Annals of Dyslexia

, Volume 63, Issue 1, pp 25–43 | Cite as

Genetic and environmental influences on writing and their relations to language and reading

  • Richard K. Olson
  • Jacqueline Hulslander
  • Micaela Christopher
  • Janice M. Keenan
  • Sally J. Wadsworth
  • Erik G. Willcutt
  • Bruce F. Pennington
  • John C. DeFries
Article

Abstract

Identical and fraternal twins (N = 540, age 8 to 18 years) were tested on three different measures of writing (Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Achievement—Writing Samples and Writing Fluency; Handwriting Copy from the Group Diagnostic Reading and Aptitude Achievement Tests), three different language skills (phonological awareness, rapid naming, and vocabulary), and three different reading skills (word recognition, spelling, and reading comprehension). Substantial genetic influence was found on two of the writing measures, writing samples and handwriting copy, and all of the language and reading measures. Shared environment influences were generally not significant, except for Vocabulary. Non-shared environment estimates, including measurement error, were significant for all variables. Genetic influences among the writing measures were significantly correlated (highest between the speeded measures writing fluency and handwriting copy), but there were also significant independent genetic influences between copy and samples and between fluency and samples. Genetic influences on writing were significantly correlated with genetic influences on all of the language and reading skills, but significant independent genetic influences were also found for copy and samples, whose genetic correlations were significantly less than 1.0 with the reading and language skills. The genetic correlations varied significantly in strength depending on the overlap between the writing, language, and reading task demands. We discuss implications of our results for education, limitations of the study, and new directions for research on writing and its relations to language and reading.

