Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Schoolchildren’s exposure to PM2.5: a student club–based air quality monitoring campaign using low-cost sensors

Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health volume 13, pages 543–551 (2020)Cite this article

Abstract

To assess schoolchildren’s exposure to outdoor/indoor air pollution and identify those at a higher risk, it is desirable to conduct personal-level air quality monitoring. This paper documents a 2-month voluntary monitoring campaign with students attending the environmental club of the Spring Valley High School in urban Las Vegas, Nevada. The students wore low-cost sensors to log their exposure to PM2.5 (particulate matter with aerodynamic diameters < 2.5 μm) at 5-min temporal resolution throughout the school hours. Calibrations of these sensors as well as concurrent outdoor monitors were traceable to the official air monitoring network. On a daily basis, the collective exposure among the students generally tracked the outdoor PM2.5 levels (r2 = 0.55), but the ratio of personal over outdoor exposure (P/O ratio) varied by student, ranging from 1.1 ± 0.6 to 1.9 ± 1.2, consistent with the indoor/outdoor (I/O) ratios for naturally-ventilated classrooms with substantial indoor sources. The personal exposure showed impacts of short-term, acute events, which were not observed outdoors and likely resulted from resuspension of particles due to students’ movements, particularly during class breaks. Such indoor sources could have dominated PM2.5 exposure when outdoor air is clean. Improving air filtration and surface cleaning for the classrooms are recommended to lower students’ exposure to particulate air pollution. The personal monitoring protocol established in this study may be expanded to different pollutants and integrated into many schools’ science curricula to generate much-needed exposure data and increase air quality awareness among schoolchildren.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

39,95 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Data availability

All original air monitoring data are available upon request.

References

  • Alves C, Nunes T, Silva J, Duarte M (2013) Comfort parameters and particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) in school classrooms and outdoor air. Aerosol Air Qual Res 13(5):1521–1535

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Amato F, Rivas I, Viana M, Moreno T, Bouso L, Reche C, Àlvarez-Pedrerol M, Alastuey A, Sunyer J, Querol X (2014) Sources of indoor and outdoor PM2.5 concentrations in primary schools. Sci Total Environ 490:757–765

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen L-WA, Gebreselassie A (2019) Low cost sensors for assessing industrial impact on air quality of an environmental justice community in Las Vegas. Presented at American Geophysical Union (AGU) Fall Meeting, San Francisco.https://agu.confex.com/agu/fm19/meetingapp.cgi/Paper/623520. Accessed 25 Mar 2020

  • Chow JC, Engelbrecht JP, Watson JG, Wilson WE, Frank NH, Zhu T (2002) Designing monitoring networks to represent outdoor human exposure. Chemosphere 49(9):961–978

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson MS (2018) CCSD unhappy with possibility of asphalt plant near school. Las Vegas Review Journal: https://www.reviewjournal.com/news/education/ccsd-unhappy-with-possibility-of-asphalt-plant-near-school/. Accessed 25 Mar 2020

  • Deary ME, Bainbridge SJ, Kerr A, McAllister A, Shrimpton T (2016) Practicalities of mapping PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations on city-wide scales using a portable particulate monitor. Air Qual Atmos Health 9(8):923–930

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Diapouli E, Chaloulakou A, Mihalopoulos N, Spyrellis N (2008) Indoor and outdoor PM mass and number concentrations at schools in the Athens area. Environ Monit Assess 136(1–3):13–20

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fromme H, Diemer J, Dietrich S, Cyrys J, Heinrich J, Lang W, Kiranoglu M, Twardella D (2008) Chemical and morphological properties of particulate matter (PM10, PM2.5) in school classrooms and outdoor air. Atmos Environ 42(27):6597–6605

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Green MC, Chow JC, Chang M-CO, Chen L-WA, Kuhns HD, Etyemezian VR, Watson JG (2013) Source apportionment of atmospheric particulate carbon in Las Vegas, Nevada, USA. Particuology 11(1):110–118

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta P, Doraiswamy P, Levy R, Pikelnaya O, Maibach J, Feenstra B, Polidori A, Kiros F, Mills KC (2018) Impact of California fires on local and regional air quality: the role of a low-cost sensor network and satellite observations. GeoHealth 2(6):172–181

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Habil M, Massey DD, Taneja A (2013) Exposure of children studying in schools of India to PM levels and metal contamination: sources and their identification. Air Qual Atmos Health 6(3):575–587

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jayaratne R, Liu X, Ahn KH, Asumadu-Sakyi A, Fisher G, Gao J, Mabon A, Mazaheri M, Mullins B, Nyaku M, Ristovski Z (2020) Low-cost PM2.5 sensors: an assessment of their suitability for various applications. Aerosol Air Qual Res 20:520–532

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiao W, Hagler G, Williams R, Sharpe R, Brown R, Garver D, Judge R, Caudill M, Rickard J, Davis M, Weinstock L (2016) Community Air Sensor Network (CAIRSENSE) project: evaluation of low-cost sensor performance in a suburban environment in the southeastern United States. Atmos Meas Tech 9(11):5281–5292

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • John K, Karnae S, Crist K, Kim M, Kulkarni A (2007) Analysis of trace elements and ions in ambient fine particulate matter at three elementary schools in Ohio. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 57(4):394–406

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jovašević-Stojanović M, Bartonova A, Topalović D, Lazović I, Pokrić B, Ristovski Z (2015) On the use of small and cheaper sensors and devices for indicative citizen-based monitoring of respirable particulate matter. Environ Pollut 206:696–704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landrigan PJ, Trasande L, Thorpe LE, Gwynn C, Lioy PJ, D'Alton ME, Lipkind HS, Swanson J, Wadhwa PD, Clark EB, Rauh VA (2006) The National Children’s Study: a 21-year prospective study of 100 000 American children. Pediatrics 118(5):2173–2186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis AC, Lee JD, Edwards PM, Shaw MD, Evans MJ, Moller SJ, Smith KR, Buckley JW, Ellis M, Gillot SR, White A (2016) Evaluating the performance of low cost chemical sensors for air pollution research. Faraday Discuss 189:85–103

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mejía JF, Choy SL, Mengersen K, Morawska L (2011) Methodology for assessing exposure and impacts of air pollutants in school children: data collection, analysis and health effects–a literature review. Atmos Environ 45(4):813–823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohai P, Kweon BS, Lee S, Ard K (2011) Air pollution around schools is linked to poorer student health and academic performance. Health Aff 30(5):852–862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morawska L, Afshari A, Bae GN, Buonanno G, Chao CYH, Hänninen O, Hofmann W, Isaxon C, Jayaratne ER, Pasanen P, Salthammer T (2013) Indoor aerosols: from personal exposure to risk assessment. Indoor Air 23(6):462–487

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morawska L, Thai PK, Liu X, Asumadu-Sakyi A, Ayoko G, Bartonova A, Bedini A, Chai F, Christensen B, Dunbabin M, Gao J (2018) Applications of low-cost sensing technologies for air quality monitoring and exposure assessment: how far have they gone? Environ Int 116:286–299

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Muller CL, Chapman L, Johnston S, Kidd C, Illingworth S, Foody G, Overeem A, Leigh RR (2015) Crowdsourcing for climate and atmospheric sciences: current status and future potential. Int Climatol 35(11):3185–3203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker JL, Larson RR, Eskelson E, Wood EM, Veranth JM (2008) Particle size distribution and composition in a mechanically ventilated school building during air pollution episodes. Indoor Air 18(5):386–393

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Poenar DP (2019) Microfluidic and micromachined/MEMS devices for separation, discrimination and detection of airborne particles for pollution monitoring. Micromachines 10(7):483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pope CA III, Dockery DW (2006) Health effects of fine particulate air pollution: lines that connect. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 56(6):709–742

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rai AC, Kumar P, Pilla F, Skouloudis AN, Di Sabatino S, Ratti C, Yasar A, Rickerby D (2017) End-user perspective of low-cost sensors for outdoor air pollution monitoring. Sci Total Environ 607:691–705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosofsky A, Lucier CA, London B, Scharber H, Borges-Mendez R, Shandra J (2014) Environmental ascription in Worcester County, MA: toxic pollution and education outcomes. Local Environ 19(3):283–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rovelli S, Cattaneo A, Nuzzi C, Spinazzè A, Piazza S, Carrer P, Cavallo D (2014) Airborne particulate matter in school classrooms of northern Italy. Int Environ Res Public Health 11(2):1398–1421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheffe RD, Solomon PA, Husar R, Hanley T, Schmidt M, Koerber M, Gilroy M, Hemby J, Watkins N, Papp M, Rice J (2009) The national ambient air monitoring strategy: rethinking the role of national networks. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 59(5):579–590

