Skip to main content

Effectiveness of an air quality intervention: an accountability study in a highly polluted industrial town


Public interventions to reduce industrial emissions and improve air quality are particularly necessary in areas that suffer an environmental and health emergency. Taranto (Apulia region, Southern Italy) is one of the most industrialized cities in Southern Italy due to the massive presence of industrial sites, including a huge steel plant. The latter hosts a large open-air mineral deposit, whose dust strongly impacts the Tamburi neighborhood, downwind of the plant when the wind blows north-wester. In order to reduce the PM10 (particulate matter) and B(a)P (Benzo(a)pirene) concentrations in this neighborhood, the Apulia Region enacted a law restricting some industrial activities during certain meteorological situations, called wind days, characterized by strong north-westerly winds. Connected to the regional law, there was a Local Health Unit warning to the Tamburi population to ventilate indoor environments during the central hours of the day. The aim of this work is to assess the effectiveness and the appropriateness of the intervention implemented and to evaluate whether it effectively improved the air quality in the neighborhood close to the mineral deposit. Time-space statistical analysis of PM data measured by the fixed monitoring network before and after the intervention period was carried out. The analysis was performed for different meteorological conditions, different wind days characteristics (long/short), time periods, and other pollutants such as PAH (polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon), which includes B(a)P for which measurements were not available. In the area closest to the industrial area, there was a reduction in the difference between the concentration of PM10 on wind days and those in other weather conditions. The reduction was more consistent on long, persistent wind days, when the difference in concentrations reduced from 13.3 to 3.9 μg/m3. However, the uncertainties regarding the wind days predictions suggest that the PM reduction may only partially be attributed to the regional law. Furthermore, the analysis of the PAH showed that there are weather conditions other than wind days that lead to a deterioration in the air quality in the neighborhood. Regarding the warning given by local health authorities to protect the population from dust injuries, the wind days daily PM10 profiles do not evidence a sharp reduction during the selected time slot, while other industrial pollutants clearly increase in the same time slot. Overall, results evidence the partiality of the intervention and call for a more comprehensive emissions plan to reduce their impact on air quality. In general, the study shows the need to periodically evaluate the effectiveness of any intervention and to take the consequent decisions to adapt them.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4


  1. Alessandrini ER, Faustini A, Chiusolo M, Stafoggia M, Gandini M, Demaria M, Antonelli A, Arena P, Biggeri A, Canova C, Casale G, Cernigliaro A, Garrone E, Gherardi B, Gianicolo EA, Giannini S, Iuzzolino C, Lauriola P, Mariottini M, Pasetto P, Randi G, Ranzi A, Santoro M, Selle V, Serinelli M, Stivanello E, Tominz R, Vigotti MA, Zauli-Sajani S, Forastiere F, Cadum E, Gruppo collaborativo EpiAir2 (2013) Air pollution and mortality in twenty-five Italian cities: results of the EpiAir2 project. Epidemiol Prev 37:220–229

    Google Scholar 

  2. Burns J, Boogaard H, Polus S, Pfadenhauer LM, Rohwer AC, van Erp AM, Turley R, Rehfuess E (2019) Interventions to reduce ambient particulate matter air pollution and their effect on health. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 5:CD010919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cesaroni G, Boogaard H, Jonkers S, Porta D, Badaloni C, Cattani G et al (2012) Health benefits of traffic-related air pollution reduction in different socioeconomic groups: the effect of low-emission zoning in Rome. Occup Environ Med 69:133–139.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chay K, Dobkin C, Greenstone M (2003) The Clean Air Act of 1970 and adult mortality. J Risk Uncertain 27:279–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Clancy L, Goodman P, Sinclair H, Dockery DW (2002) Effect of air-pollution control on death rates in Dublin, Ireland: an intervention study. Lancet 360:1210–1214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ebelt S, Brauer M, Cyrys J, Tuch T, Kreyling WG, Wichmann HE, Heinrich J (2001) Air quality in postunification Erfurt East Germany: associating changes in pollutant concentrations with changes in emissions. Environ Health Perspect 109:325–333.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. European Commission (2014) European Commission urges Italy to address severe pollution issues at Europe’s biggest steel plant, Press release IP/14/1151. Last access 11/09/2019

  8. Gianicolo EA, Mangia C, Cervino M (2016) Investigating mortality heterogeneity among neighbourhoods of a highly industrialised Italian city: a meta-regression approach. Int J Public Health 61:777–785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Greenstone M (2004) Did the clean air act cause the remarkable decline in sulfur dioxide concentrations? J Environ Econ Manag 47:585–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hedley AJ, Wong CM, Thach TQ, Ma S, Lam TH, Anderson HR (2002) Cardiorespiratory and all-cause mortality after restrictions on sulphur content of fuel in Hong Kong: an intervention study. Lancet 360:1646–1652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Heinrich J, Hoelscher B, Frye C, Meyer I, Pitz M, Cyrys J, Wjst M, Neas L, Wichmann HE (2002) Improved air quality in reunified Germany and decreases in respiratory symptoms. Epidemiology 13:394–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kelly F, Anderson HR, Armstrong B, Atkinson R, Barratt B, Beevers S, Derwent D, Green D, Mudway I, Wilkinson P, HEI Health Review Committee (2011a) The impact of the congestion charging scheme on air quality in London. Part 1. Emissions modeling and analysis of air pollution measurements. Res Rep Health Eff Inst:5–71

