Skip to main content
Log in

Processing of derived forms in high-functioning dyslexics

  • Published:
Annals of Dyslexia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We report on an experiment designed to evaluate processing of derived forms in high-functioning dyslexics, defined as university students with a history of reading difficulties who have age-appropriate reading comprehension skills. We compared high-functioning dyslexics with a group of normal adult readers in their performance on a lexical decision task with derived items (such as cloudy and ably) and pseudo-derived items (such as belly and gravy). Some items contained an orthographic change (such as able-ably and gravy) and others did not (such as cloud - cloudy). The results indicated that although control participants’ response times varied systematically as a function of morphological complexity, those of high-functioning dyslexics did not. Further, there was some evidence of a relationship between derivational processing and reading. It seems that high-functioning dyslexics have persistent difficulties in processing one particular aspect of morphology; that of derived forms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaron, P. G. (1989). Qualitative and quantitative differences among dyslexic, normal, and nondyslexic poor readers. Reading & Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 1, 291–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Dror, I., Pollatsek, A., & Scarpati, S. (1991). Word identification in isolation and in context by college dyslexic students. Brain and Language, 40, 471–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentin, S., & Feldman, L. B. (1990). The contribution of morphological and semantic relatedness to repetition priming at short and long lags: Evidence from Hebrew. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 42, 693–711.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourassa, D., Treiman, R., & Kessler, B. (in press). Use of morphology in spelling by children with dyslexia and typically developing children. Memory and Cognition.

  • Bradley, L., & Bryant, P. E. (1983). Categorising sounds and learning to read—a causal connection. Nature, 301, 419–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. I., Fishco, V. V., & Hanna, G. (1993). The Nelson-Denny reading test. Chicago: Riverside Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruck, M. (1993). Component spelling skills of college students with a childhood diagnosis of dyslexia. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 16, 171–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, P., Nunes, T., & Bindman, M. (1997). Backward readers’ awareness of language: Strengths and weaknesses. European Journal of Psychology of Education, XII, 357–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, P., Nunes, T., & Bindman, M. (1998). Awareness of language in children who have reading difficulties: Historical comparisons in a longitudinal study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 39, 501–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butterworth, B. (1983). Lexical representation. In B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language production, Vol. 2 (pp. 257–294). London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caramazza, A., Laudanna, A., & Romani, C. (1992). Lexical access and inflectional morphology. Cognition, 28, 297–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle, J. F. (1987). The use of morphological knowledge in spelling derived forms by learning disabled and normal students. Annals of Dyslexia, 37, 90–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle, J. F. (1988). Knowledge of derivational morphology and spelling ability in fourth, sixth and eighth grades. Applied Psycholinguistics, 9, 247–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle, J. F., & Stone, C. A. (2003). The effects of morphological structure on children’s reading of derived words. In E. Assink & D. Santa (Eds.), Reading complex words: Cross-language studies (pp. 27–52). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle, J. F., & Stone, C. A. (2005). The role of morphemes in word reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 40, 428–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle, J. F., Stone, C. A., & Katz, L. A. (2001). The effect of phonological transparency on reading derived words. Annals of Dyslexia, 51, 249–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casalis, S., Colé, P., & Sopo, D. (2004). Morphological awareness in developmental dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 54, 114–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coltheart, M. (1981). The MRC psycholinguistic database. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 497–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Luca, M., Borrelli, M., Judica, A., Spinelli, D., & Zoccolotti, P. (2002). Reading words and pseudowords: An eye movement study of developmental dyslexia. Brain and Language, 80, 617–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elbro, C. (1990). Differences in dyslexia. A study of reading strategies and deficits in a linguistic perspective. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbro, C., & Arnbak, E. (1996). The role of morpheme recognition and morphological awareness in dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 46, 209–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, L. B. (1992). Morphological relationships revealed through the repetition priming task. In P. Downing, S. D. Lima, & M. Noonan (Eds.), Linguistics and literacy (pp. 239–254). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, F. W., Shankweiler, D., & Liberman, I. Y. (1985). Spelling proficiency and sensitivity to word structure. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 423–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, A., & Liberman, I. (1995). The role of phonology and orthography in morphological awareness. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 157–188). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, A., Napps, S. E., & Feldman, L. B. (1985). Relations among regular and irregular morphological related words in the lexicon as revealed by repetition priming. Memory and Cognition, 13, 241–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, A. M., Laxon, V., Armstrong, E., & Frith, U. (1996). Phonological difficulties in high-functioning dyslexics. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 8, 499–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giraudo, H. (2001). Rôle et représentation de l’information morphologique chez l’apprenti lecteur et l’enfant dyslexique (The role and representation of morphological information in the beginning reader and in dyslexic children). Annales Fyssen, 16, 81–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goswami, U., & Bryant, P. (1989). The interpretation of studies using the reading level design. Journal of Reading Behavior, 21, 413–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatcher, J., Snowling, M. J., & Griffiths, Y. M. (2002). Cognitive assessment of dyslexic students in higher education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 119–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, N. E. & Butterfield, E. C. (1989). Reading-level-match designs: Myths and realities. Journal of Reading Behavior, 21, 387–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joanisse, M. F., Manis, F. R., Keating, P., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2000). Language deficits in dyslexic children: Speech perception, phonology and morphology. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 77, 30–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lefly, D. L., & Pennington, B. F. (1991). Spelling errors and reading fluency in compensated dyslexics. Annals of Dyslexia, 41, 143–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leong, C. K. (1989a). Productive knowledge of derivational rules in poor readers. Annals of Dyslexia, 39, 94–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leong, C. K. (1989b). The effects of morphological structure on reading proficiency: A developmental study. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 1, 357–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leong, C. K. (1999). Phonological and morphological processing in adult students with learning/reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 224–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leong, C. K., & Parkinson, M. E. (1995). Processing of English morphological structure by poor readers. In C. K. Leong & R. M. Joshi (Eds.), Developmental and acquired dyslexia: Neuropsychological and neurolinguistic perspectives (pp. 237–261). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marslen-Wilson, W., Tyler, L., Waksler, R., & Older, L. (1994). Morphology and meaning in the mental lexicon. Psychological Review, 10, 3–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morais, J., Carey, L., Alegria, J., & Bertelson, P. (1979). Does awareness of speech as a sequence of phones arise spontaneously? Cognition, 7, 323–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosberg, L., & Johns, D. (1994). Reading and listening comprehension in college students with developmental dyslexia. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 9(3), 130–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Napps, S. E., & Fowler, C. A. (1987). Formal relationships among words and the organization of the mental lexicon. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 15, 257–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nation, K., Marshall, C. M., & Snowling, M. J. (2001). Phonological and semantic contributions to children’s picture naming skill: Evidence from children with developmental reading disorders. Language & Cognitive Processes, 16, 241–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Bethesda MD: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parrila, R., Corkett, J., Kirby, J. R., & Hein, S. (2003). Adult reading history questionnaire-revised. Unpublished questionnaire. University of Alberta.