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder EG, Watkins TH, Solomon PA, Thoma ED, Williams RW, Hagler GS, Shelow D, Hindin DA, Kilaru VJ, Preuss PW (2013) The changing paradigm of air pollution monitoring. Environ Sci Technol 47(20):11369–11377

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon PA, Costantini M, Grahame TJ, Gerlofs-Nijland ME, Cassee FR, Russell AG, Brook JR, Hopke PK, Hidy G, Phalen RF, Saldiva P (2012) Air pollution and health: bridging the gap from sources to health outcomes: conference summary. Air Qual Atmos Health 5(1):9–62

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stranger M, Potgieter-Vermaak SS, Van Grieken R (2008) Characterization of indoor air quality in primary schools in Antwerp, Belgium. Indoor Air 18(6):454–463

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Suglia SF, Wright RO, Schwartz J, Wright RJ (2008) Association between lung function and cognition among children in a prospective birth cohort study. Psychosom Med 70(3):356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United States Environmental Protection Agency (1994) Methods for derivation of inhalation reference concentrations and application of inhalation dosimetry Office of Health and Environment Assessment, Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office, EPA/600/8-90/066F, NC, USA, US Environmental Protection Agency

  • United States Environmental Protection Agency (2019) Green Book: Nevada Nonattainment/Maintenance Status for Each County by Year for All Criteria Pollutants. https://www3.epa.gov/airquality/greenbook/anayo_nv.html. Accessed 25 Mar 2020

  • USA Today (2008) The smokestack effect: toxic air and America’s schools. https://www.ire.org/resource-center/stories/23977/. Accessed 25 Mar 2020

  • Wallace L, Williams R (2005) Use of personal-indoor-outdoor sulfur concentrations to estimate the infiltration factor and outdoor exposure factor for individual homes and persons. Environ Sci Technol 39(6):1707–1714

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (2006) Air quality guidelines global update 2005 particulate matter, ozone, nitrogen dioxide, and sulfur dioxide World Health Organization

  • Yu H, Li Y (2019) Field evaluation and calibration of a six-parameter low-cost sensor system in northwestern and southeastern US Presented at American Geophysical Union (AGU) Fall Meeting, San Francisco. https://agu.confex.com/agu/fm19/meetingapp.cgi/Paper/542242. Accessed 25 Mar 2020

  • Zervaki O, Zheng L, Dionysiou DD, Zarus GM (2017) Calibration of low-cost dust sensors. Presented at 110th Annual Conference and Exhibition of the Air & Waste Management Association, Pittsburgh. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317783838_Calibration_of_Low-cost_Dust_Sensors. Accessed 25 Mar 2020

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Lori Headrick and Juan Martinez from Clark County School District for the field assistance throughout the campaign. The authors also thank Drs. Judith Chow and John Watson at Desert Research Institute, Dr. Yi-Tung Chen at University of Nevada, Las Vegas (UNLV), and Dr. Yi Li at Sailbri Cooper Inc. for their technical support in the study planning and data analysis.

Funding

This study is in part supported by the Nevada INBRE Pilot Grant (UNR 17-64) and UNLV Top Tier Doctoral Graduate Research Assistantship (TTDGRA 2017-2020).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, School of Public Health, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV, USA

    L.-W. Antony Chen, John O. Olawepo, Aman Gebreselassie & Mi Zhang

  2. Division of Atmospheric Sciences, Desert Research Institute, Reno, NV, USA

    L.-W. Antony Chen & Mi Zhang

  3. Spring Valley High School, Clark County School District, Las Vegas, NV, USA

    Felicia Bonanno

Authors
  1. L.-W. Antony Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. John O. Olawepo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Felicia Bonanno
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Aman Gebreselassie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mi Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L.-W. Antony Chen.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(PDF 1.45 MB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, LW.A., Olawepo, J.O., Bonanno, F. et al. Schoolchildren’s exposure to PM2.5: a student club–based air quality monitoring campaign using low-cost sensors. Air Qual Atmos Health 13, 543–551 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-020-00815-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-020-00815-9

Keywords

  • Indoor air quality
  • Personal exposure assessment
  • Wearable sensor
  • Personal/outdoor ratio
  • Personal cloud
  • children’s health

Search

Navigation