Advertisement

Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health

, Volume 9, Issue 7, pp 735–741 | Cite as

Evaluation of health risk associated with fireworks activity at Central London

  • Samera HamadEmail author
  • David Green
  • Jongbae Heo
Article

Abstract

Risk analysis is extremely important in toxicology and public health studies. Health risk associated with the exposure to potentially toxic elements (PTEs), including As, Ba, Cr, Cu, Pb, Mn, Ni, Sb, Sr, V, and Zn, of ambient fine particles less than 2.5 μm in diameter (PM2.5) at day and night time during firework events was assessed. An hourly PM2.5 elemental measurements were conducted from October 16 to November 16, 2014 at central London, using Xact™ 625 automated multi-metals monitor. Results showed higher concentration of metals attributable to firework combustion emissions (including: Ba, Cu, Sb, and Sr) at night time compared to day time. 95th percentile of total PM2.5-PTEs showed combined (inhalation and ingestion) non-cancer risk for children (hazardous index, HI: 3.0) and adults (HI: 1.58) at night time, implicating the fireworks events; PM2.5-PTEs was found to be potentially harmful to only children (HI: 2.2) at day time. Cancer risk of the inhalation and the ingestion of PM2.5-As and PM2.5-Cr was lower than the threshold level of concern for both children and adults.

Keywords

PM2.5 Fireworks Health risk assessment Central London 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Authors would like to thank Anja Tremper and Max Priestman from the Environmental Research group/ School of Biomedical Sciences at King’s College London, UK, for their help in chemical measurements. Authors are grateful to Heather Walton at the School of Biomedical Sciences, King’s College London for her insightful comments on the manuscript. This work was funded by UK Natural Environment Research Council grants-Clearflo (NE/H003231/1) and Traffic (NE/I008039/1).

Supplementary material

11869_2015_384_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (342 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 341 kb)

