Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Preservice teacher knowledge of basic language constructs in Canada, England, New Zealand, and the USA


The present study examined preservice teachers’ (PSTs) knowledge of basic language constructs across four different English-speaking teacher preparations programs. A standardized survey was administered to participants from Canada (n = 80), England (n = 55), New Zealand (n = 26), and the USA (n = 118). All participants were enrolled in undergraduate university programs that led to teacher certification for general education in the primary grades. Our data reveal that preservice teachers from all four countries show patterns of relative strength in areas that were targeted to be crucial within their national initiatives. Nevertheless, in general, PSTs demonstrated a lack of knowledge of certain constructs needed to teach early reading skills. The results are discussed in relation to research reports and initiatives regarding beginning reading instruction from each of the four countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. 1.

    Words in English do not end in the letter ‘v’ therefore, words like ‘love’ and ‘give’ have a final letter ‘e’ although it does not alter the pronunciation of the short/lax vowel.

  2. 2.

    Ofsted is the Office for Standards in Education, Children’s Services and Skills in the United Kingdom. Ofsted inspects and regulates services that care for children and young people, and services providing education and skills for learners of all ages. Ofsted gives education organizations, such as teacher preparatory institutions, a rating (1 [Outstanding], 2 [Good], 3 [Requires Improvement], or 4 [Inadequate]) based on the quality of teaching, learning and assessment.


  1. Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Learning and thinking about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  2. Al Otaiba, S., & Lake, V. (2007). Preparing special educators to teach reading: Using classroom-based assessments to judge response to intervention. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 20, 591–617.

  3. Ball, D. L., & Bass, H. (2000). Interweaving content and pedagogy in teaching and learning to teach: Knowing and using mathematics. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 83–104). Westport, CT: Ablex.

  4. Ball, D. L., & Bass, H. (2003). Making mathematics reasonable in school. In J. Kilpatrick, W. G. Martin, & D. Schifter (Eds.), A research companion to principals and standards for school mathematics (pp. 27–44). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

  5. Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching what makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59, 389–407.

  6. Binks-Cantrell, E., Washburn, E., Joshi, R. M., & Hougan, M. (2012). Peter Effect in the preparation of reading teachers. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16, 526–536.

  7. Bos, C., Mather, N., Dickson, S., Podhajski, B., & Chard, D. (2001). Perceptions and knowledge of preservice and inservice educators about early reading instruction. Annals of Dyslexia, 51, 97–120.

  8. Bowers, P. N., & Kirby, J. R. (2010). Effects of morphological instruction on vocabulary acquisition. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 23, 515–537.

  9. British Dyslexia Association (n.d.) Additional resources: Dyslexia research and background history. Retrieved June 20, 2013 from http://www.bdadyslexia.org.uk/dyslexic/additional-resources.

  10. Canadian Language and Literacy Research Network (CLLRN). (2009). National strategy for early literacy: A summary report. London, ON: CLLRN.

  11. Carlisle, J. F. (2003). Morphology matters in learning to read: A commentary. Reading Psychology, 24, 291–322.

  12. Carlisle, J. F. (2007). Fostering morphological processing, vocabulary development, and reading comprehension. In R. Wagner, A. E. Muse, & K. R. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Vocabulary acquisition: Implications for reading comprehension (pp. 78–103). New York, NY: Guildford Press.

  13. Carlsen, W. S. (1991). Subject-matter knowledge and science teaching: A pragmatic perspective. Advances in Research on Teaching, 2, 115–143.

  14. Carreker, S., Joshi, R. M., & Boulware-Gooden, R. (2010). Spelling-related teacher knowledge: The impact of professional development on identifying appropriate instructional activities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 33(3), 148–158.

  15. Chall, J. S. (1983). Learning to read: The great debate (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

  16. Cheesman, E. A., McGuire, J. M., Shankweiler, D., & Coyne, M. (2009). First-year teacher knowledge of phonemic awareness and its instruction. Teacher Education and Special Education, 32(3), 270–289.

