Chemical emissions from residential dryer vents during use of fragranced laundry products

Abstract

Common laundry products, used in washing and drying machines, can contribute to outdoor emissions through dryer vents. However, the types and amounts of chemicals emitted are largely unknown. To investigate these emissions, we analyzed the volatile organic compounds (VOCs) both in the headspace of fragranced laundry products and in the air emitted from dryer vents during use of these products. In a controlled study of washing and drying laundry, we sampled emissions from two residential dryer vents during the use of no products, fragranced detergent, and fragranced detergent plus fragranced dryer sheet. Our analyses found more than 25 VOCs emitted from dryer vents, with the highest concentrations of acetaldehyde, acetone, and ethanol. Seven of these VOCs are classified as hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) and two as carcinogenic HAPs (acetaldehyde and benzene) with no safe exposure level, according to the US Environmental Protection Agency. As context for significance, the acetaldehyde emissions during use of one brand of laundry detergent would represent 3% of total acetaldehyde emissions from automobiles in the study area. Our study points to the need for additional research on this source of emissions and the potential impacts on human and environmental health.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

  1. 1.

    We use the term “during” to refer to the entire wash and dry cycle.

  2. 2.

    These thresholds were established to better ensure that only those compounds emitted from the products or from the dryer vents were reported.

  3. 3.

    Ethanol data not available.

  4. 4.

    Mean ambient concentrations (micrograms per cubic meter), from the study area site (Seattle, Beacon Hill), 2008, are as follows: acetaldehyde, 0.81; benzene, 0.76; ethylbenzene, 0.27; toluene, 1.36; m/p-xylene, 0.78; o-xylene, 0.29; and methanol, not available (US EPA 2008).

  5. 5.

    Calculations, assumptions, and sources: data based on the year 2005: 746,109 households in King County (US Census Bureau 2005); acetaldehyde emissions from automobiles in King County = 56,000 lb/year (Washington State 2005); 453.59 g = 1 lb; 187.5 cfm dryer vent flow rate = 5.6 m3/min = 336 m3/h (State of Wisconsin Department of Commerce 2001; Hardin County 2008); 268 h drying/year per household (US DOE 2009; Efficiency Vermont 2010); 41.5 μg/m3 emissions of acetaldehyde after using laundry detergent (average of each site, 47 and 36 μg/m3, from this study), assuming negligible contribution from ambient air; 37% of households use the top-selling laundry detergent tested in this study (MarketResearch.com 2007, based on data for 2006, assume similar market penetration as 2005); 79% of all households use one or more of the five top-selling laundry detergents (MarketResearch.com 2007); 73% of all households have clothes dryers (CPSC 2000), multiplied by 37% and 79%, respectively, for conservative calculations.

  6. 6.

    Similarly, VOCs in the “no products” samples could be from residual VOCs in machines from prior use of products, offgassing of machine components, entrained indoor air, reactions between residual VOCs and ambient compounds, or other factors.

References

  1. Alvarez FR, Shaul GM, Krishnen ER, Perrin DL, Rahmen M (1999) Fate of terpene compounds in activated sludge wastewater treatment systems. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 49(6):734–739

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bickers DR, Calow P, Greim HA, Hanifin JM, Rogers AE, Saurat JH, Sipes IG, Smith RL, Tagami H (2003) The safety assessment of fragrance materials. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 37(2):218–273

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cooper S, Raymer J, Pellizzari E, Thomas K, Castillo N, Maewall S (1992) Polar organic compounds in fragrances of consumer products. Final report, contract # 68-02-4544, US EPA, Research Triangle Park

  4. CPSC (2000) U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. Electric & gas clothes dryers—staff evaluation (0101), February 2000. http://www.cpsc.gov/library/foia/foia00/os/clothes.pdf. Accessed 20 Apr 2011

  5. Destaillats H, Lunden MM, Singer BC, Coleman BK, Hodgson AT, Weschler CJ, Nazaroff WW (2006) Indoor secondary pollutants from household product emissions in the presence of ozone: a bench-scale chamber study. Environ Sci Technol 40(14):4421–4428

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Efficiency Vermont (2010) Your guide to electrical usage in your home. http://www.efficiencyvermont.com/pages/Residential/SavingEnergy/HighElectricBills/. Accessed 16 Apr 2010

  7. Ford RB, Domeyer O, Easterday KM, Middleton J (2000) Criteria for development of a database for safety evaluation of fragrance ingredients. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 31(2):166–181

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hardin County (2008) Hardin County Planning and Development Commission. Building code clarification handout, #2008.004, January 2008. http://www.hcpdc.com/KYbuildingcode.asp. Accessed 16 Apr 2010

