Advertisement

Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health

, Volume 11, Issue 5, pp 505–520 | Cite as

Summer-autumn air pollution in León, Spain: changes in aerosol size distribution and expected effects on the respiratory tract

  • F. Oduber
  • A. Castro
  • A.I. Calvo
  • C. Blanco-Alegre
  • E. Alonso-Blanco
  • P. Belmonte
  • R. Fraile
Article

Abstract

The temporal variation of aerosol size distribution in León, Spain, was analyzed with an optical spectrometer, in order to identify changes associated with the summer-autumn transition. For each hour and day of the week, we have studied the temporal variation of the particle number during the day. As the summer progresses, the total particle number increases from 1000 ± 600 in August to 1500 ± 1000 particles cm−3 in October, mainly due to more intense road traffic after the summer holidays and to the beginning of the new academic year in the study area in September. The particle number was higher on weekdays than on weekends in September and October. However, in August the values were similar, due to lower activity in the city, coinciding with the main holiday period. The aerosol size distributions were bimodal. In the fine mode, both the highest concentration (573 particles cm−3) and the lowest count median diameter (0.08 μm) were recorded in October. The contribution of particles from forest fires and Saharan dust intrusions had a negative impact on the air quality of the city during the summer. Considering the estimated respirable fraction in healthy adults (after the Standard ISO 7708:1995), on weekdays the highest values are obtained between 0600 and 1000 UTC (around 15 μg m−3) and in the afternoon, between 1700 and 2000 UTC (around 12 μg m−3), coinciding with the rush hour.

Keywords

Aerosol concentration patterns Size distribution Respirable fraction Summer-autumn transition Road traffic Air pollutants 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Darrel Baumgardner for his help with the code developed by Bohern and Huffman. F. Oduber acknowledges the grant BES-2015-074473 from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness. C. Blanco-Alegre acknowledges the grant FPU16-05764 from the Spanish Ministry of Education, Culture and Sport. Noelia Ramón patiently revised the final version in English. The data from the CALIMA network are property of the Office for Quality and Environmental Evaluation (DGCEA, in its Spanish acronym), belonging to the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and the Environment. The data were supplied as a result of an agreement between the Spanish Ministry of Agriculture, Food and the Environment and the Scientific Research Council for sponsoring studies related to air pollution by particulate matter and metals in Spain.