  • Parrila, R., & Georgiou, G. (2005, June). Persistent naming speed problems in high-functioning adult dyslexics: Wherein lies the problem? Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading, Toronto, Canada.

  • Pennington, B. F., Van Orden, G. C., Smith, S. D., Green, P. A., & Haith, M. (1990). Phonological processing skills and deficits in adult dyslexics. Child Development, 61, 1753–1778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raaijmakers, J. G. W., Schrijnemakers, J. M. C., & Gremmen, F. (1999). How to deal with “the language as a fixed effect fallacy:” Common misconceptions and alternative solutions. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 416–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rack, J. (1997). Issues in the assessment of developmental dyslexia in adults: Theoretical and applied perspectives. Journal of Research in Reading, 20, 66–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosner, J., & Simon, D. P. (1971). The auditory analysis test: An initial report. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 4, 384–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, G. S., Becker, C. A., & Freeman, R. H. (1979). Morphological structure and its effect on visual word recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 18, 757–767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, H., Patterson, P. A., & Kantor, M. (1991). Morphological development and writing ability in children and adults. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 22, 228–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidenderg, M. S. (1985). The lexicon in a model of language production. New York: Garland Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shankweiler, D., Crain, S., Katz, L., Fowler, A. E., Liberman, A. E., Brady, S. A., Thornton, R., Lundquist, E., Breyer, L., Fletcher, J. M., Stuebing, K. K., Shaywitz, S. E., & Shaywitz, B. A. (1995). Cognitive profiles of reading-disabled children: Comparison of language skills in phonology, morphology and syntax. Psychological Science, 6, 149–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shankweiler, D., Lundquist, E., Dreyer, L. G., & Dickinson, C. C. (1996). Reading and spelling difficulties in high school students: Causes and consequences. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 8, 267–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, L. S., Share, D., & Geva, E. (1995). Evidence for superior orthographic skills in dyslexics. Psychological Science, 6, 250–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snowling, M. (2000). Dyslexia (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snowling, M., Nation, K., Moxham, P., Gallagher, A., & Frith, U. (1997). Phonological processing skills of dyslexic students in higher education: A preliminary report. Journal of Research in Reading, 20, 31–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoltz, J. A., & Feldman, L. B. (1995). The role of orthographic and semantic transparency of the base morpheme in morphological processing. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 109–129). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taft, M. (1979). Recognition of affixed words and the frequency effect. Memory and Cognition, 7, 263–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taft. M. (1981). Prefix stripping revisited. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 20, 289–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taft, M. (1994). Interactive-activation as a framework for understanding morphological processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 271–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taft, M. (2004). Morphological decomposition and the reverse base frequency effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 57A(4), 745–765.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taft, M., & Forster, K. I. (1975). Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 14, 630–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, A., & Nagy, W. (1990). Use of derivational morphology during reading. Cognition, 36, 17–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Leij, A., & van Daal, V. H. P. (1999). Automatization aspects of dyslexia: Speed limitations in word identification, sensitivity to increasing task demands, and orthographic compensation. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 417–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vellutino, F. R., & Scanlon, D. M. (1989). Some prerequisites for interpreting results from reading level matched designs. Journal of Reading Behavior, 21, 361–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). CTOPP: Comprehensive test of phonological processing. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, F. L., & Brown, G. D. (1992). Single-word reading in college dyslexics. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 6, 263–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock, R. (1987). Woodcock reading mastery tests-revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zoccolotti, P., De Luca, M., Di Pace, E., Gasperini, F., Judica, A., & Spinelli, D. (2005). Word length effect in early reading and in developmental dyslexia. Brain and Language, 93, 369–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Hélène Deacon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Deacon, S.H., Parrila, R. & Kirby, J.R. Processing of derived forms in high-functioning dyslexics. Ann. of Dyslexia 56, 103–128 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-006-0005-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-006-0005-3

Key Words

Navigation