Advertisement

Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health

, Volume 11, Issue 8, pp 949–954 | Cite as

Volatile chemical emissions from essential oils

  • Neda Nematollahi
  • Spas D. Kolev
  • Anne Steinemann
Article

Abstract

Essential oils, widely used in society, emit numerous volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Some of these VOCs are considered as potentially hazardous under federal regulations. However, essential oils are exempt from disclosure of their ingredients on their label. Thus, the public may lack information on emissions and potential hazards from essential oils. This study examined VOCs emitted from a range of commercial essential oils, including tea tree oils, lavender oils, eucalyptus oils, and other individual oils and mixtures of oils. Using headspace gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS), the study analyzed 24 commercial essential oils, including 12 with claims of being “natural” or related terms, such as organic, 100% pure, or plant-based. Results identified 595 VOCs emitted from the 24 essential oils, representing 188 different VOCs. The most common VOCs emitted were alpha-pinene, limonene, acetone, linalool, alpha-phellandrene, beta-myrcene, and camphene. Among the 589 VOCs identified, 124 VOCs, representing 33 different VOCs, are classified as potentially hazardous. All natural and regular essential oils emitted one or more potentially hazardous VOCs, such as acetaldehyde, acetone, and ethanol. Toluene was also found in 50% of essential oils. Moreover, for the prevalent VOCs classified as potentially hazardous, no significant difference was found between regular and natural essential oils. This study provides insights and information about emissions of commercial essential oils that can be useful for public awareness and risk reduction.

Keywords

Essential oils Fragrance Volatile organic compounds Emissions Ingredients 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The study received support from the Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship (RTP), through the University of Melbourne; the Australian Department of Education and Training (Australian Postgraduate Award); and the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO). This article is dedicated to the memory of Neda Yarmahmoudi.

Supplementary material

11869_2018_606_MOESM1_ESM.doc (263 kb)
ESM 1 (DOC 263 kb)
11869_2018_606_MOESM2_ESM.doc (262 kb)
ESM 2 (DOC 261 kb)
11869_2018_606_MOESM3_ESM.doc (21 kb)
ESM 3 (DOC 21 kb)
11869_2018_606_MOESM4_ESM.doc (17 kb)
ESM 4 (DOC 17 kb)
11869_2018_606_MOESM5_ESM.doc (26 kb)
ESM 5 (DOC 25 kb)
11869_2018_606_MOESM6_ESM.doc (430 kb)
ESM 6 (DOC 430 kb)

References

  1. Bagasra O, Golkar Z, Garcia M, Rice LN, Pace DG (2013) Role of perfumes in pathogenesis of autism. Med Hypotheses 80:795–803.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2013.03.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cheng WH, Lai CH (2014) Sampling gaseous compounds from essential oils evaporation by solid phase microextraction devices. Atmos Environ 99:124–129.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.09.069 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chiang HM, Chiu HH, Lai YM, Chen CY, Chiang HL (2010) Carbonyl species characteristics during the evaporation of essential oils. Atmos Environ 44:2240–2247.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.02.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chiu HH, Chiang HM, Lo CC, Chen CY, Chiang HL (2009) Constituents of volatile organic compounds of evaporating essential oil. Atmos Environ 43:5743–5749.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.08.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Francis GW, Stusdal TK (2014) Differential evaporation of aromatherapy mint oils. Air Qual Atmos Health 7:481–487.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-014-0245-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Globally Harmonised System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) (2018), Safe Work Australia, classifying chemicals: the GHS. https://www.safeworkaustralia.gov.au/classifying-chemicals#the-ghs
  7. González-Rivera J, Duce C, Falconieri D, Ferrari C, Ghezzi L, Piras A, Tine MR (2016) Coaxial microwave assisted hydrodistillation of essential oils from five different herbs (lavender, rosemary, sage, fennel seeds and clove buds): chemical composition and thermal analysis. Innovative Food Sci Emerg Technol 33:308–318.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2015.12.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Helmig D, Daly RW, Milford J, Guenther A (2013) Seasonal trends of biogenic terpene emissions. Chemosphere 93:35–46.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.04.058 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Huang HL, Tsai TJ, Hsu NY, Lee CC, Wu PC, Su HJ (2012) Effects of essential oils on the formation of formaldehyde and secondary organic aerosols in an aromatherapy environment. Build Environ 57:120–125.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.04.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Isidorov V, Jdanova M (2002) Volatile organic compounds from leaves litter. Chemosphere 48:975–979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lee SJ, Umano K, Shibamoto T, Lee KG (2005) Identification of volatile components in basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) and thyme leaves (Thymus vulgaris L.) and their antioxidant properties. Food Chem 91:131–137.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.05.056 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lee CJ, Chen LW, Chen LG, Chang TL, Huang CW, Huang MC, Wang CC (2013) Correlations of the components of tea tree oil with its antibacterial effects and skin irritation. J Food Drug Anal 21:169–176.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfda.2013.05.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Nematollahi N, Doronila A, Mornane PJ, Duan A, Kolev SD, Steinemann A (2018) Volatile chemical emissions from fragranced baby products. Air Qual Atmos Health:1–6.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-018-0593-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. SafeWork Australia (SWA) (2018) Hazardous chemical information system (HCIS): search hazardous chemicals, http://hcis.safeworkaustralia.gov.au/HazardousChemical
  15. Sarkic A, Stappen I (2018) Essential oils and their single compounds in cosmetics — a critical review 1–21.  https://doi.org/10.3390/cosmetics5010011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Stein SE (2008) NIST Standard Reference Database 1A. In: The National Institute of Standards and Technology NIST. pp 1–49Google Scholar
  17. Su HJ, Chao CJ, Chang HY, Wu PC (2007) The effects of evaporating essential oils on indoor air quality. Atmos Environ 41:1230–1236.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.09.044 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Winters AJ, Adams MA, Bleby TM, Rennenberg H, Steigner D, Steinbrecher R, Kreuzwieser J (2009) Emissions of isoprene, monoterpene and short-chained carbonyl compounds from Eucalyptus spp. in southern Australia. Atmos Environ 43:3035–3043.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.03.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. World Health Organization (WHO) (2018) International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, list of classifications, vol 1–120, http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Classification/latest_classif.php

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Infrastructure Engineering, Melbourne School of EngineeringThe University of MelbourneParkvilleAustralia
  2. 2.School of ChemistryThe University of MelbourneParkvilleAustralia
  3. 3.College of Science and EngineeringJames Cook UniversityTownsvilleAustralia
  4. 4.Climate, Atmospheric Sciences, and Physical Oceanography, Scripps Institution of OceanographyUniversity of California, San DiegoLa JollaUSA

Personalised recommendations