Funding information

This study was partially supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (Grant TEC2014-57821-R), the University of León (Programa Propio 2015/00054/001) and the AERORAIN project (Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, Grant CGL2014-52556-R, co-financed with European FEDER funds).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Aalto P, Hämeri K, Paatero P, Kulmala M, Bellander T, Berglind N, Bouso L, Castaño-Vinyals G, Sunyer J, Cattani G, Marconi A, Cyrys J, Klot S, Peters A, Zetzsche K, Lanki T, Pekkanen J, Nyberg F, Sjövall B, Forastiere F (2005) Aerosol particle number concentration measurements in five European cities using TSI-3022 condensation particle counter over a three-year period during health effects of air pollution on susceptible subpopulations. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 55:1064–1076.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.2005.10464702 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alonso-Blanco E, Calvo AI, Fraile R, Castro A (2012) The influence of wildfires on aerosol size distributions in rural areas. Sci World J 2012:1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1100/2012/735697 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alonso-Blanco E, Castro A, Calvo AI, Pont V, Mallet M, Fraile R (2018) Wildfire smoke plumes transport under a subsidence inversion: climate and health implications in a distant urban area. Sci Total Environ 619–620:988–1002.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.142 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Analitis A, Katsouyanni K, Dimakopoulou K, Samoli E, Nikoloulopoulos AK, Petasakis Y, Touloumi G, Schwartz J, Anderson HR, Cambra K, Forastiere F, Zmirou D, Vonk JM, Clancy L, Kriz B, Bobvos J, Pekkanen J (2006) Short-term effects of ambient particles on cardiovascular and respiratory mortality. Epidemiology 17:230–233.  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ede.0000199439.57655.6b CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Artíñano B, Salvador P, Alonso DG et al (2003) Anthropogenic and natural influence on the PM10 and PM2.5 aerosol in Madrid (Spain). Analysis of high concentration episodes. Environ Pollut 125:453–465.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0269-7491(03)00078-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown J, Gordon T, Price O, Asgharian B (2013) Thoracic and respirable particle definitions for human health risk assessment. Part Fibre Toxicol 10(1):12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Calvo AI, Alves C, Castro A, Pont V, Vicente AM, Fraile R (2013a) Research on aerosol sources and chemical composition: past, current and emerging issues. Atmos Res 120–121:1–28.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2012.09.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Calvo AI, Pont V, Castro A, Mallet M, Palencia C, Roger JC, Dubuisson P, Fraile R (2010) Radiative forcing of haze during a forest fire in Spain. J Geophys Res Atmos 115:1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012172 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Calvo AI, Pont V, Liousse C, Dupré B, Mariscal A, Zouiten C, Gardrat E, Castera P, Lacaux CG, Castro A, Fraile R (2008) Chemical composition of urban aerosols in Toulouse, France during CAPITOUL experiment. Meteorol Atmos Phys 102:307–323.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-008-0319-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Calvo AI, Tarelho LAC, Teixeira ER, Alves C, Nunes T, Duarte M, Coz E, Custodio D, Castro A, Artiñano B, Fraile R (2013b) Particulate emissions from the co-combustion of forest biomass and sewage sludge in a bubbling fluidised bed reactor. Fuel Process Technol 114:58–68.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2013.03.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Castro A, Alonso-Blanco E, González-Colino M, Calvo AI, Fernández-Raga M, Fraile R (2010) Aerosol size distribution in precipitation events in León, Spain. Atmos Res 96:421–435.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2010.01.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Castro A, Calvo AI, Alves C, Alonso-Blanco E, Coz E, Marques L, Nunes T, Fernández-Guisuraga JM, Fraile R (2015) Indoor aerosol size distributions in a gymnasium. Sci Total Environ 524–525:178–186.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.03.118 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chaloulakou A, Kassomenos P, Spyrellis N, Demokritou P, Koutrakis P (2003) Measurements of PM10 and PM2.5 particle concentrations in Athens, Greece. Atmos Environ 37:649–660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cheng Y, Lee S, Gu Z, Ho K, Zhang Y, Huang Y, Chow JC, Watson JG, Cao J, Zhang R (2015) PM2.5 and PM10-2.5 chemical composition and source apportionment near a Hong Kong roadway. Particuology 18:96–104.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.partic.2013.10.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cyrys J, Pitz M, Heinrich J, Wichmann HE, Peters A (2008) Spatial and temporal variation of particle number concentration in Augsburg, Germany. Sci Total Environ 401:168–175.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.03.043 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Deshmukh DK, Deb MK, Mkoma SL (2013) Size distribution and seasonal variation of size-segregated particulate matter in the ambient air of Raipur city, India. Air Qual Atmos Heal 6:259–276.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-011-0169-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dunn OJ (1964) Multiple comparisons using rank sums. Technometrics 6:241–252.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1964.10490181 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gerasopoulos E, Kouvarakis G, Babasakalis P et al (2006) Origin and variability of particulate matter (PM10) mass concentrations over the Eastern Mediterranean. Atmos Environ 40:4679–4690.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.04.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gomišček B, Hauck H, Stopper S, Preining O (2004) Spatial and temporal variations of PM1, PM2.5, PM10 and particle number concentration during the AUPHEP—project. Atmos Environ 38:3917–3934.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.03.056 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Goudie A (2014) Desert dust and human health disorders. Environ Int 63:101–113.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2013.10.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gugamsetty B, Wei H, Liu CN et al (2012) Source characterization and apportionment of PM10, PM2.5 and PM0.1 by using positive matrix factorization. Aerosol Air Qual Res 12:476–491.  https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2012.04.0084 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Held A, Zerrath A, Mckeon U et al (2008) Aerosol size distributions measured in urban, rural and high-alpine air with an electrical low pressure impactor (ELPI). Atmos Environ 42:8502–8512.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.06.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hieu NT, Lee BK (2010) Characteristics of particulate matter and metals in the ambient air from a residential area in the largest industrial city in Korea. Atmos Res 98:526–537.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2010.08.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hussein T, Puustinen A, Aalto PP, Mäkelä JM, Hämeri K, Kulmala M (2003) Urban aerosol number size distributions. Atmos Chem Phys Discuss 3:5139–5184.  https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-3-5139-2003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. International Organization for Standarization (ISO) (1995) ISO 7708:1995 (E): air quality—particle size fraction definitions for health related sampling. ISO publications, 1st edition, 1995-04-01Google Scholar
  26. Jacob D (1999) Introduction to atmospheric chemistry. Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  27. Johansson C, Norman M, Gidhagen L (2007) Spatial & temporal variations of PM10 and particle number concentrations in urban air. Environ Monit Assess 127:477–487.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-006-9296-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Khanum F, Chaudhry MN, Kumar P (2017) Characterization of five-year observation data of fine particulate matter in the metropolitan area of Lahore. Air Qual Atmos Heal 10:725–736.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-017-0464-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kim KH, Kabir E, Kabir S (2015) A review on the human health impact of airborne particulate matter. Environ Int 74:136–143.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2014.10.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kim YJ, Boatman JF (1990) Size calibration corrections for the active scattering aerosol spectrometer probe (ASASP-100X). Aerosol Sci Technol 12:665–672.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02786829008959381 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kim Oanh NT, Upadhyay N, Zhuang YH, Hao ZP, Murthy DVS, Lestari P, Villarin JT, Chengchua K, Co HX, Dung NT (2006) Particulate air pollution in six Asian cities: spatial and temporal distributions, and associated sources. Atmos Environ 40:3367–3380.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.01.050 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Klejnowski K, Krasa A, Rogula-Kozłowska W, Błaszczak B (2013) Number size distribution of ambient particles in a typical urban site: the first polish assessment based on long-term (9 months) measurements. Sci World J 2013:1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/539568 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kruskal WH, Wallis WA (1952) Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. J Am Stat Assoc 47:583–621.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1952.10483441 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kuzu SL (2016) Compositional variation of PCBs, PAHs, and OCPs at gas phase and size segregated particle phase during dust incursion from the Saharan Desert in the Northwestern Anatolian Peninsula. Adv Meteorol 2016:1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/7153286 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kuzu SL, Saral A (2017) The effect of meteorological conditions on aerosol size distribution in Istanbul. Air Qual Atmos Heal 10:1029–1038.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-017-0491-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lelieveld J, Evans JS, Fnais M, Giannadaki D, Pozzer A (2015) The contribution of outdoor air pollution sources to premature mortality on a global scale. Nature 525:367–371.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature15371 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lonati G, Crippa M, Gianelle V, Van Dingenen R (2011) Daily patterns of the multi-modal structure of the particle number size distribution in Milan, Italy. Atmos Environ 45:2434–2442.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.02.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lyamani H, Olmo FJ, Alados-Arboledas L (2005) Saharan dust outbreak over southeastern Spain as detected by sun photometer. Atmos Environ 39:7276–7284.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.09.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Monsalve F, Tomás C, Fraile R (2013) Influence of meteorological parameters and air pollutants onto the morbidity due to respiratory diseases in Castilla-La Mancha, Spain. Aerosol Air Qual Res 13:1297–1312.  https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2012.12.0348 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Morawska L, Salthammer T (2004) Indoor environment: airborne particles and settled dust. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, WeinhelimGoogle Scholar
  41. Pascal M, Falq G, Wagner V, Chatignoux E, Corso M, Blanchard M, Host S, Pascal L, Larrieu S (2014) Short-term impacts of particulate matter (PM10, PM10–2.5, PM2.5) on mortality in nine French cities. Atmos Environ 95:175–184.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.06.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pérez N, Pey J, Querol X, Alastuey A, López JM, Viana M (2008) Partitioning of major and trace components in PM10–PM2.5–PM1 at an urban site in Southern Europe. Atmos Environ 42:1677–1691.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.11.034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pope CA, Dockery DW (2006) Health effects of fine particulate air pollution: lines that connect. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 56:709–742.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.2006.10464485 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Puustinen A, Hämeri K, Pekkanen J, Kulmala M, de Hartog J, Meliefste K, ten Brink H, Kos G, Katsouyanni K, Karakatsani A, Kotronarou A, Kavouras I, Meddings C, Thomas S, Harrison R, Ayres JG, van der Zee S, Hoek G (2007) Spatial variation of particle number and mass over four European cities. Atmos Environ 41:6622–6636.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.04.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Querol X, Alastuey A, Viana MM, Rodriguez S, Artiñano B, Salvador P, Garcia do Santos S, Fernandez Patier R, Ruiz CR, de la Rosa J, Sanchez de la Campa A, Menendez M, Gil JI (2004) Speciation and origin of PM10 and PM2.5 in Spain. J Aerosol Sci 35:1151–1172.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2004.04.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rashki A, Rautenbach CJ d W, Eriksson PG, Kaskaoutis DG, Gupta P (2013) Temporal changes of particulate concentration in the ambient air over the city of Zahedan, Iran. Air Qual Atmos Heal 6:123–135.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-011-0152-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Reizer M, Juda-Rezler K (2016) Explaining the high PM10concentrations observed in Polish urban areas. Air Qual Atmos Heal 9:517–531.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-015-0358-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ren-Jian Z, Kin-Fai H, Zhen-Xing S (2012) The role of aerosol in climate change, the environment, and human health. Atmos Ocean Sci Lett 5:156–161.  https://doi.org/10.1080/16742834.2012.11446983 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Salvador P, Artíñano B, Viana MM, Querol X, Alastuey A, González-Fernández I, Alonso R (2011) Spatial and temporal variations in PM10 and PM2.5 across Madrid metropolitan area in 1999-2008. Procedia Environ Sci 4:198–208.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2011.03.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Samek L, Stegowski Z, Furman L, Fiedor J (2017) Chemical content and estimated sources of fine fraction of particulate matter collected in Krakow. Air Qual Atmos Heal 10:47–52.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-016-0407-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Samet J, Dominici F, Curriero F et al (2000) Fine particulate air pollution and mortality in 20 U.S. cities, 1987-1994. N Engl J Med 343:1742–1749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Stanier CO, Khlystov AYAY, Pandis SN (2004) Ambient aerosol size distributions and number concentrations measured during the Pittsburgh Air Quality Study (PAQS). Atmos Environ 38:3275–3284.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.03.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tan WC, Qiu D, Liam BL et al (2000) The human bone marrow response to acute air pollution caused by forest fires. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 161:1213–1217.  https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.161.4.9904084 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wehner B, Wiedensohler A (2002) Long term measurements of submicrometer urban aerosols: statistical analysis for correlations with meteorological conditions and trace gases. Atmos Chem Phys Discuss 2:1699–1733.  https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-2-1699-2002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wilson WE, Suh HH (1997) Fine particles and coarse particles: concentration relationships relevant to epidemiologic studies. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 47:1238–1249.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.1997.10464074 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Woo KS, Chen DR, Pui DYH, McMurry PH (2001) Measurement of Atlanta aerosol size distributions: observations of ultrafine particle events. Aerosol Sci Technol 34:75–87.  https://doi.org/10.1080/027868201300082049 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wu Z, Hu M, Lin P, Liu S, Wehner B, Wiedensohler A (2008) Particle number size distribution in the urban atmosphere of Beijing, China. Atmos Environ 42:7967–7980.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.06.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zhang KM, Wexler AS (2004) Evolution of particle number distribution near roadways—Part I: analysis of aerosol dynamics and its implications for engine emission measurement. Atmos Environ 38:6643–6653.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.06.043 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zhang KM, Wexler AS, Zhu YF, Hinds WC, Sioutas C (2004) Evolution of particle number distribution near roadways. Part II: the “Road-to-Ambient” process. Atmos Environ 38:6655–6665.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.06.044 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhysicsIMARENAB University of LeónLeónSpain
  2. 2.Centre for Energy, Environment and Technology Research (CIEMAT), Department of the EnvironmentMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations