Advertisement

Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health

, Volume 9, Issue 6, pp 597–612 | Cite as

The PM10 compositions, sources and health risks assessment in mechanically ventilated office buildings in an urban environment

  • Murnira Othman
  • Mohd Talib LatifEmail author
  • Ahmad Fariz Mohamed
Article

Abstract

Office buildings can be considered a “second home” for working people and so the contribution of pollutants in this indoor environment to a person’s overall exposure is significant. The aims of this study were to examine the composition of PM10 and the sources influencing the indoor and outdoor office environments. The PM10 sampling was performed using a mini-vol portable sampler at two sampling sites from May to August 2014 for daily 24 h sampling. The concentrations of ionic species (F, Cl, NO3 , SO4 2−) were analysed using ion chromatography while the concentration of major elements (Mg, Ca, K, Na) and trace elements (Mn, Ni, Fe, Cu, Zn, Pb, Cr, Cd, Al) were determined by inductively couple plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). The concentration of NH4 + was determined using the indophenol blue method. The results showed that the average concentrations of PM10 were 61.3 ± 27.0 μg/m3 (indoor) and 101 ± 42.8 μg/m3 (outdoor) with an indoor/outdoor ratio value of <1. The dominant components in PM10 for both the indoor and outdoor environments were NO3 , SO4 2−, Na, Fe, Al and Zn. Source apportionment analysis of the PM10 composition identified three sources of PM10 in the indoor and outdoor environments. The major source for indoor PM10 was Earth’s crust elements (95 %) followed by oil burning and human activities (4 %) and motor vehicles (1 %). The major source for outdoor PM10 was the Earth’s crust and motor exhaust emissions (80 %) with contributions of other sources such as oil burning and human activities (18 %) and motor vehicles (2 %). The potential health risks for trace elements in PM10, via inhalation exposure to the indoor occupants, show that the total hazard quotient (HQ) value was slightly higher than acceptable limits (1.0). The total excess life time carcinogenic risk (ELCR) value for both sampling stations was higher than the acceptable limit (1.0 × E−6), suggesting a high exposure to carcinogenic risk. This study suggests there is a high contribution of outdoor sources to the indoor office environment where PM10 can significantly affect the indoor air quality and occupant health.

Keywords

Office building Indoor environment Health risk assessment Particulate matter Source apportionment 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by Institute for Environment and Development (LESTARI) and Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia with Research University Grant DIP-2014-005. Special thanks to Mr. Fairus Muhamad Darus for instrument handling and guidance, and Dr Rose Norman for proof reading this manuscript.

References

  1. Allen RW, Gombojav E, Barkhasragchaa B, Byambaa T, Lkhasuren O, Amram O, Takaro TK, Janes CR (2013) An assessment of air pollution and its attributable mortality in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia. Air Qual Atmos Health 6:137–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alves C, Nunes T, Silva J, Duarte M (2013) Comfort parameter and particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) in school classroom and outdoor air. Aerosol Air Qual Res 13:1521–1535Google Scholar
  3. Azmi SZ, Latif MT, Ismail AS, Juneng L, Jemain AA (2010) Trend and status of air quality at three different monitoring stations in the Klang Valley, Malaysia. Air Qual Atmos Health 3:53–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Balakrishna G, Pervez S, Bisht DS (2010) Chemical mass balance estimation of arsenic in atmospheric dust fall out in an urban residential area, Raipur, Central India. Atmos Chem Phys Discuss 10:26411–26436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cao J-J, Li H, Chow JC, Watson JG, Lee S, Rong B, Dong J-G, Ho K-F (2011) Chemical composition of indoor and outdoor atmospheric particles at Emperor Qin’s Terra-cotta Museum, Xi’an, China. Aerosol Air Qual Res 11:70–79Google Scholar
  6. Chen C, Zhao B (2011) Review of relationship between indoor and outdoor particles: I/O ratio, infiltration factor and penetration factor. Atmos Environ 45:275–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cheng S-H, Yang L-X, Zhou X-H, Xue L-K, Gao X-M, Zhou Y, Wang W-X (2011) Size-fractionated water-soluble ions, situ pH and water content in aerosol on hazy days and the influences on visibility impairment in Jinan, China. Atmos Environ 45:4631–4640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chithra VS, Shiva Nagendra SM (2013) Chemical and morphological characteristics of indoor and outdoor particulate matter in an urban environment. Atmos Environ 77:579–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ferreira-Baptista L, De Miguel E (2005) Geochemistry and risk assessment of street dust in Luanda, Angola: a tropical urban environment. Atmos Environ 39:4501–4512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fromme H, Diemer J, Dietrich S, Cyrys J, Heinrich J, Lang W, Kiranoglu M, Twardella D (2008) Chemical and morphological properties of particulate matter (PM10, PM2.5) in school classrooms and outdoor air. Atmos Environ 42:6597–6605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Geller MD, Chang M, Sioutas C, Ostro BD, Lipsett MJ (2002) Indoor/outdoor relationship and chemical composition of fine and coarse particles in the southern California deserts. Atmos Environ 36:1099–1110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Guo H, Morawska L, He C, Gilbert D (2008) Impact of ventilation scenario on air exchange rates and on indoor particle number concentrations in an air-conditioned classroom. Atmos Environ 42:757–768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Habre R, Coull B, Moshier E, Godbold J, Grunin A, Nath A, Castro W, Schachter N, Rohr A, Kattan M, Spengler J, Koutrakis P (2013) Sources of indoor air pollution in New York City residences of asthmatic children. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 24:1–10Google Scholar
  14. Han NMM, Latif MT, Othman M, Dominic D, Mohamad N, Juahir H, Tahir NM (2014) Composition of selected heavy metals in road dust from Kuala Lumpur City Centre. Environ Earth Sci 72(3):849–859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hassanvand MS, Naddafi K, Faridi S, Arhami M, Nabizadeh R, Sowlat MH, Pourpak Z, Rastkari N, Momeniha F, Kashani H, Gholampour A, Nazmara S, Alimohammadi M, Goudarzi G, Yunesian M (2014) Indoor/outdoor relationships of PM10, PM2.5, and PM1 mass concentrations and their water-soluble ions in a retirement home and a school dormitory. Atmos Environ 82:375–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. He C, Morawska L, Taplin L (2007) Particles emission characteristic of office printers. Environ Sci Technol 41(17):6039–6045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ho KF, Cao JJ, Harrison RM, Lee SC, Bau KK (2004) Indoor/outdoor relationships of organic carbon (OC) and elemental carbon (EC) in PM2.5 in roadside environment of Hong Kong. Atmos Environ 38:6327–6335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hoek G, Kos G, Harrison R, de Hartog J, Meliefste K, ten Brink H, Katsouyanni K, Karakatsani A, Lianou M, Kotronarou A, Kavouras I, Pekkanen J, Vallius M, Kulmala M, Puustinen A, Thomas S, Meddings C, Ayres J, van Wijen J, Hameri K (2008) Indoor–outdoor relationships of particle number and mass in four European cities. Atmos Environ 42:156–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hu X, Zhang Y, Ding Z, Wang T, Lian H, Sun Y, Wu J (2012) Bioaccessibility and health risk of arsenic and heavy metals (Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb, Zn and Mn) in TSP and PM2.5 in Nanjing, China. Atmos Environ 57:146–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Huang H, Lee S-C, Cao J-J, Zou C-W, Chen X-G, Fan S-J (2007) Characteristics of indoor/outdoor PM2.5 and elemental components in generic urban, roadside and industrial plant areas of Guangzhou City, China. J Environ Sci 19:35–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jaradat QM, Momani KA, Jbarah AA, Massadeh A (2004) Inorganic analysis of dust fall and office dust in an industrial area of Jordan. Environ Res 