Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health

, Volume 11, Issue 8, pp 993–1008 | Cite as

Ozone and volatile organic compounds in the metropolitan area of Lima-Callao, Peru

  • José S. Silva
  • Jhojan P. Rojas
  • Magdalena Norabuena
  • Rodrigo J. SeguelEmail author


This study analyzes ozone formation in the metropolitan area of Lima-Callao as a function of meteorological patterns and the concentrations of nitrogen oxides and reactive organic gases. The study area is located on the west coast of South America (12°S) in an upwelling region that is markedly affected by the Southeast Pacific anticyclone. The vertical stability and diurnal evolution of the mixing layer were analyzed from radiosondes launched daily during 1992–2014 and from two intensive campaigns in 2009. Vertical profiles show that during June–November, the subsidence inversion base ranges from 0.6 to 0.9 km above sea level (asl). In contrast, during December–May, subsidence inversion dissipates, leading to weak surface inversions from 0.1 to 0.6 km asl. At the surface level, compliance with the ozone standard of 51 parts per billion by volume (ppbv) is explained by the marine boundary layer effect and by strong inhibition of ozone formation due to titration with nitric oxide. Day-of-the-week variations in ozone and nitrogen oxides suggest a VOC-limited ozone-formation regime in the atmosphere of Lima. Furthermore, the pattern of C6–C12 species indicates that gasoline-powered vehicles are the main source of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), whereas the species with the greatest ozone-forming potential corresponded to the sum of the isomers m- and p-xylene. Mean benzene concentrations exceeded the standard of 0.63 ppbv, reaching 1.2 ppbv east of Lima. Nevertheless, the cancer risk associated with the inhalation of benzene was deemed acceptable, according to USEPA and WHO criteria.


Tropospheric ozone Volatile organic compounds Benzene Marine boundary layer Radiosonde 



Rodrigo Seguel acknowledges support from CONICYT, FONDECYT Program, initiation into research 2013, Project No 11130177.


This work has been funded by the SNIP project: expansion and improvement of the monitoring network for air quality forecasting in Metropolitan Lima (N°199842).