References

  1. AQS-EEC (2015) Air quality standards - environment - European commission. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/air/quality/standards.htm. Accessed 7 Nov 2015
  2. ATSDR (2011) Agency for toxic substances and disease registry, draft toxicological profiles, http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/index.asp
  3. Baek BH, Aneja VP (2005) Observation based analysis for the determination of equilibrium time constant between ammonia, acid gases, and fine particles. Int J Environ Pollut 23:239–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bowman DM, Johnston FH (2005) Wildfire smoke, fire management, and human health. EcoHealth 2:76–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown SS, Ryerson TB, Wollny AG et al (2006) Variability in nocturnal nitrogen oxide processing and its role in regional air quality. Science 311:67–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brunekreef B, Dockery DW, Krzyzanowski M (1995) Epidemiologic studies on short-term effects of low levels of major ambient air pollution components. Environ Health Perspect 103:3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Charron A, Harrison RM (2003) Primary particle formation from vehicle emissions during exhaust dilution in the roadside atmosphere. Atmos Environ 37:4109–4119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. DEP (2008) Characterization of risks due to inhalation of particulates by construction workers. Department of environmental protectionGoogle Scholar
  9. Fang W, Yang Y, Xu Z (2013) PM10 and PM2. 5 and health risk assessment for heavy metals in a typical factory for cathode ray tube television recycling. Environ Sci Technol 47:12469–12476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Godri KJ, Green DC, Fuller GW et al (2010) Particulate oxidative burden associated with firework activity. Environ Sci Technol 44:8295–8301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hamad SH, Schauer JJ, Shafer MM et al (2014) Risk assessment of total and bioavailable potentially toxic elements (PTEs) in urban soils of Baghdad–Iraq. Sci Total Environ 494:39–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Haney JT Jr, Erraguntla N, Sielken RL Jr, Valdez-Flores C (2012) Development of a cancer-based chronic inhalation reference value for hexavalent chromium based on a nonlinear-threshold carcinogenic assessment. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 64:466–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hayes AW, Kruger CL (2014) Hayes’ principles and methods of toxicology. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  14. Hirai K, Yamazaki Y, Okada K et al (2000) Acute eosinophilic pneumonia associated with smoke from fireworks. Intern Med 39:401–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jomova K, Jenisova Z, Feszterova M et al (2011) Arsenic: toxicity, oxidative stress and human disease. J Appl Toxicol 31:95–107Google Scholar
  16. Kosanke K, Kosanke B, Dujay R (2000) Pyrotechnic particle morphologies-metal fuels. J Pyrotech 2000:46–52Google Scholar
  17. Laden F, Schwartz J, Speizer FE, Dockery DW (2006) Reduction in fine particulate air pollution and mortality extended follow-up of the Harvard six cities study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 173:667–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lave LB, Seskin EP (2013) Air pollution and human health. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Li W, Shi Z, Yan C et al (2013) Individual metal-bearing particles in a regional haze caused by firecracker and firework emissions. Sci Total Environ 443:464–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Licudine JA, Yee H, Chang WL, Whelen AC (2012) Hazardous metals in ambient air due to New Year fireworks during 2004–2011 celebrations in Pearl City, Hawaii. Public Health Rep 127:440Google Scholar
  21. Moya J, Phillips L, Laurie S (2011) Exposure factors handbook. Washington, DC: Environmental protection agency, office of research and development, US environmental protection agencyGoogle Scholar
  22. Peters A, Dockery DW, Heinrich J, Wichmann HE (1997) Short-term effects of particulate air pollution on respiratory morbidity in asthmatic children. Eur Respir J 10:872–879Google Scholar
  23. Putaud J-P, Raes F, Van Dingenen R et al (2004) A European aerosol phenomenology—2: chemical characteristics of particulate matter at kerbside, urban, rural and background sites in Europe. Atmos Environ 38:2579–2595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ravindra K, Mor S, Kaushik CP (2003) Short-term variation in air quality associated with firework events: a case study. J Environ Monit 5:260–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Reiss R, Anderson EL, Cross CE et al (2007) Evidence of health impacts of sulfate-and nitrate-containing particles in ambient air. Inhal Toxicol 19:419–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Saha U, Talukdar S, Jana S, Maitra A (2014) Effects of air pollution on meteorological parameters during Deepawali festival over an Indian urban metropolis. Atmos Environ 98:530–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schaap M, Müller K, Ten Brink HM (2002) Constructing the European aerosol nitrate concentration field from quality analysed data. Atmos Environ 36:1323–1335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schauer JJ (2003) Evaluation of elemental carbon as a marker for diesel particulate matter. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 13:443–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schwartz J, Norris G, Larson T et al (1999) Episodes of high coarse particle concentrations are not associated with increased mortality. Environ Health Perspect 107:339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shrey K, Suchit A, Deepika D et al (2011) Air pollutants: the key stages in the pathway towards the development of cardiovascular disorders. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 31:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. US EPA (1989) Risk assessment guidance for superfund, human health evaluation manual. Part A (Interim Final), Off Emerg Remedial Response US Environ Prot AgencyWashington DC. doi: EPA/540/1-89/002Google Scholar
  32. US EPA (2012) Exposure assessment. US environment protection agencyGoogle Scholar
  33. US EPA (2012) Cancer risk coefficients for environmental exposure to radionuclides federal guidance report No. 13. BiblioGovGoogle Scholar
  34. Walker S (2008) US EPA superfund radiation policy and guidanceGoogle Scholar
  35. Wang Y, Zhuang G, Xu C, An Z (2007) The air pollution caused by the burning of fireworks during the lantern festival in Beijing. Atmos Environ 41:417–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zheng N, Liu J, Wang Q, Liang Z (2010) Health risk assessment of heavy metal exposure to street dust in the zinc smelting district, Northeast of China. Sci Total Environ 408:726–733CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Behavioral and Community Health, School of Public HealthUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkUSA
  2. 2.MRC-PHE Centre for Environment and HealthKing’s College LondonLondonUK
  3. 3.Institute of Health and EnvironmentSeoul National UniversitySeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations