Advertisement

Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health

, Volume 8, Issue 2, pp 213–227 | Cite as

Elevated stacks’ pollutants’ dispersion and its contributions to photochemical smog formation in a heavily industrialized area

  • Lakhdar AidaouiEmail author
  • Athanasios G. Triantafyllou
  • Abbes Azzi
  • Stylianos. K. Garas
  • Vasileios. N. Matthaios
Article

Abstract

In this study, the photochemical smog formation over a heavily industrialized area with complex terrain was investigated. A mesoscale prognostic meteorological and air pollution model was used in combination with data, which were collected by in situ and remote monitoring stations. The area of interest is a mountainous basin in north-western Greece. The intensive industrial activity in this area has resulted in effects on the air quality of the area, mainly caused by the lignite-fired power stations and the lignite mining operation. The study focused on the dispersion of ozone production due to primary pollutants’ emissions from the power stations (PSs). Moreover, the investigation of this external sources’ contribution to the ozone concentrations measured in Kozani, the most populated city of the area, is ventured. The results showed a considerable skill of the model in predicting the major mesoscale features affecting the pollutants’ dispersion and concentrations in the area of interest. Numerical simulation data of photochemical pollutants were significantly correlated with meteorology during the simulation period. The correlation reveals the most important factors of ozone production, such as solar radiation, temperature, wind speed and topography. The obtained results have contributed to the verification of distant pollutants’ transfer from industrial sources.

Keywords

Photochemical simulation Meteorology effect Industrial emissions Mesoscale model Ozone 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Financial support was supported by the MADEPODIM programme in frame of TEMPUS III, and computations are done in the Laboratory of Atmospheric Pollution and Environmental Physics (LAP-EP), Technological Education Institute (TEI) of Western Macedonia, Kila, 501 00 Kozani, Greece.

