Advertisement

Annals of Dyslexia

, Volume 59, Issue 1, pp 34–54 | Cite as

Effects of fluency, oral language, and executive function on reading comprehension performance

  • Laurie E. Cutting
  • April Materek
  • Carolyn A. S. Cole
  • Terry M. Levine
  • E. Mark Mahone
Article

Abstract

Reading disability (RD) typically consists of deficits in word reading accuracy and/or reading comprehension. While it is well known that word reading accuracy deficits lead to comprehension deficits (general reading disability, GRD), less is understood about neuropsychological profiles of children who exhibit adequate word reading accuracy but nevertheless develop specific reading comprehension deficits (S-RCD). Establishing the underlying neuropsychological processes associated with different RD types is essential for ultimately understanding core neurobiological bases of reading comprehension. To this end, the present study investigated isolated and contextual word fluency, oral language, and executive function on reading comprehension performance in 56 9- to 14-year-old children [21 typically developing (TD), 18 GRD, and 17 S-RCD]. Results indicated that TD and S-RCD participants read isolated words at a faster rate than participants with GRD; however, both RD groups had contextual word fluency and oral language weaknesses. Additionally, S-RCD participants showed prominent weaknesses in executive function. Implications for understanding the neuropsychological bases for reading comprehension are discussed.

Keywords

Executive function Fluency Oral language Reading comprehension Reading disabilities 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by the Mental Wellness Foundation, the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine General Clinical Research Center (NIH grant M01-RR00052), and NIH R01-HD044073. The authors thank Sarah Eason for her assistance with data collection.

