Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Understanding urban exposure environments: new research directions for informing implementation of U.S. air quality standards

  • Published:
Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article explores the role that scientific information can play in improving implementation of National Ambient Air Quality Standards and discusses some of the key policy-relevant questions related to implementation that could be informed by advances in the scientific research. This article expands on the concept of urban exposure environments as useful constructs in helping to improve research into the roles of air pollution mixtures and population exposure patterns in air pollution health effects. Recommendations for potential research areas related to urban exposure environments are discussed, including (1) improving the understanding of the role that individual pollutants play within the overall mixture of pollutants that determine air quality and health outcomes in an urban area, (2) understanding the causes of heterogeneity (or similarity) across urban areas in the relative risks associated with air pollution, and (3) improving air quality characterization within urban exposure environments, recognizing the complex air pollution mixtures in many environments which may result from emissions from multiple sources, including regional and local contributors. Informed implementation policies focused on multipollutant risk-based management objectives guided by an improved understanding of multipollutant exposures are likely to lead to greater improvements in public health through more effective and efficient emissions controls.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ambient Standards Group. Ozone Population Exposure Analysis for Selected Urban Areas. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA, (EPA 452/R-07-004) 2007

  • Bell M (2006) The use of ambient air quality modeling to estimate individual and population exposure for human health research: a case study of ozone in the Northern Georgia Region of the United States. Environ Int 32(5):586–593

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bell ML, McDermott A, Zeger SL, Samet JM, Dominici F (2004) Ozone and short-term mortality in 95 US urban communities, 1987–2000. JAMA 292(19):2372–2378

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bell M, Ebisu K, Peng R, Samet J, Dominici F (2009) Hospital admissions and chemical composition of fine particle air pollution. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 179(12):1115–1120

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dominici F, Peng R, Barr C, Bell M (2010) Protecting human health from air pollution: shifting from a single-pollutant to a multipollutant approach. Epidemiology 21(2):187–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dominici F, Schwartz J, Bell M, Zanobetti A (2011) Project 5: a national study to assess susceptibility, vulnerability, and effect modification of air pollution health risks. The clean air centers program 2010–2015: Overviews and Abstracts. U.S. EPA, Durham, NC. April 2011. Online at: http://www.epa.gov/ncer/publications/workshop/04_07_2011/harvard_clarc_overview.pdf

  • Fann N, Fulcher C, Hubbell B (2009) The influence of location, source, and emission type in estimates of the human health benefits of reducing a ton of air pollution. Air Qual Atmos Health 2:169–176

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fann N, Roman HA, Fulcher CM, Gentile MA, Hubbell BJ, Wesson K, Levy JI (2011) Maximizing health benefits and minimizing inequality: incorporating local-scale data in the design and evaluation of air quality policies. Risk Anal 31(6):908–922

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greco SL, Wilson AM, Hanna SR, Levy JI (2007) Factors influencing mobile source particulate matter emissions-to-exposure relationships in the Boston urban area. Environ Sci Technol 41(22):7675–7682

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gu J, Pitz M, Schnelle-Kreis J, Diemer J, Reller A, Zimmermann R, Soentgen J, Stoelzel M, Wichmann HE, Peters A, Cyrys J (2011) Source apportionment of ambient particles: comparison of positive matrix factorization analysis applied to particle size distribution and chemical composition data. Atmos Environ 45(10):1849–1857

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hedgecock W, Volgyesi P, Ledeczi A, Koutsoukos X (2010) Dissemination and presentation of high resolution air pollution data from mobile sensor nodes. SAC '10 Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing. New York

  • HEI Panel on the Health Effects of Traffic-Related Air Pollution (2010) Traffic-related air pollution: a critical review of the literature on emissions, exposure, and health effects. HEI Special Report 17. Health Effects Institute, Boston

  • Hidy GM, Pennell WT (2010) Multipollutant air quality management. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 60(6):645–674

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hidy GM, Brook JR, Demerjian KL, Molina LT, Pennell W, Scheffe RD (Eds.) (2011) Technical challenges of multipollutant air quality management. Springer (in press)