  17. Cunningham, A. E., Perry, K. E., Stanovich, K. E., & Stanovich, P. J. (2004). Disciplinary knowledge of K-3 teachers and their knowledge calibration in the domain of early literacy. Annals of Dyslexia, 54, 139–167.

  18. Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). How teacher education matters. Journal of teacher education, 51(3), 166–173.

  19. Darling-Hammond, L. (2008). Teacher learning that supports student learning. In B. Z. Presseisen (Ed.), Teaching for Intelligence (pp. 91–100). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

  20. Darling-Hammond, L., & Berry, B. (2006). Highly qualified teachers for all. Educational Leadership, 64, 14–20.

  21. Denton, C. A., & Mathes, P. G. (2003). Intervention for struggling readers: Possibilities and challenges. In B. R. Foorman (Ed.), Preventing and remediating reading difficulties: Bringing science to scale (pp. 229–251). Timonium, MD: York Press.

  22. Department of Education. (1985). Reading in the junior classroom. Wellington, New Zealand: Learning Media.

  23. Dixon, L. Q., Wu, S., Burgess-Brigham, R., Joshi, R. M., Binks-Cantrell, E., & Washburn, E. (2014). Teaching English reading: What’s included in the textbooks of pre-service teachers? In N. Harwood (Ed.), English language teaching textbooks: Content, consumption, production (pp. 111–141). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

  24. Ehri, L. C. (1984). How orthography alters spoken language competencies in children learning to read and spell. In J. Downing & R. Valtin (Eds.), Language awareness and learning to read (pp. 119–147). New York, NY: Springer.

  25. Ehri, L. C., Nunes, S. R., Stahl, S. A., & Willows, D. M. (2001). Systematic phonics instruction helps students learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel’s meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71, 393–447.

  26. Francis, D. J., Shaywitz, S. E., Stuebing, K. K., Shaywitz, B. A., & Fletcher, J. M. (1996). Developmental lag versus deficit models of reading disability: A longitudinal, individual growth curves analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 3–17.

  27. Goodman, K. (1986). What’s whole about whole language? Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

  28. Goodman, K. (2005). Making sense of written language: A life long journey. Journal of Literacy Research, 37, 1–24. doi:10.1207/s15548430jlr3701_.

  29. Greenberg, J., McKee, A., & Walsh, K. (2013). Teacher prep review: A review of the Nation’s teacher preparation programs 2013. Washington, DC: National Council of Teacher Quality. Retrieved from http://www.nctq.org/dmsView/Teacher_Prep_Review_2013_Report.

  30. Griffin, P., Burns, M. S., & Snow, C. E. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. National Academies Press.

  31. Griffith, P. L., & Olson, M. W. (1992). Phonemic awareness helps beginning readers break the code. The Reading Teacher, 45, 516–523.

  32. Hatcher, P. J., Hulme, C., & Snowling, M. J. (2004). Explicit phoneme training combined with phonic reading instruction helps young children at risk of reading failure. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 338–358.

  33. Hoover, W. A., & Gough, P. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2(2), 127–160.

  34. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA). (2011). PIRLS 2011 international results in reading. Retrieved from http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/pirls2011/international-resultspirls.html.

  35. International Dyslexia Association. (2010). Knowledge and practice standards for teachers of reading. Baltimore, MD: Author.

  36. International Dyslexia Association (2012). Dyslexia basics. Retrieved January 22, 2015 from http://www.interdys.org/FactSheets.htm

  37. International Reading Association. (2010). Standards for reading professionals—Revised 2010. International Reading Association.

  38. Joshi, R. M., Binks, E., Hougen, M., Dahlgren, M. E., Ocker-Dean, E., & Smith, D. L. (2009). Why elementary teachers might be inadequately prepared to teach reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 392–402.

