Annals of Dyslexia

, Volume 63, Issue 1, pp 65–79 | Cite as

“An adjective is a word hanging down from a noun”: Learning to write and students with learning disabilities

Article

Abstract

By the upper elementary grades, writing becomes an essential tool both for learning and for showing what you know. Students who struggle significantly with writing are at a terrible disadvantage. Data from the National Assessment of Educational Progress indicate that only 25% of students can be classified as competent writers; students with learning disabilities (LD) have even greater problems with writing than their normally achieving peers and frequently demonstrate a deteriorating attitude toward writing after the primary grades. In this article, we focus on composing and the writing process, and examine the knowledge base about writing development and instruction among students with LD. We address what research tells us about skilled writers and the development of writing knowledge, strategies, skill, and the will to write, and how this relates to students with LD. Next, we summarize what has been learned from research on writing development, effective instruction, and the writing abilities of students with LD in terms of effective instruction for these students. Finally, we indicate critical areas for future research.

Keywords

Learning disabilities Self-regulated strategy development Strategies instruction Writing Writing instruction 

References

  1. Applebee, A., & Langer, J. (2006). The state of writing instruction: What existing data tell us. Albany: Center on English Learning and Achievement.Google Scholar
  2. Applebee, A., Langer, J., & Mullis, I. (1986). The writing report card: Writing achievement in American schools. Princeton: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
  3. Applebee, A., Langer, J., Jenkins, L., Mullis, I., & Foertsch, M. (1990). Learning to write in our Nations’ schools. Princeton: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
  4. Applebee, A., Langer, J., Mullis, I., Latham, A., & Gentile, C. (1994). NAEP 1992: Writing report card. Washington: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  5. ASCD (Producer) (2002). Teaching students with learning disabilities in the regular classroom: Using learning strategies. (DVD). http://shop.ascd.org/ProductDetail.aspx?ProductId=1553, Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
  6. Baker, S. K., Chard, D. J., Ketterlin-Geller, L. R., Apichatabutra, C., & Doabler, C. (2009). Teaching writing to at-risk students: The quality of evidence for self-regulated strategy development. Exceptional Children, 75(3), 303–318.Google Scholar
  7. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  8. Berman, J. (2001). Industry output and employment projections to 2010. Monthly Labor Review, 124, 39–56.Google Scholar
  9. Berninger, V. W., Rutberg, J. E., Abbott, R. D., Garcia, N., Anderson-Youngstrom, M., Brooks, A., et al. (2006). Tier 1 and tier 2 early intervention for handwriting and composing. Journal of School Psychology, 44(1), 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Berninger, V. W., Nielson, K., Abbott, R., Wijsman, E., & Raskind, W. (2008). Writing problems in developmental dyslexia: Underrecognized and undertreated. Journal of School Psychology, 46(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. De La Paz, S. (2007). Best practices in teaching writing to students with special needs. In S. Graham, C. A. MacArthur, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Best practices in writing instruction (pp. 308–328). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  12. Englert, C. S., Raphael, T. E., Anderson, L., Anthony, H., Stevens, D., & Fear, K. (1991). Making writing strategies and self-talk visible: Cognitive strategy instruction in writing in regular and special education classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 337–373.Google Scholar
  13. Graham, S. (2006). Writing. In P. Alexander & P. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 457–478). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  14. Graham, S. (2010). Teaching writing. P. Hogan (Ed.), Cambridge encyclopedia of language Sciences (pp. 848–851). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  15. Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (1994). The effects of whole language on children’s writing: A review of literature. Educational Psychologist, 29, 187–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (1996). Addressing problems in attention, memory, and executive functioning: An example from self-regulated strategy development. In G. Reid Lyon & N. A. Krasnegor (Eds.), Attention, memory, and executive function (pp. 349–366). Baltimore: Brookes.Google Scholar
  17. Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2002). Prevention and intervention for struggling writers. In M. Shinn, G. Stoner, & H. Walker (Eds.), Interventions for academic and behavior problems II: Preventive and remedial approaches (pp. 589–610). Bethesda: National Association of School Psychologists.Google Scholar
  18. Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2005a). Writing better: Effective strategies for teaching students with learning difficulties. Baltimore: Brookes.Google Scholar
  19. Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2005b). Improving the writing performance of young struggling writers: Theoretical and programmatic research from the Center to Accelerate Student Learning. Journal of Special Education, 39(1), 19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2009a). Almost 30 years of writing research: Making sense of it all with The Wrath of Khan. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 24, 58–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2009b). Evidence-based writing practices: Drawing recommendations from multiple sources. British Journal of Educational Psychology (monograph series), 6, 95–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2011). Writing and students with disabilities. In L. Lloyd, J. Kauffman, & D. Hallahan (Eds.). Handbook of special education (pp. 422–433). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Graham, S., & Hebert, M. (2010). Writing to read: Evidence for how writing can improve reading. Alliance for Excellence in Education, Washington, DC (commissioned by the Carnegie Corp. of New York).Google Scholar
  24. Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007a). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 445–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007b). Writing next: Effective strategies to improve writing of adolescent middle and high school. Alliance for Excellence in Education, Washington, DC (commissioned by the Carnegie Corp. of New York).Google Scholar
  26. Graham, S., Harris, K. R., & MacArthur, C. (2004). Writing instruction. In B. Wong (Ed.), Learning about learning disabilities (3rd ed., pp. 281–313). Orlando: Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Graham, S., Harris, K. R., & Olinghouse, N. (2007). Addressing executive function problems in writing. In L. Meltzer (Ed.), Executive function in education: From theory to practice (pp. 216–236). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  28. Graham, S., MacArthur, C., & Fitzgerald, J. (2007). Best practices in writing instruction. NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
  29. Harris, K. R. (1982). Cognitive-behavior modification: Application with exceptional students. Focus on Exceptional Children, 15(2), 1–16.Google Scholar
  30. Harris, K. R. (1986). The effects of cognitive-behavior modification on private speech and task performance during problem solving among learning disabled and normally achieving children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 14, 63–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (1985). Improving learning disabled students’ composition skills: Self-control strategy training. Learning Disability Quarterly, 8, 27–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (1992). Self-regulated strategy development: A part of the writing process. In M. Pressley, K. R. Harris, & J. T. Guthrie (Eds.), Promoting academic competence and literacy in school (pp. 277–309). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  33. Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (1994). Constructivism: Principles, paradigms, and integration. The Journal of Special Education, 28, 233–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (1996). Making the writing process work: Strategies for composition and self-regulation (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Brookline Books.Google Scholar
  35. Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (1999). Programmatic intervention research: Illustrations from the evolution of self-regulated strategy development. Learning Disability Quarterly, 22, 251–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (2009). Self-regulated strategy development in writing: Premises, evolution, and the future. British Journal of Educational Psychology (monograph series), 6, 113–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Harris, K.R., & Pressley, M. (1991). The nature of cognitive strategy instruction: Interactive strategy construction. Exceptional Children, 57, 392–405.Google Scholar
  38. Harris, K. R., Graham, S., & Mason, L. (2003). Self-regulated strategy development in the classroom: Part of a balanced approach to writing instruction for students with disabilities. Focus on Exceptional Children, 35(7), 1–16.Google Scholar
  39. Harris, K. R., Graham, S., Mason, L., & Friedlander, B. (2008). Powerful writing strategies for all students. Baltimore: Brookes.Google Scholar
  40. Harris, K. R., Graham, S., Brindle, M., & Sandmel, K. (2009). Metacognition and children’s writing. In D. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 131–153). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  41. Harris, K.R., Graham, S., MacArthur, C., Reid, R., & Mason, L. (2011). Self-regulated learning processes and children’s writing. B. Zimmerman and D.H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 187–202). Routledge Publishers.Google Scholar
  42. Hayes, J. (1996). A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 1–27). Mahwah: Erbaum.Google Scholar
  43. Hayes, J., & Flower, L. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In L. Gregg & E. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 3–30). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  44. Kirsch, I., Braun, H., Yamamoto, K., & Sum, A. (2007). America’s perfect storm: Three forces changing our Nation’s future. Princeton: ETS.Google Scholar
  45. Lane, K., Harris, K. R., Graham, S., Weisenbach, J., Brindle, M., & Morphy, P. (2008). The effects of self-regulated strategy development on the writing performance of second grade students with behavioral and writing difficulties. Journal of Special Education, 41, 234–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. MacArthur, C. A., Graham, S., & Fitzgerald, J. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of writing research. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  47. Mason, L. H. (2004). Explicit self-regulated strategy development versus reciprocal questioning: Effects on expository reading comprehension among struggling readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 283–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mason, L. H., Hickey Snyder, K., Sukhram, D. P., & Kedem, Y. (2006). Self-regulated strategy development for expository reading comprehension and informative writing: Effects for nine 4th-grade students who struggle with learning. Exceptional Children, 73, 69–89.Google Scholar
  49. National Commission on Writing (2003). The neglected “R.” College Entrance Examination Board.Google Scholar
  50. Olinghouse, N., Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2010). Evidence-based writing practices at the primary and secondary/tertiary level. In M. Shinn, H. Walker, & G. Stoner (Eds.), Interventions for achievement and behavior in a three-tier model including RTI (pp. 553–570). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.Google Scholar
  51. Persky, H., Daane, M., & Jin, Y. (2003). National assessment of educational progress: 2002 report card for the nation and the states. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.Google Scholar
  52. Reid, R., & Lienenmann, T. O. (2006). Strategy instruction for students with learning disabilities. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  53. Rogers, L., & Graham, S. (2008). A meta-analysis of single subject design writing intervention research. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 879–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Salahu-Din, D., Persky, H., & Miller, J. (2008). The Nation’s Report Card: Writing 2007 (NCES 2008-468). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  55. Sandmel, K. N., Brindle, M., Harris, K. R., Lane, K. L., Graham, S., Nackel, J., et al. (2009). Making it work: Differentiating tier two self-regulated strategies development in writing in tandem with schoolwide positive behavioral support. Teaching Exceptional Children, 42(2), 22–35.Google Scholar
  56. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1987). Knowledge telling and knowledge transforming in written compositions. In S. Rosenberg (Ed.), Advances in applied psycholinguistics (pp. 143–175). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Smyth, J. (1998). Written emotional expression: Effect sizes, out-come types, and moderating variables. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 174–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Swanson, H. L., & Berninger, V. W. (1996). Individual differences in children’s writing: A function of working memory or reading or both processes? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 8, 357–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Swedlow, J. (1999). The power of writing. National Geographic, 196, 110–132.Google Scholar
  60. Troia, G. A. (2006). Writing instruction for students with learning disabilities. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 324–354). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  61. Zimmerman, B., & Reisemberg, R. (1997). Becoming a self-regulated writer: A social cognitive perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 73–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The International Dyslexia Association 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Special EducationVanderbilt UniversityNashvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations