Genetic and environmental influences on writing and their relations to language and reading
- First Online:
- 786 Downloads
Identical and fraternal twins (N = 540, age 8 to 18 years) were tested on three different measures of writing (Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Achievement—Writing Samples and Writing Fluency; Handwriting Copy from the Group Diagnostic Reading and Aptitude Achievement Tests), three different language skills (phonological awareness, rapid naming, and vocabulary), and three different reading skills (word recognition, spelling, and reading comprehension). Substantial genetic influence was found on two of the writing measures, writing samples and handwriting copy, and all of the language and reading measures. Shared environment influences were generally not significant, except for Vocabulary. Non-shared environment estimates, including measurement error, were significant for all variables. Genetic influences among the writing measures were significantly correlated (highest between the speeded measures writing fluency and handwriting copy), but there were also significant independent genetic influences between copy and samples and between fluency and samples. Genetic influences on writing were significantly correlated with genetic influences on all of the language and reading skills, but significant independent genetic influences were also found for copy and samples, whose genetic correlations were significantly less than 1.0 with the reading and language skills. The genetic correlations varied significantly in strength depending on the overlap between the writing, language, and reading task demands. We discuss implications of our results for education, limitations of the study, and new directions for research on writing and its relations to language and reading.
KeywordsEnvironment Genes Language Reading Sex differences Twins Writing
- Byrne, B., Coventry, W. L., Olson, R. K., Samuelsson, S., Corley, R., Willcutt, E. G., et al. (2009). Genetic and environmental influences on aspects of literacy and language in early childhood: Continuity and change from preschool to grade 2. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 22, 219–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Compton, D. L., Olson, R. K., DeFries, J. C., & Pennington, B. F. (2002). Are all RAN created equal? Comparing the relationships among two different formats of alphanumeric RAN and various word reading skills in normally achieving and reading disabled individuals. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6(4), 343–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- DeFries, J. C., Filipek, P. A., Fulker, D. W., Olson, R. K., Pennington, B. F., & Smith, S. D. (1997). Colorado learning disabilities research center. Learning Disabilities, 8, 7–19.Google Scholar
- DeFries, J. C., & Fulker, D. W. (1988). Multiple regression analysis of twin data: Etiology of deviant scores versus individual differences. Acta Geneticae Medicae et Gemellologiae: Twin Research, 37, 205–216.Google Scholar
- Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, M. (1997). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-III. Circle Pines: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
- Friend, A., DeFries, J.C., & Olson, R.K. (2008). Parental education moderates genetic influences on reading disability. Psychological Science, 19, 1124–1130. PubMed Central ID# NIHMSID63472.Google Scholar
- Harris, K.R., & Graham, S. (2011). “An adjective is a word hanging down from a noun”: Learning to write and students with learning disabilities. Annals of Dyslexia. doi:10.1007/s11881-011-0057-x.
- Hooper, S.R., Costa, L., McBee, M., Porter, F., Anderson, K.L., Yerby, D.C., Childress, A., & Knuth, S.B. (2011). A written language intervention for at-risk second grade students: A randomized controlled trial of the process assessment of the learner lesson plans in a tier 2 response-to-intervention (RtI) model. Annals of Dyslexia. doi:10.1007/s11881-011-0056-y.
- Jastak, S., & Wilkinson, G. S. (1984). The Wide Range Achievement Test-Revised: Administration manual. Wilmington: Jastak Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
- Kovas, Y., Haworth, C. M. A., Dale, P. S., & Plomin, R. (2007). The genetic and environmental origins of learning abilities and disabilities in the early school years. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 72, 1–144.Google Scholar
- Markwardt, F. C., Jr. (1998). Peabody Individual Achievement Test—Revise-Normative Update. Circle Pines: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
- Neale, M.C., Boker, S.M., Xie, G., & Maes, H.H. (2002). Mx: Statistical Modeling. VCU Box 900126, Richmond, VA 23298: Department of Psychiatry. 6th Edition.Google Scholar
- Nichols, R. C., & Bilbro, W. C. (1966). The diagnosis of twin zygosity. Acta Genetica, 16, 265–275.Google Scholar
- Olson, R., Forsberg, H., Wise, B., & Rack, J. (1994). Measurement of word recognition, orthographic, and phonological skills. In G. R. Lyon (Ed.), Frames of Reference for the Assessment of Learning Disabilities: New Views on Measurement Issues (pp. 243–277). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.Google Scholar
- Olson, R.K., Keenan, J.M., Byrne, B., Samuelsson, S., Coventry, W.L., Corley, R., Wadsworth, S.J., Willcutt, E.G., DeFries, J.C., Pennington, B.F., & Hulslander, J. (2011). Genetic and environmental influences on vocabulary and reading development from pre-kindergarten through grade 4. Scientific Studies of Reading, 15(1), 26–46. doi:10.1080/10888438.2011.536128.
- Plomin, R., DeFries, J. C., McClearn, G. E., & McGuffin, P. (2008). Behavioral Genetics (5th ed.). New York: Worth Publishers.Google Scholar
- Shanahan, T. (2006). Relations among oral language, reading, and writing. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of Writing Research. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Wechsler, D. (2003). Examiners’ Manual: Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fourth Edition. San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
- Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Achievement. Itasca: Riverside Publishers.Google Scholar