  13. Kelly F, Anderson HR, Armstrong B, Atkinson R, Barratt B, Beevers S, Derwent D, Green D, Mudway I, Wilkinson P, HEI Health Review Committee (2011b) The impact of the congestion charging scheme on air quality in London. Part 2. Analysis of the oxidative potential of particulate matter. Res Rep Health Eff Inst:73–144

  14. Lee JT, Son JY, Cho YS (2007) Benefits of mitigated ambient air quality due to transportation control on childhood asthma hospitalization during the 2002 summer Asian games in Busan, Korea. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 57:968–973

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mangia C, Gianicolo EA, Bruni A, Vigotti MA, Cervino M (2013) Spatial variability of air pollutants in the city of Taranto and its potential impact on exposure assessment, Italy. Environ Monit Assess 185:1719–1735.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mudway IS, Dundas I, Wood HE, Marlin N, Jamaludin JB, Bremner SA et al (2018) Impact of London’s low emission zone on air quality and children's respiratory health: a sequential annual cross-sectional study. Lancet Public Health.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pitz M, Kreyling WG, Hölscher B, Cyrys J, Wichmann HE, Heinrich J (2001) Change of the ambient particle size distribution in East Germany between 1993 and 1999. Atmos Environ 35:4357–4366.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Rava M, White RH, Dominici F (2011) Does attainment status for the PM10 National Air Ambient Quality Standard change the trend in ambient levels of particulate matter? Air Qual Atmos Health 4:133–143.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Regione Puglia (2012) Piano contenente le prime misure di intervento per il risanamento della Qualità dell’Aria nel quartiere Tamburi (TA) per gli inquinanti Benzo(a)Pirene e PM10. Bari

  20. Relvas H, Miranda AI (2018) An urban air quality modeling system to support decision-making: design and implementation. Air Qual Atmos Health 11:815–824.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Rich DQ (2017) Accountability studies of air pollution and health effects: lessons learned and recommendations for future natural experiment opportunities. Environ Int 100:62–78.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sanna M, Monguzzi R, Santilli N, Felici R (2012) Perizia conferita il giorno 8 novembre 2010 dal Giudice per le Indagini Preliminari Dottoressa Patrizia Todisco e consegnata in Gennaio 2012, Tribunale di Taranto, Ufficio del Giudice per le Indagini Preliminari

  23. Scarinzi C, Alessandrini ER, Chiusolo M, Galassi C, Baldini M, Serinelli M, Pandolfi P, Bruni A, Biggeri A, De Togni A, Carreras G, Casella C, Canova C, Randi G et al (2013) Air pollution and urgent hospital admissions in 25 Italian cities: results from the EpiAir2 project. Epidemiol Prev 37:230–241

    Google Scholar 

  24. Tateo A, Miglietta MM, Fedele F, Menegotto M, Pollice A, Bellotti R (2019) A statistical method based on the ensemble probability density function for the prediction of “wind days”. Atmos Res 216:106–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. USEPA (2006) AP-42: compilation of air emissions factors

  26. van Erp AM, Kelly FJ, Demerjian KL, Pope CA, Cohen AJ (2012) Progress in research to assess the effectiveness of air quality interventions towards improving public health. Air Qual Atmos Health 5(2):217–230

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Vigotti MA, Mataloni F, Bruni A, Minniti C, Gianicolo EA (2014) Mortality analysis by neighbourhood in a city with high levels of industrial air pollution. Int J Public Health 59:645–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang T, Xie S (2009) Assessment of traffic-related air pollution in the urban streets before and during the 2008 Beijing Olympic games traffic control period. Atmos Environ 43:5682–5690.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Wichmann HE, Spix C, Tuch T, Wölke G, Peters A, Heinrich J, Kreyling WG, Heyder J (2000) Daily mortality and fine and ultrafine particles in Erfurt, Germany part I: role of particle number and particle mass. Res Rep Health Eff Inst:5–86 discussion 87-94

  30. Zhang J, Zhu T, Kipen H, Wang G, Huang W, Rich D et al (2013) Cardiorespiratory biomarker responses in healthy young adults to drastic air quality changes surrounding the 2008 Beijing Olympics. Res Rep Health Eff Inst:5–174

Download references


We wish to thank Kathy Taylor for helping revise and edit the English.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cristina Mangia.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Paper presented at the Conference RICTA 2019, Lisbon, Portugal.


• The intervention implemented for the town of Taranto need to be revised.

• In complex industrial areas interventions cannot be limited to few pollutants and meteo scenarios.

• Intervention effectiveness requires to be assessed and consequent decisions planned a priori.

Electronic supplementary material


(DOCX 607 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mangia, C., Cervino, M., Russo, A. et al. Effectiveness of an air quality intervention: an accountability study in a highly polluted industrial town. Air Qual Atmos Health 13, 289–296 (2020).

Download citation


  • Air quality regulations
  • Taranto
  • Industrial emissions
  • Mineral parks
  • Wind day