Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

How does a 10-fold pulse increase of aircraft-related NO x impact the global burdens of O3 and secondary organic aerosol (SOA)?

  • Published:
Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aircraft emissions are an important and growing global source of nitrogen oxides (NO x ). At cruising altitude, the atmosphere is particularly NO x -sensitive and aircraft emissions contribute to ozone (O3) production and oxidation of volatile organic pollutants that ultimately produce secondary organic aerosol (SOA). Rapid growth of the global fleet of aircraft and the number of flights require a careful investigation on the atmospheric impact of potential increases in total aircraft-emitted NO x . In this study, we simulated atmospheric composition before, during and after two 10× pulses of total aircraft NO x emissions, one in winter and one in summer of 2007. Results showed that the initial NO x enhancement (up to 3.25% averaged over the globe) was removed after the first 2 months and the change in O3 burden increases for 5 months (up to 3.1 and 2.7% averaged over the globe, respectively, for winter and summer perturbations). The NO x and O3 enhancements follow previously observed temporal patterns, but SOA showed strong season-specific results. During the summer, the NO x pulse decreased total secondary organic gases (SOGs) and SOA burdens, suggesting an inverse relationship with enhanced oxidation. During the winter, the NO x pulse increased the SOG and SOA burdens with SOA lagging SOG. The SOG enhancement has a spatio-temporal pattern similar to NO x . The highest changes in SOA and SOG burdens of different regions during the summer and winter pulse increases were below 1.6%. However, O3 pollution with burden increases as high as 8% in the winter months and 6% in the summer months of the northern hemisphere may even represent an air quality concern.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson BE, Cofer WR, Bagwell DR, Barrick JW, Hudgins CH, Brunke KE (1998) Airborne observations of aircraft aerosol emissions I: total nonvolatile particle emission indices. Geophys Res Lett 25:1689–1692

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bey I, Jacob DJ, Yantosca RM, Logan JA et al (2001) Global modeling of tropospheric chemistry with assimilated meteorology: model description and evaluation. J Geophys Res 106:23,073–23,095

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brasseur GP, Muller JF, Granier C (1996) Atmospheric impact of NOx emissions by subsonic aircraft: a three-dimensional model study. J Geophys Res 101:1423–1428

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eastham S, Weisenstein D, Barrett S (2014) Development and evaluation of the unified tropospheric-stratospheric chemistry extension (UCX) for the global chemistry-transport model. Atmos Environ 89:52–63

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner RM, Adams K, Cook T, Deidewig F et al (1997) The ANCAT/EG global inventory of NOx emissions from aircraft. Atmos Environ 31:1751–1766

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Henze DK, Seinfeld JH, Ng NL, Kroll JH, Fu TM, Jacob DJ, Heald CL (2008) Global modeling of secondary organic aerosol formation from aromatic hydrocarbons: high- vs. low-yield pathways. Atmos Chem Phys 8:2405–2421

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kanakidou M, Seinfeld JH, Pahdis SN, Barnes I et al (2005) Organic aerosol and global climate modelling: a review. Atmos Chem Phys 5:1053–1123

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kripke ML (1989) Health effects of ozone depletion. Int J Toxicol 8:1083–1089

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunhikrishnan T, Lawrence MG, von Kuhlmann R, Richter A, Ladstatter-Weibenmayer A, Burrows JP (2004) Analysis of tropospheric NOx over Asia using the model of atmospheric transport and chemistry (MATCH-MPIC) and GOME-satellite observations. Atmos Environ 38:581–596

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee JJ, Lukachko SP, Waitz IA, Schafer A (2001) Historical and future trends in aircraft performance, cost and emissions. Annu Rev Environ 26:167–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee YC, Wenig M, Yang X (2009) The emergence of urban episodes in autumn and air temperature rise in Hong Kong. Air Qual Atmos Health 2:111–121

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lippmann M (1991) Health effects of tropospheric ozone. Environ Sci Technol 25:1954–1962

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ma X, Yu F, Luo G (2012) Aerosol direct radiative forcing based on GEOS-Chem-APM and uncertainties. Atmos Chem Phys 12:5563–5581

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mauderly JL, Chow JC (2008) Health effects of organic aerosols. Inhal Toxicol 20:257–288

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nimitz JS, Skaggs SR (1992) Estimating tropospheric lifetimes and ozone-depletion potentials of one- and two-carbon hydrofluorocarbons and hydrochlorofluorocarbons. Environ Sci Technol 26:739–744

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Norval M, Lucas RM, Cullen AP, de Gruijil FR, Longstreth J, Takizawa Y, van der Leun JC (2011) The human health effect of ozone depletion and interactions with climate change. Photochem Photobiol Sci 10:199–225

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Presto AA, Huff Hartz KE, Donahue NM (2005) Secondary organic aerosol production from terpene ozonolysis. 2. Effect of NOx concentration. Environ Sci Technol 39:7046–7054

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reid N, Yap D, Bloxam R (2008) The potential role of background ozone on current and emerging air issues: as overview. Air Qual Atmos Health 1:19–29

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seinfeld JH, Pandis SN (2012) Atmospheric chemistry and physics: from air pollution to climate change. John Wiley& Sons, Inc. ISBN 1118591364

  • Seltzer KM, Vizuete W, Henderson BH (2015) Evaluation of updated nitric acid chemistry on ozone precursors and radiative effects. Atmos Chem Phys 15:5973–5986

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson DS, Derwent RG (2009) Does the location of aircraft nitrogen oxide emissions affect their climate impact? Geophys Res Lett 36:L17810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson DS, Doherty RM, Sanderson MG, Collins WJ, Johnson CE, Derwent RG (2004) Radiative forcing from aircraft NOx emissions: mechanisms and seasonal dependence. J Geophys Res 109:D17307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsakiri KG, Zurbenko IG (2011) Prediction of ozone concentrations using atmospheric variables. Air Qual Atmos Health 4:111–120

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Volkamer R, Jimenez JL, San Martini F, Dzepina K, Zhang Q, Salcedo D, Molina LT, Worsnop DR, Molina MJ (2006) Secondary organic aerosol formation from anthropogenic air pollution: rapid and higher than expected. Geophys Res Lett 33:L17811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasiuk DK, Khan AH, Shallcross DE, Lowenberg MH (2016) A commercial aircraft fuel burn and emissions inventory for 2005-2011. Atmosphere 78:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Wayson RL, Fleming GG (2009) Methodology to estimate particulate matter emissions from certified commercial aircraft engines. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 59:91–100

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wey CC, Anderson BE, Wey C, Miake-Lye RC, Whitefield P, Howard R (2007) Overview on the aircraft particle emissions experiment. J Propuls Power 23:898–905

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yu F, Wang Z, Turco R (2007) Ion-mediated nucleation as an important global source of tropospheric aerosols. Atmos Chem Phys Discuss 7:13597–13626

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Environmental Engineering Sciences, Engineering School of Sustainable Infrastructure and Environment, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA

    Nima Afshar-Mohajer & Barron Henderson

  2. Department of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe St., Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA

    Nima Afshar-Mohajer

Authors
  1. Nima Afshar-Mohajer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Barron Henderson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nima Afshar-Mohajer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Afshar-Mohajer, N., Henderson, B. How does a 10-fold pulse increase of aircraft-related NO x impact the global burdens of O3 and secondary organic aerosol (SOA)?. Air Qual Atmos Health 10, 929–938 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-017-0483-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-017-0483-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation