Advertisement

Annals of Dyslexia

, Volume 62, Issue 3, pp 172–185 | Cite as

Dyslexia in a second language?—a dynamic test of reading acquisition may provide a fair answer

  • Carsten ElbroEmail author
  • Hanne Trebbien Daugaard
  • Anna S. Gellert
Article

Abstract

Dyslexia is hard to diagnose in a second language. Poor performance on a test of reading may be caused by poor language proficiency in the second language or by limited schooling rather than by poor reading ability per se. This confound was supported in a study of 88 adult second language learners and 65 native language speakers. The incidence of dyslexia in the second language learners varied widely depending on the measure of reading. In order to reduce language and schooling confounds, a dynamic test of acquisition of basic decoding ability was developed. In the dynamic test, participants are taught three novel letters and to synthesise the letter sounds into new words. Results from the study indicated that the dynamic test provided results in accordance with the current IDA definition of dyslexia, while significantly reducing the influence second language vocabulary and amount of schooling. With the dynamic measure, the same cut-off point between dyslexic and non-dyslexic performance appeared valid in both native language speakers and second language learners.

Keywords

Diagnosis Dynamic testing Dyslexia Learning to decode Second language learners Vocabulary 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Danish Ministry of Education (contract #082.863.021) and 21 language, dyslexia and adult education centres from all over the country. The authors are also indebted to 12 students who contributed to the data collection.

References

  1. Bridges, M. S., & Catts, H. W. (2011). The use of a dynamic screening of phonological awareness to predict risk for reading disabilities in kindergarten children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44(4), 330–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Campione, J., & Brown, A. (1987). Linking dynamic assessment with school achievement. In C. S. Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential (pp. 82–115). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  3. Catts, H. W., Adlof, S. M., & Weismer, S. E. (2006). Language deficits in poor comprehenders: A case for the simple view of reading. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49(2), 278–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cline, T., & Shamsi, T. (2000). Language needs or special needs? The assessment of learning difficulties in literacy among children learning English as an additional language: A literature review. London: DfEE Publications.Google Scholar
  5. Cummins, J. (1984). Bilingualism and special education: Issues in assessment and pedagogy. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  6. Droop, M., & Verhoeven, L. (2003). Language proficiency and reading ability in first- and second-language learners. Reading Research Quarterly, 38(1), 78–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Durgunoğlu, A. Y. (2002). Cross-linguistic transfer in literacy development and implications for language learners. Annals of Dyslexia, 52, 189–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Elbro, C. (2010). Dyslexia as disability or handicap: When does vocabulary matter? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43(5), 469–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Everatt, J., Ocampo, D., Veii, K., Nenopoulou, S., Smythe, I., al Mannai, H., & Elbeheri, G. (2010). Dyslexia in biscriptal readers. In N. Brunswick, S. McDougall, & P. Davies (Eds.), Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies (pp. 221–245). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  10. Everatt, J., Smythe, I., Ocampo, D., & Gyarmathy, E. (2004). Issues in the assessment of literacy-related difficulties across language backgrounds: A cross-linguistic comparison. Journal of Research in Reading, 27(2), 141–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fuchs, D., Compton, D. L., Fuchs, L. S., Bouton, B., & Caffrey, E. (2011). The construct and predictive validity of a dynamic assessment of young children learning to read: Implications for RTI frameworks. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44(4), 339–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Geva, E., & Wade-Woolley, L. (2004). Issues in the assessment of reading disability in second language children. In I. Smythe, J. Everatt, & R. Salter (Eds.), International book of dyslexia: A cross-language comparison and practice guide (pp. 195–206). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  13. Geva, E., Yaghub-Zadeh, Z., & Schuster, B. (2000). Understanding individual differences in word recognition skills of ESL children. Annals of Dyslexia, 50, 123–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Goff, D. A., Pratt, C., & Ong, B. (2005). The relations between children’s reading comprehension, working memory, language skills, and components of reading decoding in a normal sample. Reading and Writing, 18, 583–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gough, P. B., Hoover, W. A., & Peterson, C. L. (1996). Some observations on a simple view of reading. In C. Cornoldi & J. Oakhill (Eds.), Reading comprehension difficulties. Processes and intervention (pp. 1–13). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  16. Grigorenko, E. L. (2008). Dynamic assessment and response to intervention: Two sides of one coin. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42(2), 111–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Grigorenko, E. L., & Sternberg, R. J. (1998). Dynamic testing. Psychological Bulletin, 124(1), 75–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Harrison, G. L., & Krol, L. (2007). Relationship between L1 and L2 word-level reading and phonological processing in adults learning English as a second language. Journal of Research in Reading, 30(4), 379–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hoover, W. A., & Gough, P. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2, 127–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Keenan, J. M., Betjemann, R. S., & Olson, R. K. (2008). Reading comprehension tests vary in the skills they assess: Differential dependence on decoding and oral comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12(3), 281–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lervåg, A., & Aukrust, V. G. (2010). Vocabulary knowledge is a critical determinant of the difference in reading comprehension growth between first and second language learners. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 51(5), 612–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Limbos, M., & Geva, E. (2001). Accuracy of teacher assessments of ESL children at risk of reading disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 136–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lindgrén, S.-A., & Laine, M. (2007). The adaptation of an adult group screening test for dyslexia into Finland-Swedish: Normative data for university students and the effects of language background on test performance. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 48(5), 419–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lindsey, K. A., Manis, F. R., & Bailey, C. E. (2003). Prediction of first-grade reading in Spanish-speaking English-language learners. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(3), 482–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lipka, O., & Siegel, L. S. (2007). The development of reading skills in children with English as a second language. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(2), 105–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lyon, G. R., Shaywitz, S. E., & Shaywitz, B. A. (2003). A definition of dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 53, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Meng, X.-L., Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. (1992). Comparing correlated correlation coefficients. Psychological Bulletin, 111(1), 172–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nation, K., Clarke, P., Marshall, C. M., & Durand, M. (2004). Hidden language impairments in children: Parallels between poor reading comprehension and specific language impairment? Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47(1), 199–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nation, K., & Cocksey, J. (2009). The relationship between knowing a word and reading it aloud in children's word reading development. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103(3), 296–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ricketts, J., Nation, K., & Bishop, D. V. M. (2007). Vocabulary is important for some, but not all reading skills. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(3), 235–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Samson, J. F., & Lesaux, J. F. (2009). Language-minority learners in special education: Rates and predictors of identification for services. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 148–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Seymour, P. H. K., Aro, M., Erskine, J. M., Wimmer, H., Elbro, C., Lyytinen, H., et al. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94(2), 143–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sparks, R. L., Patton, J., Ganschow, L., Humbach, N., & Javorsky, J. (2006). Native language predictors of foreign language proficiency and foreign language aptitude. Annals of Dyslexia, 56(1), 129–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sparks, R. L., Patton, J., Ganschow, L., Humbach, N., & Javorsky, J. (2008). Early first-language reading and spelling skills predict later second-language reading and spelling skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(1), 162–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Spector, J. E. (1992). Predicting progress in beginning reading: Dynamic assessment of phonemic awareness. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 353–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sunderland, H. (2000). Diagnosing multilingual adults. In L. Peer & G. Reid (Eds.), Multilingualism, literacy and dyslexia (pp. 153–162). London: David Fulton Publishers.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The International Dyslexia Association 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carsten Elbro
    • 1
    Email author
  • Hanne Trebbien Daugaard
    • 1
  • Anna S. Gellert
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Reading ResearchUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagen SDenmark

Personalised recommendations