Annals of Dyslexia

, Volume 47, Issue 1, pp 115–150 | Cite as

Decoding strategies as predictors of reading skill: A follow-on study

  • Diane McGuinness
Part II Diagnostic Issues


A follow-on study was conducted on first- and third-grade children who were tested on the Word Identification subtest of the Woodcock Reading Mastery Test. Errors were phonetically transcribed and proportions of total errors were assigned to one of four strategy types based upon the type of decoding analysis: whole word, part word, and either probable (legal) or improbable (illegal) phonetic decoding. The type of strategy employed was highly correlated with concurrent reading test scores and predicted 30 to 37% of the variance in word recognition 19 months later. Use of phonetic decoding was a strong positive predictor and whole word decoding a negative predictor at both first and third grade. Part word decoding became a negative predictor at third grade. Nearly all children used more than one strategy and there was a developmental trend to shift to a phonetic strategy. But this shift was not inevitable and had not occurred for 31% of the children at the close of the study. Children who stayed with the most inefficient strategies had significantly higher vocabulary scores and equivalent phonemic processing ability when compared to readers with more efficient decoding strategies.


Reading Skill Letter String Dyslexia Phoneme Awareness Decode Strategy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adams, M. J. 1990. Beginning to Read. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. Ball, E. W., and Blachman, B. A. 1991. Does phoneme awareness training in kindergarten make a difference in early word recognition and developmental spelling? Reading Research Quarterly 26:49–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baron, J. 1979. Orthographic and word-specific mechanisms in children’s reading of words. Child Development 50:60–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barr, R. 1974. The effect of instruction on children’s reading strategies. Reading Research Quarterly 10:555–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beck, I. L. 1981. Reading problems and instructional practices. In Reading Research: Advances in Theory and Practice, G. E. MacKinnon and T. G. Waller (eds.). Vol. 2. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  6. Beck, I. L., and McCaslin, E. S. 1978. An analysis of the dimensions that affect the development of code-breaking ability in eight beginning reading programs. LRDC Report No. 1978/6. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Learning Research and Development Center.Google Scholar
  7. Blachman, B. A., Ball, E. W., Black, R. S., and Tangel, D. M. 1994. Kindergarten teachers develop phoneme awareness in low-income, inner city classrooms. Reading and Writing 6:1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bradley, L., and Bryant, P. E. 1985. Rhyme and Reason in Reading and Spelling. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bruck, M., and Treiman, R. 1992. Learning to pronounce words: The limitations of analogies. Reading Research Quarterly 27:375–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Calfee, R. C., Lindamood, P. E., and Lindamood, C. H. 1973. Acoustic-phonetic skills and reading—kindergarten through 12th grade. Journal of Educational Psychology 64:293–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cohen A. S. 1974. Oral reading errors of first grade children taught by a code emphasis approach. Reading Research Quarterly 10:616–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dunn, L. M., and Dunn, L. M. 1981. Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test—Revised. Circle-Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
  13. Ehri, L. C., and Robbins, C. 1992. Beginners need some decoding skill to read words by analogy. Reading Research Quarterly 27:13–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Frith, U. 1985. Beneath the surface of developmental dyslexia. In Surface Dyslexia, K. Patterson, M. Coltheart, and J. Marshall (eds.). London: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  15. Goswami, U. 1986. Children’s use of analogy in learning to read: A developmental study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 42:73–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Goswami, U. 1988. Orthographic analogies and reading development. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 40:239–68.Google Scholar
  17. Goswami, U. 1991. Learning about spelling sequences: The role of onsets and rimes in analogies in reading. Child Development 62:1110–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Goswami, U., and Bryant, P. 1990. Phonological Skills and Learning to Read. Hove, U.K.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Ltd.Google Scholar
  19. Gough, P. B., and Hilliger, M. L. 1980. Learning to read: An unnatural act. Bulletin of The Orton Society 20:179–96.Google Scholar
  20. Gough, P. B., Juel, C., and Roper-Schneider, D. 1983. Code and cipher: A two-stage conception of initial reading acquisition. In Searches for Meaning in Reading/Language Processing and Interaction, J. A. Niles and L. A. Harris (eds.). Rochester, NY: National Reading Conference.Google Scholar
  21. Henry, M. K. 1989. Children’s word structure knowledge: Implications for decoding and spelling instruction. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 2:135–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hohn, W. E., and Ehri, L. C. 1983. Do alphabet letters help prereaders acquire phoneme segmentation skill? Journal of Educational Psychology 75:752–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Howard, M. 1982. Utilizing oral-motor feedback in auditory conceptualization. Journal of Educational Neurology 2:24–35.Google Scholar