  9. Jo WK, Lee JH, Kim MK (2008) Head-space, small-chamber and in-vehicle tests for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) emitted from air fresheners for the Korean market. Chemosphere 70(10):1827–1834

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. MarketResearch.com (2007) Laundry care products in the U.S. Packaged Facts, Rockville, MD

  11. Nazaroff WW, Weschler CJ (2004) Cleaning products and air fresheners: exposure to primary and secondary air pollutants. Atmos Environ 38(18):2841–2865

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Peck AM, Hornbuckle KC (2006) Synthetic musk fragrances in urban and rural air of Iowa and the Great Lakes. Atmos Environ 40(32):6101–6111

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Rastogi SC, Heydorn S, Johansen JD, Basketter DA (2001) Fragrance chemicals in domestic and occupational products. Contact Dermat 45(4):221–225

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Reiner JL, Kannan K (2006) A survey of polycyclic musks in selected household commodities from the United States. Chemosphere 62(6):867–873

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Reiner JL, Berset JD, Kannan K (2007) Mass flow of polycyclic musks in two wastewater treatment plants. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 52(4):451–457

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rimkus GG (1999) Polycyclic musk fragrances in the aquatic environment. Toxicol Lett 111(1):37–56

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sarwar G, Olson DA, Corsi RL, Weschler CJ (2004) Indoor fine particles: the role of terpene emissions from consumer products. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 54(3):367–377

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Simonich SL, Begley WM, Debaere G, Eckhoff WS (2000) Trace analysis of fragrance materials in wastewater and treated wastewater. Environ Sci Technol 34(6):959–965

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Simonich SL, Federle TW, Eckhoff WS, Rottiers A, Webb S, Sabaliunas D, de Wolf W (2002) Removal of fragrance materials during U.S. and European wastewater treatment. Environ Sci Technol 36(13):2839–2847

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. State of Wisconsin Department of Commerce (2001) Optional Uniform Dwelling Code (UDC) makeup and combustion air worksheet, April 2001. http://commerce.wi.gov/sb/. Accessed 16 Apr 2010

  21. Steinemann AC (2009) Fragranced consumer products and undisclosed ingredients. Environ Impact Assess Rev 29(1):32–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Steinemann AC, MacGregor IC, Gordon SM, Gallagher LG, Davis AL, Ribeiro DS, Wallace LA (2011) Fragranced consumer products: chemicals emitted, ingredients unlisted. Environ Impact Assess Rev 31(3):328–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. US Census Bureau (2005) American FactFinder, Data Set: 2005 American Community Survey. http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/DatasetMainPageServlet?_program=ACS&_submenuId=datasets_1&_lang=en&_ts=. Accessed 11 May 2010

  24. US DOE (2009) 2009 Buildings energy data book. US Department of Energy, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  25. US EPA (1994) Environmental Protection Agency, technical background document to support rulemaking pursuant to the Clean Air Act, Section 112(g), ranking of pollutants with respect to hazard to human health, EPA-450/3-92-010, February

  26. US EPA (1999) Determination of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in air collected in specially-prepared canisters and analyzed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS). Method TO-15. Compendium of methods for the determination of toxic organic compounds in ambient air, 2nd ed. EPA/625/R-96/010b. US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Cincinnati. http://www.epa.gov/ttnamti1/airtox.html. Accessed 4 Feb 2010

  27. US EPA (2005) Guidelines for carcinogen risk assessment. EPA/630/P-03/001F, Washington, D.C., March 2005

  28. US EPA (2008) United States Environmental Protection Agency, air quality system, raw data report (AMP350). Beacon Hill site, Seattle, WA. Report generated March 29, 2011

  29. US EPA (2010) Table 1, prioritized chronic dose-response values for screening risk assessments (4/27/2010). http://www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/toxsource/summary.html. Accessed 26 Apr 2011

  30. Wallace L, Nelson W, Pellizzari E, Raymer J, Thomas K (1991) Identification of polar volatile organic compounds in consumer products and common microenvironments. Paper #91-62.4 presented at the 84th Annual Meeting of the Air and Waste Management Association, Vancouver, BC, June

  31. Washington State (2005) WA Emissions Inventory 2005, King County. Washington State Department of Ecology, Olympia

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the individuals who volunteered the use of their homes and their washing and drying machines for this study. We also thank Jaret Basden for his valuable assistance with this article.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne C. Steinemann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Steinemann, A.C., Gallagher, L.G., Davis, A.L. et al. Chemical emissions from residential dryer vents during use of fragranced laundry products. Air Qual Atmos Health 6, 151–156 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-011-0156-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Emissions
  • Fragrance
  • Dryer vent
  • Laundry products
  • VOC