Keywords

Environment Genes Language Reading Sex differences Twins Writing 

References

  1. Berninger, V. W., Abbott, R. D., Abbott, S. P., Graham, S., & Richards, T. (2002). Writing and reading: Connections between language by hand and language by eye. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 39–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berninger, V., & Fuller, F. (1992). Gender differences in orthographic, verbal, and compositional fluency: Implications for diagnosis of writing disabilities in primary grade children. Journal of School Psychology, 30, 363–382. Berninger and Fuller.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berninger, V. W., Nielsen, K. H., Abbott, R. D., Wijsman, E., & Raskind, W. (2008). Gender differences in severity of writing and reading disabilities. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 151–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Betjemann, R. S., Keenan, J. M., Olson, R. K., & DeFries, J. C. (2011). Choice of reading comprehension test influences the outcomes of genetic analyses. Scientific Studies of Reading, 15(4), 363–382. doi:10.1080/10888438.2010.493965.Google Scholar
  5. Betjemann, R. S., Willcutt, E. G., Olson, R. K., Keenan, J. M., DeFries, J. C., & Wadsworth, S. J. (2008). Word reading and reading comprehension: Stability, overlap and independence. Reading and Writing, 21, 539–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Byrne, B., Coventry, W. L., Olson, R. K., Hulslander, J., Wadsworth, S., DeFries, J. C., et al. (2008). A behavior-genetic analysis of orthographic learning, spelling, and decoding. Journal of Research in Reading, 31, 8–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Byrne, B., Coventry, W. L., Olson, R. K., Samuelsson, S., Corley, R., Willcutt, E. G., et al. (2009). Genetic and environmental influences on aspects of literacy and language in early childhood: Continuity and change from preschool to grade 2. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 22, 219–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Camarata, S., & Woodcock, R. (2006). Sex differences in processing speed: Developmental effects in males and females. Intelligence, 34, 231–252. doi:10.1016/jintell.2005.12.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Compton, D. L., Olson, R. K., DeFries, J. C., & Pennington, B. F. (2002). Are all RAN created equal? Comparing the relationships among two different formats of alphanumeric RAN and various word reading skills in normally achieving and reading disabled individuals. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6(4), 343–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. DeFries, J. C., Filipek, P. A., Fulker, D. W., Olson, R. K., Pennington, B. F., & Smith, S. D. (1997). Colorado learning disabilities research center. Learning Disabilities, 8, 7–19.Google Scholar
  11. DeFries, J. C., & Fulker, D. W. (1985). Multiple regression analysis of twin data. Behavior Genetics, 15, 467–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. DeFries, J. C., & Fulker, D. W. (1988). Multiple regression analysis of twin data: Etiology of deviant scores versus individual differences. Acta Geneticae Medicae et Gemellologiae: Twin Research, 37, 205–216.Google Scholar
  13. Denckla, M. B., & Rudel, R. G. (1976). Rapid “automatized” naming (R.A.N.): Dyslexia differentiated from other learning disabilities. Neuropsychologia, 14, 471–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, M. (1997). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-III. Circle Pines: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
  15. Fitzgerald, J., & Shanahan, T. (2000). Reading and writing relations and their development. Educational Psychologist, 35, 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Friend, A., DeFries, J.C., & Olson, R.K. (2008). Parental education moderates genetic influences on reading disability. Psychological Science, 19, 11241130. PubMed Central ID# NIHMSID63472.Google Scholar
  17. Gayán, J., & Olson, R. K. (2001). Genetic and environmental influences on orthographic and phonological skills in children with reading disabilities. Developmental Neuropsychology, 20(2), 487–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gayán, J., & Olson, R. K. (2003). Genetic and environmental influences on individual differences in printed word recognition. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 84, 97–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Graham, S., Berninger, V., Weintraub, N., & Schafer, W. (1998). The development of handwriting fluency and legibility in grades l through 9. Journal of Educational Research, 92, 42–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Graham, S., Harris, K. R., & Fink, B. (2002). Contributions of spelling instruction to the spelling, writing, and reading of poor spellers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 669–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Harlaar, N., Cutting, L., Deater-Deckard, K., DeThorne, L. S., Justice, L. M., Schatschneider, C., et al. (2010). Predicting individual differences in reading comprehension: A twin study. Annals of Dyslexia, 60, 265–288. doi:10.1007/s11881-010-0044-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Harlaar, N., Spinath, F. M., Dale, P. S., & Plomin, R. (2005). Genetic influences on early word recognition abilities and disabilities: A study of 7-year-old twins. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46, 373–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Harris, K.R., & Graham, S. (2011). “An adjective is a word hanging down from a noun”: Learning to write and students with learning disabilities. Annals of Dyslexia. doi:10.1007/s11881-011-0057-x.
  24. Hooper, S.R., Costa, L., McBee, M., Porter, F., Anderson, K.L., Yerby, D.C., Childress, A., & Knuth, S.B. (2011). A written language intervention for at-risk second grade students: A randomized controlled trial of the process assessment of the learner lesson plans in a tier 2 response-to-intervention (RtI) model. Annals of Dyslexia. doi:10.1007/s11881-011-0056-y.
  25. Jastak, S., & Wilkinson, G. S. (1984). The Wide Range Achievement Test-Revised: Administration manual. Wilmington: Jastak Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
  26. Jenkins, J. R., Johnson, E., & Hileman, J. (2004). When is reading also writing: Sources of individual differences on the new reading performance assessments. Scientific Studies of Reading, 8, 125–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Keenan, J. M., Betjemann, R., Wadsworth, S. J., DeFries, J. C., & Olson, R. K. (2006). Genetic and environmental influences on reading and listening comprehension. Journal of Research in Reading, 29, 75–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kovas, Y., Haworth, C. M. A., Dale, P. S., & Plomin, R. (2007). The genetic and environmental origins of learning abilities and disabilities in the early school years. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 72, 1–144.Google Scholar
  29. Markwardt, F. C., Jr. (1998). Peabody Individual Achievement Test—Revise-Normative Update. Circle Pines: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
  30. McGue, M., & Bouchard, T. J., Jr. (1984). Adjustment of twin data for the effects of age and sex. Behavior Genetics, 14, 325–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Miller, B., & McCardle, P. (2011a). Reflections on the need for continued research on writing. Reading and Writing, 24(2), 121–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Miller, B., & McCardle, P. (2011b). Moving closer to a public health model of language and learning disabilities: The role of genetics and the search of etiologies. Behavior Genetics, 41, 1–5. doi:10.1007/s10519-010-9439-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Neale, M.C., Boker, S.M., Xie, G., & Maes, H.H. (2002). Mx: Statistical Modeling. VCU Box 900126, Richmond, VA 23298: Department of Psychiatry. 6th Edition.Google Scholar
  34. Nichols, R. C., & Bilbro, W. C. (1966). The diagnosis of twin zygosity. Acta Genetica, 16, 265–275.Google Scholar
  35. Olson, R. K. (2004). SSSR, environment, and genes. Scientific Studies of Reading, 8(2), 111–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Olson, R., Forsberg, H., Wise, B., & Rack, J. (1994). Measurement of word recognition, orthographic, and phonological skills. In G. R. Lyon (Ed.), Frames of Reference for the Assessment of Learning Disabilities: New Views on Measurement Issues (pp. 243–277). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  37. Olson, R.K., Keenan, J.M., Byrne, B., Samuelsson, S., Coventry, W.L., Corley, R., Wadsworth, S.J., Willcutt, E.G., DeFries, J.C., Pennington, B.F., & Hulslander, J. (2011). Genetic and environmental influences on vocabulary and reading development from pre-kindergarten through grade 4. Scientific Studies of Reading, 15(1), 26–46. doi:10.1080/10888438.2011.536128.
  38. Olson, R. K., Wise, B., Conners, F., Rack, J., & Fulker, D. (1989). Specific deficits in component reading and language skills: Genetic and environmental influences. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 339–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schmitz, S., Cherny, S. S., & Fulker, D. W. (1998). Increase in power through multivariate analyses. Behavior Genetics, 28, 357–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Plomin, R., DeFries, J. C., McClearn, G. E., & McGuffin, P. (2008). Behavioral Genetics (5th ed.). New York: Worth Publishers.Google Scholar
  41. Shanahan, T. (2006). Relations among oral language, reading, and writing. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of Writing Research. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  42. Wechsler, D. (2003). Examiners’ Manual: Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fourth Edition. San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  43. Wolf, M., & Bowers, P. G. (1999). The double-deficit hypothesis for the developmental dyslexias. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 415–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Achievement. Itasca: Riverside Publishers.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The International Dyslexia Association 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard K. Olson
    • 1
  • Jacqueline Hulslander
    • 1
  • Micaela Christopher
    • 1
  • Janice M. Keenan
    • 2
  • Sally J. Wadsworth
    • 1
  • Erik G. Willcutt
    • 1
  • Bruce F. Pennington
    • 2
  • John C. DeFries
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Institute for Behavioral GeneticsUniversity of Colorado at BoulderBoulderUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of DenverDenverUSA

Personalised recommendations