  24. Jeffrey, W. E., and Samuels, S. J. 1967. The effect of method of reading training on initial reading transfer. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 6:354–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Juel, C., Griffith, P. L., and Gough, P. B. 1984. Reading and spelling strategies of first grade children. In Issues in Literacy. A Research Perspective, J. A. Niles and R. Lalik (eds.). Rochester, NY: National Reading Conference.Google Scholar
  26. Juel, C., and Roper-Schneider, D. 1985. The influence of basal readers on first grade reading. Reading Research Quarterly 20:134–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Liberman, I. Y., Shankweiler, C., Fischer, F. W., and Carter, B. 1974. Reading and the awareness of linguistic segments. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 18:201–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lindamood, G. H., and Lindamood, P. C. 1971. Lindamood Auditory Conceptualization Test. Austin, TX: PRO-ED. Also available Riverside Publishing.Google Scholar
  29. Lundberg, I., Olofsson, A., and Wall, S. 1980. Reading and spelling skills in the first school years predicted from phoneme awareness skills in kindergarten. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 21:159–73.Google Scholar
  30. Marchbanks, G., and Levin, H. 1965. Cues by which children recognize words. Journal of Educational Psychology 56:57–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Marsh, G., Friedman, M., Welch, V., and Desberg, P. 1981. A cognitive-developmental approach to reading acquisition. In Reading Research Advances in Theory and Practice, T. G. Waller and G. E. MacKinnon (eds.). Vol. 3. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  32. McGuinness, C., McGuinness, D., and McGuinness, G. 1996. Phono-Graphix: A new method for remediating reading difficulties. Annals of Dyslexia 46:73–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McGuinness, D. 1981. Auditory and motor aspects of language development in males and females. In Sex Differences in Dyslexia, A. Ansara, N. Geschwind, A. Galaburda, M. Albert, and N. Gartress (eds.). Baltimore: The Orton Dyslexia Society.Google Scholar
  34. McGuinness, D. 1985. When Children Don’t Learn. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  35. McGuinness, D. 1997a. Why our Children Can’t Read. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  36. McGuinness, D. 1997b. Allographs I: A Linguistic Spelling Program. Sanibel, FL: SeaGate Press.Google Scholar
  37. McGuinness, D., McGuinness, C., and Donohue, J. 1995. Phonological training and the alphabet principle: Evidence for reciprocal causality. Reading Research Quarterly 30:830–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mullis, I. V. S., Campbell, J. R., and Farstrup, A. E. 1993. NAEP 1992 Reading Report Card for the Nation and States. Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Education, Office of Education Research and Improvement, National Center for Education Statistics.Google Scholar
  39. Nation, K., and Hulme, C. 1997. Phoneme segmentation, not onset-rime segmentation, predicts early reading and spelling skills. Reading Research Quarterly 32:154–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rayner, K. 1976. Developmental changes in word recognition strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology 68:323–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rayner, K., and Pollatsek, A. 1989. The Psychology of Reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  42. Richards, F. A., and Commons, M. L. 1990. Postformal cognitive-developmental theory and research: A review of its current status. In Higher Stages of Cognitive Development, C. N. Alexander and E. J. Langer (eds.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Rosner, J., and Simon, D. P. 1971. The auditory analysis test: An initial report. Journal of Learning Disabilities 4:384–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Share, D. L., Jorm, A. F., Maclean, R., and Matthews, R. 1984. Sources of individual differences in reading acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology 76:1309–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tangel, D. M., and Blachman, B. A. 1995. Effect of phoneme awareness instruction on the invented spelling of first-grade children: A one-year follow-up. Journal of Reading Behavior 27:153–84.Google Scholar
  46. Treiman, R. 1985. Onsets and rimes as units of spoken syllables: Evidence from children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 39:161–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Treiman, R., Goswami, U., and Bruck, M. 1990. Not all nonwords are alike: Implications for reading development and theory. Memory and Cognition 18:559–67.Google Scholar
  48. Treiman, R., and Zukowski, A. 1991. Levels of phonological awareness. In Phonological Process in Literacy. A Tribute to Isabelle Y. Liberman, S. A. Brady and D. P. Shankweiler (eds.). Hillsdale, NJ; Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  49. Wagner, R. K., and Torgesen, J. K. 1987. The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skill. Psychological Bulletin 101:192–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., and Rashotte, C. A. 1994. The development of reading-related phonological processing abilities: New evidence of bidirectional causality from a latent variable longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology 30:73–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Willert, M. K., and Kamii, C. 1985. Reading in kindergarten. Direct vs. indirect teaching. Young Children May, 3–9.Google Scholar
  52. Williams, J. P., Blumberg, E. L., and Williams, D. V. 1970. Cues used in visual word recognition. Journal of Educational Psychology 61:310–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Woodcock, R. W. 1987. Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests—Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The International Dyslexia Association 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Diane McGuinness
    • 1
  1. 1.University of South FloridaFort Myers

Personalised recommendations