  39. Joshi, R. M., Binks, E., Graham, L., Dean, E., Smith, D., & Boulware-Gooden, R. (2009). Do textbooks used in university reading education courses conform to the instructional recommendations of the National Reading Panel? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 458–463.

  40. Juel, C. (1988). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of children in first and second grade. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 437–447.

  41. Kim, J. S. (2008). Research and the reading wars. The Phi Delta Kappan, 89(5), 372–375.

  42. Lyon, G. R., Shaywitz, S. E., & Shaywitz, B. A. (2003). A definition of dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 53, 1–14.

  43. Martinussen, R., Ferrari, J., Aitken, M., & Willows, D. (2015). Pre-service teachers’ knowledge of phonemic awareness: Relationship to perceived knowledge, self-efficacy beliefs, and exposure to a multimedia-enhanced lecture. Annals of Dyslexia, 1–17. doi:10.1007/s11881-015-0104-0.

  44. McLachlan, C., & Arrow, A. (2011). Literacy in the early years in New Zealand: Policies, politics and pressing reasons for change. Literacy, 45, 126–133.

  45. McCutchen, D., Abbott, R. D., Green, L. B., Beretvas, S. N., Cox, S., Potter, N. S., et al. (2002). Beginning literacy links among teacher knowledge, teacher practice, and student learning. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 69–86.

  46. McCutchen, D., Green, L., Abbott, R. D., & Sanders, E. A. (2009). Further evidence for teacher knowledge: Supporting struggling readers in grades three through five. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 22, 401–423.

  47. McCutchen, D., Logan, B., & Biangardi Orpe, U. (2009). Making meaning: Children's sensitivity to morphological information during word reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 44, 360–376.

  48. Melby-Lervåg, M., Lyster, S., & Hulme, C. (2012). Phonological skills and their role in learning to read: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 322–352.

  49. Ministry of Education. (1996). The learner as a reader: Developing reading programmes. Wellington, New Zealand: Learning Media.

  50. Ministry of Education. (2007). Literacy learning progressions: Meeting the reading and writing demands of the curriculum. Wellington, New Zealand: Learning Media.

  51. Moats, L. C. (1994). The missing foundation in teacher education: Knowledge of the structure of spoken and written language. Annals of Dyslexia, 44, 81–101.

  52. Moats, L. C. (2004). Science, language, and imagination in the professional development of reading teachers. In P. McCardle & V. Chhabra (Eds.), The voice of evidence in reading research (pp. 269–287). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.

  53. Moats, L. C. (2009). Knowledge foundations for teaching reading and spelling. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 22, 379–399.

  54. Moats, L. C. (2014). What teachers don’t know and why they aren’t learning it: Addressing the need for content and pedagogy in teacher education. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties. doi:10.1080/19404158.2014.941093.

  55. Moats, L. C., & Foorman, B. R. (2003). Measuring teachers’ content knowledge of language and reading. Annals of Dyslexia, 53, 23–45.

  56. Nagy, W. (2007). Metalinguistic awareness and the vocabulary-comprehension connection. In R. Wagner, A. E. Muse, & K. R. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Vocabulary acquisition: Implications for reading comprehension (pp. 52–77). New York, NY: The Guildford Press.

  57. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH publication No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

  58. New Zealand House of Representatives. (2001). Let's all read. Report of the Education and Science Select Committee into the teaching of reading in New Zealand. Wellington, New Zealand: Author.

  59. Office for Standards in Education. (2008) . The annual report of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills. London: OfSTED

  60. Piasta, S. B., Connor McDonald, C., Fishman, B. J., & Morrison, F. J. (2009). Teachers’ knowledge of literacy concepts, classroom practices, and student reading growth. Scientific Studies of Reading, 13, 224–248.

  61. Phelps, G., & Schilling, S. (2004). Developing measures of content knowledge for teaching reading. Elementary School Journal, 105, 31–48.

  62. Pressley, M. (2006). Reading instruction that works: The case for balanced teaching. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

  63. Reed, D. K. (2008). A synthesis of morphology interventions and effects on reading outcomes for students in grades K–12. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 23, 36–49.

  64. Rose, J. (2006). Independent review of the teaching of early reading. Retrieved June 1, 2009 from https://www.education.gov.uk/publications/standard/publicationDetail/Page1/DFES-0201-2006

  65. Rose, J. (2009). Identifying and teaching children and young people with dyslexia and literacy difficulties. Retrieved June 15, 2010 from https://www.education.gov.uk/publications/standard/publicationdetail/page1/DCSF-00659-2009

  66. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4–14.

  67. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–23.

  68. Shulman, L., & Grossman, P. (1988). The intern teacher casebook. San Francisco, CA: Far West Laboratory for Educational Research and Development.

  69. Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press.

  70. Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (2005). Knowledge needed to support the teaching of reading: Preparing teachers for a changing world. Washington, D. C.: National Academy Press.

  71. Spear-Swerling, L. (2009). A literacy tutoring experience for prospective special educators and struggling second graders. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 431–443.

  72. Spear-Swerling, L., & Sternberg, R. J. (2001). What science offers teachers of reading. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16, 51–57.

  73. Spear-Swerling, L., & Brucker, P. O. (2003). Teachers’ acquisition of knowledge about English word structure. Annals of Dyslexia, 53, 72–103.

  74. Spear-Swerling, L., & Brucker, P. O. (2004). Preparing novice teachers to develop basic reading and spelling skills in children. Annals of Dyslexia, 54, 332–364.

  75. Spear-Swerling, L., Brucker, P. O., & Alfano, M. P. (2005). Teachers’ literacy-related knowledge and self-perceptions in relation to preparation and experience. Annals of Dyslexia, 55, 266–296.

  76. Stanovich, P. J., & Stanovich, K. E. (2003). Using research and reason in education: How teachers can use scientifically based research to make curricular & instructional decisions . Washington, DC: US Department of Education.

  77. Taskforce, L. (1999). Report of the literacy taskforce to the minister of education. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.

  78. Taylor, B., Pearson, P. D., Clark, K., & Walpole, S. (1999). Beating the odds in teaching all children to read (pp. 2–006). Ann Arbor, MI: Center for the Improvement of Early Reading Achievement. CIERA Report Series.

  79. Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C. A., Lindamood, P., Rose, E., Conway, T., et al. (1999). Preventing reading failure in young children with phonological processing disabilities: Group and individual responses to instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 579–593.

  80. U.S. Department of Education. (2002). Strategic plan, 2002–2007. Washington, DC: Author.

  81. Van Driel, J. H., Verloop, N., & de Vos, W. (1998). Developing science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 673–695.

  82. Walsh, K., Glaser, D., & Wilcox, D. D. (2006). What education schools aren't teaching about reading and what Elementary teachers aren’t learning. Washington D.C.: National Council on Teacher Quality.

  83. Washburn, E. K., Joshi, R. M., & Binks-Cantrell, E. S. (2011a). Are preservice teachers prepared to teach struggling readers? Annals of Dyslexia, 61, 21–43.

  84. Washburn, E., Joshi, R. M., & Binks, E. (2011b). Teacher knowledge of basic language concepts and dyslexia. Dyslexia, 17, 165–183.

  85. Wong-Fillmore, L., & Snow, C. (2000). What teachers need to know about language. (Contract No. ED-99-CO-0008). U.S. Department of Education’s Office of Educational Research and Improvement, Center for Applied Linguistics.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Erin K. Washburn.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Washburn, E.K., Binks-Cantrell, E.S., Joshi, R.M. et al. Preservice teacher knowledge of basic language constructs in Canada, England, New Zealand, and the USA. Ann. of Dyslexia 66, 7–26 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-015-0115-x

Download citation


  • Language
  • Literacy
  • Teacher education
  • Teacher knowledge