References

  1. Aaron, P. G., Joshi, R. M., & Williams, K. A. (1999). Not all reading disabilities are alike. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 120–137. doi: 10.1177/002221949903200203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asato, M. R., Sweeney, J. A., & Luna, B. (2006). Cognitive processes in the development of TOL performance. Neuropsychologia, 44, 2259–2269. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.05.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barkley, R. (2006). Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. In D. A. Wolfe, & E. J. Mash (Eds.), Behavioral and emotional disorders in adolescents: Nature, assessment, and treatment (pp. 91–152). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  4. Barnes, M. A., & Dennis, M. (1996). The effects of knowledge availability and knowledge accessibility on coherence and elaborative inferencing in children six to fifteen years of age. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 61, 216–241.Google Scholar
  5. Barnes, M. A., Faulkner, H. J., & Dennis, M. (2001). Poor reading comprehension despite fast word decoding in children with hydrocephalus. Brain and Language, 76, 35–44. doi: 10.1006/brln.2000.2389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berninger, V. (1994). Reading and writing acquisition: A developmental neuropsychological perspective. Madison, WI: Brown & Benchmark.Google Scholar
  7. Biancarosa, G., & Snow, C. E. (2004). Reading next—A vision for action and research in middle and high school literacy: A report from Carnegie Corporation of New York. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.Google Scholar
  8. Cain, K. (2006). Individual differences in children's memory and reading comprehension: An investigation of semantic and inhibitory deficits. Memory (Hove, England), 14(5), 553–569. doi: 10.1080/09658210600624481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. (2006). Profiles of children with specific reading comprehension difficulties. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 683–696. doi: 10.1348/000709905X67610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Bryant, P. (2004). Children’s reading comprehension ability: Concurrent prediction by working memory, verbal ability, and component skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 31–42. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Catts, H. W., Fey, M. E., Zhang, X., & Tomblin, J. B. (1999). Language basis of reading and reading disabilities: Evidence from a longitudinal investigation. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 331–361. doi: 10.1207/s1532799xssr0304_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Catts, H. W., Hogan, T. P., Adof, S. M., & Barth, A. E. (2003a). The simple view of reading changes over time. Boulder, CO: Society for Scientific Study of Reading.Google Scholar
  13. Catts, H., Hogan, T. P., & Fey, M. (2003b). Subgrouping poor readers on the basis of reading-related abilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 151–164. doi: 10.1177/002221940303600208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cornoldi, C., De Beni, R., & Pazzaglia, F. (1996). Profiles of reading comprehension difficulties: An analysis of single cases. In C. Cornoldi, & J. Oakhill (Eds.), Reading comprehension difficulties: Processes and intervention. (pp. 113–136). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  15. Cutting, L. E., Eason, S. H., Young, K., & Alberstadt, A. L. (2009). Reading comprehension: cognition and neuroimaging. In K. Pugh, & P. McCardle (Eds.), How children learn to read: current issues and new directions in the integration of cognition, neurobiology and genetics of reading and dyslexia research and practice (p. 329). Philadelphia, PA: Earlbaum.Google Scholar
  16. Cutting, L. E., & Scarborough, H. S. (2006). Prediction of reading comprehension: Relative contributions of word recognition, language proficiency, and other cognitive skills can depend on how comprehension is measured. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10(3), 277–299. doi: 10.1207/s1532799xssr1003_5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450–466. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(80)90312-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1997). Peabody picture vocabulary test—Third edition (PPVT-III). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
  19. DuPaul, G. J., Power, T. J., Anastopoulos, A. D., & Reid, R. (1998). ADHD rating scale-IV. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  20. Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. RASE: Remedial & Special Education, 7(1), 6–10. doi: 10.1177/074193258600700104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fletcher, J. M., Shaywitz, S. E., Shankweiler, D. P., Katz, L., Liberman, I. Y., Stuebing, K. K., et al. (1994). Cognitive profiles of reading disability: Comparisons of discrepancy and low achievement definitions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 6–23. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.86.1.6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Francis, D. J., Snow, C. E., August, D., Carlson, C. D., Miller, J., & Iglesias, A. (2006). Measures of reading comprehension: A latent variable analysis of the diagnostic assessment of reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10(3), 301–322. doi: 10.1207/s1532799xssr1003_6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jenkins, J. R., Fuchs, L. S., Van den Broek, P., Espin, C., & Deno, S. L. (2003a). Sources of individual differences in reading comprehension and reading fluency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 719–729. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jenkins, J. R., Fuchs, L. S., Van den Broek, P., Espin, C., & Deno, S. L. (2003b). Accuracy and fluency in list and context reading of skilled and RD groups: Absolute and relative performance levels. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 237–245. doi: 10.1111/1540-5826.00078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Juel, C. (1988). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 437–447. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.80.4.437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99, 122–149. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.99.1.122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kaplan, E., Fein, D., Kramer, J., Delis, D., & Morris, R. (1999). WISC-III as a process instrument. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  28. Klauda, S. L., & Guthrie, J. T. (2008). Relationships of three components of reading fluency to reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 310–321. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.100.2.310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Keenan, J. M., Betjemann, R. S., & Olson, R. K. (2008). Reading comprehension tests vary in the skills they assess: Differential dependence on decoding and oral comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12, 281–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  31. LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293–323. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(74)90015-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Leach, J. M., Scarborough, H. S., & Rescorla, L. (2003). Late-emerging reading disabilities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 211–224. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.95.2.211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lyon, G. R. (1995). Toward a definition of dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 45, 3–27. doi: 10.1007/BF02648210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mahone, E. M., Cirino, P. T., Cutting, L. E., Cerrone, P. M., Hagelthorn, K. M., Hiemenz, J. R., et al. (2002a). Validity of the behavior rating inventory of executive function in children with ADHD and/or Tourette syndrome. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 17(7), 643–662. doi: 10.1016/S0887-6177(01)00168-8.Google Scholar
  35. Mahone, E. M., Zabel, T. A., Levey, E., Verda, M., & Kinsman, S. (2002b). Parent and self-report ratings of executive function in adolescents with myelomeningocele and hydrocephalus. Child Neuropsychology, 8(4), 258–270. doi: 10.1076/chin.8.4.258.13510.Google Scholar
  36. Mangeot, S., Armstrong, K., Colvin, A. N., Yeates, K. O., & Taylor, H. G. (2002). Long-term executive function deficits in children with traumatic brain injuries: Assessment using the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF). Child Neuropsychology, 14, 271–284. doi: 10.1076/chin.8.4.271.13503.Google Scholar
  37. McCardle, P., Scarborough, H. S., & Cattsm, H. W. (2001). Predicting, explaining, and preventing children’s reading difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16, 230–239. doi: 10.1111/0938-8982.00023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nation, K. (2001). Reading and language in children: Exposing hidden deficits. The Psychologist, 14, 238–242.Google Scholar
  39. Nation, K., Adams, J. W., Bowyer-Crane, C. A., & Snowling, M. J. (1999). Working memory deficits in poor comprehenders reflect underlying language impairments. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 73, 139–158. doi: 10.1006/jecp.1999.2498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nation, K., & Snowling, M. J. (1998). Semantic processing and the development of word-recognition skill: Evidence from children with reading comprehension difficulties. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 85–101. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1998.2564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nation, K., & Snowling, M. J. (1999). Developmental differences in sensitivity to semantic relations among good readers and poor comprehenders: Evidence from semantic priming. Cognition, 70, B1–B13. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00004-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nation, K., & Snowling, M. J. (2000). Factors influencing syntactic awareness skills in normal readers and poor comprehenders. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21, 229–241. doi: 10.1017/S0142716400002046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP).(2003). NAEP 2003 trends in academic progress. Retrieved April 11, 2007 from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2004451, (2007).
  44. Newcomer, P. L., & Hammill, D. D. (1997). Test of language development—Primary (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
  45. Oakhill, J. (1993). Children’s difficulties in reading comprehension. Educational Psychology Review, 5(3), 223–237. doi: 10.1007/BF01323045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Oakhill, J., & Garnham, A. (1988). Becoming a skilled reader. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  47. Oakhill, J., & Yuill, N. (1996). Higher order factors in comprehension disability: Processes and remediation (pp. 69–92). Mahwah, New Jersey: Earlbaum.Google Scholar
  48. Oullette, G. P. (2006). Whats meaning got to do with it: The role of vocabulary in word reading and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 554–566. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.98.3.554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Perfetti, C. A., & Hogaboam, T. (1975). Relationship between single word decoding and reading comprehension skill. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 461–469. doi: 10.1037/h0077013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Perfetti, C. A., Marron, M. A., & Foltz, P. W. (1996). Sources of comprehension failure: Theoretical perspectives and case studies. In C. Cornoldi, & J. Oakhill (Eds.), Reading comprehension difficulties: Processes and intervention (pp. 137–166). Mahwah, New Jersey: Earlbaum.Google Scholar
  51. Powell, K. B., & Voeller, K. K. (2004). Prefrontal executive function syndromes in children. Journal of Child Neurology, 19, 785–797.Google Scholar
  52. Purvis, K. L., & Tannock, R. (1997). Language abilities in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, reading disabilities, and normal controls. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 25, 133–144. doi: 10.1023/A:1025731529006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ruffman, T. (1996). Reassessing children's comprehension–monitoring skills. In C. Cornoldi, & J. Oakhill (Eds.), Reading Comprehension Difficulties: Processes and Intervention (pp. 37–67). Mahwah, New Jersey: Earlbaum.Google Scholar