  • Hubbell BJ, Crume RV, Evarts DM, Cohen JM (2010) Policy monitor: regulation and progress under the 1990 clean air act amendments. Rev Environ Econ Pol 4(1):122–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humbert S, Marshall JD, Shaked S, Spadaro JV, Nishioka Y, Preiss P, McKone TE, Horvath A, Jolliet O (2011) Intake fraction for particulate matter: recommendations for life cycle impact assessment. Environ Sci Technol 45(11):4808–4816

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Isakov V, Touma JS, Burke J, Lobdell D, Palma T, Rosenbaum A, Özkaynak H (2009) Combining regional- and local-scale air quality models with exposure models for use in environmental health studies. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 59:461–472

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen S, Larson T, Deeptic K, Kaufman J (2009) Modeling traffic air pollution in street canyons in New York City for intra-urban exposure assessment in the US Multi-Ethnic Study of atherosclerosis and air pollution. Atmos Environ 43(30):4544–4556

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mauderly J, Campen M, McDonald J, Seagrave J (2010a) Differential toxicity of PM and PM components: what does in vivo animal toxicology tell us? Presentation for the EPRI air quality research seminar, Washington D.C., May 26

  • Mauderly JL, Burnett RT, Castillejos M, Ozkaynak H, Samet JM, Stieb DM, Vedal S, Wyzga RE (2010b) Is the air pollution health research community prepared to support a multipollutant air quality management framework? Inhal Toxicol 22(1):1–19

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McKone TE, Ryan PB, Ozkaynak H (2009) Exposure information in environmental health research: current opportunities and future directions for particulate matter, ozone, and toxic air pollutants. J Expos Sci Environ Epidemiol 19(1):30–44

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (NRC) (2004) Air quality management in the United States. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng RD, Chang HH, Bell ML, McDermott A, Zeger SL, Samet JM, Dominici F (2008) Coarse particulate matter air pollution and hospital admissions for cardiovascular and respiratory diseases among Medicare patients. JAMA 299(18):2172–2179

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ramanathan N, Lukac M, Ahmed T, Kar A, Praveen PS, Honles T, Leong I, Rehman IH, Schauer JJ, Ramanathan V (2011) A cellphone based system for large-scale monitoring of black carbon, Atmospheric Environment, In Press, Corrected Proof, Available online 27 May 2011.

  • Thurston GD, Ito K, Lall R (2011) A source apportionment of U.S. fine particulate matter air pollution. Atmospheric Environment 45(24):3924–3936

    Google Scholar 

  • van Erp AMM, O’Keefe R, Cohen AJ, Warren J (2008) Evaluating the effectiveness of air quality interventions. J Toxicol Environ Health A 71:583–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Erp AMM, Kelly FJ, Demerjian KL, Pope CA, III, Cohen AJ (2011) Progress in research to assess the effectiveness of air quality interventions towards improving public health. Air Quality Atmosphere and Health. Published online January 11, 2011.

  • Walsh L, Gilmour I, Davies D, Lappi E, Terrell D, Highfill J, Dreher K (2010) Engineering system for simultaneous inhalation exposure of rodents to fine and ultrafine concentrated ambient particulate matter from a common air source. Presentation for American Association for Aerosol Research Conference: Air Pollution and Health, San Diego, March

  • Wesson K, Fann N, Morris M, Fox T, Hubbell B (2010) A multi-pollutant, risk-based approach to air quality management: case study for Detroit. Atmospheric Pollution Research 1:296–304

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zwack LM, Paciorek CJ, Spengler JD, Levy JI (2011) Characterizing local traffic contributions to particulate air pollution in street canyons using mobile monitoring techniques. Atmos Environ 45(15):2507–2514

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bryan Hubbell.

Additional information

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this document are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views and policies of the U.S. EPA.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hubbell, B. Understanding urban exposure environments: new research directions for informing implementation of U.S. air quality standards. Air Qual Atmos Health 5, 259–267 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-011-0153-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-011-0153-4

Keywords

Navigation