References

  1. Allen C, Durrenberger C (2002) Acceleration science evaluation of ozone formation in the Houston-Galveston area. University of TexasGoogle Scholar
  2. Bernard SM, Samet JM, Grambsch A, Ebi KL, Romieu I (2001) The potential impacts of climate variability and change on air pollution-related health effects in the United States. Environ Health Perspect 109:199–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brulfert G, Chemel C, Chaxel E, Chollet JP (2005) Modelling photochemistry in alpine valleys. Atmos Chem Phys 5:2341–2355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brunelli U, Piazza V, Pignato L, Sorbello F, Vitabile S (2007) Two-days ahead prediction of daily maximum concentrations of SO2, O3, PM10, NO2, CO in the urban area of Palermo, Italy. Atmos Environ 41:2967–2995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen KS, Ho YT, Lai CH, Chou YM (2003) Photochemical modeling and analysis of meteorological parameters during ozone episodes in Kaohsiung, Taiwan. Atmos Environ 37:1811–1823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Couach O, Balin I, Jiménez R, Ristori P, Perego S, Kirchner F, Simeonov V, Calpini B, van den Bergh H (2003) An investigation of ozone and planetary boundary layer dynamics over the complex topography of Grenoble combining measurements and modeling. Atmos Chem Phys 3:549–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Di Sabatino S, Buccolieri R, Pulvirenti B, Britter R (2007) Simulations of pollutant dispersion within idealised urban-type geometries with CFD and integral models. Atmos Environ 41:8316–8329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dias de Freitas E, Droprinchinski Martins L, da Silva Dias PL, Fatima de Andrade M (2005) A simple photochemical module implemented in RAMS for tropospheric ozone concentration forecast in the metropolitan area of Sao Paulo, Brazil: coupling and validation. Atmos Environ 39:6352–6361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Elbir T, Kara M, Bayram A, Altiok H, Dumanoglu Y (2010) Comparison of predicted and observed PM10 concentrations in several urban street canyons. Air Qual Atmos Health 4:121–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gilliliand AB, Hogrefe C, Pinder RW, Godowitch JM, Foley KL, Rao ST (2008) Dynamic evaluation of regional air quality models: assessing changes in O3 stemming for changes in emissions and meteorology. Atmos Environ 42(20):5110–5123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Godowitch JM, Gilliam RC, Rao ST (2011) Diagnostic evaluation of ozone production and horizontal transport in a regional photochemical air quality modeling system. Atmos Environ 45:3977–3987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hurley P (2005) The air pollution model (TAPM) version 3. Part 1: technical description, CSIRO atmospheric research technical paper no. 71. Available at http://www.dar.csiro.au/TAPM
  13. Hurley P, Manins P, Lee S, Boyle R, Ng Y, Dewundege P (2003) Year-long, high-resolution, urban airshed modelling: verification of TAPM predictions of smog and particles in Melbourne. Australia Atmos Environ 37:1899–1910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hurley P, Physick WL, Luhar AK (2005) TAPM: a practical approach to prognostic meteorological and air pollution modelling. Environ Model Software 20:737–752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Johnson GM (1984) A simple model for predicting the ozone concentration of ambient air. Proceedings of the 8th International Clean Air and Environment Conference, New Zealand, Clean Air Society of Australia & New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  16. Kaldellis JK, Kapsali M, Emmanouilidis M (2012) Long-term evaluation of nitrogen oxides and sulphur dioxide emissions from the Greek lignite-based electricity generation sector. Fresenius Environ Bull 21(9):F-2012–F-2197Google Scholar
  17. Ling ZH, Guo H, Cheng HR, Yu YF (2011) Sources of ambient volatile organic compounds and their contributions to photochemical ozone formation at a site in the Pearl River Delta, southern China. Environ Pollut 159:2310–2319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Linkov I, Loney D, Cormier S, Satterstrom FK, Bridges T (2009) Weight-of-evidence evaluation in environmental assessment: review of qualitative and quantitative approaches. Sci Total Environ 407:5199–5205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Moussiopoulos N, Papalexiou S, Sahm P (2006) Wind flow and photochemical air pollution in Thessaloniki, Greece. Part I: simulations with the European zooming model. Environ Model Softw 21:1741–1751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nam J, Kimura Y, Vizuete W, Murphy C, Allen DT (2006) Modeling the impacts of emission events on ozone formation in Houston, Texas. Atmos Environ 40:5329–5341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Napelenok SL, Foley KM, Kang D, Mathur R, Pierce T, Rao ST (2011) Dynamic evaluation of regional air quality model’s response to emission reductions in the presence of uncertain emission inventories. Atmos Environ 45:4091–4098CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Palaciosa M, Kirchner F, Martilli A, Clappier A, Martin F, Rodriguez ME (2002) Summer ozone episodes in the Greater Madrid area. Analyzing the ozone response to abatement strategies by modelling. Atmos Environ 36:5323–5333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Papalexiou S, Moussiopoulos N (2006) Wind flow and photochemical air pollution in Thessaloniki, Greece. Part II: statistical evaluation of European zooming model’s simulation results. Environ Model Softw 21:1752–1758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Peng Y-P, Chen K-S, Wang H-K, Lai C-H, Lin M-H, Lee C-H (2011) Applying model simulation and photochemical indicators to evaluate ozone sensitivity in southern Taiwan. J Environ Sci 23:790–797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pontiggia M, Derudi M, Busini V, Rota R (2009) Hazardous gas dispersion: a CFD model accounting for atmospheric stability classes. J Hazard Mater 171:739–747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Triantafyllou AG (2001) PM10 pollution episodes as a function of synoptic climatology in a mountainous industrial area. Environ Pollut 112(3):491–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Triantafyllou AG, Kassomenos PA (2002) Aspects of atmospheric flow and dispersion of air pollutants in a mountainous basin. Sci Total Environ 297:85–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Triantafyllou AG, Helmis CG, Asimakopoulos DN, Soilemes AT (1995) Boundary layer evolution over large and broad mountain basin. Theor Appl Climatol 52:19–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Triantafyllou AG, Kiros E, Evagelopoulos V (2002) Respirable particulate matter at an urban and nearby industrial location: concentrations and variability and synoptic weather conditions during high pollution episodes. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 52:174–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Triantafyllou AG, Zoras S, Evagelopoulos V, Garas S, Diamantopoylos C (2008) DOAS measurements above an urban street canyon in a medium sized city. Glob NEST 10:160–167Google Scholar
  31. Triantafyllou AG, Krestou A, Matthaios V (2013) Source-receptor relationships by using dispersion model in a lignite burning area in western Macedonia, Greece. Glob NEST J 15(2):195–203Google Scholar
  32. Vlachokostas C, Achillas C, Moussiopoulos N, Kalogeropoulos K, Sigalas G, Kalognomou E, Banias G (2010a) Health effects and social costs of particulate and photochemical urban air pollution: a case study for Thessaloniki, Greece. Air Qual Atmos Health. doi: 10.1007/s11869-010-0096-1 Google Scholar
  33. Vlachokostas C, Nastis S, Achillas C, Kalogeropoulos K, Karmiris I, Moussiopoulos N, Chourdakis E, Banias G, Limperi N (2010b) Economic damages of ozone air pollution to crops using combined air quality and GIS modelling. Atmos Environ 44:3352–3361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wang X, Carmichael G, Chen D, Tang Y, Wang T (2005) Impacts of different emission sources on air quality during March 2001 in the Pearl River Delta (PRD) region. Atmos Environ 39:5227–5241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wilmott CJ, Ackleson SG, Davis RE, Feddema JJ, Klink KM, Legates DR, O’Donnell J, Rowe CM (1985) Statistics for the evaluation and comparison of models. J Geophys Res 90:8995–9005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zhou W, Cohan DS, Napelenok SL (2013) Reconciling NOx emissions reductions and ozone trends in the U.S., 2002–2006. Atmos Environ 70:236–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lakhdar Aidaoui
    • 1
    Email author
  • Athanasios G. Triantafyllou
    • 2
  • Abbes Azzi
    • 1
  • Stylianos. K. Garas
    • 2
  • Vasileios. N. Matthaios
    • 2
  1. 1.Laboratoire Aero-Hydrodynamique Navale, Faculté de Génie MécaniqueUniversité des Sciences et de la Technologie d’Oran (USTO)OranAlgeria
  2. 2.Laboratory of Atmospheric Pollution and Environmental PhysicsTechnological Education Institute (TEI) of Western MacedoniaKozaniGreece

Personalised recommendations