96:139–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. John K, Karnae S, Crist K, Kim M, Kulkarni A (2007) Analysis of trace elements and ions in ambient fine particulate matter at three elementary schools in Ohio. J Air Waste Manag 57:394–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jones NC, Thornton CA, Mark D, Harrison RM (2000) Indoor/outdoor relationships of particulate matter in domestic homes with roadside, urban and rural locations. Atmos Environ 34:2603–2612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kagi N, Fujii S, Horiba Y, Namiki N, Ohtani Y, Emi H, Tamura H, Kim YS (2007) Indoor air quality for chemical and ultrafine particle contaminants from printers. Build Environ 42:1949–1954CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Khillare PS, Sarkar S (2012) Airborne inhalable metals in residential areas of Delhi, India: distribution, source apportionment and health risks. Atmos Pollut Res 3:46–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Koponen IK, Asmi A, Keronen P, Puhto K, Kulmala M (2001) Indoor air measurement campaign in Helsinki, Finland 1999—the effect of outdoor air pollution on indoor air. Atmos Environ 35:1465–1477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Latif MT, Yong SW, Saad A, Mohamad N, Baharuddin NH, Mokhtar M, Tahir NM (2013) Composition of heavy metals in indoor dust and their possible exposure: a case study of preschool children in Malaysia. Air Qual Atmos Health 7(2):181–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lazaridis M, Aleksandropoulou V, Hanssen J, Dye C, Eleftheriadis K, Katsivela E (2008) Inorganic and carbonaceous components in indoor/outdoor particulate matter in two residential houses in Oslo, Norway. J Air Waste Manag 58:346–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lee SC, Lam S, Fai HK (2001) Characterization of VOCs, ozone, and PM 10 emissions from office equipment in an environmental chamber. Build Environ 36:837–842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Madureira J, Paciência I, Fernandes EO (2012) Levels and indoor-outdoor relationships of size-specific particulate matter in naturally ventilated Portuguese schools. J Toxicol Environ Health A 75:1423–1436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mancuso TF (1975) Consideration of chromium as an industrial carcinogen. International Conference on Heavy Metals in the Environment, October 27–31, 1975, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 343–356Google Scholar
  32. Mansha M, Ghauri B, Rahman S, Amman A (2012) Characterization and source apportionment of ambient air particulate matter (PM2.5) in Karachi. Sci Total Environ 425:176–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Martuzevicius D, Grinshpun SA, Lee T, Hu S, Biswas P, Reponen T, LeMasters G (2008) Traffic-related PM2.5 aerosol in residential houses located near major highways: indoor versus outdoor concentrations. Atmos Environ 42:6575–6585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Massey D, Masih J, Kulshrestha A, Habil M, Taneja A (2009) Indoor/outdoor relationship of fine particles less than 2.5μm (PM2.5) in residential homes locations in central Indian region. Build Environ 44:2037–2045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Massey DD, Kulshrestha A, Taneja A (2013) Particulate matter concentrations and their related metal toxicity in rural residential environment of semi-arid region of India. Atmos Environ 67:278–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Maynard D, Coull BA, Gryparis A, Schwartz J (2007) Mortality risk associated with short-term exposure to traffic particles and sulfates. Environ Health Perspect 115(5):751–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Minguillón MC, Schembari A, Triguero-Mas M, de Nazelle A, Dadvand P, Figueras F, Salvado JA, Grimalt JO, Nieuwenhuijsen M, Querol X (2012) Source apportionment of indoor, outdoor and personal PM2.5 exposure of pregnant women in Barcelona, Spain. Atmos Environ 59:426–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Morawska L, He C, Johnson G, Jayaratne R, Salthammer T, Wang H, Uhde E, Bostrom T, Modini R, Ayoko G, McGarry P, Wensing M (2009) An investigation into the characteristic and formation mechanisms of particles originating from operation of laser printers. Environ Sci Technol 43:1015–1022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Othman M, Latif MT (2013) Dust and sas emissions from small-scale peat combustion. Aerosol Air Qual Res 13:1045–1059Google Scholar
  40. Pavilonis BT, Anthony TR, O’Shaughnessy PT, Humann MJ, Merchant JA, Moore G, Thorne PS, Weisel CP, Sanderson WT (2013) Indoor and outdoor particulate matter and endotoxin concentrations in an intensely agricultural county. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 23:299–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pegas PN, Nunes T, Alves CA, Silva JR, Vieira SLA, Caseiro A, Pio CA (2012) Indoor and outdoor characterisation of organic and inorganic compounds in city centre and suburban elementary schools of Aveiro, Portugal. Atmos Environ 55:80–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pope CA, Thun MJ, Namboodiri MM, Dockery DW, Evans JS, Speizer FE, Heath CW (1995) Particulate air pollution as a predictor of mortality in prospective study of U.S. adults. Am J Respir Crit Care 115(3):669–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Quang TN, He C, Morawska L, Knibbs LD (2013) Influence of ventilation and filtration on indoor particle concentrations in urban office buildings. Atmos Environ 79:41–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Querol X, Viana M, Alastuey A, Amato F, Moreno T, Castillo S, Pey J, de la Rosa J, Sánchez de la Campa A, Artíñano B, Salvador P, García Dos Santos S, Fernández-Patier R, Moreno-Grau S, Negral L, Minguillón MC, Monfort E, Gil JI, Inza A, Ortega LA, Santamaría JM, Zabalza J (2007) Source origin of trace elements in PM from regional background, urban and industrial sites of Spain. Atmos Environ 41:7219–7231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rasmussen PE, Wheeler AJ, Hassan NM, Filiatreault A, Lanouette M (2007) Monitoring personal, indoor, and outdoor exposures to metals in airborne particulate matter: risk of contamination during sampling, handling and analysis. Atmos Environ 41(28):5897–5907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rivas I, Viana M, Moreno T, Bouso L, Pandolfi M, Alvarez-Pedrerol M, Forns J, Alastuey A, Sunyer J, Querol X (2015) Outdoor infiltration and indoor contribution of UFP and BC, OC, secondary inorganic ions and metals in PM2.5 in schools. Atmos Environ 106:129–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sangiorgi G, Ferrero L, Ferrini BS, Lo Porto C, Perrone MG, Zangrando R, Gambaro A, Lazzati Z, Bolzacchini E (2013) Indoor airborne particle sources and semi-volatile partitioning effect of outdoor fine PM in offices. Atmos Environ 65:205–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. See SW, Balasubramanian R (2006) Risk assessment of exposure to indoor aerosols associated with Chinese cooking. Environ Res 102:197–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. See SW, Balasubramanian R (2008) Chemical characteristics of fine particles emitted from different gas cooking methods. Atmos Environ 42:8852–8862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Slezakova K, Pereira MC, Alvim-Ferraz MC (2009) Influence of tobacco smoke on the elemental composition of indoor particles of different sizes. Atmos Environ 43:486–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Taner S, Pekey B, Pekey H (2013) Fine particulate matter in the indoor air of barbeque restaurants: elemental compositions, sources and health risks. Sci Total Environ 454–455:79–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Taylor SR, McLennan SM (1985) The continental crust; its composition and evolution; an examination of the geochemical record preserved in sedimentary rock. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  53. Tippayawong N, Khuntong P, Nitatwichit C, Khunatorn Y, Tantakitti C (2009) Indoor/outdoor relationships of size-resolved particle concentrations in naturally ventilated school environments. Build Environ 44:188–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tzollas NM, Zachariadis GA, Anthemidis AN, Stratis JA (2010) A new approach to indophenol blue method for determination of ammonium in geothermal waters with high mineral content. Int J Environ Anal Chem 90(2):115–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. USEPA (1994) Methods for derivation of inhalation reference concentration and application of inhalation dosimetry. Environmental criteria and assessment office. United States Environmental Protection AgencyGoogle Scholar
  56. USEPA (2010) Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund (RAGS) (Part A): human health evaluation manual. United States Environmental Protection Agency.http://www.epa.gov/oswer/riskassessment/ragsa/. Accessed 13 April 2015
  57. USEPA (2014) Regional Screening Level (RSL). United States Environmental Protection Agency.http://www.epa.gov/region9/superfund/prg/. Accessed 13 April 2015
  58. USEPA (2015) Integrated Risk Information System. United States Environmental Protection Agency.http://www.epa.gov/iris/index.html. Accessed 13 April 2015
  59. Wahid NB, Latif MT, Suratman S (2013) Composition and source apportionment of surfactants in atmospheric aerosols of urban and semi-urban areas in Malaysia. Chemosphere 91:1508–1516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Westphalen D, Koszalinski S (1999) Energy consumption characteristics of commercial building HVAC systems volume II : thermal distribution, Auxiliary equipment, and ventilation. LocationGoogle Scholar
  61. Wolkoff P, Wilkins CK, Clausen PA, Larsen L (1993) Comparison of volatile organic compounds from processed paper and toners from office copiers and printers: methods, emission rates and modeled concentration. Indoor Air 3:113–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zhou J, You Y, Bai Z, Hu Y, Zhang J, Zhang N (2011) Health risk assessment of personal inhalation exposure to volatile organic compounds in Tianjin, China. Sci Total Environ 409:452–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Zhu C-S, Cao J-J, Shen Z-X, Liu S-X, Zhang T, Zhao Z-Z, Xu H-M, Zhang E-K (2012) Indoor and outdoor chemical components of PM2.5 in the rural areas of Northwestern China. Aerosol Air Qual Res 12:1157–1165Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Murnira Othman
    • 1
  • Mohd Talib Latif
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Ahmad Fariz Mohamed
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Environment and Development (LESTARI)Universiti Kebangsaan MalaysiaBangiMalaysia
  2. 2.School of Environmental and Natural Resource Sciences, Faculty of Science and TechnologyUniversiti Kebangsaan MalaysiaBangiMalaysia

Personalised recommendations