., Maclean, R., and Matthews, R. 1984. Sources of individual differences in reading acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology 76:1309–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Share, D. L., Moffitt, T. E., and Silva, P. A. 1988. Factors associated with arithmetic-and-reading disability and specific arithmetic disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities 21:313–20.Google Scholar
  30. Shaywitz, S. E., Shaywitz, B. A., Fletcher, J. M., and Escobar, M. D. 1990. Prevalence of reading disability in boys and girls: Results of the Connecticut Longitudinal Study. Journal of the American Medical Association 264:998–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Siegel, L. S. 1989. IQ is irrelevant to the definition of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities 22:469–78, 486.Google Scholar
  32. Siegel, L. S. 1992. An evaluation of the discrepancy definition of dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities 25:618–29.Google Scholar
  33. Stanovich, K. E. 1986. Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly 26: 360–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Stanovich, K. E. 1991. Discrepancy definitions of reading ability: Has intelligence lead us astray? Reading Research Quarterly 26:7–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stevenson, H. W., and Newman, R. S. 1986. Long-term prediction of achievement and attitudes in mathematics and reading. Child Development 57:646–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Strang, J. D., and Rourke, B. P. 1983. Concept-formation/nonverbal reasoning abilities of children who exhibit specific academic problems with arithmetic. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology 12:33–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wagner, R. K., and Torgesen, J. K. 1987. The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin 101:192–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wechsler, D. 1963. Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence. New York: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  39. Weinstein, M. C. 1980. Neuropsychological approach to math disability. New York University Education Quarterly 11:22–28.Google Scholar
  40. Wright, S. F., Fields, H., and Newman, S. P. 1996. Dyslexia: Stability of definition over a five year period. Journal of Research in Reading 19:46–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wrigley, J. 1958. The factorial nature of ability in elementary mathematics. British Journal of Educational Psychology 28:61–78.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The International Dyslexia Association 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nathlie A. Badian
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Holbrook Public SchoolsHolbrook
  2. 2.Harvard Medical SchoolBoston

Personalised recommendations