  1. Albrecht JA (1981) The twenty year average atmospheric structure at Lima, Peru. Dissertation. Dept. of Meteorology, Florida State University, TallahasseeGoogle Scholar
  2. Alvim DS et al (2017) Main ozone-forming VOCs in the city of Sao Paulo: observations, modelling and impacts. Air Qual Atmos Health 10:421–435. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. ATSDR (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry) (2007) Toxicological profile for benzene. Update. Public Health Service, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, GAGoogle Scholar
  4. Bell ML, McDermott A, Zeger SL, Samet JM, Dominici F (2004) Ozone and short-term mortality in 95 us urban communities, 1987-2000. JAMA 292:2372–2378. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carslaw DC (2013) The Openair manual: open-source tools for analyzing air pollution data. Manual for version 0.9. King’s College London. London, UK. [WWW Document] URL (accessed 5 January 2018)
  6. Carter WPL (2010) Development of the SAPRC-07 chemical mechanism. Atmos Environ 44:5324–5335. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chameides W, Lindsay R, Richardson J, Kiang C (1988) The role of biogenic hydrocarbons in urban photochemical smog: Atlanta as a case study. Science 241:1473–1475. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Enfield DB (1981) Thermally driven wind variability in the planetary boundary layer above Lima, Peru. J Geophysical Res: Oceans 86:2005–2016. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fiore AM, Naik V, Leibensperger EM (2015) Air quality and climate connections. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 65:645–685. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Forouzanfar MH et al (2015) Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks in 188 countries, 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2013. Lancet 386:2287–2323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fujita EM, Campbell DE, Stockwell WR, Lawson DR (2012) Past and future ozone trends in California’s south coast air basin: reconciliation of ambient measurements with past and projected emission inventories. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 63:54–69. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fujita EM, Stockwell WR, Campbell DE, Keislar RE, Lawson DR (2003) Evolution of the magnitude and spatial extent of the weekend ozone effect in California’s south coast air basin, 1981–2000. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 53:802–815. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Heffter JL (1980) Transport layer depth calculations. Second Joint Conference on Applications of Air Pollution Meteorology. New Orleans, LAGoogle Scholar
  14. Jaimes-Palomera M, Retama A, Elias-Castro G, Neria-Hernández A, Rivera-Hernández O, Velasco E (2016) Non-methane hydrocarbons in the atmosphere of Mexico City: Results of the 2012 ozone-season campaign. Atmos Environ 132:258–275. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lippmann M (1991) Health effects of tropospheric ozone. Environ Sci Technol 25:1954–1962. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Liu JC, Peng RD (2018) Health effect of mixtures of ozone, nitrogen dioxide, and fine particulates in 85 US counties. Air Qual Atmos Health 11:311–324. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. MINAM (2017) Decreto supremo N° 003-2017-MINAM—Estandares Nacionales de calidad ambiental (ECA) para aire, Ministerio del Ambiente (MINAM). Republic of Peru. [WWW Document] doi:D.SNo 003–2017–MINAMGoogle Scholar
  18. Monks PS et al (2015) Tropospheric ozone and its precursors from the urban to the global scale from air quality to short-lived climate forcer. Atmos Chem Phys 15:8889–8973. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rappengluck B et al (2005) An urban photochemistry study in Santiago de Chile. Atmos Environ 39:2913–2931. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schultz MG et al (2017) Tropospheric ozone assessment report: database and metrics data of global surface ozone observations. Elem Sci Anth 5:58. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Seguel RJ, Mancilla CA, MAL G (2018) Stratospheric ozone intrusions during the passage of cold fronts over central Chile. Air Qual Atmos Health:1–14 11:535–548. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Seguel RJ, Mancilla CA, Rondanelli R, Leiva MA, Morales RGE (2013) Ozone distribution in the lower troposphere over complex terrain in Central Chile. J Geophys Res Atmos 118:2966–2980. Google Scholar
  23. Seguel RJ, Morales SR, Leiva GM (2012) Ozone weekend effect in Santiago, Chile. Environ Pollut 162:72–79. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Silva J, Rojas J, Norabuena M, Molina C, Toro RA, Leiva-Guzmán MA (2017) Particulate matter levels in a south American megacity: the metropolitan area of Lima-Callao, Peru. Environ Monit Assess 189:635. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tashiro Y, Taniyama T (2002) Atmospheric NO2 and CO concentration in Lima, Peru. Environ Int 28:227–233. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Toro R, Donoso C, Seguel RJ, Morales RES, Leiva MG (2013) Photochemical ozone pollution in the Valparaiso region, Chile. Air Qual Atmos Health 7:1–11. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Toro R, Seguel RJ, Morales SRE, Leiva GM (2014) Ozone, nitrogen oxides, and volatile organic compounds in a central zone of Chile. Air Qual Atmos Health 8:1–13. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Underhill LJ et al (2015) Association of roadway proximity with indoor air pollution in a peri-urban community in Lima, Peru. Int J Environ Res Public Health 12:13466–13481. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. USEPA (1999) Method TO-1: method for the determination of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in ambient air using Tenax adsorption and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS), in: Compendium of Methods for the Determination of Toxic Organic Compounds in Ambient Air, second ed. EPA/625/R-96/010b. Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyGoogle Scholar
  30. USEPA (2017) Final revised PAMS VOC target list.
  31. Wenig M, Spichtinger N, Stohl A, Held G, Beirle S, Wagner T, Jähne B, Platt U (2003) Intercontinental transport of nitrogen oxide pollution plumes. Atmos Chem Phys 3:387–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. WHO (2000) Air Quality Guidelines for Europe 2000, second ed. Copenhagen, World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe. s/pdf_file/0005/ 74732/E71922.pdf
  33. Yin Y, Chevallier F, Ciais P, Broquet G, Fortems-Cheiney A, Pison I, Saunois M (2015) Decadal trends in global CO emissions as seen by MOPITT. Atmos Chem Phys 15:13433–13451. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Meteorology and Hydrology ServiceLimaPeru
  2. 2.Environmental Department, Trade and International Advisory SAGUSantiagoChile

Personalised recommendations