  54. Scarborough, H. S. (1990). Very early language deficits in dyslexic children. Child Development, 61, 1728–1743. doi: 10.2307/1130834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Scarborough, H. S. (2005). Developmental relationships between language and reading: Reconciling a beautiful hypothesis with some ugly facts. In H. W. Catts, & A. G. Kamhi (Eds.), The connections between language and reading disabilities (pp. 3–24). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  56. Schmalhofer, F., & Perfetti, C. A. (2007). Higher level language processes in the brain: Inference and comprehension processes. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  57. Sesma, H. W., Mahone, E. M., Levine, T., Eason, S.H., & Cutting, L.E. (2008). The contribution of executive skills to reading comprehension. Child Neuropsychology, 15, 1–15.Google Scholar
  58. Shallice, T. (1982). Specific impairments of planning. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 298, 199–209. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1982.0082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Shankweiler, D. (1999). Words to meanings. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 113–127. doi: 10.1207/s1532799xssr0302_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Share, D. L., & Leikin, M. (2004). Language impairment at school entry and later reading disability: Connections at lexical versus supralexical levels of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 8(1), 87–110. doi: 10.1207/s1532799xssr0801_5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Snow, C. E. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward a research and development program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.Google Scholar
  62. Stothard, S. E., & Hulme, C. (1995). A comparison of phonological skills in children with reading comprehension difficulties and children with decoding difficulties. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 36, 399–408. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1995.tb01298.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Swanson, H. L. (1999). Reading comprehension and working memory in learning-disabled readers: Is the phonological loop more important than the executive system. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 72, 1–31. doi: 10.1006/jecp.1998.2477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Swanson, H. L., & Alexander, J. E. (1997). Cognitive processes as predictors of word recognition and reading comprehension in learning-disabled and skilled readers: Revisiting the specificity hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 128–158. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.89.1.128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Swanson, H. L., & Berninger, V. M. (1996). Individual differences in children’s working memory and writing skill. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 63(2), 358–385.Google Scholar
  66. Swanson, H. L., & Trahan, M. (1996). Learning disabled and average readers’ working memory and comprehension: Does metacognition play a role. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 333–355.Google Scholar
  67. Torgesen, K. L. (2000). Individual differences in response to early interventions in reading: The lingering problem of treatment resisters. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15, 55–64. doi: 10.1207/SLDRP1501_6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). Test of word reading efficiency. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
  69. Torppa, M., Tolvanen, A., Poikkeus, A. M., Eklund, K., Lerkkanen, M. K., Leskinen, E., et al. (2007). Reading development subtypes and their early characteristics. Annals of Dyslexia, 57, 3–32. doi: 10.1007/s11881-007-0003-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Vellutino, F., Scanlon, D., & Tanzman, M. (1994). Components of reading ability: Issues and problems in operationalizing word identification, phonological coding, and orthographic coding. In G. R. Lyon (Ed.), Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities: New views on measurement issues (pp. 279–332). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
  71. Wechsler, D. L. (1991). Wechsler intelligence scale for children—III. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  72. Wechsler, D. (2003). Wechsler intelligence scale for children—Fourth Edition. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  73. Wiederholt, L., & Bryant, B. (2000). Examiner’s manual: Gray oral reading test—Fourth Edition. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
  74. Wiig, E., & Secord, W. (1989). Test of language competence—Expanded. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  75. Willcutt, E. G., Doyle, A. E., Nigg, J. T., Faraone, S. V., & Pennington, B. F. (2005). Validity of the executive function theory of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A meta-analytic review. Biological Psychiatry, 57, 1336–1346. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.02.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Wolf, M., & Katzir-Cohen, T. (2001). Reading fluency and its intervention. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 211–238. doi: 10.1207/S1532799XSSR0503_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Woodcock, R. W. (1998). Woodcock reading mastery tests—Revised/normative update. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The International Dyslexia Association 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Laurie E. Cutting
    • 1
    • 2
    • 4
    • 5
  • April Materek
    • 6
  • Carolyn A. S. Cole
    • 1
    • 3
  • Terry M. Levine
    • 1
  • E. Mark Mahone
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Kennedy Krieger InstituteBaltimoreUSA
  2. 2.Department of NeurologyJohns Hopkins School of MedicineBaltimoreUSA
  3. 3.Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral SciencesJohns Hopkins School of MedicineBaltimoreUSA
  4. 4.Johns Hopkins University School of EducationBaltimoreUSA
  5. 5.Haskins LaboratoriesNew HavenUSA
  6. 6.Loyola CollegeBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations